COMMENTS: 42
Birthday Bashed
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
The gathering -- featuring a brass band, a color guard and military re-enactors -- was ostensibly the main event in a nationwide 230th birthday celebration to honor Army veterans. To several hundred protesters who arrived to crash the party, however, it looked like a thinly veiled attempt to recruit more bodies during a time when the Army has missed its recruiting goals for four months straight and Americans are increasingly viewing the Iraq war as a mistake.
"The Army has a right to celebrate its birthday," said Vietnam veteran and Veterans for Peace member Winston Warfield, "but this is a military circus."
Most of the displays were clearly calculated to appeal to a younger audience. The event began with four members of a parachute team jumping from a Blackhawk helicopter 4,000 feet above the crowd. Around the common, kids in baseball caps and teens in basketball jerseys gawked at grenade launchers and military vehicles, including a brightly painted "Super Hum-Vee" and an Army truck filled with video games.
Holding a pro-war rally in Cambridge signals a new level of aggression -- or desperation -- for the Army, akin to staging an peace march on the parade ground at West Point. Nicknamed the "People's Republic" for its left-leaning politics, Cambridge ranks with Berkeley and Madison in its anti-war fervor. Many of those who came out to demonstrate decried the Army's use of the city's image for an event they did not find out about until a week before it happened.
"It's interesting that there was no attempt to hold a birthday celebration for the 225th or 220th anniversary," said resident Phyllis Gately, "but now that we are in the midst of a war they come into the People's Republic and flex their muscles."
Many students also came out to protest in an area known for its academic institutions. "Not only is this area strongly against the war," said Alison Ramer, a 19-year-old student from nearby Lesley College, "but this is an area for students and young people who are directly being targeted by recruiters." Ramer came with the youth group Boston Mobilization, which fielded white T-shirts hand-lettered in red with the words "You Can't Bribe Us To Die" on the front and "You Can't Bribe Us To Kill" on the back. (The army recently inked a $100 million advertising contract and upped its signing bonuses to a maximum of $20,000.)
The speakers on the stage, which included Acting Undersecretary of the Army Raymond DuBois, lost no opportunity to sweeten the pot with patriotic comparisons. "We stand at the very spot where the United States all-volunteer army gathered to march and expel the British from Boston in 1775," said DuBois. "There are modern-day enemies of freedom who did not want Afghanistan and Iraq to have the same ideals that were begun right here."
Whenever the microphone fell silent, however, the crowd was treated to chants seeking to remind them that Washington's army of liberation has become Bush's army of torture and occupation. As the parachute team landed on a baseball field, the backstop was lined with protesters chanting, "Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, U.S. torture has got to go."
During DuBois' remarks, protesters standing within a cordon of black uniformed police officers near the stage chanted "No blood for oil, U.S. off Iraqi soil." As Cambridge Mayor Michael Sullivan laid a wreath at the base of a military monument, they completely drowned out the sound of a lone trumpeter playing "Taps" with chants of "Bush is still lying, soldiers are still dying."
Most of the speakers did their best to ignore the chants, though some were clearly rattled. DuBois, however, directly addressed the protesters by bizarrely comparing them with the soldiers -- as if trying out a new recruitment message more suited to the environment. "We are gathered here as the spiritual descendants of the raggedy band who gathered here to do what? To protest -- and to pledge themselves to honor and liberty. That band of protesters, that first all-volunteer formation is today's US Army."
DuBois used the term "all-volunteer" to describe the army at least four times during his brief remarks. That may have been an attempt to head off persistent rumors that the military is considering a reintroduction of the draft (including a hoax email going around saying the draft would begin on Wednesday). Asked after the ceremony whether he could promise that there would be no draft, DuBois said, "I personally promise it for myself, but then again I think that decision is above my pay grade." (Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has also gone on record opposing a draft.)
The undersecretary made no bones about the fact that the birthday celebration was, at least in part, a recruitment effort. "We recruit 365 days a year. If my message has a resonance about the importance of national service, so be it." As for the demonstrators, DuBois dismissed them out of hand. "I came back from Vietnam and saw protesters," he said, "and this is chump change."
The several hundred protesters present at the hastily organized demonstration was a far cry from the hundreds of thousands who mobilized for peace demonstrations before Bush's re-election and the parliamentary elections in Iraq. However, those who crashed the military's birthday may now actually represent a solid majority of Americans. A Gallup poll this week showed that almost 6 in 10 of respondents favored a withdrawal of some or all of the troops form Iraq, with almost 3 in 10 favoring a total withdrawal. Another poll by ABC News and the Washington Post this week found that 58% of respondents said the Iraq war was not worth fighting.
"Around here there was a downturn in numbers [at protests] after the election, but Kerry's defeat didn't disorganize activists, it energized them," says Mike Prokosch, spokesman for the local coalition, United for Justice with Peace. His group recently met in a regional conference with other activists to plan their strategy for upcoming months, which includes a "counter-recruiting" effort to warn students of recruiters' false promises and tell them how to take their names off of call lists. Another campaign targets members of Congress, he says, noting that several Republican Congressmen have recently come out against the war.
"The numbers may be down, but the focus is up, and the support is way up," says Prokosch. "It's really a matter of mobilizing the majority and making their will felt rather than swimming upstream."
If that is true, the the "raggedy band" of protesters, not the slick military circus, may be the true heir to Washington's army of freedom.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thx1138 on Jun 16, 2005 5:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's see how things go if the Neocons and the Pentagon succumbs to Israels insistence that we continue fighting it's enemies so it can continue it's apartheid policies in Palestine and invade Iran, reinstitue a draft, and send not only young males, but young females to serve while the wealthy and the rich find loopholes for their kids to aviod their so-called "patriotic duty." Where are the Bush children? Any onf them from the entire family serve in uniform? Hmmm. Makes one wonder...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam
Posted by: kww355
» RE: Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam
Posted by: kmeyer
» RE: Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam - Bush Senior
Posted by: nanobubble
» RE: Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam - Bush Senior
Posted by: gopbarfbag
» RE: Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam - Bush Senior
Posted by: Iamnotafruittree
» RE: Iraq Nam Again ! Incoming- friendly fire= resistance fatigue?
Posted by: SgtBuddha
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nanobubble on Jun 16, 2005 6:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
by Justin M
Email: just1pin (nospam) ureach.com (unverified!) 15 Jun 2005
CAMBRIDGE, MA - The American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts condemns the arrests today of peaceful protesters by Cambridge police officers during an event on the Cambridge Common to mark the founding of the United States Army. The organization also criticized the police for forcing people to move into a "pen" if they were expressing views critical of U.S. policies.
...
According to witnesses, people wishing to leave the pen were forced by police to leave the Common. Observers said that one man who was simply holding a sign was made to move and the police also forced photographers from the area if they looked like protesters."
full article
Shout-out to Pat!
Peace in the middle east
-Nanobubble
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ACLU of Massachusetts Condemns Arrest of Peaceful Protesters
Posted by: jingoist
» RE: ACLU of Massachusetts Condemns Arrest of Peaceful Protesters
Posted by: nanobubble
» RE: Is this some kind of freudian twist in your mind?
Posted by: gopbarfbag
» RE: the last post is directed to jingoist
Posted by: gopbarfbag
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nakis on Jun 16, 2005 9:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the author that the Army does deserve to celebrate anniversaries but the 230th?
In a time where enlistment numbers are significantly low?
It's like giving that stadium a military name. They are selling the military as a product. Not patriotism. The enlistment numbers show that even bonus's and educational help do not outweigh the peoples recognition that enlistment isn't about patriotic duty (or even a way out of poverty) but about being a corporate hitman.
No offense to those in the military. I support our military. It's just the people who order our military around I stand in opposition to and why they send our soldiers into danger.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Betsy L. Angert on Jun 16, 2005 9:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is disquieting as are all recent military actions, at least to me!
The use of verbiage and image to persuade is pervasive under King George II. The Pentagon trumpets as the President does.
Recruiting those that are reluctant to serve is costly, as is war. The price we are paying for this ill-advised, foolhardy, and self-imposed war is outrageous. Lives, limbs, reason, and respect are lost.
I recently wrote two pieces on recruitment. I invite you to please visit my words and share your thoughts.
The first missive discusses the reasons for recruitment shortfalls.
RELUCTANT WARRIORS, RECRUITMENT SHORTFALLS ©
The second looks at the idea of a Volunteer Armed Service and questions this truth.
VOLUNTEER ARMED FORCES OR VICTIMS OF VOUCHERS©
Be-Think
Betsy L. Angert
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: crz53 on Jun 16, 2005 11:57 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That being said, I'd like to throw out a radical question that will, no doubt, offend some people here. Why aren't progressives demanding that every soldier in Iraq be held accountable for his or her role in this abomination. If the war in Iraq is truly an unjust, immoral war of aggression (which it is), then why aren't we saying to every person involved, from Rummy on down to the privates in Fallujah - "What you are doing is not heroic, it is wrong".
I understand that these people took an oath to be loyal soldiers. But there are times where doing what is right means not honoring an oath. I don't accept the argument that they are just following orders. No one owns your body but yourself. Soldiers can disobey. Granted, they might be thrown in jail, they might be kicked out of the military dishonorably. One could argue that both scenarios are morally superior to being an accomplice to war crimes. I think that anyone involved in the illegal war of aggression in Iraq is doing just that.
I also understand that most of the soldiers in Iraq probabaly joined the military with no intentions of killing civilians or even going to Iraq. That makes no difference. No matter how noble or honorable their motives going in, you can't separate the people from their actions. The fact of the matter is that the war in Iraq is both illegal and immoral; and any one involved with it is a guilty party, not a hero.
I don't support American soldiers in Iraq because I don't support their actions there. It is impossible to seperate one from the other. Don't misunderstand me, I wish them no harm, and I want them to come home safely and quickly. But I cannot support them in what they are doing in Iraq.
I realize that this goes completely against the conventional wisdom that regards all American soldiers as heros. I think that's bullshit. Everyone has a choice to do what is right or to do what is wrong. Soldiers are no more exempt from that decision that anyone else. Unless we can stop separating soldiers from war and people from their actions, progressives will never be able form a truly articulate and effective response to the warmonger's call to "Support our troops".
- Mike Lorenz
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Being a soldier doesn't make you a hero
Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: Being a soldier doesn't make you a hero
Posted by: gopbarfbag
» RE: Being a soldier doesn't make you a hero
Posted by: nanobubble
» RE: Being a soldier doesn't make you a hero
Posted by: girleagle1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Campesino on Jun 17, 2005 9:57 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Feel the Love
Posted by: nanobubble
» RE: Feel the Love
Posted by: girleagle1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: girleagle1 on Jun 18, 2005 6:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Our Militaary Protects us
Posted by: Sandra
» RE: Our Militaary Protects us
Posted by: girleagle1
» RE: Our Militaary Protects us
Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: Our Militaary Protects us
Posted by: apodapa
» RE: Our Militaary Protects us
Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: Our Militaary Protects us
Posted by: apodapa
» RE: Our Militaary Protects us
Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: Our Militaary Protects us
Posted by: crz53
» RE: Our Militaary Protects us
Posted by: girleagle1
» RE: Our Militaary Protects us
Posted by: bonapartist
» Genocide in Iraq?
Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: Genocide in Iraq?
Posted by: gaspass
» Civilized Warfare
Posted by: crz53
» RE: Civilized Warfare
Posted by: gaspass
» RE: Genocide in Iraq?
Posted by: gopbarfbag
» RE: Genocide in Iraq?
Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: Our Militaary Protects us
Posted by: crz53
» RE: Our Militaary Protects us by slaughtering innocent women, children and elderly people
Posted by: larojoes
Are U.S. Pot Laws The Root Cause of Mexican Drug Violence?
GOP and Dems Agree: Crack/Powder Cocaine Disparity Unjust and Needs Reform
The FBI Could Be Watching You on Facebook




