Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

A World of Economic Do-Gooders

By Matthew Wheeland, AlterNet. Posted June 24, 2005.


A global movement has rejected the Enron business model in favor of an entrepreneurial spirit that is changing the planet.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Matthew Wheeland

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Too often progressives reject the world of business as inherently corrupt or tainted. Even worse, we will often ignore it entirely, recycling the business section of the daily paper unopened. But if the only practices we undertake are shopping for organic produce or buying fair-trade goods from Global Exchange, we're missing a golden opportunity to make a difference.

The message woven throughout "The New Heroes," a four-hour PBS series that begins on June 28, is that well-meaning individuals can create immense change in the world. Each episode visits places where enterprising people have combined business skills with a desire to improve peoples' lives. The results are magnificent and uplifting. In India, Kailash Satyarthi raids a camp to free children and adults enslaved by the international rug trade. In Peru, Albina Ruiz Rios turns garbage into money by helping people start waste-management companies. Closer to home, Mimi Silbert runs the Delancey Street Foundation in San Francisco, a cluster of businesses including restaurants and a moving company that give ex-cons a chance to turn their lives around.

Several of the projects featured in the series make use of innovative technology to solve very basic problems. Nick Moon and Martin Fisher's company ApproTEC has distributed low-cost irrigation pumps and oilseed presses throughout Africa; the boost in productivity allows people to move beyond subsistence farming to make a better living, and the resulting boom in businesses contribute about $35 million a year to the developing country's economies.

And in India, Dr. Govindappa Venkataswamy and David Green revolutionized medical care based on their belief in "compassionate capitalism." The two men trained local workers in high-tech medical and manufacturing procedures, and have since opened five hospitals across India that treat nearly 2 million patients a year, at a cost low enough to make health care available to India's poorest people.

What these very different projects have in common is "social entrepreneurship," the concept at the core of "The New Heroes." Instead of seeking to reap profits, social entrepreneurs use their innovations to create social change, starting from the bottom up. It's an idea brilliantly summed up by the work of Bangladeshi banker Muhammad Yunus, who says, "The whole principle of conventional banking is 'the more you have the more you get.' I said the logical thing would be the less you have, the more attention you should get, and if you have nothing, you are the one who should get the highest priority."

Yunus' Grameen Bank in Bangladesh started in 1976 with a loan of $27, split between 42 people who used the money to start small businesses like selling rice at the market. In the last 29 years, Grameen's "micro-credit" loans have spread worldwide, and in Bangladesh the bank has provided nearly $5 billion in loans to four and a half million people. And because 96 percent of Grameen's borrowers are women, Muhammad Yunus' simple idea of small loans has changed the social structure of Bangladesh by giving women the power of self-sufficiency.

This is the spirit of social entrepreneurship writ large, and it's the idea behind "New Heroes" house parties organized by the Skoll Foundation, a major funder of the series. "We believe that if you see these stories you will be inspired," said the Skoll Foundation's Terri Nagel. "We're hoping to motivate people to actually get out there and help, whether it's writing a check or starting your own social entrepreneurship program."

The idea behind the viewing parties is to get friends, families and coworkers to discuss the ideas of social entrepreneurship, and especially how everyone can make a difference. The Skoll Foundation sends out DVDs of the series along with a toolkit including topics to discuss after watching the episodes. The foundation will match up to $100,000 in donations to any of the groups in the "New Heroes" series.

Providing the series on DVD is a new step for this kind of viewing party. Instead of being tied to the PBS schedule, viewers can watch the shows at their convenience, and make a plan for when to get a good group together.

"The DVDs are meant to help people really appreciate the stories in an atmosphere where they have an opportunity to talk with others about them," Nagel said. "We are encouraging our house party hosts to work together as a group to find out what they can do to make the world a better place."

"The New Heroes" airs on PBS starting June 28. Check local times on the PBS Web site. To get a house parties toolkit, visit NewHeroes.org.

Digg!

Matt Wheeland is an Associate Editor at AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
How long do you think the elites will allow this to continue?
Posted by: Pepper on Jun 24, 2005 5:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....especially if it works?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is great...but...
Posted by: canuckistani on Jun 24, 2005 6:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not to take anything away from these wonderful entrepreneurs, but I fear that pieces like this will distract from the real failure of capitalism. Corporations are legislated to make profit at all costs. Governments own that legislation, or, more accurately, WE own that legislation. That's right, corporations only exist because we have enabled them to exist to serve our purposes, in fact that's why they were created way back when in the USA (if you watched The Corporation then please forgive my awkward rehash). The point is, we, the people, are the gaurdians of legislation, we are the government, so if we really want corporations to change their behavious, we simply need to change the legislation that governs them. It's really that simple. Of course convincing the elites who "represent" us to do so is the problem since they themselves are conviced they serve the "economy" (read business and elite interests) and are held hostage to terms such as "jobs". This is a failure of understanding what an economy is (a system of trading labour for goods. period.) My point is: while it's great to be hopeful about some good apples and voluntary agreements, it takes away from real change that can be done within the legislation that governs corporate behaviour.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This is great...but... Posted by: Pierre
» RE: This is great...but... Posted by: canuckistani
» RE: This is great...but... Posted by: bqtrain
» RE: This is great...but... Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: This is great...but... Posted by: DanielT
» RE: This is great...but... Posted by: Livemike
Naysayers aside....
Posted by: helenwheels on Jun 24, 2005 7:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am heartened to see these people getting the spotlight. This is exactly what has to happen in order to affect change in our society, and our world.

Being negative does nothing, but focusing on and learning from the progressive and creative, hard-working people or organizations such as these can do amazing things.

Now, I'm no Pollyana. But I think that whenever something as inspiring as this effort is made, it does change things, even if in a small way at first. It's catching. It gives people a new slant on reality and awareness of a new realm of possibilities in what has become a very cynical world. I can't wait to see it.

ON another note: One has to wonder if the right-wing partisan airwave agenda nuts saw the programming schedule before they attempted to cut the funding!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Having done this myself...
Posted by: CLB on Jun 24, 2005 1:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
("done this" meaning created and succesfully run a business that equally combined profitability with responsibility) I can say two things: It feels amazing--much better than I can describe--to have been an agent for positive change in another's life, especially when that person leaves the business taking new skills and increased confidence, and building upon your 'investment'. It becomes an accomplishment that years and years later still returns a feeling so incomparable as to outstrip any monetary success. I imagine it may be the way a teacher feels when a student has been positively affected by their work as a teacher.

The other thing I can say is that creating a socially just and responsible business, that has an impact, does not require it be done on the scale represented by companies in the PBS special.

I would like to see a similar special that shows how small, ordinary businesses of maybe 5-7 employees can and have, accomplished the same outcomes on a local scale. I think that would encourage viewers who may be business owners to consider how they could create such outcomes in their own localles.

Consider this: approximately 80% of businesses in America are considered small. What if only half of one percent changed their practices to include social responsibility? I can't crunch the numbers (but I bet one of you can)...and I think just the impact from such a small change could fundamentally alter not only how people experience business (as an institution), work and their jobs but how they experience their power to influence those things.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Having done this myself... Posted by: rickslatton
» RE: Having done this myself... Posted by: Samantha Vimes
Well...
Posted by: CLB on Jun 24, 2005 7:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know if "investment" means to you what it does to me. In a nutshell, I started a business producing products that I knew how to make and how to market. After several years I was able to open a small shop from which I could produce and market those goods. As time went by and I had a bit more cash I purchased products others made that fit into my product line. After more time, and proving I had both a product and market, I found an invester to share costs and create a larger business. At that point, when I could hire other people, I worked out a plan where the people I hired would be cross-trained and able to profit-share. That is the point at which my business went from just sustaingin me to social responsibility.

In the end, it was just being involved in making business from what I knew I could do for myself to sharing the pie of knowledge of how to do that with people I employed.

Often business people jealously gaurd their inner business secrets from their employees for fear they will become competitors. I took a different approach. I aasumed people who could be my competitiors would be, no matter what I hid. So I decided to bring everyone into the business side so they would understand why decisions were made in particular ways. And in the end, those who left the business did well, in fields that interested them, not my area of business at all.

So, IMHO, all I can say in the end is that you have to take care of yourself until you have something to offer others. That is personal responsibility. After that, you can think of helping others...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We need more fresh water, more clean air, and better public health
Posted by: Sojourner on Jun 24, 2005 8:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NOT MORE CONSUMPTION.

Yes, cooperation can make life better. But tokens and gestures are not enough.

Right now we have enough food to prevent hunger on our planet, yet the number of hungry grows every year -- even in the US. We don't trust cooperation, because lies work better for the liar.

Global warming is spreading the region of tropical diseases. North America get ready to welcome malaria and encephalitis. We don't trust cooperation, because it won't happen to me and mine or in my lifetime.

Health and consumption can and do conflict. Our growth is now a cancer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cleaner Capiltalism
Posted by: nakis on Jun 25, 2005 2:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As has been pointed out before capitalism essentially is a self-destructing time bomb. It requires ever increasing consumerism. It requires ever increasing consumption of resources. It requires an ever increasing amount of waste. It requires and ever more fragile financial structure that is prone to abuse, major adjustments and eventual collapse. And because it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean it will not. It requires human beings to be a resource. One of the darkest days in human history was when corporations were allowed the status of legal entities. This is akin to artificial intelligence with any sense of morality. Since that is exactly what it is. It has created a new mind. A new intelligence that doesn't hold to morality. You only need to read the headlines and news from our executive and legislative branches for proof of this.

I applaud these (not really new) ventures in kinder capitalism. This kind of capitalism would greatly extend the life of capitalism. Not indefinitely but much farther than it will exist as it is now.
It's not the best change but it is a majorly significant change that will bring about much happiness and alleviation of suffering for many millions of people. And if we can take it far enough maybe we can reverse the curse and make the elite suffer and the poor happy.

If I had the desire to go into business myself then I certainly would engage in this practice. Especially the small low interest loans for the poor. This has proved to be extremely beneficial to raising people out of poverty and despair.

These are the people who should be acclaimed as great business men. And the Ken Lay's of the world should lament that from prison instead of multimillion dollar sheltered homes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Cleaner Capiltalism Posted by: Livemike
Perfect example...
Posted by: CLB on Jun 25, 2005 11:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of real people in a real (small) world working side-by-side with people who probably live in the same community (or at least the same county).

The downside can be a kind of provincial biasing (the 'we don't like people who we don't know' kind of thing) but if the business owner takes a broader view of themself as part of a community of socially useful providers, as compared to self-serving survival--which I hate to admit is sometimes a necessity--your example is pretty much what I'm talking about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Capitalism is not Free Enterprise
Posted by: freedem on Jun 26, 2005 9:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Real story is that the bank is supporting Free Enterprise. Regular Banks only support Capitalism. The Reason? Capitalism demands that the business have some sort of control of the market so that excess profits can be squeezed to pay off the bank. In an actual Free Enterprise situation there is an actual Marketplace and prices are limited to what others in the business are willing to take, with little room to squeeze extra profits.
For free enterprise think computer assemblers, for Capitalism think Microsoft. To see it form Microsoft's actual view see http://www.opensource.org/halloween/
Capitalism becomes indistinguishable from Russia's Communism with less social responsibility, unless there is strong control from another force. Free Enterprise is subject to the actual forces and efficiencies apologists try to claim for Capitalism.
It is time Progressive forces encourage legitimate free enterprise as an alternative to Mercantilist Capitalism at every quater. Both helping people enter free markets and reducing unnecessary government like controls by Capitalistic Kleptocracracys.
For free eneterprise think computer assemblers, for Capitalism think Microsoft. To see it form Microsoft's actual view see http://www.opensource.org/halloween/
Capitalism becomes indistinguishable from Russia's Communism with less social responsibility, unless there is strong control from another force. Free Enterprise is subject to the actual forces and effeciencies apologists try to claim for Capitalism.
It is time Progressive forces encourage legitimate free enterprise as an alternative to Merchantilst Capitalism at every quater. Both helping people enter free markets and reducing unnecessary government like controls by Capitalistic Beauracracy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No buts about it!
Posted by: Gaye on Jun 27, 2005 9:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are only limited by our thoughts and lack of dreams. No matter how small you start, if you have something to share start today. The wheels are turning in my mind as I tap this out. Thank you for a breath of hope and inspiration!
oxox
g =)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]