Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Class of 9/11

By Mark Danner, The New York Review of Books and TomDispatch. Posted May 31, 2005.


A speech to Berkeley graduates asks how students will bring their degrees to bear on a world in a dire state.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Mark Danner

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The following is based on the commencement address given to the graduating students of the Department of English of the University of California at Berkeley in the Hearst Greek Theatre, May 15, 2005.

When I was invited to give this speech, I was asked for a title. I dillied and dallied, begged for more time, and of course the deadline passed. The title I really wanted to suggest was the response that all of you have learned to expect when asked your major: What are you going to do with that? To be an English major is to live not only by questioning, but by being questioned. It is to live with a question mark placed squarely on your forehead. It is to live, at least some of the time, in a state of "existential dread." To be a humanist, that is, means not only to see clearly the surface of things and to see beyond those surfaces, but to place oneself in opposition, however subtle, an opposition that society seldom lets you forget: What are you going to do with that?

To the recent graduate, American society -- in all its vulgar, grotesque power -- reverberates with that question. It comes from friends, from relatives, and perhaps even from the odd parent here and there. For the son or daughter who becomes an English major puts a finger squarely on the great parental paradox: you raise your children to make their own decisions, you want your children to make their own decisions -- and then one day, by heaven, they make their own decisions. And now parents are doomed to confront daily the condescending sympathy of your friends -- their children, of course, are economics majors or engineering majors or pre-meds -- and to confront your own dread about the futures of your children.

It's not easy to be an English major these days, or any student of the humanities. It requires a certain kind of determination, and a refusal -- an annoying refusal, for some of our friends and families, and for a good many employers -- to make decisions, or at least to make the kind of "practical decisions" that much of society demands of us. It represents a determination, that is, not only to do certain things -- to read certain books and learn certain poems, to acquire or refine a certain cast of mind -- but not to do other things: principally, not to decide, right now, quickly, how you will earn your living; which is to say, not to decide how you will justify your existence. For in the view of a large part of American society, the existential question is at the bottom an economic one: Who are you and what is your economic justification for being?

English majors, and other determined humanists, distinguish themselves not only by reading Shakespeare or Chaucer or Joyce or Woolf or Zora Neale Hurston but by refusing, in the face of overwhelming pressure, to answer that question. Whether they acknowledge it or not -- whether they know it or not -- and whatever they eventually decide to do with "that," they see developing the moral imagination as more important than securing economic self-justification.

Such an attitude has never been particularly popular in this country. It became downright suspect after September 11, 2001 -- and you of course are the Class of September 11, having arrived here only days before those attacks and the changed world they ushered in. Which means that, whether you know it or not, by declaring yourselves as questioners, as humanists, you already have gone some way in defining yourselves, for good or ill, as outsiders.

I must confess it: I, too, was an English major...for nineteen days. This was back in the Berkeley of the East, at Harvard College, and I was a refugee from philosophy -- too much logic and math in that for me, too practical -- and I tarried in English just long enough to sit in on one tutorial (on Keats's "To Autumn"), before I fled into my own major, one I conceived and designed myself, called, with even greater practical attention to the future, "Modern Literature and Aesthetics."

Which meant of course that almost exactly twenty-five years ago today I was sitting where you are now, hanging on by a very thin thread. Shortly thereafter I found myself lying on my back in a small apartment in Cambridge, Massachusetts, reading the New York Times and the New York Review -- very thoroughly: essentially spending all day, every day, lying on my back, reading, living on graduation-present money and subsisting on deliveries of fried rice from the Hong Kong restaurant (which happened to be two doors away -- though I felt I was unable to spare the time to leave the apartment, or the bed, to pick it up). The Chinese food deliveryman looked at me dispassionately and then, as one month stretched into two, a bit knowingly. If I knew then what I know now I would say I was depressed. At the time, however, I was under the impression that I was resting.


Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Beautiful!
Posted by: terihu on Jun 1, 2005 5:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a proud Berkeley English major myself, I can only think back to my own graduation in 1996 and think, "What has the world come to?"

Back then, things were far from rosy, but there wasn't this dark cloud of despair that hung over everything like now. How did we get to this point? And what are we going to do about it?

And no, the answer is not as simple as "get a Democrat in the White House." The Dems are somewhat better, but not by much. They will not fix the fundamental flaws that have brought us to this state.

To the class of 2005, I wish you all the best.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

where was he when I graduated as an english major?
Posted by: theywillknowusbyourabsurdity on Jun 1, 2005 5:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I couldn't have said it better myself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

who are you?
Posted by: hattonr on Jun 1, 2005 8:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You have earned your living, you have justified your existence, if you care.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How might one be gracious with the choices made?
Posted by: amilius on Jun 1, 2005 10:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Integrity is a gracious choice. Deception and disingenuous spin are not. Integrity finds importance in relating graciousness to the choices made. There is integrity in revealing ungracious choices as well, perhaps more so since the powers that perpetrate ungracious behaviors do not believe their choices invite consequences. They will not appreciate and will attempt to squelch anyone who reminds them, "All ungracious choices invite instructive consequences, the 'benefit' of an ungracious choice." What is so timely about this speech is the incredible number of ungracious leaders choosing for this nation on behalf of the 'advantage' of the fewest of its citizens in recent memory. They ungraciously use the questioning of motive behind the 9.11 terrorists as the justification for their own ungracious choices. They do so to distract from the fact that it is their own ungracious empowerment of tyranny in Saudi Arabia that inspired 15 of the terrorists on 9.11, as well as their leader Osama Bin Laden. To acknowledge this they might have to change their policies. They see more purpose to ungraciously empowering the military industrial complex than dismantling the platforms of anger on which terrorists stand. With regard to all choices, one might always beneficially ask, "Is my choice gracious?" The opposite of 'evil' is not 'good'. The opposite of 'good' is 'bad'. The opposite of 'evil' is 'gracious'. Danner, even in his questioning of circumstances, has graciously shared with others his integrity with candor. Were it that the executive branch had any integrity or candor to share.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Benefit vs. Advantage
Posted by: amilius on Jun 1, 2005 10:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One might do well to notice the choice of terms in political discourse and what they reveal about graciousness. Benefit, that which might be shared with all, is gracious. Advantage, that which by definition is not shared with all, is ungracious. Ever notice that the 'benefit' of higher education became the 'advantage' of higher education during the Reagan years? W only speaks of benefit with disingenuous 'sincerity' or disdain, frequently extolling the advantages to be secured with the ungracious policy he puts forth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

History lesson
Posted by: Lathor on Jun 1, 2005 10:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So we're officially an empire, and we are writing our own history...and that's supposed to be a good thing, right?

Except that, historically, empires fall. Superpowers fade, governments crumble. We have (had?) the opportunity to buck that tide, by being a democracy: the government for the people, by the people. Are we really ready to give that up for the "glory" of empire?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

thank you mr. danner
Posted by: pjohn on Jun 1, 2005 10:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
dear mr. danner:

thank you. thank you. thank you...

with much thanks,

thank you.

p.s. thanks

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

commencement speech
Posted by: tatateeta on Jun 1, 2005 8:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That was beautiful. Thank you so much.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ty Babe
Posted by: hotlipsin61 on Jun 7, 2005 10:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That was a beautiful piece about English majors, but I am upset over the direction our country has taken since 9/11. Is this what the USA has become, an "empire"? If so, we're doomed.
No one is willing to take on the Bush administration to answer for their crimes against Afghanistan and Iraq.
Life here is difficult for many. We've endorsed torture and other devious ways to deny people their rights. We've become a nation of sheep. Passive and doing nothing to stop King-um-our Fuerher Bush and his cast of idiots from leading us down a disastrous path.
And to call this country a leader of democracy and democratic values is no longer valid. We're just as bad as any other corrupt empire in the past. I am ashamed to live in the United States. We will someday pay for these crusades into the Middle East.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]