Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Urban Archipelago

By John Nichols, The Nation. Posted June 8, 2005.


At a time when the federal government is dominated by right-wing Republicans, and when liberal state governments are rare, cities are electing a new generation of progressives.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by John Nichols

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Something's the matter with Kansas: On April 5, Sunflower State voters overwhelmingly endorsed a meanspirited ban on same-sex marriages and packed school boards with more of those folks who want to teach creationism.

But on the same day, progressives swept every open post in Lawrence, one of the state's fastest-growing cities, on a platform promising to fight discrimination, protect the environment and develop affordable housing. The new mayor of this city of 80,000, Dennis "Boog" Highberger, took charge with the announcement that "there are not many places...where an ex-hippie, disabled guy with a funny name can become mayor." The next day he opened an online chat with Lawrence residents with the message: "Greetings, citizens! Let the wild rumpus begin!"

Lawrence, a progressive oasis of higher education and high-tech development in what, thanks to Thomas Frank's 2004 book, is the nation's most famously conservative state, hasn't exactly gone wild. Highberger and the other officials elected with the support of Progressive Lawrence -- a local group that two years ago wrested power from more conservative, pro-development forces -- have focused on the basics of implementing "smart growth" strategies to prevent sprawl, working with local employees to improve delivery of services and promoting tolerance in a state where that can be controversial.

"We haven't exactly reversed the whole 'What's the Matter With Kansas?' thing, but we're working on it," jokes Highberger, a lawyer who got Lawrence to officially condemn the USA Patriot Act but who spends most of his time on mundane municipal issues like funding library services and buying new land for park space. "The things that happen in Washington and Topeka are fairly abstract, and usually frustrating. When we make a decision on the city commission -- on protecting the environment, on treating people fairly -- people see something change in their backyard the next day. Local politics is where progressives should be."

Variations on the Lawrence story are playing out across the country, with local leaders and coalitions shaping a new, more aggressive politics in what has begun to be referred to as an "urban archipelago" of major metropolitan centers, aging industrial cities and college towns that represent progressive blue islands in what appears on electoral maps to be a red sea of conservatism.

These are crowded islands, with enough voters to influence politics far beyond their borders, and they remain bastions of American liberalism: Every American city with a population of more than 500,000 voted for John Kerry in 2004, as did about half the cities with populations between 50,000 and 500,000. In virtually every state that backed the Democratic presidential nominee last year -- even traditional Democratic strongholds like Illinois, New Jersey and Michigan -- it was only thanks to overwhelming majorities in urban areas that Kerry prevailed.

At a time when the federal government is dominated by right-wing Republicans, and when liberal state governments are rare, cities are electing a new generation of progressives--a trend highlighted on May 17 when the second-largest city in the country, Los Angeles, replaced a cautious Democratic incumbent mayor with progressive Antonio Villaraigosa.

It is not surprising that urban politics trend left. Cities are more likely than suburbs or rural areas to be home to the people who are least comfortable in George W. Bush's America: racial minorities, gays and lesbians, immigrants, trade unionists, the working poor and the young professionals whose "new urbanist" homesteading has renewed downtowns from Providence to San Diego.

Cities also have problems that are not solved by the free market in which conservatives place their blind faith: poverty, violence, decaying schools and NAFTA-battered industries. And at a time when more and more federal spending is being directed toward the military and tax cuts for the rich, old challenges are becoming new crises. Seventy-eight percent of mayors surveyed by the US Conference of Mayors reported increases in the number of requests for emergency shelter in 2004, and more than 80 percent said funding to meet the demand was lacking. The Bush administration's assaults on funding for community development block grants and transportation and housing initiatives, as well as the additional burdens placed on urban schools by the No Child Left Behind Act, make the prospects for meeting urban needs more daunting than ever.

Despite the challenges, or in some cases because of them, a growing number of progressives are taking their stand at the municipal level. "Local governments are the only place where progressive ideas can get any traction -- where big ideas are being tried," says Madison, Wisconsin, Mayor Dave Cieslewicz, 46, a former chief of staff in a State Senate office and an environmental leader who was elected in 2003. "Cities are where you can break through the big money, the media spin -- everything that is wrong with our politics -- and capture the public's imagination." Unfortunately, he says, traditional organizations of local officials have been slow to catch the wave of municipal resistance to the nation's conservative moment. "I went to my first US Conference of Mayors meeting after I got elected, and I was horrified. The corporate influence was pervasive," Cieslewicz says, recalling a dinner where toy trucks featuring the Waste Management, Inc. logo served as party favors. "Here we were, with education, transportation and housing programs that are essential for cities facing cuts, and I just didn't see the sense of urgency."


Digg!

John Nichols, The Nation's Washington correspondent, has covered progressive politics and activism in the United States and abroad for more than a decade. He is currently the editor of the editorial page of Madison, Wisconsin's Capital Times.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Strong Communities - it works!
Posted by: nanobubble on Jun 8, 2005 7:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article builds upon the 'Start Making Sense' / Lakoff&Co article posted yesterday here on Alternet.org. The gist is that progressives working in the framework of a strong community will elect progressive community leaders to municipal offices. A political domino effect, as described in the Wisconsin minimum wage of this article, falls into place and the progressive framework will make it work when appealing to a higher degree.

It is relieving to read articles like this that build action upon discussion, as too many people read discussion and become impatient with the lack of 'real results' and the like. They need to be taught patience and the worth of the discussion - or perhaps just contacted when the discussion ends? Although that is not how I participate in politics, everyone participates in their own way and both components are necessary for the engine to run.

Strong communities is contagious. When your neighbor has a good idea, typically you adhere to it. This is the basic fuction of communities - social innovation and evolution. In a political context, that is a beacon to progressives. If our communities are strong, a united front against state or national issues is a matter of applying the channels of communication.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No wonder Howard Dean was right
Posted by: maxpayne on Jun 8, 2005 11:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He always wanted to help the Party recover from bottom up not top to bottom. About the urban areas, the free trade policies so adored by conservatives first killed the rural areas. And since urban areas still depend on the well being of their rural counterparts, I'd say it was a domino's effect that free trade had from rural to suburban to urban. Unlike rural and suburban areas though, I suspect that the only reason urban areas still vote for Democrats despite some of them voting for these free trade agreements is they're probably willing to vote for them albeit with their noses held while voters in rural and even suburban areas have no patience for Democrats who do not support economic populism even though it's ironic that these voters fell for the same bait and switch on kultural konservativism. Getting progressives united on all local levels is the only way we're going to get out of this mess and I'm glad that Howard Dean has wisely chosen to travel to red states, and even red areas in blue states, and meet with local progressives and realize the true plight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can anything good come out of L.A.?
Posted by: Sojourner on Jun 8, 2005 1:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes. A new generation of landlords is developing apartment buildings where the afterschool care for children comes built in.

It's only a couple sites, but it is such a winner, one can only hope the idea will spread. Urban renewal begins at home.

Space in the apartment building comes equipped with activity directors, tutors, computers, etc. to provide somewhere for school kids to come home to when mom and dad are out making a living. It becomes a kind of co-op, sponsored by the landlord. No kids tearing up apartments. Tenant selectivity rents to those concerned about child welfare.

So far, so good. Time will tell. Imagine the city with neighborhoods that work!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mike
Posted by: lastmarx on Jun 8, 2005 1:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What about Portland? First city to dump the JTTF under newly elected mayor Tom Potter? Trying to turn the local electric company (Enron-PGE) into public power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Local politics
Posted by: cfpisaps on Jun 9, 2005 4:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a city councilperson in a small Ohio town, I have come to fervently believe in the power of local boards, commissions and committees to map the landscape of the forgotten America. The abstractions that the mayor of Lawrence is talking about are real as the average voter does not feel that their concern or outrage will ever penetrate the corrupt walls of Washington, DC. So many, the concienscious, turn that frustration into making their town and counties into the miniature versions of the America they want to live in. Perhaps, local politics and moral/ethical responsibility will always go hand and hand. It is easier to love thy neighbor if you know their name. It is easier to feed the poor if they live next door. And it is easier to imagine and see the benefits of a green world if that means a lush park across the street from your house. Maybe we can retake the world one local election at a time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]