Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Requiem for a Hollywood Reporter

By Nikki Finke, LA Weekly. Posted June 24, 2005.


The bizarre story of a Hollywood reporter who'd cried wolf too often to have a legitimate death threat taken seriously.
Advertisement

In the movies, reporters are mostly made out to be sleazy louts (It Happened One Night) or bumbling fools (Absence of Malice). Hollywood moguls even portray good journalists (All the President's Men) as egotistical, obsessive, not-very-nice people. Or maybe it's just payback. After all, good journalists usually portray Hollywood moguls as egotistical, obsessive, not-very-nice people. Combine the two, and a good Hollywood journalist means a double dose of all those qualities that make a person insufferable.

That, in a nutshell, was veteran movie industry reporter Anita Busch.

"Was" is the operative word here because she has abandoned the profession she zealously plied for nearly 20 years. Not just because she was sniffing around a story that ended in her fearing for her life, not just because she burned her bridges at the major media outlets, but also because the Los Angeles Times and the Hollywood press corps turned their backs on her when she came under what we now know was a genuine threat.

"She told me she's never going to work as a journalist again," one of her closest friends told L.A. Weekly. "It's not so much what happened to her but the whole way this went down. How she was treated left a sour taste."

She is gone and, worse, she is near-forgotten, an inconspicuous end to an esteemed career. So I, for one, am going to apologize to Busch on behalf of everyone who covers Hollywood: Yes, we are at fault. Yes, we didn't take this seriously at first, second or third. Yes, we made the mistake of putting personality before principle. Shame on us -- especially now that this ongoing Hollywood puzzle is starting to fall into place.

On Friday, the Los Angeles District Attorney's office announced that celebrity private eye Anthony Pellicano, already in prison on federal weapons and explosives counts, was charged with conspiracy and threatening Busch. The man he allegedly hired to do the dirty work, Alexander Proctor, already had been charged with one count of making criminal threats against Busch in a case filed in 2003. Still unclear is who hired Pellicano. Busch, who's been in contact with the FBI and the D.A.'s Office all this time, has tantalizingly whispered to friends that her case could lead to a big Hollywood name.

Busch wouldn't return my phone calls. (Though a guy called me anonymously and warned repeatedly, "You're being monitored. Everything you say about Anita Busch.") Also not talking to me was the literary agent for the novel she's supposedly writing, and the lawyer for the civil lawsuit she filed two years after the incident against nearly everyone she claims was involved. Those who are in contact with her say she's obsessed with every facet of the ongoing Pellicano taping scandal and talks about it constantly.

She also hasn't worked for the Los Angeles Times in years, and left there disappointed that the paper's management "didn't back her up" more, according to one pal. "She didn't find them as supportive as she would have liked. They turned the matter over to the Human Resources administrative people. This was very offensive to her."

To refresh your memory, the long-time trade paper reporter-editor was newly hired as a contract writer by the Los Angeles Times when she was threatened while working on a story about has-been action star Steven Seagal's alleged ties to the mob. That's when Anita in LaLaland fell down the rabbit hole and never came out again.

Separating fact from fantasy seemed impossible given the wacko stuff that happened that June 10, 2002, involving an actor, the Mafia, a hit man, a note that said "STOP," a shatter mark on her car windshield -- alleged shenanigans by Proctor and Pellicano. The street where she lived was evacuated so the bomb squad could investigate the contents of the mystery package left on her auto; it contained a dead fish and a rose but no explosive device. "People didn't take it seriously because it sounded like a movie script," another friend says. "That's why few people felt sorry for her."

Blame that on Busch herself and her reputation first as a Hollywood queen, and then as a drama queen. Over time, she went from the reporter relentlessly pursuing stories to reversing course and becoming the story. She was schmoozing media writers for high-profile treatment in stories about Hollywood coverage, sitting for a portrait and profile in the LAT when she became editor of The Hollywood Reporter, or slithering around in evening dress for an Elle magazine feature on "Hollywood After Dark." The dead fish experience was seen as just another peril to befall Anita: She'd had as many as Pauline over the years, culminating in the bottle of MSG she claimed was sent to her by Michael Ovitz because of her lethal allergy to the food additive.


Digg!

Contact Nikki Finke at nikkifinke@deadlinehollywood.com

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Requiem for a Hollywood Reporter
Posted by: bansidh@citlink.net on Jun 24, 2005 11:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What happened to her?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

too bad so sad
Posted by: kittykat on Jun 24, 2005 12:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Am i supposed to feel sorry when a pissy,prissy,arrogant,spoiled,bitchy snot from the media has some of their very own b.s. come back to bite them on their phony ass? Because i sure as hell don't the problem is too many people in the media have it confused they think the people they cover and write shit about need them more than they need the people they write about. Guess she found out the hard way that's not the case

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hollywood
Posted by: sarah on Jun 24, 2005 2:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what's super sad is that all those threats and trouble was based on her inquiry into an actor, Stephen Seagal, who was on the hallowed hollywood pedestal of glory at that time... but who is now a has-been with no power. i lived in hollywood in the 80's for a coupla years, hanging out with the punks, but working briefly as an office assistant for an entertaiment CPA in beverly hills. In the early 90's, when i was still in school i moved back there and commuted to long beach for classes. I loved the place and all its nuances, but there's a need to be wary, esp. of the beautiful people.

It's funny...in Hollywood, STARS are temporary gods in the entertainment biz and surrounding world, and then usually they fade out... everybody who had ever lived more than a coupla months in the area notices this fact if they manage not to suscribe to it.... but in the case of Anita, who, if disliked, was at least lauded for her reporting talent, the elevation of Seagal as being "above the law and other people" left a residual negative effect on her life. Peronally, I'd FREAK if i opened a package and found a dead fish and a rose... it's an obviously mysogenistic slur, at best, a creepy icky threatening thing at worst. And if that had been a package were me, i'd have preferred a bomb for myself... at least i'd be clear on the meaning.... and there'd be closure, for sure. BUT, that's just my preference for myself. most wouldn't subcribe to that for themselves. (just kidding.)

what happened to her? it's unclear.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As during the Prohibition Era...
Posted by: Sojourner on Jun 24, 2005 9:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...corruption runs rampant today -- and in the name of law and order. The US had little organized crime before alcohol prohibition. Crime is funded by underground money made possible by unenforceable laws.

We elect legislators who write bad laws -- where the punishment is worse than the crime. They convince us that so long as they speak no evil, they see no evil, hear no evil.

Unlike the proverbial ostrich, we bury our heads in tv, movies, pop music, but one sand is as good as another to stifle your sensibilities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]