Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

On the Wrong Side of 'Friendly Fire'

By David Phinney, CorpWatch. Posted June 9, 2005.


Tension and confusion are on the rise in Iraq after a group of American security contractors were thrown in jail under suspicion of shooting at the U.S. Marines in Fallujah.
On the Wrong Side of 'Friendly Fire'
On the Wrong Side of 'Friendly Fire'
Advertisement

Late one Saturday afternoon in May, a group of armed American private security guards in white Ford trucks and an Excursion sports utility vehicle barreled through the battle-scarred streets of Fallujah, Iraq. The group was a security convoy from Zapata Engineering, a company hired to destroy enemy ammunition, such as shells and bombs, in Iraq. As they swerved through traffic, the men heard gunfire they could not identify.

Snipers still regularly attack civilians and troops patrolling Fallujah, despite the fact that the US bombed the city heavily in April and November 2004 to flush out suspected rebels.

According to the Zapata contractors, one of their vehicles veered left on a road leading to a Marine checkpoint. It ran over the spike strip in the road near the guard house and the tire went flat. The anxious contractors jumped into action and put on a spare. Within minutes, they began rolling again.

A Marine captain brought the convoy to a halt. Had anyone in the convoy shot at the guard tower, he asked. Negative, said a convoy member.

But the captain was not convinced. Sixteen American and three Iraqi security contractors in the Zapata convoy were then taken into custody presumably on suspicion of shooting at the Marine tower. They were thrown in jail on the evening of May 28.

Earlier that day, May 28, the soldiers recounted, "receiving small arms fire from gunman in several late-model trucks and sport utility vehicles" at approximately 2 P.M. "Marines also say they witnessed passengers in the vehicles firing at and near civilian cars on the street," the Marines' report continues.

According to a Marines press statement, "Three hours later, another Marine observation post was fired on by gunmen from vehicles matching the description of those involved in the earlier attack. Marines saw passengers in the vehicles firing out the windows." This second account coincides with the arrest of the Zapata men.

Today the contractors have been set free and each side tells a different story. Contractors and their families feel they were unfairly arrested and, once in the military prisons, they say they were treated with disrespect.

Was this simply a case of "friendly fire" -- the term used when soldiers of the same flag shoot at one another by mistake? Is the confusion just a product of the "fog of war"? Or does it reflect a larger problem in Iraq, where the uniformed military works side-by-side with an estimated 25,000 armed civilian security guards?

The contractors are either paid by the Pentagon or by reconstruction contractors. Some wear camouflage gear but many dress casually and carry high-tech weaponry in an environment teeming with armed attackers who also eschew military uniforms. Like their enemies, private military contractors also travel in marked military vehicles.

The contractors are hired to work in cooperation with the military officers but many are paid far more. On top of these differences, the contractors tend follow a very different set of rules than their military counterparts.

"Roughed Up" in Fallujah

All 19 Zapata men were confined to small cells, measuring six feet by eight feet, and dressed in orange prison garb. They were imprisoned for three days without being charged or provided with legal counsel. Night and day, they listened to suspected Iraqi fighters held nearby. The contractors say they ate the same bad food that the Iraqi prisoners were served and were forced to urinate in bottles in their cells.

However, not all accounts of their capture line up. According to some of the contractors and their wives, the Marines also roughed up the security contractors before taking them to jail. They say they slammed the contractors down on the concrete one by one, bruising some pretty badly.

Several wives of the security contractors, back in the United States, waiting for their daily phone calls from their husbands in Iraq, began thinking the worst when the calls stopped coming.

"There were all these families sitting at home not knowing what's going on," says Jana Crowder, who runs the Web site, American Contractors In Iraq.com from her home in Johnson City, Tennessee. Crowder, who started the site as a support network, has heard from a number of concerned wives of the Zapata contractors.

Who is Zapata?

Zapata Engineering began its work in Iraq on September 30, 2003 as one of five companies originally hired under a $200 million contract to supervise the destruction and storage of U.S military ammunition worldwide.

Under a new contract, awarded on April 16, 2004 by the Army Corps of Engineers, a $43.8 million task order sent Zapata to Iraq to manage captured enemy ammunition(CEA). Some would be destroyed, while the rest was put away for safe-keeping until a new Iraq government could take charge.

The original assignment included $2.8 million for the salaries of a five person team, which broke down to remarkably high and controversial salaries.While $850,000 was earmarked for the company's overhead, insurance and profit costs, a single liaison officer in Iraq was budgeted for a $350,000 salary. The other four employees, identified as project managers, were budgeted for annual pay of $275,000, according to a recent Winston-Salem Journal report.

A similar investigation by the Center for Public Integrity calculated the actual salaries (based on a 84-hour work week) for the liaison officer at closer to $700,000 for the year and the managers at just over $520,000.

Zapata Engineering is one among scores of military contractors in Iraq that perform duties ranging from cooking food to conducting interrogations. The company was started in 1991 in North Carolina by Manuel Zapata, a Chilean-born immigrant. Initially he worked for contacts he made while serving as head of an international business development committee at the Charlotte Chamber in the mid-1980s.

Zapata soon discovered that the company qualified for preferential treatment in government contracts because, as a Hispanic citizen, he is considered a minority. "A project manager told me about it," Zapata told the Charlotte Business Journal at the time. "I had no idea it existed."

In 1996 this status allowed his company to win a 10-year, $32.5 million environmental engineering project involving military base closures with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Today the company has worked in Hawaii, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia, as well as China and Saipan. Many of these jobs involved the destruction and storage of unexploded bombs and outdated weaponry.

Other companies involved in the destruction and storage of captured enemy ammunition include Parsons Corp., EOD Technology Inc., Foster Wheeler Environmental Corp. (now Tetra Tech Inc.) and USA Environmental Inc., each of whom received a $65 million task order for initial operations in Iraq that were later increased to $66.9 million.

Although it is not a private security contractor, Zapata is allowed to subcontract or directly hire qualified security personnel as needed under provisions of their agreement with the Army Corps of Engineers, according to corps spokeswoman Kim Gillespie.

Digg!

David Phinney is a journalist and broadcaster based in Washington, DC, whose work has appeared in the Los Angeles Times, New York Times and on ABC and PBS.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
War in Iraq: wider picture
Posted by: dearkitty on Jun 9, 2005 2:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This story gives some idea: if US contractors are treated like this, then how about Iraqi civilians??

Some more sides of the Iraq war here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: War in Iraq: wider picture Posted by: jingoist
Jail all of the contractors (mercenaries)!!!
Posted by: gopbarfbag on Jun 9, 2005 4:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I like the term mercenaries instead of contractors,, and if they get killed, injured, or jailed for crimes they committ, so fucking what? The thing that pissed me off most about the four mercenaries who were killed and hung on a bridge and burned was that the U.S. media treated them as if they were patriotic heros. They were not. They got what they deserved. The truth about mercenaries is that they are paid huge sums of money for their work and my opinion is that any person who goes to Iraq to work for profit and gets killed in the process took a risk and got caught. No tears from me, actually I get some kind of smug satisfaction when mercenaries die. Just like a guy who deals or smuggles drugs; the risk is that you may die or get thrown in jail. Fuck the contractors, it's hard enough accepting that our men and women in uniform are caught in this war AND I wish them peace. safety, and comfort. I cry for soldiers in uniform who suffer. Then again, some of our soldiers I find utterly despicable (Lyndie England, snipers, gleeful killers, et al). It's hard to believe that regular American people are so bloodthirsty and cruel. Contractors can go to hell in the gulag of Abu Graihb or Gitmo, or San Quneton with the Bush Mafia and the neo-cons, for all I care about them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: JINGOIST
Posted by: Pepper on Jun 9, 2005 4:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, my goodness, I get it!!!!! Your a disinformation specialist. Your whole objective is to dissemble. Thanks, I almost missed it. Hahahaha

As for the story, its typical of what is happening here. First we have a war for oil and greed and raping and pillaging the taxpayer and then we use a mercenary army to conduct that war. I am shocked at the cry baby's that they are using? War is like that. If you get in the middle of one your going to get shot at, P-U-L-E-E-S-E, tell them to quit whining for their $200,000 per year tax free I might add as long as they stay longer than 18 mos.

The military isn't much better. The good soldiers have refused to fight in an illegal war and stayed stateside. The ones who are there and enjoying it are the ones who will be the next mercenaries for the next private company making millions if not billions off the US. Not much difference lately between them.
Like our politicians, not much difference between repub and dem lately. They both voted for more repressive legislation under the newly reinstalled patriot act. I think we are seeing more and more nazi's emerging. Very interesting to watch. I will also look for the underground to start emerging as well. Now that will be really fun to watch. LOL

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: jingoist
Hey, JINGOIST!
Posted by: bamage on Jun 9, 2005 4:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jingoist, you ought to stick to your usual formula - you know, this story doesn't matter because BILL CLINTON did something far worse! You are so predictable it'd be laughable if it weren't so pitiable. I'm trying to imagine the mindset of somebody who spends as much time as you do anxiously awaiting the next AlterNet story so you can vomit your neo-con/libertarian hogwash ad nauseum in order to impress yourself w/ your "blogging" ability. Get a life. You're pathetic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hey, JINGOIST! Posted by: jingoist
» RE: Hey, JINGOIST! Posted by: jpme
» RE: Hey, JINGOIST! Posted by: gopbarfbag
RE: JINGOIST
Posted by: blue3zero on Jun 9, 2005 5:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone who doesn't think like you is a leftist coward, committing treason and condoning sedition. I guess that about follows the party line comrade.
Wrap yourself in the flag, surround yourself with the ghosts of brave men, and then try and destroy the very thing that they gave their lives for. My question is "Why would you want to turn this country into a religion based facist state"? Are you so terrified by other people having dissenting views on things that you can't sleep at night? Also, lets cover the

"Brave young soldiers doing us all an incalculable favor by killing terrorists bastards "over there"",

if you don't have anything that can prove your point just keep repeating the same wrong thing over and over. Let me explain something to you jingo, not every arab and/or muslim is a terrorist. Like you, their are people with extreme views (very misguided, extreme views) all over the world, and like you they spew hatred every chance they get. The majority of people just want the oppurtunity to live, raise a family, and give their children a better chance then they had. When you take that from them, kill their children, bomb their homes they get pissed off. I would be against anyone doing it here no matter what their justification is/was or how much they lied to get it started.

And before you start with the leftist coward crap. I was in the first gulf war, and served proudly in the Army, but when something goes against everything I believe in as an American, it is my duty as a patriot to stand up and say the emperor isn't wearing any clothes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: jpme
Remove 'civilian contractors'
Posted by: Wacre on Jun 9, 2005 7:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about we leave the fighting (if we should be there at all, which is another argument entirely) to the armed forces; which is their purpose, after all.

To have so many armed individuals roaming about just muddies the waters and increases the likelihood (as if the odds of dying suddenly and very violently in Iraq needed increasing) of more 'friendly fire' incidents.

BTW, does anyone else have difficulty with the concept of 'friendly fire'? If you're shooting at me I suspect that we can safely throw the 'friendly' part out the window.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mercenaries
Posted by: turdfurguson on Jun 9, 2005 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
hahaha, maybe the Marines are pissed that these unaccountable contracters go over there, can come and go as they please, make zillions of dollars at taxpayer expense, while marines can't even scrounge for adequate armor ect...
Wasn't Zapata Oil the name of Bush Sr's oil company?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mercenaries Posted by: Voicedude
Remember When
Posted by: nakis on Jun 9, 2005 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember how low and insulting it was that the British used mercenaries in the Revolutionary War? How we we the people of the land who fought (against the original people too) to gain our independence over our land.
How terrible it was for our adversaries to use foriegn guns for hire instead of those loyal to their state and cause?

We're in another nations land, using mercenaries are exhorbitant prices. Why? Because the payoff is higher than the cost. The payoff? Democracy? Um, I don't think so. The wealth of Iraq's resources. Her oil and her people. We feel good dishing out billions because we know the trillions are already flowing back. Just off the change in balance sheets in the billions Iraq had under Saddam Hussien already paid off our wealthy elite. We're just making sure to set up the money lines for years to come.
Mercenaries are just one of the evils of class warfare we are willing to use to get to "eat everyone elses lunch".

What a wonderful tool war is. Selling souls and bartering lives of the innocent and brave and the patriotic for power and money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: emember When Posted by: itchyvet
RE: JINGOIST
Posted by: 42Years on Jun 9, 2005 9:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ah, such conviction! How long were you on active duty with the military and where did you serve?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: jingoist
Some questions...and some ranting
Posted by: Lathor on Jun 9, 2005 10:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't wholly condemn the "contractors," as many of them took the work because they couldn't get jobs in this country. They may have already served in the military and/or be too old or otherwise not acceptable for service. The lure of that high pay for someone who may have been unemployed or underemployed for months or years cannot be underestimated; the desperate are vulnerable. Similarly, much of our "volunteer army" is joining because of a lack of any other opportunity; the enticement of "money for college, money for car," wrapped in the cloak of "patriotism" and "duty one's country" is powerfully seductive. However, as many others have already pointed out, isn't there something fundamentally wrong with the whole equation? Such as, why are we the taxpayers (it's a large part of our military budget) paying so much to these PRIVATE CORPORATIONS to do the reconstruction of a country that we are destroying, leaving vast numbers of Iraqis unemployed and available for "insurgency" (which might, to them, be more like "defending their country")? Especially as our military was sent in with inadequate equipment (remember the unarmored Humvees and the Vietnam era flak jackets? The jungle camouflage gear in the desert?). Seems like once upon a time war profiteering was looked down upon...now it's rewarded.

And one more question, to all the so-called "patriots" who are lapping up Bush's tax cuts (Governing 101: "wartime" and "tax cuts" are not supposed to happen at the same time)...isn't it just a little obscene to drive around in your shiny new Hummer (or other gas guzzler) with the "Support Our Troops" sticker prominently displayed while our troops are fighting and dying in Iraq? Let's see...why are they there? Because the Iraqis were responsible for 9/11? No, uh, because of the WMD? No, uh, we're SPREADING DEMOCRACY! It's all about the, uh, freedom. Oh yeah. THAT'S why we've got troops fighting and getting wounded and dying over there...NOTHING to do with the oil that we need more and more of. Those bases and prisons we're building? Just tryin' to settle things down so those Iraqis can experience a little...freedom. (Incidentally, as regards those troops getting wounded...their medical care has to be paid for, but there never seems to be money enough for that...you'd think that maybe those defense contractors (aka war profiteers) could kick back a little tax money to help out with that, but....)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:You left out DU Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: You left out DU Posted by: Lathor
"Her Husband lost seven pounds while imprisoned."???
Posted by: owlbear1 on Jun 9, 2005 11:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was three days...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JINGOIST
Posted by: jingoist on Jun 9, 2005 1:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey everyone,
Your comments on my original posting are irrelevant since it has been censored. It looks like you can go back to your comfortable little leftist echo chamber and not be bothered anymore by hard hitting dissent. I know there are a few of you that are intelligent enough to be bothered by this. Stalin used to "disappear" people from pictures after he had them killed in REAL gulags. In this same manner my article (which contained no profanities, unlike some of yours) has been censored. How about that "freedom of speech?" JINGOIST

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: Matthew Wheeland
» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: thirdmg
» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: AdamSelene40
Jingoist - I will pray for 4u
Posted by: gopbarfbag on Jun 9, 2005 1:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, somethine you said is incorrect. Things you write in response to Alternet posted articles, and reader commentary are not "article(s)" they are merely responses. Alternet provides a forum for readers of it's website to speakout, much like calling in to a talk radio show. Professional people who make a living as journalists, commentators, educators, propagandists, or anyone with enough professinal or public credibility who can get published, call them what you will, write articles. Not you, not here. Nor do I. What we do is talk to anyone who cares to listen, because Alternet gives us this space. You obviously have something to say. Why don't you put it proper terms and submit to publications and if your words get published, then you could call it an article. Until then it's almost like spitting into the wind.
I was working today, I am a writer and I can say that because I get paid for writing (not this stuff) and I revisited this site just to get a laugh from your response but I missed it, damn. In any case, I hope you lighten up. I love you. It's only another day in the crumbling empire, chill out, go read Mother Jones, have an ice cream cone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Jingoist - I will pray for 4u Posted by: gopbarfbag
War is Hell
Posted by: Sojourner on Jun 9, 2005 8:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For some more than for others. Who to believe? The Marines' denial? The Zapata accusations? I'd split the difference.

I've never been in combat, but my brother and several friends have. Mostly they did not like to talk about it. What little they said made it clear it was far from glamorous.

The news story's description of conflict on top of conflict probably barely scratches the surface of the damage being done.The hangover from war lasts for generations. I expect we will never know fully how deep the wounds go. Even in victory we lose.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The New Armed Forces of our Brave New corporate-fascism
Posted by: zorro on Jun 10, 2005 10:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The truth is there is very little difference between 'contractors', mercenaries, and our volunteer forces. The US armed forces is nothing more than an extension of the corporate-government running this country. Although, some Americans join the armed forces for truly noble reasons--they unfortunantly do it for a lie, and out of ignorance. And of course for personal stability, college...but what is even more frightening is that so many are willing to plunder for the corporate kingdom in private armies--and the corporate government isn't trying to hide it any longer. Soon the corporate mercenary will be the norm, and that will solve the volunteer problem. And with technolical advances small, mobile, and highly-lethal mercanry forces (like special forces under corporate command) is all that will be necessary to enforce corporate agendas, uhum, I mean American government agendas. Oh Brave NEw World! We should all be very frightened of this--they will have no ethics binding them whatsoever, not even a lie. They will only be bound and motivated by personal and corporate profit and agenda--in this world there are no nations, not citizens American or otherwise--just sheep and seditionists who fail to chant the company logo. Profit is everything. And this will become accepted as the propaganda machine floods the American mind with fear. Security will be the catalyst. And there coming to a nation near you....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Narrow your brush strokes Posted by: OldRedleg
Irony
Posted by: bonapartist on Jun 11, 2005 12:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just love the fact that the Zapata company shares the name with Mexican revolutionary Emiliano Zapata. linked text

BTW, check the photo at the top of the article. Guy in the upper right corner holds a black flag with skull and crossbones.

Very appropriate methinks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Melissa
Posted by: bansidh@citlink.net on Jun 11, 2005 9:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obviously the contractors hate America and hate our freedom and ......I forget the rest of the trash talk Bush uses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fallacy on Orders of Magnitude
Posted by: Michael Turnauer, Vancouver,WA on Jun 12, 2005 11:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This story, if accurate, perfectly illustrates the ill-conceived manner in which the administration chose to carry out this ill-advised military operation. It's little wonder that military personnel would not care to fight alongside private contractors (mercenaries, soldiers of fortune, call 'em what you will) though this is no justification of maltreatment of said personnel or any captive personnel. One can't help but wonder how much of this illegal behavior goes to training, to attitudes within chain of command, or simply low morale brought on by fatigue or other factors.

It's should have been little surprise from the outset how problematic it would be to partially privatize warfare. I wonder if the ex-military personnel contractors were prohibited from re-enlisting or if they are choosing more beneficial terms under which to serve in Iraq. That said it should also come as no surprise that armed services are failing to meet recruitment goals of late when on top of all the other factors going against them they have to compete for "labor" with these contractors. I know the Bushies want to privatize many of the services that are performed by government today but I always thought Red and Blue America were in agreement that "providing for the common defense" was a core government activity.

How ironic that Clinton, the ideologues repeatedly charged, should not be trusted as Commander-in-Chief of a military he so despises but these same ideologues long to run an institution (the government) for which they hold so much contempt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Money, Money, Money
Posted by: beans on Jun 13, 2005 9:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Listen, these contractors are looking to make a quick buck and "kill", that is their purpose. Just look at the clowns at the top of the page. Tough guys huh. It is all fun and games until you lose an eye and then they start crying for their momies. These people are cowboys, but the sad thing is that these folks in certain aspects represent us. These contractors are definitely not ambassadors, rather they are opportunists looking for money and adventure and they are getting both. If these individuals get killed, hey too bad. I will not lose any sleep and can care less if they are hanging from the bridge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]