COMMENTS: 19
A World of Economic Do-Gooders
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
The message woven throughout "The New Heroes," a four-hour PBS series that begins on June 28, is that well-meaning individuals can create immense change in the world. Each episode visits places where enterprising people have combined business skills with a desire to improve peoples' lives. The results are magnificent and uplifting. In India, Kailash Satyarthi raids a camp to free children and adults enslaved by the international rug trade. In Peru, Albina Ruiz Rios turns garbage into money by helping people start waste-management companies. Closer to home, Mimi Silbert runs the Delancey Street Foundation in San Francisco, a cluster of businesses including restaurants and a moving company that give ex-cons a chance to turn their lives around.
Several of the projects featured in the series make use of innovative technology to solve very basic problems. Nick Moon and Martin Fisher's company ApproTEC has distributed low-cost irrigation pumps and oilseed presses throughout Africa; the boost in productivity allows people to move beyond subsistence farming to make a better living, and the resulting boom in businesses contribute about $35 million a year to the developing country's economies.
And in India, Dr. Govindappa Venkataswamy and David Green revolutionized medical care based on their belief in "compassionate capitalism." The two men trained local workers in high-tech medical and manufacturing procedures, and have since opened five hospitals across India that treat nearly 2 million patients a year, at a cost low enough to make health care available to India's poorest people.
What these very different projects have in common is "social entrepreneurship," the concept at the core of "The New Heroes." Instead of seeking to reap profits, social entrepreneurs use their innovations to create social change, starting from the bottom up. It's an idea brilliantly summed up by the work of Bangladeshi banker Muhammad Yunus, who says, "The whole principle of conventional banking is 'the more you have the more you get.' I said the logical thing would be the less you have, the more attention you should get, and if you have nothing, you are the one who should get the highest priority."
Yunus' Grameen Bank in Bangladesh started in 1976 with a loan of $27, split between 42 people who used the money to start small businesses like selling rice at the market. In the last 29 years, Grameen's "micro-credit" loans have spread worldwide, and in Bangladesh the bank has provided nearly $5 billion in loans to four and a half million people. And because 96 percent of Grameen's borrowers are women, Muhammad Yunus' simple idea of small loans has changed the social structure of Bangladesh by giving women the power of self-sufficiency.
This is the spirit of social entrepreneurship writ large, and it's the idea behind "New Heroes" house parties organized by the Skoll Foundation, a major funder of the series. "We believe that if you see these stories you will be inspired," said the Skoll Foundation's Terri Nagel. "We're hoping to motivate people to actually get out there and help, whether it's writing a check or starting your own social entrepreneurship program."
The idea behind the viewing parties is to get friends, families and coworkers to discuss the ideas of social entrepreneurship, and especially how everyone can make a difference. The Skoll Foundation sends out DVDs of the series along with a toolkit including topics to discuss after watching the episodes. The foundation will match up to $100,000 in donations to any of the groups in the "New Heroes" series.
Providing the series on DVD is a new step for this kind of viewing party. Instead of being tied to the PBS schedule, viewers can watch the shows at their convenience, and make a plan for when to get a good group together.
"The DVDs are meant to help people really appreciate the stories in an atmosphere where they have an opportunity to talk with others about them," Nagel said. "We are encouraging our house party hosts to work together as a group to find out what they can do to make the world a better place."
"The New Heroes" airs on PBS starting June 28. Check local times on the PBS Web site. To get a house parties toolkit, visit NewHeroes.org.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Pepper on Jun 24, 2005 5:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: canuckistani on Jun 24, 2005 6:40 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This is great...but...
Posted by: Pierre
» RE: This is great...but...
Posted by: canuckistani
» RE: This is great...but...
Posted by: bqtrain
» RE: This is great...but...
Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: This is great...but...
Posted by: DanielT
» RE: This is great...but...
Posted by: Livemike
Comments are closed-
Posted by: helenwheels on Jun 24, 2005 7:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being negative does nothing, but focusing on and learning from the progressive and creative, hard-working people or organizations such as these can do amazing things.
Now, I'm no Pollyana. But I think that whenever something as inspiring as this effort is made, it does change things, even if in a small way at first. It's catching. It gives people a new slant on reality and awareness of a new realm of possibilities in what has become a very cynical world. I can't wait to see it.
ON another note: One has to wonder if the right-wing partisan airwave agenda nuts saw the programming schedule before they attempted to cut the funding!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CLB on Jun 24, 2005 1:33 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The other thing I can say is that creating a socially just and responsible business, that has an impact, does not require it be done on the scale represented by companies in the PBS special.
I would like to see a similar special that shows how small, ordinary businesses of maybe 5-7 employees can and have, accomplished the same outcomes on a local scale. I think that would encourage viewers who may be business owners to consider how they could create such outcomes in their own localles.
Consider this: approximately 80% of businesses in America are considered small. What if only half of one percent changed their practices to include social responsibility? I can't crunch the numbers (but I bet one of you can)...and I think just the impact from such a small change could fundamentally alter not only how people experience business (as an institution), work and their jobs but how they experience their power to influence those things.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Having done this myself...
Posted by: rickslatton
» RE: Having done this myself...
Posted by: Samantha Vimes
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CLB on Jun 24, 2005 7:20 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the end, it was just being involved in making business from what I knew I could do for myself to sharing the pie of knowledge of how to do that with people I employed.
Often business people jealously gaurd their inner business secrets from their employees for fear they will become competitors. I took a different approach. I aasumed people who could be my competitiors would be, no matter what I hid. So I decided to bring everyone into the business side so they would understand why decisions were made in particular ways. And in the end, those who left the business did well, in fields that interested them, not my area of business at all.
So, IMHO, all I can say in the end is that you have to take care of yourself until you have something to offer others. That is personal responsibility. After that, you can think of helping others...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sojourner on Jun 24, 2005 8:49 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, cooperation can make life better. But tokens and gestures are not enough.
Right now we have enough food to prevent hunger on our planet, yet the number of hungry grows every year -- even in the US. We don't trust cooperation, because lies work better for the liar.
Global warming is spreading the region of tropical diseases. North America get ready to welcome malaria and encephalitis. We don't trust cooperation, because it won't happen to me and mine or in my lifetime.
Health and consumption can and do conflict. Our growth is now a cancer.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nakis on Jun 25, 2005 2:51 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I applaud these (not really new) ventures in kinder capitalism. This kind of capitalism would greatly extend the life of capitalism. Not indefinitely but much farther than it will exist as it is now.
It's not the best change but it is a majorly significant change that will bring about much happiness and alleviation of suffering for many millions of people. And if we can take it far enough maybe we can reverse the curse and make the elite suffer and the poor happy.
If I had the desire to go into business myself then I certainly would engage in this practice. Especially the small low interest loans for the poor. This has proved to be extremely beneficial to raising people out of poverty and despair.
These are the people who should be acclaimed as great business men. And the Ken Lay's of the world should lament that from prison instead of multimillion dollar sheltered homes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Cleaner Capiltalism
Posted by: Livemike
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CLB on Jun 25, 2005 11:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The downside can be a kind of provincial biasing (the 'we don't like people who we don't know' kind of thing) but if the business owner takes a broader view of themself as part of a community of socially useful providers, as compared to self-serving survival--which I hate to admit is sometimes a necessity--your example is pretty much what I'm talking about.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: freedem on Jun 26, 2005 9:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For free enterprise think computer assemblers, for Capitalism think Microsoft. To see it form Microsoft's actual view see http://www.opensource.org/halloween/
Capitalism becomes indistinguishable from Russia's Communism with less social responsibility, unless there is strong control from another force. Free Enterprise is subject to the actual forces and efficiencies apologists try to claim for Capitalism.
It is time Progressive forces encourage legitimate free enterprise as an alternative to Mercantilist Capitalism at every quater. Both helping people enter free markets and reducing unnecessary government like controls by Capitalistic Kleptocracracys.
For free eneterprise think computer assemblers, for Capitalism think Microsoft. To see it form Microsoft's actual view see http://www.opensource.org/halloween/
Capitalism becomes indistinguishable from Russia's Communism with less social responsibility, unless there is strong control from another force. Free Enterprise is subject to the actual forces and effeciencies apologists try to claim for Capitalism.
It is time Progressive forces encourage legitimate free enterprise as an alternative to Merchantilst Capitalism at every quater. Both helping people enter free markets and reducing unnecessary government like controls by Capitalistic Beauracracy
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gaye on Jun 27, 2005 9:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
oxox
g =)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Pepper on Jun 24, 2005 5:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: canuckistani on Jun 24, 2005 6:40 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This is great...but...
Posted by: Pierre
» RE: This is great...but...
Posted by: canuckistani
» RE: This is great...but...
Posted by: bqtrain
» RE: This is great...but...
Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: This is great...but...
Posted by: DanielT
» RE: This is great...but...
Posted by: Livemike
Comments are closed-
Posted by: helenwheels on Jun 24, 2005 7:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being negative does nothing, but focusing on and learning from the progressive and creative, hard-working people or organizations such as these can do amazing things.
Now, I'm no Pollyana. But I think that whenever something as inspiring as this effort is made, it does change things, even if in a small way at first. It's catching. It gives people a new slant on reality and awareness of a new realm of possibilities in what has become a very cynical world. I can't wait to see it.
ON another note: One has to wonder if the right-wing partisan airwave agenda nuts saw the programming schedule before they attempted to cut the funding!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CLB on Jun 24, 2005 1:33 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The other thing I can say is that creating a socially just and responsible business, that has an impact, does not require it be done on the scale represented by companies in the PBS special.
I would like to see a similar special that shows how small, ordinary businesses of maybe 5-7 employees can and have, accomplished the same outcomes on a local scale. I think that would encourage viewers who may be business owners to consider how they could create such outcomes in their own localles.
Consider this: approximately 80% of businesses in America are considered small. What if only half of one percent changed their practices to include social responsibility? I can't crunch the numbers (but I bet one of you can)...and I think just the impact from such a small change could fundamentally alter not only how people experience business (as an institution), work and their jobs but how they experience their power to influence those things.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Having done this myself...
Posted by: rickslatton
» RE: Having done this myself...
Posted by: Samantha Vimes
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CLB on Jun 24, 2005 7:20 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the end, it was just being involved in making business from what I knew I could do for myself to sharing the pie of knowledge of how to do that with people I employed.
Often business people jealously gaurd their inner business secrets from their employees for fear they will become competitors. I took a different approach. I aasumed people who could be my competitiors would be, no matter what I hid. So I decided to bring everyone into the business side so they would understand why decisions were made in particular ways. And in the end, those who left the business did well, in fields that interested them, not my area of business at all.
So, IMHO, all I can say in the end is that you have to take care of yourself until you have something to offer others. That is personal responsibility. After that, you can think of helping others...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sojourner on Jun 24, 2005 8:49 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, cooperation can make life better. But tokens and gestures are not enough.
Right now we have enough food to prevent hunger on our planet, yet the number of hungry grows every year -- even in the US. We don't trust cooperation, because lies work better for the liar.
Global warming is spreading the region of tropical diseases. North America get ready to welcome malaria and encephalitis. We don't trust cooperation, because it won't happen to me and mine or in my lifetime.
Health and consumption can and do conflict. Our growth is now a cancer.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nakis on Jun 25, 2005 2:51 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I applaud these (not really new) ventures in kinder capitalism. This kind of capitalism would greatly extend the life of capitalism. Not indefinitely but much farther than it will exist as it is now.
It's not the best change but it is a majorly significant change that will bring about much happiness and alleviation of suffering for many millions of people. And if we can take it far enough maybe we can reverse the curse and make the elite suffer and the poor happy.
If I had the desire to go into business myself then I certainly would engage in this practice. Especially the small low interest loans for the poor. This has proved to be extremely beneficial to raising people out of poverty and despair.
These are the people who should be acclaimed as great business men. And the Ken Lay's of the world should lament that from prison instead of multimillion dollar sheltered homes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Cleaner Capiltalism
Posted by: Livemike
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CLB on Jun 25, 2005 11:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The downside can be a kind of provincial biasing (the 'we don't like people who we don't know' kind of thing) but if the business owner takes a broader view of themself as part of a community of socially useful providers, as compared to self-serving survival--which I hate to admit is sometimes a necessity--your example is pretty much what I'm talking about.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: freedem on Jun 26, 2005 9:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For free enterprise think computer assemblers, for Capitalism think Microsoft. To see it form Microsoft's actual view see http://www.opensource.org/halloween/
Capitalism becomes indistinguishable from Russia's Communism with less social responsibility, unless there is strong control from another force. Free Enterprise is subject to the actual forces and efficiencies apologists try to claim for Capitalism.
It is time Progressive forces encourage legitimate free enterprise as an alternative to Mercantilist Capitalism at every quater. Both helping people enter free markets and reducing unnecessary government like controls by Capitalistic Kleptocracracys.
For free eneterprise think computer assemblers, for Capitalism think Microsoft. To see it form Microsoft's actual view see http://www.opensource.org/halloween/
Capitalism becomes indistinguishable from Russia's Communism with less social responsibility, unless there is strong control from another force. Free Enterprise is subject to the actual forces and effeciencies apologists try to claim for Capitalism.
It is time Progressive forces encourage legitimate free enterprise as an alternative to Merchantilst Capitalism at every quater. Both helping people enter free markets and reducing unnecessary government like controls by Capitalistic Beauracracy
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gaye on Jun 27, 2005 9:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
oxox
g =)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped
California Carbon Trading Allows Timber Companies to Sell CO2 Credits for Their Worst Logging Practices
How to Answer the Dumb Things Climate Deniers Say




