Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Blogfather

By Jan Frel, AlterNet. Posted June 16, 2005.


Jerome Armstrong of the political blog MyDD discusses how the Internet has changed -- and how it's changing Democratic politics.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Jan Frel

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

If you had to name the two things the Internet has done to change Democratic Party politics the most, going with Howard Dean's campaign and the DailyKos blog would be pretty safe bets.

Dean's Net-based bid for his party's presidential nomination redefined political campaigning: it showed the way to a Democratic politics that wouldn't have to depend on big-money donors, it used a blog as a means of communicating to supporters without a media filter, and it resurrected grassroots organizing through social software hosted on the site.

DailyKos, run by Markos Moulistas Zuniga, has risen to become the most popular political blog out there. A single entry on the blog's main page in favor of a Democrat running for office can net as much money as a fundraiser for the candidate, and as much attention as a profile from a major newspaper. And DailyKos is slowly becoming the epicenter of all Democratic Party discourse -- members of Congress, leaders of progressive organizations, and hundreds of party activists post their own entries on the blog.

What the Dean campaign and DailyKos share is that neither of these two ventures would be what they are today if it weren't for the political activist Jerome Armstrong, who has played a big behind-the-scenes role in the innovation and successes of both. Jerome is the founder of a Democratic politics blog called MyDD, or My Due Diligence of Politics. Before he started his own blog, Kos was posting on MyDD. He credits Armstrong as his "blogfather," and now the two are business partners, currently working on a book together.

Joe Trippi, the former Dean campaign manager, writes in his book "The Revolution Will Not Be Televised," that he too, got hooked on my MyDD. Trippi started responding to criticism about him posted by users of the blog. "Pretty soon, I was reading Jerome's blog regularly, and occasionally commenting on my own stupidity. Then, in January, right before I went up to Burlington, [Vermont], Jerome wrote in his blog about a web site called Meetup.com where, he said, some Howard Dean supporters were using the internet to get together in a handful of cities." Meetup went on to become one of the campaign's central grassroots organizing tools, and Trippi would later bring Armstrong on to the campaign to consult on internet issues.

Armstrong stayed in Burlington after the Dean campaign ended, but he has gone on to consult with Democratic campaigns across the country, most recently for the new Los Angeles mayor elect, Antonio Villaraigosa, and his MyDD blog was ground zero for discussion and rumors about the election of the new DNC chair, which just happened to go in Howard Dean's favor. Armstrong and Kos have also founded a political action committee called BlogPac which aims to harness the collective power of the hundreds of pro-Democrat political blogs out there.

AlterNet met with Armstrong in Washington, D.C. to talk about how he started his MyDD blog, got involved in the Dean campaign, and why he sees political bloggers as a growing force within the Democratic Party.

Were you involved in politics before you went online?

Jerome Armstrong: Not much. I voted, that was it. Political participation wasn't on my radar, really. I did some field organizing in in Portland, Oregon in the early '90s. What really got me going was in 2000 when I was working as a day trader. I started following the Florida story online. I'd go into Salon's discussion forums and check out what people were saying. I started my own blog, MyDD, in June 2001. I'd send what I was writing over to BuzzFlash and they'd link to it. Here I was, working as a day trader, and pretty soon 200 or 300 people were reading my articles on the Bush Administration. 300 people isn't that many, but I saw the potential for where this could go right away.

I started getting very interested in elections. 2001, like 2005, was an "off year" for elections. The only big ones going on at the time were the New York City mayor's race, and the the New Jersey and Virginia governors' races, just like this year. I was pretty much the only one blogging about those elections in depth, and people started dropping in on MyDD to see what was going on.

When did you start thinking about the 2004 presidential race?

Armstrong: Well, Kerry was the first one I started hearing about in early 2002, but I wasn't too enthusiastic about him. I read about Howard Dean in an article -- I think the article just mentioned his name -- and searched for his campaign. He didn't even have a site up, just one for his PAC; Fund for a Healthy America. I got in touch with his campaign and found out that Dean was making a trip that May out to the West Coast, where I was living at the time, and so I met up with him in Seattle, where he was speaking to the King County Democrats. I got there early, and Howard was the only one there, so I introduced myself and we talked.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Jan Frel has worked as an editor for AlterNet and TomPaine.com, and occasionally posts entries on MyDD.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
2004 is over
Posted by: VAGreen on Jun 16, 2005 7:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anybody But Bush had its chance in 2004. Could Alternet please go back to talking about parties besides the Democratic Party? I've seen the same thing at The Nation. It's basically turned into a magazine about the Democrats.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 2004 is over Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: 2004 is over Posted by: VAGreen
Blogfather?
Posted by: Campesino on Jun 16, 2005 11:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everybody in the blogosphere knows that the Blogfather is Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit. That's been used for years

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time a new party is founded. The IMPEACH Party?
Posted by: Meremark on Jun 16, 2005 11:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are strong signs it is time a new party is founded.

New internet technology is cohering and has far-reaching, empowering implications. The invention more parallels telegraphy and photography (circa 1830s) than it is like broadcasting (radio and TV) in that telegraphy (enabled telephony) is point-to-point and two-way, whereas broadcast is central (intelligence)-to-all and is one-way.
[Indeed, we are ready to cut broadcasting out of politics, having seen how debilitating it is. So: Ban paid political broadcast ads, exactly as paid tobacco broadcast ads are banned.
Same reasons: It is addictive, (nicotine, brainwashing), and it is a public health hazard, (cardio-pulmonary illness, mental perception illness).
Same recourse: Tobacco and politicians keep access to print, the Press, billboards, p.o.s., apparel, sides of race cars, whatever. Broadcast (true) NEWS can carry smokers smoking, politicians speaking -- so they can still be 'on TV,' only they have to make a public appearance for that.
Same rights: Constitutional Freedom of Press is NOT freedom of broadcasting, (spatial-perception brain processing is NOT same as temporal-perception brain processing); we already ban (7 ?) words, speech, images, references in broadcast that are not banned in Press.
Some result: Politicians would not need to collect billions of dollars of campaign donations to 'buy' TV 'time.']

Signs show We, the People, are troubled and disagree majorly -- evidence when we talk to folks, listen to folks, read what's going around -- against the rigged installation of a POTUS who is son of a former POTUS, ahead of the people's favor. As was done when Adams Jr. got 'in office' ahead of defrauded Andrew Jackson whose case led to inventing the political (nominating) convention and founding the Democrat Party (circa 1830s).

Signs in the sky. The planets have come around to the same position as last time, about 10 years after planet Uranus has passed in front of planet Neptune. This is the slowest cycle among earh's peers, (forget Pluto), taking approx. 172 earth-orbits, (years). Uranus conjuncted Neptune in 1995 and 1823 (only times for America. Prior in 1649, 1473, 1296, etc.) Last planet time like now was circa 1830s.

[FYI, Neptune discovered in 1846 near 25 degrees Aquarius, completes one orbit and returns to that point for the first time in 2009.]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Grass roots
Posted by: Anne on Jun 16, 2005 1:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Grass roots" tends to be one of those phrases thrown around by both parties to prove they're not out of touch with The Peepul.

Thanks to the internet, and Dean's loyalty to his own base of support, the Democratic "leadership" is increasingly finding itself face-to-face with the actual "grass-roots" of their party. They seem to be finding it a bit of a shock.

(Count me as one of those who doesn't let a day go by without checking MyDD. I don't read Kos, but I've read MyDD since I first discovered political blogs in '02.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dailykos the most popular?
Posted by: maxpayne on Jun 16, 2005 7:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now don't get me wrong. I appreciate that they're posting lots of truthful stuff. However, as one poster there put it, dailykos is more like a cheerleading site and less focused on actually building a solid Democratic Party. Hell, they'll even accept some Tom, Dick, and Harry Democrat like Ben Nelson of NE despite the fact that he's pretty much close to Zell Miller, a turncoat Democrat talibanized into the GOP tent. There are better blogs out there that are truly progressive and focus on progressive ideology like www.davidsirota.com (a sturdy Montana progressive which can be applied nationally) . Even moderate blogs such as "Mount Blogmore" which is open to people of all strips can prove more meaningful (Imagine a Democrat getting back to a closer race in the Dakotas). The problem I have with dailykos is it relies on polls and is always in a waiting like state for some major GOP operative like Tom Delay to fall out. As Thomas Frank would perfectly put it, true progressive/liberals are tired of the current D.C. Democrats cheering and waiting for conservatives to just push their lunacy a bit more hoping that they can then step in and Democrats will be back in power even when it's obvious that it just doesn't work. They would be better off focusing more on bringing out the real beauty of the progressive ideology and encouraging more people to frame issues accordingly and point out the strengths and weaknesses of Democrats issue by issue rather than wasting time just bashing Bush and GOP, while they are right to do so, and making it an "Anybody But Bush/GOP" site.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Possibly, but...
Posted by: Tergenev on Jun 17, 2005 8:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone in the blogosphere also knows that "blogfather" has been converted into a generic term that indicates the person who functioned as one's intellectual and organizational mentor upon entering the blogosphere. The method to determine whether one is referring to the individual rather than the generic term is, as always in English, a matter of following the rules for proper names. "Blogfather" (capitalized) naturally refers to the rather deluded individual at InstaPundit. "blogfather", with the lower case 'b', is the generic term, and is clearly how kos refers to Jerome Armstrong.

Please try to keep up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]