COMMENTS: 4
Chronicling Conflict
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
Chakarova, a documentary photographer who teaches journalism at the University of California at Berkeley, is currently immersed in two long-term projects, one documenting the military standoff in Kashmir and the other focusing on the sex trafficking of women in Eastern Europe. Born in Bulgaria under communism, Chakarova grew up in a village “running barefoot and playing with the chickens.â€
When she was 13, her family traveled to Baltimore, Maryland, on a three-month exchange program sponsored by her father’s research position at Johns Hopkins University. Chakarova spoke no English, and the inner-city public school she attended classified her as developmentally disabled.
As a teenager, she worked three jobs in order to afford her first camera, which allowed her to communicate visually rather than verbally. She went on to study fine-arts photography, receiving a BFA from the San Francisco Art Institute, but she became frustrated with the endless introspection of the art world and turned to journalism, finding the field’s outward gaze refreshing.
Chakarova, who is now 29, has traveled all over the world, documenting living conditions and human rights in Africa and the Caribbean for her graduate thesis, and shooting the daily lives of Cubans surviving in the country’s two rival economies—the black market and withering communism—in photos that are featured in the book Capitalism, God, and a Good Cigar: Cuba Enters the Twenty-First Century.
“My mother asked me recently, ‘Mimi, it’s taken us so long to get out of poverty, why do you keep going back?’†Chakarova recalls. “I said, ‘Because it’s so familiar, Mom.’â€
Kashmir
The disputed region of Kashmir, located on the borders of the two nuclear powers of India and Pakistan, has suffered an estimated 85,000 fatalities as a result of the conflict hinging on the national and religious strife between the Hindu and Muslim countries. Flare-ups between regional militants and Indian troops stationed in the region create a climate of perpetual war.
Chakarova’s photos of Kashmir, which were exhibited at the San Francisco World Affairs Council of Northern California this past winter, depict a world of torture, forced relocation, decimated villages, and traumatized civilians. Chakarova focuses on the war’s impact on civilians, specifically women, whom she believes disproportionately bear the brunt of the war’s hardship.
In one photo, beds are lined up across the front lawn of a psychiatric hospital. The facility is filled beyond capacity, as the war results in not only physical injuries but also cases of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. The text accompanying the exhibit explains that women in the region attempt suicide with an unusual frequency—on average, five to seven attempts per day are recorded. (In hopes of forgiveness, attempts are most frequent on Fridays, the holiest day of the week in Islamic tradition.) Most choose to consume organophosphorus pesticides used in agriculture.
A young woman working in rural development, quoted in the exhibit, declares, “I am fighting a war on two fronts; I am fighting a patriarchal society and also dealing with the conflict that’s existed here since I got out of school.â€
After photographing a massacre that included women, children, the elderly, and the disabled, Chakarova chose to exhibit only a photograph of the evidence left behind. After the 23 bodies were removed for burial, a flip-flop leaned against the padded armrest of a crutch, and a woman’s shoe rested against a dark stain of blood on the autumn leaves of the forest floor. Because viewers are already inundated with violent images, Chakarova prefers to capture and display those that raise questions, rather than titillate with shock value.
Instead of titling her photos, Chakarova captions them with descriptions of the conflict’s history and excerpts of interviews. A man clasps the head of his tortured brother, who is perhaps dead; beneath the image is his, rather than Chakarova’s, explanation of what happened: “They blindfolded him, poured salt and pepper in his wounds, and electrocuted him.â€
In a picture of a military bunker, an enormous gun leans against a wall plastered with photos of naked blond women and clothed Indian fashion models, diligently cut out in silhouette; “i love my india†is scrawled across it in white chalk. Chakarova’s caption describes her encounter with a general who, as a matter of national security, forbade her from photographing inside the military camp.
“Kashmir was incredibly lonely,†Chakarova remembers. “All of my friends were male journalists. As a woman, once it gets dark you can’t wander the streets because there are soldiers everywhere.†She took to sleeping with her film in her pillowcase, partially to guard it but also to stave off feelings of total isolation. “The majority of people I’ve met don’t want to be part of India or Pakistan; they feel like they’ve been used.â€
Chakarova will return to Kashmir this summer, and plans to release the project as a book.
Sex trafficking
As economic conditions continue to deteriorate, increasing numbers of women and girls from postcommunist Eastern European nations are being trafficked into the European Union, as well as Asia and beyond. From Dubai to Israel to Southeast Asia—wherever women migrate to after leaving their economically depressed homelands—prostitutes are known simply as “Natashas,†and women with Eastern European complexions are assumed to be sex workers.
On the streets of Turkey, men holler the name at Chakarova. While it’s not uncommon for impoverished, desperate women from these regions to immigrate to wealthier cities to find employment in sex work, trafficking is something else entirely. Many of these women and girls are duped into indentured sexual servitude, often believing they are being transported to work in the mainstream service industry.
“One girl grabbed my arm and said, ‘Do you want to know how it was? Thirty customers per day, the youngest was 11 and the oldest was 83,’†Chakarova says. She quotes another woman: “Some of the men felt sorry for me when they saw I was pregnant, but they still had sex with me.â€
Chakarova and her collaborator, writer Lauren Gard, traveled to Moldova, which has the highest incidence of trafficked girls and, not coincidentally, is also the poorest country in Europe. Located between Romania and Ukraine, Moldova’s living standards declined after communism fell; poverty is still on the rise and wage discrepancies between men and women are growing rapidly.
Through a shelter frequented by girls who had been trafficked, Chakarova and Gard met Olesea. Their project retraces Olesea’s path from Moldova to Turkey, where Chakarova’s fractured Russian, dredged up from childhood, allowed them to pose as girls looking for work in order to meet one of Olesea’s clients. Through him, they made contact with her pimp.
“Here, I have my credentials and my affiliation with the University of California,†Chakarova explains. “There, that was all gone—all he saw was a girl from Bulgaria looking for work. Imagine having a man stare at you and evaluate you like cattle based on your appearance, the way you talk, and how you move. Everything about you has a certain price. This pimp was notorious for doing sadistic shit to these girls. I had seen the scars and I had heard the stories. These guys know how to perform abortions and how to hit you so you don’t bruise. They raped the girls many times. He didn’t know that we knew any of this. He was giving us his best facade, which is ‘We’re gonna be partners, 50-50.’ I knew he was offering to buy us, and if we were ignorant and desperate village girls, we would look at him as our savior.â€
For reporters who want to do more than interview girls after the fact, there are two routes to a firsthand account of sex trafficking. Female journalists must pose as girls looking for work; male journalists can pose as customers. Chakarova comments that because these men are playing the part of customers—and, later, of sympathetic would-be saviors of trafficked girls—the images that result from their charade too often resemble soft-core porn, playing up the sex appeal, rather than the horror, of sex trafficking. “In a lot of the cases, the girls are wearing a bra and bikini and lots of makeup. It’s almost like lingerie ads. The photos show no insight into who they truly are.â€
Chakarova sees this as contributing to a common inability to see the underlying causes of trafficking. “I read everything there was on sex trafficking in Moldova, and always there was the same bullshit, which is ‘Why is the demand so high for girls from Moldova? Because they’re incredibly beautiful.’ That’s the stereotype, and journalists publishing these photographs and printing these words are adding to the stereotype, because people read this and think, I want a girl from Moldova because they’re gorgeous. Guess what? These girls who have been trafficked and at the high schools in the villages, they’re not supermodels. They’re just ordinary girls with pimples and imperfections. Ordinary girls living in really poor circumstances.â€
With her basic Russian, Chakarova was only able to ask simple questions of the women, like “What happened?†But when she did, they would spill over with information. “On several occasions, I said, ‘Why are you telling me all this? Why are you giving me so much?’ and they said, ‘You’re the only one who isn’t judging me for what has happened to me.’â€
Chakarova spent time photographing the shelters in Moldova where the women were living. “To me it’s really important sometimes just to put the camera away and be a person, be compassionate, and be yourself. The main thing for me is just to be there and make girls laugh, dance in front of them, say something in Russian that’s really silly. Just make them laugh. Do you know how good that feels when I know what they’ve been through? They’re at a shelter and we’re all smoking and they’re just giggling like they should be because they’re 19 and 20. I don’t have pictures of that, because I was actually experiencing it. A lot of photographers are always behind the camera and quit experiencing what’s in front of them. I want to be able to say, ‘Fuck it, I’m not going to have these shots, I’m not going to take pictures right now.’ They see that: ‘So she’s not just taking and taking and taking, she’s actually giving something in return.’ That’s what I mean when I say I leave behind pieces of myself.â€
To contact Mimi Chakarova or view her photographs and other projects, visit www.mclight.com. Capitalism, God, and a Good Cigar: Cuba Enters the Twenty-First Century, edited by Lydia Chavez, features more than 70 of Chakarova’s photos.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sarah on Jun 19, 2005 12:33 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ironically, even marketers for change dehumanize. For instance, i read a magazine ad soliciting money to "help orphans for only a dollar a day." Glancing at the photos, I saw an updated shot of Sally Struthers, but the same photo of the same hungry big-eyed toddler that i'd seen for decades. That child, i thought, had either survived into adulthood on the "pennies" a day solicited in the past, or had died. Either way, the person in campaign. Someone, maybe, but not with her face.
I noticed similar media coverage. For instance the public is shocked by reports & photographs of reports on different issues in Africa. Perhaps for dramatic effect, the reports tend to both ovewhelm and to magnify the "exotic," romanticizing those effected by drought, famine, and violence. With such input, I start doubting my "right" to interfere, thinking momentarily & incorrectly, that these ancient peoples are like story folk, part of a movie that evokes emotion to watch from the comfort of my modern home. So separate, I even have insane "guilty american" spasms, thinking maybe it's best not to intervene with such noble old souls. But beneath the stories and stock photos are real people, prefering not to be hungry, thirsty, sick, or hacked with machetes.
The work of people like Mimi C, can help re-sensitize the American public. I was impressed that in the shelter for the rescued girls, she didn't photograph the giggling girls since she was experiencing them. In this, she recognizes the individuality of her subjects. That respect & recognition shows in her work. Her photographs are of human beings who giggle, grieve, hunger, & experience life, just as we all do. With the faces of tragedy rehumanized, we can begin see them as ourselves & our neighbors & feel able to help.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sarah on Jun 19, 2005 5:58 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sarah on Jun 19, 2005 6:06 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ironically, even marketers for change dehumanize. For instance, i read a magazine ad soliciting money to "help orphans for only a dollar a day." Glancing at the photos, I saw an updated shot of Sally Struthers, but the photo of the hungry big-eyed toddler was the same that i'd seen for decades. That child, i thought, had either survived into adulthood on the "pennies a day" solicited in the past or had died. Either way, the person helped by the campaign was someone, maybe, but with a different face.
Similiarly, the US public is shocked by reports & photographs on different issues in Africa. Perhaps for dramatic effect, coverage tends to both overwhelm and to magnify the "exotic," romanticizing those effected by drought, famine, and violence. With such input, I start doubting my "right" to interfere, thinking momentarily & incorrectly, that these ancient peoples are like story folk, part of a movie that evokes emotion, but only to watch from the comfort of my modern home. So separate, I even have insane "guilty american" spasms, thinking maybe it's best not to intervene with such noble old souls. But beneath the stories and stock photos are real people, preferring not to be hungry, thirsty, sick, or hacked with machetes.
The work of people like Mimi C, can help re-sensitize the reactions ofAmerican public. I was impressed that in the shelter , she didn't photograph the giggling girls because she was experiencing them. In this, she seems to recognize the individuality of her subjects. That respect & recognition shows in her work. Her photographs are of human beings who giggle, grieve, hunger, & experience life, just as we all do. With the faces of tragedy rehumanized, we can begin see them as ourselves & our neighbors
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: re-edit (damn word limit)
Posted by: ulmster
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sarah on Jun 19, 2005 12:33 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ironically, even marketers for change dehumanize. For instance, i read a magazine ad soliciting money to "help orphans for only a dollar a day." Glancing at the photos, I saw an updated shot of Sally Struthers, but the same photo of the same hungry big-eyed toddler that i'd seen for decades. That child, i thought, had either survived into adulthood on the "pennies" a day solicited in the past, or had died. Either way, the person in campaign. Someone, maybe, but not with her face.
I noticed similar media coverage. For instance the public is shocked by reports & photographs of reports on different issues in Africa. Perhaps for dramatic effect, the reports tend to both ovewhelm and to magnify the "exotic," romanticizing those effected by drought, famine, and violence. With such input, I start doubting my "right" to interfere, thinking momentarily & incorrectly, that these ancient peoples are like story folk, part of a movie that evokes emotion to watch from the comfort of my modern home. So separate, I even have insane "guilty american" spasms, thinking maybe it's best not to intervene with such noble old souls. But beneath the stories and stock photos are real people, prefering not to be hungry, thirsty, sick, or hacked with machetes.
The work of people like Mimi C, can help re-sensitize the American public. I was impressed that in the shelter for the rescued girls, she didn't photograph the giggling girls since she was experiencing them. In this, she recognizes the individuality of her subjects. That respect & recognition shows in her work. Her photographs are of human beings who giggle, grieve, hunger, & experience life, just as we all do. With the faces of tragedy rehumanized, we can begin see them as ourselves & our neighbors & feel able to help.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sarah on Jun 19, 2005 5:58 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sarah on Jun 19, 2005 6:06 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ironically, even marketers for change dehumanize. For instance, i read a magazine ad soliciting money to "help orphans for only a dollar a day." Glancing at the photos, I saw an updated shot of Sally Struthers, but the photo of the hungry big-eyed toddler was the same that i'd seen for decades. That child, i thought, had either survived into adulthood on the "pennies a day" solicited in the past or had died. Either way, the person helped by the campaign was someone, maybe, but with a different face.
Similiarly, the US public is shocked by reports & photographs on different issues in Africa. Perhaps for dramatic effect, coverage tends to both overwhelm and to magnify the "exotic," romanticizing those effected by drought, famine, and violence. With such input, I start doubting my "right" to interfere, thinking momentarily & incorrectly, that these ancient peoples are like story folk, part of a movie that evokes emotion, but only to watch from the comfort of my modern home. So separate, I even have insane "guilty american" spasms, thinking maybe it's best not to intervene with such noble old souls. But beneath the stories and stock photos are real people, preferring not to be hungry, thirsty, sick, or hacked with machetes.
The work of people like Mimi C, can help re-sensitize the reactions ofAmerican public. I was impressed that in the shelter , she didn't photograph the giggling girls because she was experiencing them. In this, she seems to recognize the individuality of her subjects. That respect & recognition shows in her work. Her photographs are of human beings who giggle, grieve, hunger, & experience life, just as we all do. With the faces of tragedy rehumanized, we can begin see them as ourselves & our neighbors
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: re-edit (damn word limit)
Posted by: ulmster
Vancouver's Games Will Be the Gayest Olympics Ever
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped




