Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Mugging of the American Dream

By Bill Moyers, AlterNet. Posted June 6, 2005.


Washington is a divided city -- not between north and south as in Lincoln's time, but between those who can buy all the government they want and those who can't even afford a seat in the bleachers.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Women's Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"Women Are Being Killed All Over the World": One Reporter's Fight Against So-Called "Honor Killings"
Robert S. Eshelman

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Bill Moyers

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Editor's Note: The following is the prepared text of the speech Bill Moyers gave June 3 at the Take Back America conference in Washington, D.C. The transcript of the speech as delivered can be found at ourfuture.org.

It's good to be with you again. Your passion for democracy is inspiring and your enthusiasm contagious. I can't imagine a more exuberant gathering today except possibly at the K Street branch of the Masters of the Universe where they are celebrating their coup at the Securities and Exchange Commission

I wish that I could have attended all your sessions, listened to all the speakers, and heard all the points of view that have been raised here. But thanks to C-Span I was able to catch enough of your proceedings to realize you covered so many subjects and touched on so many ideas that you've left me little to say. That's okay, because as Bob Borosage reminded us back in January, what matters most isn't what is said in Washington but what you do on the ground across the country to build an independent infrastructure, generate ideas, drive local campaigns, persuade the skeptic, organize your neighbors, and carry on the movement at the grassroots for social and economic justice.

Before you go home, however, Bob has asked me to talk about what's at stake in what you are doing. Given all that has already been said, I will take my cue from the late humorist Robert Benchley who arrived for his final exam in international law at Harvard to find that the test consisted of this one instruction: "Discuss the arbitration of the international fisheries problem in respect to hatcheries protocol and dragnet and procedure as it affects (a) the point of view of the United States and (b) the point of view of Great Britain." Benchley was desperate but he was also honest, and he wrote: "I know nothing about the point of view of Great Britain in the arbitration of the international fisheries problem, and nothing about the point of view of the United States. I shall therefore discuss the question from the point of view of the fish."

That's what I have done in much of my work in journalism. Thirty-five years ago almost to the day I set out on a three-month trip of over l0, 000 miles to write a book called "Listening to America." I completed the book but I've never finished the trip; never was able to come off the road; never could stop listening. My worldview has been a work in progress, molded largely by the stories I've heard from the people I've met. I want to tell you this morning about some of those people. They tell us what's at stake.

I begin with two families in Milwaukee. The breadwinners in both households lost their jobs in that great wave of downsizing in 1991 as corporations began moving jobs out of the city and out of the country. In a series of documentaries over the next decade my colleagues and I chronicled their efforts to cope with the wrenching changes in their lives and find a place for themselves in the new global economy. I grew up with people like them. They're the kind my mother called "the salt of the earth" (takes one to know one!) They love their children, care about their neighborhoods, go to church every Sunday, and work hard all week. But like millions of Americans, these two families in Milwaukee were playing by the rules and still losing. By the end of the decade they were running harder but slipping behind, and the gap between them and prosperous America had reached Grand Canyon proportions.

I want to show you a very brief excerpt from that first documentary. It aired on PBS in January 1992 with the title "Minimum Wages: The New Economy." You'll see the father of one family as he looks for work after losing his machinist's job at the big manufacturer, Briggs and Stratton. You'll meet his wife in their kitchen as they make a desperate call to the bank that is threatening to foreclose on their home after failing to meet their mortgage payments. During our filming the fathers in both families became seriously ill. One was hospitalized for two months, leaving the family $30,000 in debt. You'll hear the second family talk about what it's like when both parents lose their jobs, depriving them of health insurance and putting their children's education up for grabs. Take a look.

[VIDEO]

Seeing those people again I thought of the interviews that the Campaign for America's Future conducted around the country on the eve of your conference. A woman in Columbus, Ohio, told one interviewer something that I've heard in different ways in my own reporting over the past few years. She said: "Everyday life pulls families apart." It takes a moment for the implications of that to hit home. Think about it: Our country, the richest and most powerful nation in the history of the race -- a place where "everyday life pulls families apart."

What turns these personal traumas into a political travesty is that the people we're talking about are deeply patriotic. They love America. But they no longer believe they matter to the people who run the country. When our film opens, they are watching the inauguration of Bill Clinton on television in 1992. By the end of the decade, when our final film in the series aired, they were paying little attention to politics; they simply didn't think their concerns would ever be addressed by our governing elites. They are not cynical - their religious faith leaves them little capacity for cynicism -- but they know the system is rigged against them. As it is.

You know the story: For years now a relatively small fraction of American households have been garnering an extreme concentration of wealth and income as large economic and financial institutions obtained unprecedented levels of power over daily life. In 1960 the gap in terms of wealth between the top 20% and the bottom 20% was 30-fold. Four decades later it is more than 75 fold. (See Joshua Holland, AlterNet, posted 4/25/05.)

Such concentrations of wealth would be far less of an issue if everyone were benefiting proportionally. But that's not the case. Statistics tell the story. Yes, I know -- statistics can cause the eyes to glaze over, but as one of my mentors once reminded me, "It is the mark of a truly educated man [or woman] to be deeply moved by statistics."

Let's see if these statistics move you.

While we've witnessed several periods of immense growth in recent decades, the average real income of the bottom 90 percent of American taxpayers - that's a heap of people - fell by 7 percent between l973 and 2000 (ibid).

During 2004 and the first couple of months this year, wages failed to keep pace with inflation for the first time since the l990 recession. They were up somewhat in April, but it still means that "working Americans effectively took an across-the-board pay cut at a time when the economy grew by a healthy four percent and corporate profits hit record highs as companies got more productivity out of workers while keeping pay raises down." (ibid).

Believe it or not, the United States now ranks the highest among the highly developed countries in each of the seven measures of inequality tracked by the index. While we enjoy the second highest GDP in the world (excluding tiny Luxembourg), we rank dead last among the 20 most developed countries in fighting poverty and we're off the chart in terms of the number of Americans living on half the median income or less (ibid).

And the outlook is for more of the same. On the eve of George W. Bush's second inauguration The Economist - not exactly a Marxist rag - produced a sobering analysis of what is happening to the old notion that any American can get to the top. With income inequality not seen since the first Gilded Age (and this is The Economist editors speaking, not me) - with "an education system increasingly stratified with fewer resources than those of their richer contemporaries" and great universities "increasingly reinforcing rather than reducing these educational inequalities" - with corporate employees finding it "harder...to start at the bottom and rise up the company hierarchy by dint of hard work and self-improvement" - "with the yawning gap between incomes at the top and bottom" - the editors of The Economist - all friends of business and advocates of capitalism and free markets -- concluded that "The United States risks calcifying into a European-style class-based society."

Let me run that by you again: "The United States risks calcifying into a European-style class-based society."

Or worse. The Wall Street Journal is no Marxist sheet, either, although its editorial page can be just as rigid and dogmatic as old Stalinists. The Journal's reporters, however, are among the best in the country. They're devoted to getting as close as possible to the verifiable truth and describing what they find with the varnish off. Two weeks ago a front-page leader in the Journal concluded that "As the gap between rich and poor has widened since 1970, the odds that a child born in poverty will climb to wealth - or that a rich child will fall into middle class - remain stuck....Despite the widespread belief that the U.S. remains a more mobile society than Europe, economists and sociologists say that in recent decades the typical child starting out in poverty in continental Europe (or in Canada) has had a better chance at prosperity." (Wall Street Journal, page one, May 13, 2005.)

That knocks the American Dream flat on its back. But it should put fire in our bellies. Because what's at stake is what it means to be an American.

A few weeks ago my colleague Charlie Rose put a question to the new president of CNN, Jonathan Klein. He asked: Could there ever be a successful progressive version of Fox News Channel? Klein didn't think so. He said Fox appeals to "mostly angry white men" while liberals -- "you know, they don't get too worked up about anything."

Well, here's something to get worked up about:

Under a headline stretching six columns across the page, the New York Times reported last year that tuition in the city's elite private schools, kindergarten as well as high school, would hit $26,000 for the coming school year. On the same page, under a two-column headline, the Times reported on a school in nearby Mount Vernon, just across the city line, with a student body that is 97% black. It is the poorest school in the town: Nine out of ten children qualify for free lunches; one out of ten lives in a homeless shelter. During black history month this past February a sixth-grader who wanted to write a report on the poet Langston Hughes could not find a single book about Hughes in the library - not one. There is only one book in the library on Frederick Douglass. None on Rosa Parks, Josephine Baker, Leontyne Price, or other path breakers like them in the modern era. Except for a couple of Newbery Award books bought by the librarian with her own money, the books are largely from the l950s and l960s, when all the students were white. A child's primer on work begins with a youngster learning how to be a telegraph delivery boy. There's a l967 book about telephones with the instruction: "When you phone you usually dial the number. But on some new phones you can push buttons." The newest encyclopedia dates from l99l, with two volumes missing. And there is no card catalogue in this library. Something worth getting mad about.

How about this:

Caroline Payne's face and gums are distorted because her Medicaid-financed dentures don't fit. Her appearance has caused her to be continuously turned down for jobs. Caroline Payne is one of the people in David Shipler's recent book, The Working Poor: Invisible in America. . She was born poor; although she once owned her own home and earned a two-year college degree, Caroline Payne has bounced from one poverty-wage job to another all her life, equipped with the will to move up, but lacking the resources to deal with such unexpected and overlapping problems as a mentally handicapped daughter, a broken marriage, and a sudden layoff that forced her to sell her few assets, pull up roots, and move on. "In the house of the poor..." Shipler writes, "the walls are thin and fragile, and troubles seep into one another." If you believe the Declaration of Independence means what it says - that all of us are endowed by the Creator with a love of life, a longing for liberty, and a passion for happiness - and everyone includes Caroline Payne - this is something to get worked up about.

Or this - courtesy of the columnist, Mark Shields. It seems workers in the American territory of the Northern Mariana Islands were being forced to labor under sweatshop conditions producing garments for Tommy Hilfiger, Calvin Klein, Gap and Liz Claiborne. The garments were then shipped tariff-free and quota-free to the American market where they were entitled to display the coveted "Made in the USA" label. When Republican Senator Frank Murkowski of Alaska heard that these people were being paid barely half the U.S. minimum hourly wage and were forced to live behind barbed wire in squalid shacks without plumbing while working l2 hours a day, often seven days a week, with none of the legal protections U.S. workers are guaranteed, he became enraged. He got the Senate to pass a bill - unanimously - that would extend the protection of our laws to the U.S. territory of the Northern Marianas. But then the notorious lobbyist Jack Abramoff moved into action with an SOS to his good friend, Tom DeLay. The records show they met at least two dozen times. DeLay traveled to the Marianas with his family and staff - on a "scholarship" provided by Abramoff's clients -- where they played golf and went snorkeling not far the sweatshops (some scholarship!) Was Tom DeLay offended by what he saw? To the contrary. He told the Washington Post that the sweatshops were "a perfect petri dish of capitalism. ABC-TV News recorded him praising Abramoff's clients by saying: "You are a shining light for what is happening to the Republican Party, and you represent everything that is good about what we are trying to do in America and leading the world in the free-market system." And Tom Delay - the rightwing radicals' revisionist incarnation of Saint Francis of Assisi -- killed the Senate bill. (Mark Shields, CNN.com. 5/28/05.)

If that doesn't get your dander up, maybe this will: The minimum wage hasn't been raised since l997. After the Republicans recently defeated an effort to increase it, Rick Wilson wrote for CommonDreams.org about a single mother of two children working somewhere in his home state of West Virginia at $5.l5 an hour, 40 hours a week, or $5,378 below the federal poverty level of $l6,090 for a family that size. Put another way, "her earnings only reach two-thirds of the poverty level." Meanwhile, the base salary of the Members of Congress who voted down the wage increase is $l62, l00. That single mom would have to work about 3l, 476 hours to earn what those members of Congress get in a year. And remember -- the minimum wage she earns is actually worth less than it was 40 years ago (Rick Wilson, CommonDreams.org. 5/25/05.)


It wasn't supposed to be this way. America was not meant to be a country where the winner takes all. Through a system of checks and balances we were going to maintain a decent equilibrium in how democracy works so that it didn't just work for the powerful and privileged (If you don't believe me, I'll send you my copy of The Federalist Papers). The economist Jeffrey Madrick put it well: Because equitable access to public resources is the lifeblood of any democracy, Americans made primary schooling free to all. Because everyone deserves a second chance, debtors - especially the relative poor - were protected by state laws against their rich creditors. Charters to establish corporations were open to most if not all (white) comers, rather than held for elites. Government encouraged Americans to own their own piece of land and even supported squatters' rights. The old hope for equal access to opportunity became a reality for millions. Including yours truly.

Ruby and Henry Moyers were knocked down and almost out when the system imploded into the Great Depression. They worked hard all their lives but never had much money - my father's last paycheck before he retired was $96 and change, after taxes. We couldn't afford books at home but the public library gave me a card when I was eight years old. I went to good public schools. My brother made it to college on the GI bill. And in my freshman year I hitchhiked to college on public highways stopping to rest in public parks. Like millions of us, I was an heir to what used to be called the commonwealth - the notion of America as a shared project. It's part of our DNA, remember: "We, the People...in order to create a more perfect union"

You're never more mindful of this than at the Lincoln Memorial. Like you, I've been there many times over the years. Back in l954, when I was a summer employee in the Senate, I took the same hike every Sunday. Starting at the Capitol I headed for the Washington Monument, briskly climbed its 898 steps, came down almost as briskly (I was only 20, remember), veered over to the Jefferson Memorial and then doubled back to the mall and down past the reflecting pool to where Lincoln gazes perpetually over this city - a city that because of him is the capital of the United States of America and not just the Northern States of America.

Standing there last night, I sensed that temple of democracy where Lincoln broods to be as deeply steeped in melancholy as it was during the McCarthy reign of terror, the grief of Vietnam, or the crimes of Watergate. You stand there silently contemplating the words that gave voice to Lincoln's fierce determination to save the Union - his resolve that "government of, by, and for the people shall not perish from the earth" - and then you turn and look out, as he does, on a city where those words are daily mocked. This is no longer Lincoln's city. And those people from all walks of life making their way up the steps to pay their respects to this martyr for the Union - it's not their city, either. This is an occupied city, a company town, a wholly owned subsidiary of the powerful and privileged whose have hired an influence racket to run it. The records are so poorly kept it's impossible to know how many lobbyists there really are in this town, but the Center for Public Integrity found that their ranks include 240 former members of Congress and heads of federal agencies and over 2000 senior officials who passed through the revolving door of government at warp speed. Lobbyists now spend $3 billion a year buying influence and access for their clients and, according to the New York Times, over the last six years spent more than twice the amount spent by candidates for federal office. Once again this is a divided city. Not between North and South as in Lincoln's time, but between those who pay to play - those who can buy the government they want -- and those who can't even afford even a seat in the bleachers.

So it is that huge financial institutions like MBNA - the credit card giant that is the biggest contributor to the President's two campaigns for the White House - prevail in getting Congress and George W. Bush to curtail personal bankruptcies, making it harder for those families in Milwaukee to get a fresh start and a second chance.

So it is that Wal-mart, with the third largest corporate political action committee in the country, and pharmaceutical giants with more lobbyists in town than there are Members of Congress, join with gun manufacturers and asbestos makers and the White House to restrict the right of aggrieved citizens to take corporations to court for malfeasance.

So it is that as Exxon Mobil accumulates more than $l billion a month from escalating oil prices -- more than $l billion a month even after allocating for dividends, share repurchases, and capital spending - the oil and gas industry wrings huge tax breaks from a public already squeezed hard by high prices at the gas pumps.

And so it is that on the Sunday before President Bush's second inaugural, Nick Confessore, writing in the New York Times Magazine, , describes how the president's first round of tax cuts has brought the United States tax code closer to a system under which income from savings and investments would not be taxed at all and revenues for public services would be raised exclusively from taxes on working men and women. One of the most fervent right-wing class warriors in Washington is quoted as predicting: "No capital gains tax, no dividends tax. No estate tax, no tax on interest." It will be one of President Bush's enduring legacies to have replaced estate taxes on the wealthy with a sweat tax on their grave diggers.

Let me read you something:

When political interests shower Washington with millions in campaign contributions, they often get what they want. But it's ordinary citizens and firms that pay the price and most of them never see it coming. This is what happens if you don't contribute to their campaigns or spend generously on lobbying. You pick up a disproportionate share of America's tax bill. You pay higher prices for a broad range of products from peanuts to prescriptions. You pay taxes that others in a similar situation have been excused from paying. You're compelled to abide by laws while others are granted immunity from them. You must pay debts that you incur while others do not. You're barred from writing off your tax returns some of the money spent on necessities while others deduct the cost of their entertainment. You must run your business by one set of rules, while the government creates another set for your competitors. In contrast the fortunate few who contribute to the right politicians and hire the right lobbyists enjoy all the benefits of their special status. Make a bad business deal; the government bails them out. If they want to hire workers at below market wages, the government provides the means to do so. If they want more time to pay their debts, the government gives them an extension. If they want immunity from certain laws, the government gives it. If they want to ignore rules their competition must comply with, the government gives its approval. If they want to kill legislation that is intended for the public, it gets killed.
Once again I'm not quoting Marx or Lenin or even The Nation, the American Prospect, the Washington Monthly, In These Times, The Progressive, or Mother Jones.

I'm quoting from.....Time. From the heart of the Time-Warner empire comes the judgment that America now has "government for the few at the expense of the many."

You read this, and then you read the report by the American Political Science Association which finds that "increasing inequalities threaten the American ideal of equal citizenship and that progress toward real democracy may have stalled in this country and even reversed." You also read - in that same report - that a quarter of all whites in this country have no financial assets. Then you read on and learn that the median white household has 62% more income and twelve times as much wealth as the median black household and that 6l% of African-Americans in this country and half of all Latinos have no financial assets at all.

Then you open Jared Diamond's new book, Collapse: How Societies Choose to Succeed or Fail to find the Pulitzer Prize-winning scholar's description of an America where rich elites cocoon themselves "in gated communities, guarded by private security guards, and filled with people who drink bottled water, depend on private pensions, and send their children to private schools." Gradually, they lose the motivation "to support the police force, the municipal water supply, Social Security, and public schools." Any society where the elite insulate themselves from the consequences of their action, Diamond warns, contains a built-in blueprint for failure.

You read all this and realize you have been seeing it with your own eyes as a reporter in the field. You're seeing the mugging of the American Dream right before your eyes.

Go with me for a moment to a small town in Pennsylvania. Two years ago, for my weekly PBS series Now with Bill Moyers, one of our teams spent time there listening to regular people talk about what's happening in their lives. I want to share with you an excerpt so that you can eavesdrop on the hidden conversation of America that the ruling powers in Washington wants to stay hidden, as I'll explain in a moment. First look at this:

[VIDEO]

Let me tell you something about these people ("the point of view of the fish," remember?)

They don't ask to get rich.

They want a job that pays a living wage.

They want social security to be there in their old age, for their own sake and so their kids won't be burdened with their care.

They want a simple, comprehensive health care system.

They want their livelihoods and the fate of their communities to be taken into account as the elites in government and corporations measure profits, economic growth and the GDP.

And they would like to see the political system cleaned up, so the playing field is more level and their voices not wholly drowned out by the deep-pocket predators from the Business Roundtable.

These are not radical views. These are not even "liberal" views. They are just plain American values. Any reporter who spends any time in the field can see that. You just have to get out of the Washington and New York studios, throw away the talking points sent you by the Republican National Committee, stop yakking and start listening, leave the winners to their champagne and buy the losers a beer, and you'll discover that the actual experience of regular people is the missing link in a nation wired for everything but the truth.

And let me tell you: These plain American values - the truth from an America that is barely holding on - scare the hell out of the powers that be.

Case in point: When that broadcast aired in November of '03, Kenneth Tomlinson was watching. As most of you know by now, Mr. Tomlinson is chairman of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, an ally of Karl Rove, and the rightwing monopoly's point man to keep tabs on public broadcasting. You've heard no doubt that he and I have been, shall we say, somewhat at odds of late. I didn't know exactly what started the trouble until just a few days ago, when the Washington Post carried a story reporting that when Mr. Tomlinson watched that documentary from Tamaqua, Pennsylvania, it was too much for him. Reaching into the well-worn book of mindless rightwing clichés, he called it "liberal advocacy journalism" and decided right then and there "to bring some 'balance' to the public TV and radio airwaves."

So what did he do? Well, apparently the saintly Tom DeLay was too busy snorkeling with lobbyists to take on his own show informing the folks in Tamaqua, Pennsylvania, that they are the "Petri dish of capitalism." But Mr. Tomlinson found kindred spirits at the rightwing editorial board of the Wall Street Journal where the "animal spirits of business" are routinely celebrated with nary a negative note about the casualties of their voracious appetites. Now you can get on public television every week, in The Wall Street Editorial Report, an alternative view of reality to life as it is lived in Tamaqua, Pennsylvania and communities like it all across this country.

Here's the point: The last thing ideologues want is reporting about the facts on the ground. Facts on the ground subvert the party line. That's why if you live where rightwing talk radio and media monopolies dominate the public discourse, you are told a hundred different ways every day why unregulated markets work better than democracy. It's a lie, but it works, because you are never told the other side of the story. But here, on PBS one Friday evening, was the other side of the story. Here were ordinary people who are in pain for reasons not of their own making. And it was more than a rightwing apparatchik could take. Because too much of the truth might set those people free. Might take them to the voting booths - or even to the streets - to declare: We're mad as hell and we're not going to take it anymore!"

This is a good place to pause and call on that old journalistic warhorse, Hal Crowther, who was at Time and Newsweek and the Buffalo News before going his own way with an independent column. Just this week he writes that "The first thing every reporter was taught, back when reporters were taught things, is that the best way to find the truth is to follow the money....If the media still hunted with live ammunition, Enron, Halliburton and the energy industry's pornographic profits since 9/11 would be enough to force this oil-soaked, sheik-beholden government to resign. In disgrace--remember disgrace?" And he goes on: "Worse still than handouts to the wealthy is the reprehensible new legislation that blocks working Americans from climbing the hill where the money flows - laws like boulders rolled downhill to crush the scrambling underclass, the millions of Americans unable to pay their bills. Think about what it means to limit personal bankruptcies, inhibit class action suits against toxic employers, protect chemical polluters (usually oil companies) from liability lawsuits and cap settlements in personal injury cases. It means trying to eliminate what little protection ordinary citizens retain against corporate leviathans that cheat, exploit, injure and poison them, trap them in hopeless jobs, renege on their healthcare and default on their pensions. It means striping leverage from the people who have no leverage to spare."

Hal Crowther is one of those journalists who goes hunting with live ammunition. But if Kenneth Tomlinson and Karl Rove have their way, public broadcasting journalists will be firing blanks.

What's important in this story is not only that journalism still matters - that reporting from the ground up can strike a nerve in the heart of the imperium. What's important is that you see what as citizens you are up against. These guys play for keep. They mean to control the story. And if they can they will silence or discredit anyone who dissents from the official view of reality.

A profound transformation is occurring in America and those responsible for it don't want you to connect the dots. We are experiencing what has been described as a "fanatical drive to dismantle the political institutions, the legal and statutory canons, and the intellectual and cultural frameworks that have shaped public responsibility for social harms arising from the excesses of private power." From public land to water and other natural resources, from media with their broadcast and digital spectrums to scientific discoveries and medical breakthroughs, a broad range of America's public resources is being shifted to the control of elites and the benefit of the privileged. It all seems so clear now that we wonder how we could have ignored the warning signs at the time. Back in the early l970s President Nixon's Attorney General, John Mitchell, predicted that "this country is going to go so far to the right that you won't recognize it." A wealthy right-winger of the time, William Simon, President Nixon's Secretary of the Treasury, wrote a polemic declaring that "funds generated by business...must rush by the multimillions" to conservative causes. Said Business Week, bluntly: "Some people will obviously have to do with less...It will be a bitter pill for many Americans to swallow the idea of doing with less so that big business can have more."

We've seen the strategy play out for years now: to cut workforces and wages, scour the globe in search of cheap labor, trash the social contract and the safety net meant to protect people from hardships beyond their control, make it hard for ordinary citizens to gain redress for the malfeasance and malpractice of corporations, and diminish the ability of government to check and balance "the animal spirits" of economic warfare where the winner takes all. Streams of money flowed into think tanks to shape the agenda, media to promote it, and a political machine to achieve it. What has happened to working Americans is not the result of Adam Smith's benign and invisible hand but the direct consequence of corporate money, ideological propaganda, a partisan political religion, and a string of political decisions favoring the interests of wealthy elites who bought the political system right out from under us.

It's an old story in America. We shouldn't be surprised by it any more. Hold up a mirror to this moment and you will see reflected back to you the first Gilded Age in the last part of the l9th century. Then, as now, the great captains of industry and finance could say, with Frederick Townsend Martin, "We are rich. We own America. We got it, God knows how, but we intend to keep it."

They were deadly serious. Go for the evidence to such magisterial studies of American history as Growth of the American Republic ( Morison, Commager, and Leuchtenberg), and you'll read how they did it: They gained control of newspapers and magazines. They subsidized candidates. They bought legislation and even judicial decisions. To justify their greed and power they drew on history, law, economics, and religion to concoct a philosophy that would come to be known as Social Darwinism - "backed up by the quasi religious principle that the acquisition of wealth was a mark of divine favor." One of their favorite apologists, Professor William Graham Sumner of Yale, said: "If we do not like the survival of the fittest, we have only one possible alternative, and that is the survival of the unfittest. The former is the law of civilization; the latter is the law of anti-civilization.

I'm not making this up. It's right there in the record. The historians tell us that a boundless continent lay open and ready for their exploitation and "all the bounties of nature were allowed to fall into the hands of strong men and powerful corporations." Clever lawyers came up with new devices for the legal aggrandizement of private fortunes (shades of today's Federalist Society!) No labor laws or workingmen's compensation nets interfered with their profits (shades of DeLay's "Petri dish of capitalism! ") No public opinion penetrated the walls of their conceit (shades of "The Great Republican Noise Machine.")

They're back, my friends. They're back in full force and their goal is to take America back - to their private Garden of Eden in that first Gilded Age when "the strong take what they wanted and the weak suffer what they must." Look no further than today's news: William Donaldson, who made a decent stab at enforcing post-Enron reform on Wall Street, is out as Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission; according to USA Today, the President's big donors - the captains of finance - cashed in their IOUs and came away from the White House with his head on a platter. In his place: A rightwing congressman who takes a dim view of shareholder suits and favors eliminating the estate tax, the dividend tax, the - well, there's no tax on wealth he doesn't want to eliminate. Once again the chicken coop is sold to the fox.

Back in the first Gilded Age it was the progressives who took them on, throwing themselves at the juggernaut to try and keep it from rolling over the last vestiges of democracy. They lost the first rounds and only because they kept fighting for many long years did in time America begin to balance the power of concentrated wealth with the claims and needs of ordinary people. Nowadays it's you who stand between that regenerated juggernaut and those families in Milwaukee, those folks in Tamaqua, and the millions like them around the country. You must be like the Irishman coming upon a street brawl who yells in a loud voice: "Is this a private fight, or can anyone get in it?" Not waiting, he wades in.

Wade in! Go home and tell the truth to your neighbors and fight the corruption of the system. But it's not enough just to say how bad the others are. You owe your opponents the compliment of a good argument. Come up with fresh ideas to make capitalism work for all. Ask entrepreneurs to join you - they know how to make things happen. Show us a new vision of globalization with a conscience. Stand up for working people and people in the middle and people who can't stand on their own. Be not cowed, intimidated, or frightened - you may be on the losing side of the moment, as the early progressives were, but you're on the winning side of history. And have some fun when you fight - Americans are more likely to join the party that enjoys a party . Come to think of it, go out and argue that working people should have more time off from the endless hours of tedious work that devours the soul and the long commutes that devastate families and communities.

Above all, know what you belief and why. So I have some homework for you. Here's your summer reading: Thomas Paine and the Promise of America, by Harvey Kaye, soon at your bookstores (along, I might add, with a revised and updated paperback version of Moyers on America.) Thomas Paine was the foremost journalist of the American Revolution who called forth the better angels of our nature, imbued us with our democratic impulse, and articulated our American Identity with its exceptional purpose and promise. It was Paine who argued that America would afford "an asylum for mankind," provide a model to the world, and support the global advance of republican democracy. In these pages is tonic for flagging spirits facing great odds - because it was Thomas Paine who insisted that "it is too soon to write the history of the Revolution." And writing the history of the Revolution is now up to you. That's what truly is at stake.

Good luck!

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
mazur
Posted by: mazur on Jun 6, 2005 2:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article is excellent, but there is an important point which must be made. For a long time already, there has been much confusion in political and social philosophy which often leads to progressives shooting themselves in the foot. Here is the sample from this article:

but you're on the ... winning side of history.

Bill really shouldn't have said that, because what is right (expressed by normative statements) cannot be derived from historical facts (declarative statements), and still less from historical facts-to-be. The phrase "history shall judge" boils down to "future power is always right", which is morally the same as "present power is always right" and "past power (tradition) is always right", and all these three principles essentially put personal responsibility and moral decisions out of circulation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mazur Posted by: jingoist
» RE: mazur Posted by: clyde
» For goodness sakes.... Posted by: jawoomer
JINGOIST
Posted by: jingoist on Jun 6, 2005 3:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Mr. Moyers,
After reading your article I was left with many questions so I'll just ask a few. Don't we live in a representative republic and not a democracy? It's the difference between mob rule and citizens having inalienable rights. Also, just as important, isn't this society a meritocracy instead of a redistributionist cleptocracy? In this type of society people can rise as high as their G-d given talent and effort will bring them. Oh sure, injustices will occur. That's why we have laws on the books. Forcing equality of outcomes leads to all of the Communist horrors that we have seen. Last question. When you worked for L.B.J., did you actually order F.B.I. background checks on all of Barry Goldwater's men? They never did that to you. Bill, most feedom loving Americans would really frown on such an abuse of power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: mazur
» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: jingoist
» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: thirdmg
» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: jingoist
» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: WitchyNy
» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: jingoist
» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: LeeAnnG
» RE: meritocracy Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: jingoist
» Destruction by the Reds Posted by: JimActivist
» RE: Destruction by the Reds Posted by: jingoist
» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: RoguebotV
» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: jingoist
» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: RoguebotV
» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: freemark
» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: jingoist
» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: wiseup
JINGOIST
Posted by: jingoist on Jun 6, 2005 3:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Mr. Moyers,
After reading your article I was left with many questions so I'll just ask a few. Don't we live in a representative republic and not a democracy? It's the difference between mob rule and citizens having inalienable rights. Also, just as important, isn't this society a meritocracy instead of a redistributionist cleptocracy? In this type of society people can rise as high as their G-d given talent and effort will bring them. Oh sure, injustices will occur. That's why we have laws on the books. Forcing equality of outcomes leads to all of the Communist horrors that we have seen. Last question. When you worked for L.B.J., did you actually order F.B.I. background checks on all of Barry Goldwater's men? They never did that to you. Bill, most feedom loving Americans would really frown on such an abuse of power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: JINGOIST Posted by: jingoist
Mugging of the American dream?
Posted by: Nigelthebrit on Jun 6, 2005 4:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's happening to the American dream is disturbing us on my side of the Atlantic too. I'm reading William Shirer's book "The Collapse of the Third Republic", about the causes of the collapse of France in 1940. Like the USA today, the politicians in the France of 1930 - 1940 looked out for their own futures, rather than for the future of their country. Likewise the rich, in avoiding their fair share of taxation.

Seeing the state of the USA now, I must confess that I'm minded to think that the fall of liberty in the land of liberty will be the most awesome spectacle the World will see in the 21st Century - made all the more so by implosion from within. But I have enough faith to believe that, as in France during and after the last World War, liberty will rise again - the vegetation is rotten, but the tree's roots remain strong!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mugging of the American dream? Posted by: Nigelthebrit
» RE: Mugging of the American dream? Posted by: FloraFamily
BuyBlue
Posted by: nanobubble on Jun 6, 2005 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All the more reason to buyblue.org !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When Will WE Wake Up?
Posted by: jobie1kno on Jun 6, 2005 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I applaud Bill Moyers' comments, and cannot express just how seriously his comments should be taken, not simply by the conscious, but by the (apparently) 50% of people who are being bludgeoned by the powers of the elites, while supporting its very existence.
I am a former UK resident, and did my homework before moving to the US. The research seemed to confirmed my beliefs that the US is indeed a great country, a beacon of light standing for equality, fairness, democracy, hard work and reward. Since moving to this country some years ago, my vision of the American Dream has become somewhat jaded- it is a quick and slippery race to the bottom for the majority, while the powerful elites become the only recipients in the equity, fairness and reward stakes. Picture the game of "Adders and Ladders", where the only difference is that the gatekeepers at the bottom rung demand a million up front. And the Adders at the top of the board are nested in a coil.
Readers who wish me a speedy trip back to the UK after reading this posting will be disappointed, however. I feel very strongly that this is now my country, too, and I, like many, have no intention of accepting the injustices. It takes people like Moyers to refocus our attention to these matters. Tomorrow's leaders are waiting in the wings, and this revolution will take place, eventually. That is what my history taught me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bravo, Bill!
Posted by: mendomama on Jun 6, 2005 7:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bravo! I loved this article. I thought that Bill hit the nail on the head with respect to the state of this country. A country in which young families struggle to get their head above water, and are lucky if they can make their rent (or house payment if they're really lucky), afford to put gas in their car to get to their low paying job, and hopefully, afford to put dinner on the table for their family. Health insurance is not only a stretch - but completely out of the question, as is setting aside any money for retirement. Older generations in this country are struggling to keep from sinking. Too old to work, but too poor not to, they struggle to hold on to homes they've owned most of their adult lives, scramble to pay for healthcare costs that in some cases exceed their monthly income, and in many cases forces them to choose between medicine and food. Meanwhile, the rich continue to fill their pockets, with, apparently, enough money to buy all the rose colored glasses necessary to keep from seeing the reality that most American families live with every day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

National Treasure
Posted by: JackieGiles on Jun 6, 2005 8:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Eat your veggies, Bill. You're a National Treasure!

It's up to us Liberals to get worked up and do something about the right-wing Republican hegemony!

I'm retired, just moved to a new state, and am getting in touch with Progressives in my area so I can work with others to halt our land of freedom and opportunity in its decline toward a monarchy of the moneyed, catered to by legions of "servants" holding down multiple service jobs to feed and house themselvesand their families--if they're lucky.

What will you do?

And by the way, Joe Biden and you other Republicrat fellow-travelers: Quit trashing Howard Dean for telling the truth. The Republican leadership IS mean, and yeah, many of them have yet to work a day in an honest job. They and we know who they are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Make mine sedition
Posted by: RoguebotV on Jun 6, 2005 9:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great story Bill!!!!(as always)
As for you doubting thomases who listen to the right's rhetoric and point to communisim as the way we will go if we act like humans I say FOO on YOU!!!!!!!
We were never to be at this point if our founding fathers had anything to do with it.
Our current lack of caring( Nafta, bancruptcy law, political access, removal of assistance from the poor) all stem from our own depravity. If we do not care for the other man/woman/child we will never make the decisions needed to correct our failed system.
Our founding fathers went out of their way to get above the mundane P.O.V of classism and elite perogatives.
They knew that no one would have fair treatment if their personal privacy/ religion/ economic status, was controlled and dictated by the U.S. govenment and that would destroy the union faster than anything else.(They wrote directly against the elites as they knew the little man would not survive without powerful protections
)Now we have corporate henchmen whose only task is to promote a very narrow interpretation of freedom that does not include the rest of us.
Control of the U.S. came at the expense of freedom and revolt is the only answer as the lines of communication between the U.S. and US have been severed over years of criminal acts that none of us out here can control.
Money is great but people are stronger.
Take to the streets now!!!
(Oh, that rights Oprah's on then it's C.S.I. maybe after that )

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Make mine sedition Posted by: jingoist
» RE: Make mine sedition Posted by: jpme
» RE: Make mine sedition Posted by: jingoist
» RE: Make mine sedition Posted by: jpme
» RE: Make mine sedition Posted by: jingoist
» RE: Make mine sedition Posted by: dennyduke@earthlink.net
» RE: Make mine sedition Posted by: RoguebotV
» RE: Make mine sedition Posted by: jingoist
» RE: Make mine sedition Posted by: jingoist
» RE: Make mine sedition Posted by: BriMan
Luck?
Posted by: 42Years on Jun 6, 2005 11:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wish it were enough to have luck in order to change the world, even if it is only the small part that each of us occupy. But luck is like waiting for something to happen. Everyone knows that luck is winning the lottery or finding a dime on the sidewalk. It just happens without any interference from anyone. A good luck wish is no different than saying goodbye when you part or God bless when you sneeze. It is a formality that never comes true, like wishing on a star. If all the news about the rich and the poor, the politicians and the electorate, the rule makers and the law abiding citizens, and the white and the black are true, as I have every right to believe, then we have gone over the edge of reason and fallen into an abyss -- the cesspool that is the White House and Congress -- choking on the raw sewerage offered up as fact for what our "leaders" are doing in our name, today. We have gone more than half-way into the woods and must now continue on until we get out into the sunlight. Bill could have been writing this article in 1920 or 1945 or 1960 or anytime in the past. Yes, there are degrees of difference between now and then, but it is always the same story. People are suffering in the greatest country in the world and with few exceptions, we are doing nothing to change that fact. The really poor don't have time to try to fix the system. The middle class are afraid that if they try to fix the system they will lose everything and join the ranks of the really poor. The rich -- the top 10 percent -- don't try to fix the system because it works just fine for them, insulated behind their money as they are. The United States and the world are facing profound changes so fast that there is no time to debate the pros and cons. Couple what the US has turned into since 1939 with the fact they we are using up our finite resources at warp speed and you see that the train is speeding at 100 miles per hour through the station headed for the biggest wreck of all times. Maybe, the final end-game that will change the way we live forever. I do not say this lightly, but perhaps the train has to wreck and people have to die en mass to get our attention. All aboard!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bill, Would you adopt me?
Posted by: nakis on Jun 6, 2005 11:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another wonderfully plain spoken call it like it is with sound logic and facts article.

You've had a long career Bill and you deserve to retire in peace. But dang it, we need you (he said on his knees with his hands clasped together)!!!!
The nation needs you!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bill, Would you adopt me? Posted by: hobson2040
We have two economies
Posted by: chuckrightmire on Jun 6, 2005 12:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with all that you have said, Bill Moyers, but I would add that for some time now we have had two economies in this country. I have seen those who depend on their tax returns to pay their bills once a year and those who cannot afford dental or other health care. They are all around us. But we have a society today in which there is the world economy and down below is the local economy in which most of us live. Out here in the least known state we deal with the small businessman, with all the problems that entails but who are the foundation of the small economy. I would suggest that the right's concentration of morals having to do with activities between the waist and the knee have a great deal to do with this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Do We Really Do Now?
Posted by: thehousedog on Jun 6, 2005 1:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow - there are sure a lot of people standing up and picketing, and getting ready to take action outside my office; perhaps I'll join then...

We're all living in a fiction that we eat with, sleep with, and live with - and not one of us is going to do anything about it until somebody does something so violent that it shakes us all out of our slumber.

Where's the next revolutionary? She or he needs to step up to the plate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The True Patriots
Posted by: FloraFamily on Jun 6, 2005 1:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we are the patriots. those who support king george are loyalists. see Jefferson on " banks", Franklin on "an inquiry into a paper currency". Paine suggested a social security system. Bill Moyers is great. w.l.christensen

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Republican, Kevin Phillips, has said much the same
Posted by: Sojourner on Jun 6, 2005 3:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why won't the American people listen?

Where's this generation's Edward R. Murrow? Or where's Mike Wallace when we need him? Dan Rather won't you please come home?

We, the people, are being economically raped and robbed. And shamed in the eyes of the world for invading a nation that had not attacked us.

You mean it must get even worse than this before the people wise up and rise up?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Spare me the excessive ass-kissing
Posted by: h2oaso on Jun 6, 2005 6:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The unraveling state of this country and all that it stands for isn't just the product of the powers that be and the sheeple that elect them. There are far more overreaching trends such as the foisting of hyper-materialism and hyper-individualism, coupled by our society of wanton waste that only makes the situation worse. And as bad as that may sound, we haven't even come close to reaching bottom yet.

Do a search in AlterNet on Peak Oil and Air Jesus and you'll see what I'm talking about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mr. Bill Moyers
Posted by: aries72 on Jun 6, 2005 8:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I uphold what you have to say, we are not lost until we actually crawl into our holes and refuse to communicate.
I have watched all this happening around me for the past 55 years, and not with a dead head either, have always given my utmost, my idea's, my ideals, my willingness to attempt to change many things that were going to destroy America, and have, but because I was of the medium class it was hard, and you said it loud and clear, that didn't stop me. I am very saddened as to what is happening to my country, and now find myself wanting to do something with my hands tied behind my back - you can be assured that will not stop me.. Somehow we got ourselves into this pickle, since we got ourselves in we can also get ourselves out, when all who believe in the truth will finally get together really, not just words but actions to give America back to the people and the elitest take the hindmost - I really do have a lot to say, but will not at this particular time, hope to hear from you.
Jackie ONeil
aries72@nu-world.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mr. Moyers, Thanks for graciously sharing perspective, not spin.
Posted by: amilius on Jun 7, 2005 12:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As the religious right and wealthy elite align to roll back the Enlightenment principles upon which this nation was established, Thank God Bill Moyers is around to remind us that we may yet experience being a truly gracious nation if and when we, as a nation, choose differently. Clearly, it will not happen under current circumstances. Few in the halls of the Capital and none in the White House have been accurately described as 'gracious'. 'Gracious' is the opposite of 'evil', not 'good'. It is a good thing to be clear on this. We will be on the track that serves our potential as an expansive, inclusive abundantly beneficial society when our leaders ask about every choice, " Is this Gracious?" Not one administration policy discussed above would pass this simple test. Every policy that is being attacked or dismantled by the current administration would. " IS THIS CHOICE GRACIOUS?" It is that simple.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lets Step Up To The Plate
Posted by: jobie1kno on Jun 7, 2005 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tony Blair's Labour Party was once the "third party". Time and neccessity made it one of the two dominant parties in UK politics. Take strength from this. We can't see into the future, but we are here to shape it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yogi
Posted by: evaneis on Jun 7, 2005 12:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right on Bill Moyers! What you describe has been going on for a long time and it's time to stop it. The best thing we can do right now is make sure our states pass laws requiring paper ballots for voting, and pressure Congress to do it on a national level (although the Republicans won't let that happen). We don't need these computerized voting machines with private software, we then let Diebold count our votes (see Blackboxvoting.org). We don't need optical scanners to count our paper ballots either, those can also be hacked. We just need paper ballots and citizens to count them, all open to public view, like in Germany and Switzerland. This is the first step to regulating the corporations and the greedy bastards in the Republican Party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Still the City of Lincoln
Posted by: kikz on Jun 7, 2005 1:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"You stand there silently contemplating the words that gave voice to Lincoln's fierce determination to save the Union - his resolve that "government of, by, and for the people shall not perish from the earth" - and then you turn and look out, as he does, on a city where those words are daily mocked. This is no longer Lincoln's city. And those people from all walks of life making their way up the steps to pay their respects to this martyr for the Union - it's not their city, either. This is an occupied city, a company town, a wholly owned subsidiary of the powerful and privileged whose have hired an influence racket to run it."

I love Moyers, but as a son of the South, and an investigative reporter he should know more of his own cultural history... If Moyers knew his own history, he would know that the government on which Lincoln waxed poetic, that government "of, for and by the people" was a mockery from its utterance, and in actuality meant government in perpetuity of, for, and by, wealthy northern REPUBLICANS ONLY.

If you know any actual history... you know the real reasons as to why Lincoln was so fired up to save the union, "Morril Tariff" revenue to finance his masters' (Republican Robber Barons & Bankers) Government Subsidized Public Works Scams, the Canals and Railroads, and to lockdown republican control of the government.
Lincoln could've given a rat's ass about slavery or slaves.

Lincoln was an attorney/lobbyist (hired gun for the Railroad) and being privy to the planning, bought land at future crossroads. Don't believe me? Read for yourself. www.lewrockwell.com /dilorenzo/dilorenzo51.html. I offer this one link, at which Tom Dilorenzo's archives may be accessed, on these and many other myths of Lincoln.

I offer another, for your perusal and information on the "Robber Barons of the Gilded Age", entitled
History of the Great American Fortunes by Gustavas Myers www.geocities.com /doswind/myers/myers_index.html

cc the url, and delete the space after .com.
Both should be required reading.
I hope you as Americans, seeking truth, will discover your true national history, as I have.

So you see, it is still the City of Lincoln, same company town, same old plunderers, same old game, only the dates and names have changed, and Moyers should know better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Crawling out from under the rubble of Bushism
Posted by: Ellen Remore on Jun 7, 2005 4:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bill Moyers is an island of wisdom and sensitivity in a sea of venality, apathy, and scrambling self-aggrandizement. This administration has been such a spectacular travesty that it's difficult to know where to begin to triage the wounds it's inflicted. However, after much thought, I believe our top priorities ought to be: 1.) election reform...far-reaching and fast; and 2.) the prohibition of lobbying. It's nothing but legalized bribery, and the most expeditious means possible for parties with deep pockets and shallow motives to buy themselves scoundrel-friendly legislation. I realize it's a tall order. But if we all start nagging our Congresspeople, until we become annoying enough to get their attention...perhaps we can make these viable campaign issues in the not-too-distant future. By the way, I've become a pom-pom girl (old bag that I am) for Howard Dean ever since I read his statement, "I hate Republicans and everything they stand for." Give 'em hell, Howard!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

human being
Posted by: joankushner on Jun 8, 2005 6:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
would it be possible, somehow, to require all financial supporters of any politician donate an equal amount of money to non-partisan charity? to health care for the indigent? for small business loans? in effect, for the people in your article?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

too late
Posted by: too late on Jun 8, 2005 2:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it's nice to see that the class war is finally (after at least 35 years) getting some comment. but i fear it is too late--the war has already been lost. the greedy have pretty much taken everything and soon will succeed in killing the goose. nothing is going to happen until the system implodes, and then there will be a great darkness that will last for who knows how long. what will come after that? Probably a hi-tech dark age ruled by a small elite. On the other hand, the greedy have already ruined the environment and we all, rich and poor, may suffer the results of that. globalization cannot work unless there is a tremendous culling of the world population, including much of the population here in the good ol' US of A. I suggest that you can kill yourself whenever you choose or wait until the bird flu (or whatever) arrives. when everything descends into chaos many of the greedy will also suffer and die, if that is any consolation. We all have to die anyway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THANK YOU BILL
Posted by: longthought on Jun 9, 2005 10:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your article was inspiring. I fear it will get worse before it gets better. The new Robber Barons know they have to leave us enough to keep our cable TV on for now. When that ceases the masses may rise up in one form or another, at least I hope so, I feel so helpless most of the time. I see this coming, I see it already here. Your article has given me a second wind, I thank you. Another excellent book although a few years old now titled "CORPORATON NATION" by Charles Derber lays out alot of what you mentioned. I found it to enlightening.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's quit paying them!
Posted by: revsuzanne on Jun 10, 2005 12:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bill Moyers is absolutely right, and again he makes his point eloquently. Since Reagan, big business and their lobbyists have been more and more in charge of everything. Laws have been bought, and the wage-earning middle class has been sold out. I am reminded of the basic precepts that brought this country into realization: "NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!" I think that should be our battle cry. We haven't been represented in a long, long time. We need to QUIT PAYING THESE BUGGERS to screw us over. Our taxes are just a huge feeding trough for multinationals and the richest 2% who don't pay into the system. We need to cut them off.
Can you think of anything else that would actually get the attention of our so-called government?
The question is, can we ordinary citizenry get organized in such a way so as to make the thought attempting to exact taxes from us too daunting to the IRS and its enforcement arm, the FBI? I know the 16th Amendment was never ratified and there is no actual law on the books that says we HAVE to pay taxes, but that hasn't stopped them. Can enough people remove their money from the playing field all at once to send the message? How do we do it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

larry
Posted by: trurel on Jun 11, 2005 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What can I say? Just fantastic!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CORPORATION NATION
Posted by: drjimmy on Jun 11, 2005 9:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not talking about taxing the rich too much, but surely they could be taxed fairly at least equal to what it was % wise 20 years ago and maybe more in line with the rest of the top 49.9%. Some of the richest people in this country agree they are not paying their fair share. Believe me if they can make a buck in Amereica they'll stay here no matter what the tax is. To not tax them for fear they will leave is ludicrous. They make big bucks in America, and should consider themselves privileged to do business here, not the other way around. The best skilled labor force in the world lives here and yes they should pay for that and they will and do. Plumbing was a skill that I feel privileged to have learned and yes it paid me well as a journeyman and as a Contractor. Coming from S. California it would of been real tempting to hire illegals for under minimum wage to do a lot of labor intensive work most contractors do that. As an apprentice in the Union I was able to learn my trade and work from the ditches up to piping and plumbing. Today there are a lot less qualified Plumbers because of the Cheap Illegal Alien workforce available for manual labor to replace up and coming plumber apprentices and it's worse in other trades.
The poor getting poorer is Corporate America's fault. It's almost conspiratorial they hire the illegals without fear of reprisal. The Corporate World has such a hold on our society it's scary. Look at what is taking place, the Corporations are dictating how many hours a week America works, if and when you may have or have not a vacation/benefits/retirement,(retirement maybe we'll just let the government handle this in another Corporate Welfare Case like the Airlines retirements are now doing). They dictate where you will live, what you wear, and now what you do when you are not at work. There is not much left to dictate to us. Now if you are more my age 50+, I''m pretty well set they cannot dictate to me and probably not you. Imagine having 2 or 3 kids a mortgage 2 cars etc. When the company tells you to quit smoking and wear a better suit to work what are you going to do? And by the way we need every other Saturday from now on for the same pay. What are you going to do? You suck it up and that's what's happening nation/world wide and the Coporations know this. The counter-vailing forces are not there today. The unions are barely holding on and the Government is no longer accountable to the people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cool
Posted by: lindsa on Dec 11, 2006 7:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Best Pharmacy
Posted by: lindsag on Dec 22, 2006 4:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hi !
Posted by: sqa on Jan 20, 2007 7:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
financial
Posted by: meendawgaz on Feb 12, 2007 5:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Apply for master card apply for master card
Master card offers master card offers
Chase Master Card Chase Master Card
Tribute Master Card Tribute Master Card
Prepaid Master Card Prepaid Master Card
MBNA Master Card MBNA Master Card
GM Master Card GM Master Card
Western Union Prepaid Master Card Western Union Prepaid Master Card
Platinum Master card Platinum Master card
Citibank Master Card Citibank Master Card
Imagine Master Card Imagine Master Card
HSBC Master Card HSBC Master Card
Orchard Bank Master Card Orchard Bank Master Card
Chase Platinum Master Card Chase Platinum Master Card
Reward Master Card Reward Master Card
Master Card Debit Card Master Card Debit Card
Bank of America Master Card Bank of America Master Card
Air Miles Master Card Air Miles Master Card
Forex News Forex news
Forex software forex software
Forex trade forex trade
Forex market forex market
Forex broker forex broker
Forex trading system forex trading system
Forex seminar forex seminar
Forex currency trading currency forex trading
Forex online trading forex online trading
Forex chart forex chart
Forex training forex training
Forex trading course forex trading course
Forex trading books forex trading books
Forex trader forex trader
Forex trading strategy forex trading strategy
Forex profiting forex profiting
Forex trading education forex trading education
Learn forex learn forex
Forex day trading forex day trading
Forex trading software

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

apply for credit
Posted by: meendawgaz on Feb 12, 2007 5:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Apply for credit apply for credit
credit repair credit repair
bad credit debt consolidation bad credit debt consolidation
home equity line of credit home equity line of credit
bad credit loan bad credit loan
bad credit personal loan bad credit personal loan
free credit report free credit report
credit report credit report
credit union credit union
credit score credit score
bad credit refinance bad credit refinance
bad credit mortgage bad credit mortgage
online credit card approval online credit card approval
eliminate credit card debt eliminate credit card debt
consumer credit counseling consumer credit counseling
credit card application credit card application
credit counseling credit counseling
bad credit auto loan bad credit auto loan
free credit score free credit score
credit card consolidation credit card consolidation
credit card debt consolidation credit card debt consolidation
online credit report online credit report
instant approval credit card instant approval credit card
unsecured credit card unsecured credit card
low interest credit card low interest credit card
no credit check loan no credit check loan
credit and debt counseling credit and debt counseling
free instant credit report free instant credit report
credit card debt management credit card debt management
credit reporting agency credit reporting agency
business to business credit union business to business credit union
free credit report online free credit report online

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement