Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

100 Days and Counting

By Sam Graham-Felsen, AlterNet. Posted June 2, 2005.


The Democratic Party in D.C. is ready to call Dean a disaster, but the local parties love what he's done so far. Who's right and who's wrong?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Nobel Laureate Slams the Bible, Calls It "A Catalogue of Cruelties"
Mario de Queiroz

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Sam Graham-Felsen

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

No one wrote about Terry McAuliffe's first 100 days as the chair of the Democratic National Committee. I'm willing to bet the landmark didn't even occur to anyone, with the exception, perhaps, of Mr. McAuliffe himself. But when 100 days passes and his successor, Howard Dean -- the most highly anticipated, scrutinized, equally loathed and beloved DNC chair in recent memory -- is at the helm of the party, it's a different story. It is, in fact, a story.

It goes without saying that 100 days is an arbitrary and premature point at which to assess whether Dean is saving or screwing the party. Right-wing pundits have already started celebrating what they see as Dean's speedy march towards failure. Although Dean is hitting "record levels," according to DNC spokesperson Laura Gross, with a million-dollar-a-week fundraising pace, conservatives are gloating over RNC chair Ken Mehlman's $34.2 million-twice the amount Dean has raised so far.

And Dean's image problem was and still is a primary concern of party leaders Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, who publicly opposed Dean's candidacy and privately urged him to tone down his rhetoric after being appointed Dean sent shudders through the Democratic establishment with his now-infamous suggestion in May that Tom Delay "go back to Houston, where he can serve his jail sentence."

Even Barney Frank, not exactly a tight-lipped centrist, said Dean's words were "overstate[d]," "unfair," and "just inappropriate." Meanwhile, the people who make up Dean's base -- progressives and grassroots activists eager for an overhaul of the Democratic Party -- haven't been too pleased either. Many are uncomfortable with the news that Dean is buddying up with establishment D.C. Democrats like Reid and New York Senator Chuck Schumer; others are uneasy with him spending time in Washington period.

On April 20 Dean told a Minnesota audience about his Iraq war stance, "Now that we're there, we're there and we can't get out? I hope the President is incredibly successful with his policy now."

Coming from a former presidential candidate whose momentum was built largely on a candid and unwavering anti-Iraq war platform, the statement prompted immediate outrage on the left, voiced in an open letter to Dean from longtime peace activist Tom Hayden. Dennis Kucinich followed Hayden's lead, asking Dean, "Did these words really come from the same man who claimed to represent the Democratic wing of the Democratic party? It was [our] hope and expectation that you would prevent the party from repeating its past drift to the Republican-lite center."

Dean's first major media appearance as DNC chair did little to abate the criticism. Appearing on Meet the Press on May 22nd, Dean endured an endless barrage of linguistic nitpicking from Tim Russert. Intent on perpetuating Dean's image as an unstable hothead, Russert gave the chairman little opportunity to explain his vision for the Party, instead tossing out gems like, "You said in December of 2003 that we shouldn't prejudge Osama bin Laden. How can you sit here and have a different standard for Tom DeLay and prejudge him?"

Republicans on the Hill snickered. And for the soundbyte-oriented Democratic establishment, this was proof positive of everything they'd warned about Dean. Hayden and Kucinich couldn't have been too happy about the performance either. Even though Dean stood firm on his criticism of Delay, he equivocated on abortion and didn't even approach the issue of withdrawal from Iraq.

It's no wonder then that Dean has avoided the national spotlight, with criticism being launched at him from all sides and media-jealous Democratic colleagues muttering about his inability to stay "on message." But perhaps the main reason that Dean's been AWOL from the Sunday talk show circuit is that he's been busy traveling the country, learning about the state of politics at the local level. Since he began as chair on February 12, Dean's priorities have been set less on cultivating a perfect, all-encompassing message for the Democratic Party and more on "showing up."

In the last three months, Dean has visited 18 states, where he has met with Democratic officials at the state and local level and promoted his plan to build the party infrastructure from the bottom up. Unlike McAuliffe, Dean isn't arriving in limousines; he's flying coach, paying for his own bus tickets, and carrying his own bags. And if you listen to the people that Dean has spent most of his tenure thus far speaking to -- people in some of the Reddest states of the country -- Dean is doing a fantastic job

Dean ran for chair on a platform promising to radically depart from the previous DNC strategy of targeting specific states during crucial election cycles. His plan was to focus on all fifty states, cultivate candidates at all levels of government, and get paid grassroots organizers on the ground immediately. "I'm not much of a Zen person," he remarked upon accepting chairmanship, "But I've found that the path to power, oddly enough, is to trust others with it. That means putting the power where the voters are." Judging from my conversations with state and county leaders, Dean is doing exactly that.

Dean's "Red, White, and Blue" tour through the South was initially met with trepidation, not only by Democratic insiders, but also state party leaders who feared Dean's aggressive "northeastern liberal" style wouldn't fly in their states. When Dean showed up, for the most part, those impressions were shattered. The Dean they saw was not a firebrand, but a pragmatic leader determined to build the nuts and bolts of the party. "I was nervous before Governor Dean came to town," said Gabe Holmstrom, Executive Director of the Arkansas Democratic Party, "but I found that Dean had a lot of insight into local politics and a real interest in taking a much more aggressive role in organizing from the grassroots. His commitment was clear." Party leaders described crowds at Dean events in their states as "electric," "ecstatic," and "very excited." Nick Casey, West Virginia's State Chair told me people were driving in "three hours from the south, five hours from the east, just to hear him."

After years of being virtually ignored by the DNC, state party leaders are extremely enthusiastic about Dean's state partnership program. On April 8, Dean announced the first round of his investments in the states, half a million dollars that would be spread among the state parties of Missouri, North Carolina, North Dakota, and West Virginia. Since then, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, Wyoming, and Kansas have received DNC funding. In Nebraska-which received ten times the $12,000 they got from Terry McAuliffe last year-the state party is putting organizers in all 93 of their counties. In West Virginia, Casey is excited about using the additional funds to recruit teachers to serve as mentors for Young Democrats clubs at high schools, and energizing long-stagnant groups like the Federation of Democratic Women. "In 2004, we started campaign after the May primary," says Casey. "We just started our coordinating campaign a month ago for 2008. That makes a hell of a difference."

Chairs from other states which are yet to receive funding, such as Arizona's Jim Pederson, are looking forward to boosting the basics-improving technology, getting enhanced voter files, and putting organizers on the ground to reach out to potential voters who haven't been contacted in years. Montana's State Chair, Bob Ream, is thrilled about the prospects of hiring more organizers for his state. "We only have one person trying to cover the whole state as a field organizer. With funding, we can get two or three more and locate them in far eastern and western Montana," Ream says. "Precinct level organizing was something our party did forty or fifty years ago and I think it's important to get back to that, especially in a state like ours that is so scattered, population-wise."

The state leaders I spoke with all praised Dean for allotting them with real independence, a tangible indicator of what they see as his dedication to the bottom-up model. Gabe Holmstrom is glad that Dean is "shifting the power outside of the Beltway" an allowing his state party to hire its own staff, from its own state, on its own terms. Jim Hester, State Chair from Tennessee agrees, saying that "It's important from a messaging standpoint too, because it's better when people who are living in the real world -- people who get up, go to work, feed their kids -- are sharing their concerns about the country. We need to talk about what we real people need, not what the disconnected folks in Washington think we need."

Hadley Glover, a 31-year-old mom and Democratic chair of Arkansas' Benton County, says Dean's plan is "music to her ears." With the highest Republican population in the state, Benton County residents are inundated with negative portrayals of Democrats. But with money and county officials on their side, Glover says, Benton county residents can define the party themselves. "It's easy to cast stones or call names or dismiss political parties with cliches. It's very difficult to do the same thing when it's your next door neighbor or the person you go to church with," says Glover. "We've got to put a face on the party that people know. It's very easy for them to dismiss John Kerry as a 'babykiller.' It isn't so easy to call Hadley Glover a 'babykiller.'"

According to Hester, Dean's not only giving state and county-level parties independence to cultivate their own messages, he's asking for their help in cultivating a national message for the party. "We've had more communication and more of a close working relationship with the DNC in the short time he's been here since any other time in my memory," says Hester. "There's a real back and forth exchange of ideas that's taking place now." In Dean, Glover hears the DNC saying, "'We don't have to control all the purse strings, we don't have to make all of the yes-or-no decisions in order to make this work.'"

Time will tell if Dean truly intends to continue in his commitment to the grassroots. Dean intends to personally visit or send DNC staff to party headquarters at all fifty states by the end of July, and plans to extend his partnership program to every state in the country as soon as possible. But will he continue to pour money into organizing on the local level in 2006 and 2008? If the establishment feels the grassroots have gained too much power, will Dean buckle?

Democratic pollster Pat Caddell, who says he saw Dean "roll over like a puppy after Kerry won the nomination when he should have put pressure on him," is a skeptic. Caddell thinks Dean's grassroots talk could very well just be a gimmick. "If you're really going to be empowering people you actually have to let them in, rather than just get money off of them," he says. Additionally, he doubts that the grassroots energy from 2004 can carry over much longer. "You cannot sustain the grassroots enthusiasm without changing what the party stands for. You can't tell me the Democrats have a real vision right now. The grassroots can only exist when you believe in something."

Still, state party leaders like Hester are optimistic. "What Dean is doing right now has never happened before in an off-election year," says Hester. "He's going out there right now and putting DNC money where his mouth is. He said he was gonna come down South and listen to us and that's what he did. That's real and that's tangible."

For all the hits on Dean coming from Washington for his slow fundraising start, his lack of media savvy, and his as-yet undelivered technological improvements to the party machine, it's worth noting that the D.C. Democrats who criticize him don't have much to stand on as they've been a bunch of losers in the recent elections. After all, the only real political "experts" out there are the ones who win campaigns.

The Democratic state chairs in the heavily Republican states -- who have seen why Democrats have been losing firsthand -- think Dean's taken the right approach. His face-to-face meetings with local party officials and his message of devolving power from Washington are proving to Democrats across the country that they can and should be a part of the political process. And that, at 100 days in, is something can Dean be proud of.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Sam Graham-Felsen is co-author with The Nation's Katrina vanden Heuvel of the weekly online feature, Sweet Victories.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
100 days and counting
Posted by: rosestern@msn.com on Jun 2, 2005 5:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find Howard Dean a refreshing change from Terry McCaulliffe , who I never trusted and he certainly didn't lead a successful Presidential Campaign. Dean is Honest, Open and held his own with the BIG BOLD moderator of Meet THe PRESS. Power to the people. We gave our support to John Kerry in whatever amount we could afford, but I fear he was getting bad advice from the oily McCaulliffe.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 100 days and counting Posted by: Indysavvy
Keep up the good work Dean!
Posted by: nosylae on Jun 2, 2005 6:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kerry got bad advice from everyone on his staff and from the Beltway. Dean is actually listening to what the people want. And established Democrats (or should that be pansycrats) are so disconnected from their base that they can't hear us anymore. They are all afraid of Dean and what he represents.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Grass Roots is the Key
Posted by: Sandra on Jun 2, 2005 7:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm out here in the real world and I have lost faith with the Democrats in Washington. I expect that they will yield and compromise on key legislation. I don't have faith that they will watch out for the people in this country. I've held my breath regarding Social Security, hoping that they will hold firm and not develop some compromise bill that guts the program. I held my breath on the Bankruptcy legislation and the list goes on and on. There are so many issues with this Bush administration that would allow for impeachment in a sane world. Where's the outrage and leadership from the Democrats in Washington? It's about time that the Washington Democrats listened to the people and I applaud Dean for making that effort. Of course he doesn't have all the answers and can't please everybody. Of course Democrats can't raise the same amounts of money as Republicans at this time. What the Democrats do have is people in this country who are fed up with the policies and paths taken by the Bush administration. Give the local people some money to organize and the opportunities to develop the messages that resonate with their neighbors. We are the sane people who care about our families, our neighbors, our communities, our state, our country and yes, the world that we all have to live in. We care about quality of life and leaving a better world for our children and grandchildren. We are fed up and we want to see some backbone in the Democratic Party leadership. The political structure in this country at this time does not seem to offer the hope of success to alternative parties in national elections, particularly presidential elections. We may manage to get to a point in the future that parties outside the Democrats and Republicans are viable on the national level. Right now we need to work to try to change the Democratic Party because the Republicans are a lost cause.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not surprisngly
Posted by: maxpayne on Jun 2, 2005 7:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's the establishment up in Washington who is planning to recall Dean in 2006 if they don't win the House and Senate by then. At least Dean isn't wasting public money the way previous chairs including Ron Brown and Terry McAWFUL have done using corporate money to fund the party which is another reason why our Democratic Party has been more like the PANSY Party ! Dean, don't let the mf-ers poison your mind. Stay the progressive course and encourage more new Democrats to do the same and please take back that Iraq War comment of staying the Bush course on leaving our troops in Iraq. I would love to see the purging of centrists begin by running populist type candidates against centrist incumbents in 2006. Yes, it'll hurt for a little while but at least the road to longterm victory will finally be in place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

History shows the D.C. Democrats' methods lead to FAILURE!
Posted by: owlbear1 on Jun 2, 2005 7:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anything that upsets them has to be good for the Democratic party...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A sustainable Democratic Party
Posted by: greenindy on Jun 2, 2005 7:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Grassroots organizing is a key to the success of the Democratic Party. Where Republicans have all manner of well healed contributors, such backing for the Dems is inherently counter-message and less fruitful.

Just as saving our planet from catastrophic environmental degradation will require that each of us take responsibility for our resource use, so will a healthy Democratic Party require support from each of its constituents. Agreeing on a common-sense platform is the lesser of the tasks at hand.

The effects of disconnection of the party leadership to its base are all too apparent by observing the current Democratic Congress. Wishy-washy and out-of-touch does not work against a determined Republican constituency of DIY business-oriented folks. Their self-determinism has created the Bush administration and is sustaining it thus far, no matter how crass it may seem to the world at large.

Democrats unite! at the local level, where the heart of sustainability beats.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Local Democratic Party Posted by: AdamSelene40
Howard Dean at 100
Posted by: Stegs on Jun 2, 2005 7:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Insiders have been underestimating Howard Dean for years especially the success he has had in mobilizing grass roots action. Democrats, more than money and message, need a dose of enthusiasm. Dean inspires it. Despite characterization as a loose cannon and the incessant lampooning of him by the national press, Dean perseveres, competes locally, doesn't sell out to money interests and carries his own bags. The party will never succeed at a national level if it can't or won't find its constituency and represent it locally. Dean found that out in his presidential campaign and that is his strategy moving forward. Here's one Democrat who endorses that approach.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Beltway Dems Disappointed and Skeptical? That's the Point.
Posted by: macbd on Jun 2, 2005 8:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article quotes Frank, Pelosi and others within the withered ranks of Beltway Democrats, all critical of Dean. They still don't get it. We don't care what they think of Dean or of the rest of us who really do embrace a progressive view for this country - their brand of situational ethics and empty pragmatism is as useless as it is annoying. The future of the Democratic Party will not be carried on the shoulders of Frank, Reid, Pelosi - and certainly not Caddell. Their gutless response to the outrages of the Bush administration are emblamatic of the problem, not the solution. I just hope Dean is properly dismissive of their criticism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time to Clean House in Washington
Posted by: beata on Jun 2, 2005 8:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here in my part of the "grassroots" (Deep South) we Democrats are talking about issues such as (and not necessarily in this order) fair trade, living wages, environmental stewardship, government accountability, peace on earth, civil liberties, separation of church and state - why aren't the people we sent to Washington to represent us, representing us??? They care more about protecting their own power than doing the jobs we sent them to do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dean Not as Bad
Posted by: nakis on Jun 2, 2005 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democrats in Washington - bad, Dean not as bad.

Dean looks great by comparison but he's only playing a crooked game on a crooked ball field.

If Dean or any Democrat really wants to change the way things work then going around for more grassroots action and asking for more money from the people is not going to change much. Sure it can get more people involved but we are still stacked up against corporate controlled media and a political budget that will ALWAYS outstrip any grassroots movement and the corporate support for profit/payback the Democratic party can put together.

Yes I'm a bit bitter. All totaled up I gave more than $2,000 to the Democrats for the last election. I'm just an ordinary blue collar guy. My money didn't do squat. The Democrats wasted our money and it didn't come close to what the Republicans did and were able to spend on the election. Power and Money. Not democratic principles. So why do we keep with the same old same old?
Why isn't the great reformer, the grassroots hollerer going after a way to level the playing field? Put together a grassroots effort to demand a real change to election funding. Get it off the corporate payoff-role and into a federally funded system that gives everyone, I mean everyone, a chance. Not just a D&R race, with the Democrats at the disadvantage, but a real chance for other parties. Make it is so each party gets equal air time in real honest to goodness debates. No commercials. No payed for by liars advertisements.

Dean is better, but he's still off by a longshot. Why? Because that's the way they want it. Root for Dean if you will. He is a good guy. But demand something real from your party.
Goodness knows I've sent them enough e-mails begging them to take action on election reform and media reform. Haven't heard a wisper yet. Ask yourself why. Ask yourself why Clinton and Bush never try to do anything about the genocide in the Congo. Ask why you never hear much about it unless you read about it from people who've been there.
People here keep saying to wake up to the facts. That is great and essential but people keep looking to the same system to create change. It doesn't want change. It proves it daily.

We really need to ask more and ask tougher questions.
Peace be with you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Money is the Mother's Milk of Politics
Posted by: Campesino on Jun 2, 2005 10:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dean is in trouble

Washington Outlook
Edited by Lee Walczak

Howard Dean's Raised Voice Isn't Raising Cash

One hundred days into his tenure as the high-energy, higher-decibel chairman of the Democratic Party, Howard Dean is in trouble with party moneybags. The former Vermont governor seems to be doing a better job flaying the Republicans than bridging the cash chasm between the parties. Given Dean's 2004 run as a populist crusader, moderates were never wild about his takeover of the Democratic National Committee. So some big donors are sitting on their wallets.

Dean wowed the faithful in '04 with his Web-based fund-raising magic. But major business donors still count, and in his new role as party honcho, the feisty doctor seems to be struggling to connect. After achieving money parity with the GOP in 2004, Democrats have fallen far behind. According to the Federal Election Commission, the DNC raised $14.1 million in the first quarter of 2005, vs. the Republican National Committee's $32.3 million. Dean drew about 20,000 new donors, while his rivals picked up 68,200. The bottom line: Republicans have $26.2 million in the bank vs. $7.2 million for the Dems.

Why the yawning gap? For starters, Dean is not a natural fit for the "stroke and joke" style that traditional party chiefs use to extract cash from well-heeled contributors. "It appears that the chairman has come to the conclusion that he doesn't need major donors," sniffs one fat cat. "He hasn't made any effort to reach out."

Personality factors aside, Dean's business-bashing '04 campaign makes him a hard sell in corporate circles. "There's a wait-and-see attitude from business and major contributors," says Nathan Landow, a Maryland developer and big-time donor. "This guy has some work to do to get the comfort level up." William W. Batoff, a Philadelphia real estate developer and longtime Democratic fund-raiser who backed President Bush in 2000 and 2004, is less diplomatic. "Howard Dean is the wrong person to be chair," says Batoff, who claims he will help fund the Dems' congressional efforts but will boycott the national committee while Dean reigns.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dean is the only Chance for Democrats
Posted by: gopbarfbag on Jun 2, 2005 2:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Forget the fuax republican wannabe Democrat Leadership Council (DLC), who are a group of corporate suck ups and losers. Howard Dean is probably the only person who has the guts to take on the Krazy Khristian Kult and their radical neo-con fascist girlfriends. If the long-time losers in the party don't support Dean, and I doubt they will because the party is too fractured to make any real attempt at winning anything, then the country will belong to the far right-wing extremeist long inot the next decade and years more of war before a vialble peraon can wrestle control of the Democrat Party from the likes of From and the Clintons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He is Great for Republicans!
Posted by: jakealeah on Jun 2, 2005 4:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dean is doing an outstanding job at giving the Republicans more ammunition to use against the Democrats.

Grass roots...Dean is the weed killer!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are We Sure That the Grassroots Is Progressive?
Posted by: thirdmg on Jun 2, 2005 4:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's an assumption in most of the comments on this forum that the grassroots of the Democratic Party is dominantly progressive. The assumption might be correct, and I hope that it is. However, I've had some personal experience with activist conservative Democrats trying to wrest control of local party politics away from progressives and using dirty tactics to do it. It was like having a disguised fifth column working against us. That happened in a generally liberal area. I wonder how things are in generally conservative areas, such as southern and mid-western states.

My hope is that progressives will work to make sure that their power and agendas are dominant, and not take them for granted. One obvious way to do that might be to actively recruit members from other progressive political parties, such as the Greens, and to search out "lapsed" progressives who gave up on the Democratic Party as it drifted to the right in recent decades.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Knock em loose
Posted by: Michiganman on Jun 2, 2005 5:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good start Howard! It's about time someone paid attention to the people who actually ARE the Democratic party. Those buttheads in Washington have no idea what is important to us. I submit that from now on any Democrat who votes along with the republicans on their insane agenda be labeled REPUBLICRATS and swiftly BLACKLISTED! Knock some sense into their heads Howard!!! Tell em we are sick of their pandering to the right! BUT you had better support an END to this ridiculous oil war, or else.......you"ll go the way of McAwful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Right On Howard
Posted by: Uptotheplate on Jun 2, 2005 5:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its what I have believed all along and have been trying to convince my liberal friends. And that is each state needs to set their own agenda aligned with the democratic party. In red states the party may need to be more moderate, blue more liberal, or a combination. By letting the local districts set their agenda, I believe we can bring in the moderate republican who is looking for a reason to jump away from the religious right wing facist rhetoric. Along with their right wing candidates.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's A Plan. Don't Blame Dean.
Posted by: foodguy on Jun 3, 2005 3:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I gave a lot of money both Move On, Dean and Kerry last year. But because of the disastrous failure of the Democrats and the desert landscape on which stands absolutely no visible candidate for the presidency in 2008, I now plan to register as a Republican.

Once inside the GOP, I can finally do something about Religious Right, which I had hoped the Democrats would take on. I can work to make John McCain the GOP Presidential Candidate, who on some issues at least is passable.

It's not all that odd, if you think about it. Could I be as effective if I stay a Democrat? If change is important, and it is to me, why not?

Can anyone suggest a more effective way of stopping the religious right than by clipping them inside the party that protects them?

Meanwhile, leave the corpse of the Democratic Party to the good Dr. Dean to see if he can revive it. And, if he does, let's not forget that it also takes a doctor to show the Democrats where another part of their anatomy is located, as Dean did in 2004 when he opposed the Iraq War and suddenly the other candidates came scrambling back.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Democrats in DC?
Posted by: Scott on Jun 5, 2005 2:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NOW who in their right mind would believe or agree with anything that any bunch of Democrats in DC put together? Dean is a fresh voice from the hinder lands and if I read my history right, revolutions always start in the hinder lands!! Hurrah for Dean, Death to the DC Democrats!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JINGOIST
Posted by: jingoist on Jun 5, 2005 7:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Keep Howard Dean on the job. He's screwing you guys up royally!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement