Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Pentagon's Manpower Crisis

By Paul Rieckhoff, Huffington Post. Posted June 10, 2005.


Military recruiting numbers are deep into the Porta-Potty. The all-volunteer military has been run into the ground -- and now it's broken.
Advertisement

The Pentagon on Wednesday postponed by more than a week the release of military recruiting figures for May, as the Army and Marine Corps struggle to attract new troops amid the Iraq war. The military services had routinely provided most recruiting statistics for a given month on the first business day of the next month. Air Force Lt. Col. Ellen Krenke, a Pentagon spokeswoman, said the May numbers for the active-duty and reserve components of the all-volunteer military will be released on June 10. - Reuters, June 1

The Pentagon is continuing to fight the war in Iraq, by controlling the way it is perceived at home in the press. I have a plea to the people of the press who read this: PLEASE DO NOT LET THIS SLIP OUT OF THE NEWS! This is a very important story -- much more important than the Michael Jackson trial -- (the top story right now on cnn.com, intentionally not hyperlinked).

Military recruiting numbers are deep into the Porta-Potty. We have a manpower crisis on our hands. The Army is already 16 percent short of its year-to-date goal. Mark my word, when the Pentagon does release the May figures they are going to be bad--real bad. The Army will miss its numbers for the fourth straight month in a row.

They were short last month by a whopping 42 percent. Let's break that percentage down. For April, the active-duty Army was short of its target of 6,600 by 3,379. Think about that. 3,379 short. It's not like we need millions of bodies here. Just 3,379. We are at war, we have a population of over 290 million people, and we can't get 3,379 people to join the fight? Wow.

We would have an easier time convincing parents to send their kids to the Neverland ranch for a sleepover party.

The all-volunteer military has been run into the ground and is now broken. Don't let the Pentagon deceive you. There is indeed a manpower shortage. A "special skills draft" could be right around the corner. All you doctors, computer experts, pilots, police officers and firefighters had better take notice.

But the Pentagon and White House continue to piss on our heads and tell us that it's raining:

"Military recruiting is instrumental to our readiness and merits the earliest release of data. But at the same time, this information must be reasonably scrutinized and explained to the public, which deserves the fullest insight into military performance in this important area," Air Force Lt. Col. Ellen Krenke said.

Huh? This lady must have graduated from the Donald Rumsfeld School for the Intentionally Disingenuous.

This is total bullshit. What the statement really means is that the Pentagon has a strategy to spin the bad numbers and release them when they want to. This entire story is an example of damage control to the fullest. Krenke and her buddies in the Pentagon have the power of a total stranglehold on information given out to the media. They used that power to delay the release of the data until today, June 10.

Wondering why June 10?

Because today is a Friday. That is always the best day of the week to release bad news. On Friday most reporters are leaving work early, going to softball games, or doing time for protecting sources. The story about the Army missing their numbers will run on Saturday, June 11 (probably on page 12, with the names of the dead), when nobody is reading the newspaper or watching TV. It is by far the lowest newspaper circulation day of the week. So by the time Monday the 13th rolls around, and everybody is back to reading the paper and watching the news, America will have a much different, much bigger story to be force-fed, like the latest development in the case of the "runaway bride."

And you won't even notice that we don't have enough people to fight our wars.

Digg!

Paul Rieckhoff is the executive director and founder of Operation Truth, and a veteran of the war in Iraq, where he served as a platoon leader with the Third Infantry Division.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Friday bad news
Posted by: dcarmack on Jun 10, 2005 11:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't they always save really bad news for Friday evening so it cant be on the news all week long?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Friday bad news Posted by: rubymydear
Military service is no longer survivable
Posted by: revsuzanne on Jun 10, 2005 12:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Rieckhoff's organization is important and I think that it can bring the big issues to the foreground. Between the grinding overdeployment of current troops to the point of dysfunction, lack of vehicle armor, and the use of depleted uranium weapons to dump hundreds of tons of radioactive dust on the deployment zones for our troops to soak up, military service is simply not survivable. This is even aggravated by the fact that benefits are being denied to profoundly disabled soldiers on the smallest technicalities. We have several hundred veterans from the first Gulf War now disabled by multiple cancers from the DU. The human rights abuses being endured by our own soldiers and their families are as insane as the lies that dragged us into this war. Why should our young people die to put even MORE money into Bush, Cheney and Rumsfield's pockets?
I want to see class action suits being filed against Bush and his cronies by the families of servicemen. I want to see Halliburton-KBR sued by their employees who were sent to Iraq without being informed about the DU dust they would be soaking up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But Don't Ask and Don't Tell
Posted by: thirdmg on Jun 10, 2005 2:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In view of this critical manpower shortage, wouldn't you think the military's absurd anti-gay "don't ask, don't tell" policy would be repealed?

A study done by the Government Accountability Office showed that more than 10,000 service members have been discharged over the last 10 years under the policy and that it has cost taxpayers more than $200 million to recruit replacements for those who were discharged.

And now the absurdity has reached new levels: a May 19, 2005, article in the gay news media reports that "The Congress may grant 'special immigrant status' to 50 foreign translators who were hired by the US military to replace Americans fired by the Pentagon after they came out."

And the radical right calls us ideologues!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mr
Posted by: Peace on Jun 13, 2005 7:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US could always introduce a selective draft. Family members of congress could go to Iraq as members of the military. This would be a good way of ensuring that members of congress are kept up to date with the situation in Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mr Posted by: Erin
» RE: Mr Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: Mr. is RIGHT! Posted by: Scott
» remembers Vietnam Posted by: margdw
So this is BAD News?
Posted by: asque on Jun 13, 2005 8:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suspect that most of us would be even more worried if thier plans to reshape the world had not stalled at the very first step. Bush has definitely demostrated the limits of military action and therefore finds his agenda limited by the reality he has created.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

VOLUNTEER ARMED FORCES OR VICTIMS OF VOUCHERS, RECRUITMENT SHORTFALLS
Posted by: Betsy L. Angert on Jun 13, 2005 9:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Paul Rieckhoff . . .

Wow! I had no idea that these figures were not released in a timely manner, though I am not surprised. I too have written of incidents in which the Pentagon/Whitehouse has waited to disclose reports that could be detrimental to the Bush Band agenda.

Propaganda and postponements are the mantra in the world of Bush 43.

I offer two recent essays that I wrote on the recruitment issue and hope that you will share your thoughts on these.
VOLUNTEER ARMED FORCES OR VICTIMS OF VOUCHERS ©
RELUCTANT WARRIORS, RECRUITMENT SHORTFALLS ©

Betsy L. Angert
Be-Think

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Specialty Draft? Red State boys or Blue? Screw Darwin!
Posted by: Violetflame11 on Jun 13, 2005 2:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's right, start drafting those bright young God fearing boys in the red states, for the holy war against evil. Oh wait...most of those boys are dumb, poorly educated, untrained idiots...oh no...if this is a special sevices draft, looking for skilled men with intelligence and education...why they'll have to scour the blue states for them afterall!
There are no cows to tip in the desert. I doubt that camels would tip so easily. No neat rows of corn to hide in either. Maybe Darwin was full of crap afterall. Good for Kansas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

remembers Vietnam
Posted by: margdw on Jun 14, 2005 9:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We had a favorite poster during Vietnam that
seem appropriate for today.... it was, "What if they
gave a war and nobody came?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hmmm
Posted by: manustrium on Jun 14, 2005 9:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
somehow i don't think berating red staters is a good way to promote the progressive agenda. there are progressives in red states too, i'll b it a minority, and it can b tuff to talk cut through the illogic of many peoples' political attitudes, but when i talk to "reds" i usually try to stick to the issues and trully try to figure out how they built their opinions. critisizing their lives, homes, education, and economic surroundings never really seems to lead to many productive changes, anymore than moving to a blue state would cause any real changes in my home state.
signed,
a very offended, college educated, progressively thinking oklahoman

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:oops Posted by: manustrium
Draft Beer?
Posted by: Michiganman on Jun 14, 2005 6:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How the hell will they manage to spin the Draft? If a draft doesn't wake people up then..?..no people will start to stand up if that happens..I suppose the rove crew will paint a SELECTIVE draft as the same firemen that were involved in 9 11, and a few cops that's all, rummy will wave off the notion it's anything to cause concern or more than a few ...ahh 10,000's.... or so.
I can't believe this is happening, we've got to get out of this ridiculous war! How can we spin that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yasmin
Posted by: LatinLiberal on Jun 16, 2005 11:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I never knew about these numbers. It is just one more thing added to the list of alarming and dangerous things the current Bush administration is doing. Thank you for sharing this article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They are getting desperate
Posted by: Dr. T on Jun 19, 2005 10:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a mental health professional working at one of the service's bases where recruits are trained, I assume that the recruiters really are getting quite desperate. There has been a marked influx of recruits with significant psychiatric histories that are being told not to report them. They all present with essentially the exact same story, so I highly doubt they are all lying. Naturally, once they start boot camp the problems become evident, but even then there is pressure to keep them in training (which I ignore). I would also say that my experience with service member's as a whole (including my personal experience) suggests that the typical recruiter lies and cheats there way to getting someone enlisted. One hears constantly how folks were promised certain jobs or educational benefits, which NEVER pan out. It is very satisfying to see the recent activity on the part of parents in addressing the issue of recruiters in schools.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]