Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Michael's Media Circus

By Monica Mehta, AlterNet. Posted June 16, 2005.


The barrage of nauseating particulars by day, coupled with the merciless jokes by night, served to desensitize Americans to the seriousness of the allegations in the Jackson case.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Monica Mehta

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The debacle known as the Michael Jackson case is finally over, with the pop star acquitted of all charges, and the country is the worse off for it. It didn't have to be this way. We could have learned something.

At its heart, the case was about one of the most despicable of crimes: child sexual abuse. It's difficult to think of anything worse a human being could do than prey on an innocent, defenseless child. In prison, child sex abusers are the bottom feeders, below even murderers. They must often be separated from the rest of the population for fear of being killed by other inmates.

But precisely because of its taboo nature, there are also few topics the public is more fascinated with. Daily news reports on the Jackson trial fed this obsession: A former security guard claimed he saw Jackson kneeling to perform oral sex on a naked boy. The younger brother of the accuser said he saw Jackson masturbating with his hand down the accuser's pants. Police found a pornographic book with nude prepubescent boys in suggestive poses at the ranch. The sordid details went on and on.

And then, somehow, it was suddenly okay to joke about kids being molested. "Saturday Night Live" comedian Amy Poehler joked, "The judge in the Michael Jackson child molestation trial selected 250 candidates for the jury pool, while Jackson himself has selected 20 for the kiddie pool." An online movie showed an animated Jackson singing, "Hey little Billy with the high tops on, Check out this nudie mag but please don't tell your mom; Let's have a party at Neverland, pay no attention to where I put my gloved hand."

Another website featured a game called "Escape from Neverland," in which players could shoot little boys trying to flee from the ranch. Jay Leno was the worst of all, with nightly routines like, "Michael Jackson is broke and can't even afford the payroll at Neverland Ranch. So the next time you see Michael with his hands in a 12-year-old's pocket, he might just be looking for lunch money."

The barrage of nauseating particulars by day, coupled with the merciless jokes by night, served to desensitize Americans to the seriousness of the allegations. Amidst all this, the media gave up the opportunity to focus responsibly on what was at the heart of the case.

According to the U.S. Department of Justice, 1 in 3 girls and 1 in 7 boys are molested before the age of 18. Sixty-seven percent of all reported victims of sexual assault are minors, and 34 percent of those victims are under the age of 12, according to the National Incident-Based Reporting System -- and these figures are considered low. Ninety-three percent of juvenile sexual assault victims know their attacker. Media and community groups might have encouraged more responsible awareness of the issue, while avoiding the climate of near-hysteria in cases such as Elizabeth Smart's abduction. There is a precedent for such public information campaigns; when O.J. Simpson was tried for allegedly killing his wife after many incidents of violence towards her, the topic of domestic violence was spotlighted in the media. But in this case, the public, and the press, were too busy focusing on what was in the King of Pop's porn collection.

Now, it's all over. Jackson will remain a social pariah. The prosecutor who spent 12 years trying to get him has lost face. The 15-year-old known only as "the accuser" will likely continue to suffer the consequences of irresponsible parenting; a mother who put her son in harm's way and seemingly cost him the case; and a father who pleaded no contest to child cruelty charges in 2002.

Yet another media circus has made us even more desensitized, and increased our appetite for destruction.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Monica Mehta is an associate editor at AlterNet. For resources on this issue, visit Stop It Now! The Campaign to Prevent Child Sexual Abuse.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The humor is sickening
Posted by: TomC on Jun 16, 2005 12:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was also disturbed at all the jokes they were making about young boys during the trial. I saw Jon Stewart yesterday, I usually like his stuff but that Colbert guy went too far talking about an all night party at Neverland with little boys running around after the verdict. I can only wonder what male victims of sex abuse must feel as it becomes acceptable to joke about what they've gone through. Why is it okay to joke about their pain, but if it were young girls or woman who had been allegedly taken advantage of, you wouldn't have heard any jokes? Or maybe I'd be proven wrong about that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The humor is sickening Posted by: doctordee
Persecuted by the establishment
Posted by: Lizka on Jun 16, 2005 2:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that Jackson will and should go to live abroad. If the Californian establishment don't want him there and are obviously trying to persecute him, as they are - why don't they persecute Bush, by the way? Lawrence E. King/White House/Nebraska sex abuse/child prostitution ring case, by the way? The documentary that was BANNED from the Discovery Channel in 1993 or 4??

No, instead they choose to show stupid stuff designed to incriminate by British newsreader Martin Bashir, who isn't - well, I'm British so I know - ANY kind of proper documentary-maker and has LITTLE interviewing experience (outside of talking heads) and LESS showbiz experience! So WHY was he picked by Channel 4 to make this documentary?

But, as I said. Once the establishment has decided to persecute you and you're black - better, like Hurricane Carter, once vindicated, to leave the country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Protect your children, get them implanted...
Posted by: JohnnyFuctup on Jun 16, 2005 3:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Child abuse is sick, that much is a given, but let us face facts. Peidophiles have been around for thousands of years. They are not some new menace to the Western world. They are rare, and the chances your child is going to get kidnapped by some child abuser is very slim... yet reading the papers or watching the news would suggest they're hiding in every shrub and round every street corner.

This whole Jackson trial seemed more ike a reality show than anything else. My personal view is that the sensationalism of child abuse in the media in recent years seems like an elaborate plan to get parents to want their children microchipped...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good article -sad but true
Posted by: christee on Jun 16, 2005 4:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I too was very dissappointed in what happened in the media over this case. I'm not sure if I believe that Jackson was guilty or not as he seems to have lived in a cage all his life, but I was very sad to see the Daily Show and Jay Leno sell out and stoop so low. In this Rush Limbaugh type of newsworld we are living in, not much is properly reported. Important items are glossed over and made a joke of.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Michael Jackson case
Posted by: Ekatellis on Jun 16, 2005 5:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the sexual abuse of children is a serious issue, but this case was about something else. A New York Times op-ed piece by Andrew Vachss put it well in arguing that the real abuser could be seen by the jury to be not Michael Jackson but the accuser's mother, a woman "who trafficked her own child to a potentially dangerous person in the hope of a multimillion-dollar payoff."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's called humor
Posted by: maiaoming on Jun 16, 2005 6:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have a feeling no one will be pleased by what I'm going to say but -- yes, it was a media circus, and yes, the idea of wacko jacko doing ANYTHING is grotesque and disturbing, and using humor to deal with this bizarre situation is very human. And yes, funny. Good god, Amy Poehler and Jon Stewart are not Pro-Pedophile!

My mother is a surivor of child molestation, the effects of which were felt in my family and in my life. I take it absolutely seriously. But give me a break! There's an element of the absolutely ridiculous, the spectacle, to Jackson, and I thought they were hilarious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's called humor Posted by: spyderbaby
» RE: It's called humor Posted by: sterlingwisdom
Oh, Well that's Sorted then ...
Posted by: DaftAida on Jun 16, 2005 6:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It occurs to me that the question of innocence or guilt in the Jackson case highlights a fundamental question: To what degree is a mind-controlled victim guilty of perpetrating offences? I have always felt that Jackson is innocent for some reason; deranged, yes, but willing to hurt children? Now, having read extensive reportage on SRA and mind control, I can see how he is innocent and guilty at the same time. Neverlands itself sounds clearly like an MC trigger; in Cathy O'Brien's Trance-formation of America "never-never-land' was used in the process of trancing out-children as part of the programme to, I guess, 'make-believe' that the horrific abuse they suffered was unreal. So, there's an obvious link for me. Jackson's primary 'handler' would be his father and Neverland (as is Disney Land) is the perfect fantasy playground in which high-profile abusers can rely on a steady stream of little kids for their deranged, inhumane practices. By acquitting Jackson, people will get an important messages: Politicians, Judges etc. can't be involved in this type of behaviour without exposure - look what happened to Michael Jackson AND he was acquitted. This diverts attention away from the perpetrators behind such crimes whilst giving the impression that those seeking justice for victims are paranoid or incompetant. The 'evidence' needed to prove a case lies within an untold number of terrified children who, mind-controlled themselves and abused by those figureheads who are in positions of immense power,have no recourse to justice. So my verdict is that Jackson, the individual is both innocent and guilty but it's the bastards behind him that need to be dug out. How to do this when SRA is institutionalised is a daunting task. Trivialising the gravity of this crime against humanity are the media lackeys who are probably involved to one degree or another in this sickening crime - at the least, guilty by collusion. The question is, who is behind them? Some of us know the answer, it's for the rest of you out there to find out - seek and ye shall find but what you discover will blow your mind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Language Abuse
Posted by: ty111 on Jun 16, 2005 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't any of you have spell check on your pcs?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Language Abuse Posted by: DaftAida
» RE: Language Abuse Posted by: doctordee
In agreement in Ohio
Posted by: babyrobin on Jun 16, 2005 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for the thoughtful article on the Jackson debacle. I have avoided paying attention to it over these many months. Some say that the media frenzy was a red herring to keep the public from paying attention to other more important things happening--especially politically--in the world over this time. If this is the case, poor Michael. He was not grotesque enough on his own, but he was pilloried by the political powers that be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHEN WE ARE MICHAEL JACKSON, INNOCENT! ©
Posted by: Betsy L. Angert on Jun 16, 2005 7:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Monica Mehta . . .

I agree; we are quite desensitized to many abuses, sexual violence among them.

Yes, to take advantage of another persons’ mind, heart, body, and soul is a brutal act. To do so to a child, to many children is despicable. It was interesting to me that at least one of the jurors admits, he believes, that Michael has done this, more than once, though possibly not to the accuser. I believe that this juror dismisses the fact that the complainant was violated merely to justify his own decision to acquit. Nonetheless.

I too was so baffled by this benign verdict that I felt compelled to write. Please read my thoughts and share your impression of these.
WHEN WE ARE MICHAEL JACKSON, INNOCENT! ©

Betsy L. Angert Be-Think

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He was proven innocent
Posted by: Seven on Jun 16, 2005 8:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who were the real child abusers here? What parent would allow their children to go play with a 40 year old man at his house, let alone stay in his bedroom? Do you think if he wasn't weathy and famous this would have happened? Obviously, whatever they could drain out of Michael Jackson was certainly more important to these people than their childrens' welfare from the beginning. I think that's what is truly a sad statement about our society.

The facts are, that the jury looked at the evidence very hard and did not find him guilty. That is how our legal system works and justice was done. Can we stop and imagine what it would be like to send an innocent man or woman to jail for child molestation?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: He was proven innocent Posted by: morticia
» RE: He was proven innocent Posted by: Tubeguru
» RE: He was proven innocent Posted by: morticia
» RE: He was proven innocent Posted by: doctordee
Reality Check
Posted by: deborahkate on Jun 16, 2005 9:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jackson was found not guilty of the counts against him - this does not mean he is innocent. It means the system worked in his favor. Largely, it seems to have worked for him because the child's mother presented herself so effectively against their own case. She's as culpable as Jackson, in my opinion. I don't think jail's the place for Jackson. I'd like to see him in an institution with intensive therapy and monitoring of this so called "change" he's pledged to make - that would be more helpful. The boy will need therapy and support for many years to come.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not all pedophiles are equal
Posted by: morticia on Jun 16, 2005 10:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
C'mon, people. It's not as if Michael Jackson was the neighborhood priest, Boy Scout troop leader or kindly old granddad next door. He's only the most famous chickenhawk on the entire planet. Sending your kid to a sleepover at Neverland is like having Puss 'n' Boots babysit your canary, then being shocked to find feathers in Puss's whiskers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Re: Jackson's case
Posted by: Trixed on Jun 16, 2005 12:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where is the line between humour and plain old slander. I find that some media people think they have a licence to insult people in their work and all is legitimate. Michael Jackson was acquitted on all counts, why can't people accept the ruling of the court and of the Jury. Our system of justice would rather see a guilty person walk than having to take away the prvilege of an innocent person. I think that is the way it has to be. If anyone of us/our children/family/friend were in MJ's shoes, we would want that for ourselves. Do not let us begrudge his freedome. Things are never as they seem and even though when one looks at the case simplistically and many average people are, they tend see guilt. In part, because they listen to the media, some of which, push their own agenda. The law operates above all that noise to the core of the matter. The prosecutor did not prove his case beyond a reasonable doubt. Far from it. Justice has been served and we should all be happy because we could be in MJ shoes one of these days as well.
As a footnote, here in Canada we had a notorious case of child sexual abuse 15 years ago where about six people were touted to jail on the basis of children in a daycare saying they had been sexually abused by all of the workers.
This outraged civil society. On the basis of these children's testimony (some were rather bizzare). These people were sent to jail. Those children grew up and refuted the allegations - they all said nothing happened to them and that people had put words in their mouth. As a result of this hasty judgement several people lost years of their lives sitting in a prison, hurt and sad, for something that they did not do. Don't forget children can be manipulated. whether MJ did it or not, it is not for me to judge but I truly believe MJ when he says he is innocent. We as a society are so jaded by the abuse we suffer in our own families, and the betrayal of our church, and family friends that we do not trust adults with children. That pure friendship that used to be there is gone. Thanks for reading this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JINGOIST
Posted by: jingoist on Jun 16, 2005 5:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bravo Monica!! Brilliantly written and right on the mark. I would add one thing. Due to the "incurable" nature of the crime, the most horrible offenders need to be dealt with swiftly. We know what to do with mad dogs, humans who commit the most horrific of crimes are even worse. Let's "put them down" quickly. JINGOIST

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: sterlingwisdom
Releasing of Doves... what a clown
Posted by: DavidTbone on Jun 16, 2005 8:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the people are missing the REAL humor about this case. Who the hell was that woman releasing the doves, and who is her therapist? She obviously has spent too much time looking at the man in the mirror and needs to start weening off the Paxil.

Anyway, I think I'm going to check out what happened with John Conyers today. Arent we in some kind constitutional crisis, or a war or something?

When they find George Bush GUILTY of misleading the American people into a war, I think I will release some doves myself.

Peace

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

money talks b.s walks
Posted by: kittykat on Jun 19, 2005 8:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't remember anybody 'bemoaning' about the real crime of rape when this was marv pervert or william kennedy smith[god forbid i ever pick on a precious kennedy].And another thing most of the comments were complete b.s. so let me get this straight sicko roman polanski can drug and rape an underage girl and not only not get vilified but win a damn oscar and be celebrated,pete townsend gets caught downloading kiddie porn claims it was 'research' then gets off with a 'warning',jerry lee lewis can give an ode to jerry springer by not only commiting incest but statutory rape as well,creepy pee-wee[who was caught in a porn theater] offers an underage teen money for a lap dance,'party of five' star scott bairstow faces allegations he bedded his ex-wife's cousin when she was only 12 and he was 28,and hockey player sergei fedorov is now bragging he married anna kourkinova when she was still in her teens and HE was 28. That's just afew examples but it really gets me how some of you racist hypocrites are so ready to scream bloody murder and decry certain people selectively yet remain deliberately oblivious to someone you like or worship so who are you snots kidding and who in the hell are you to judge. that goes double for the sickos an dfreak shows you worship while referring to mr. jackson as 'bizzare' look who in the bleep is talking

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: money talks b.s walks Posted by: morticia
What is wrong with the media? Read the book "No Questions Asked"
Posted by: farhada on Jun 22, 2005 12:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hi,
This is exactly what is wrong with the US media. Read more on:

No Questions Asked, a book by Lisa Finnegan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]