Bicoastal Debate: New York or San Francisco?

By Monica Mehta, San Francisco Chronicle. Posted May 28, 2005.

"It's so sleepy here -- like a big 'burb. New York's the only city worth living in."

"Manhattanites! Can't you survive off a 23-square-mile island? At least there's some peace and quiet here."

"Too much. In San Francisco, you can't get a decent meal after 10 p.m."

"Yeah, but how lame is your food? You've got the avocados from hell."

"Avocados, shmavocados. Gimme a slice of Ray's any day. And what's up with bagels with no holes?"

"News flash, dude: San Francisco isn't a colonial outpost of New York."

"Yeah, well, everyone here walks like a 90-year-old. Try going to Third and Market on a Monday morning. Slackers all. It's time to work, people."

"Time to chill out's more like it. I spent Saturday on a cliffside trail above the Pacific Ocean. Now that's life."

"Sounds a little far from civilization to me -- 2,913 miles to be exact. "

Few cities generate as much heated comparison as New York and San Francisco. They're intrinsically bonded. When the rest of the country relies on cars to get around, their inhabitants walk. When a rash turns others red, these two will undoubtedly stay blue.

But we, the outsiders in love with both, will always have to choose between them. Should we pick the bon vivant boyfriend, the one who keeps us up all night with his brash stories and neurotic energy? Or the thoughtful girlfriend who awes us with her beauty, kindness and knack for cooking with arugula and cardoons? 212 or 415?

In the last seven years, I've moved from New York, to San Francisco, to New York, to San Francisco. My husband grew up in the Bay Area; I, in New York. As soon as we were in one place, we started fantasizing about the other.

The thing is, we kept thinking the city we ended up in would define who we were. We were wrong.

When I first moved to San Francisco in 1998, a recent graduate of a top college, I wanted to be "the best," whatever that was. The dot-com boom was reaching sonic levels, and young Bay Area types sat in front of computer screens, creating "content" and muttering about "cross-branding." I was ready to construct the best Web site, be the best online editor in the valley.

Being a New Yorker, I naturally sped through my first Bay Area stint, at one point commuting more than two hours a day. But it wasn't enough. The "best" should be at the center of things, I thought, not out at the edge of the serene Pacific. How exciting it would be to join a magazine, to be back where there was a publishing opportunity around every corner. So off we went.

Pretty soon, I was living the quintessential New York life. An apartment near Gramercy Park. A position with a major entertainment magazine. On my way to making good money.

My husband, a medical resident, was guaranteed a future job. New York is like a drug: Parties, friends, family, movies, theater, lectures, museums. The whirl. I had made it in the city of cities.

On paper, everything was great, but something was missing.

One day, I happened upon a commencement speech by Anna Quindlen, a graduate of my New York college: "You cannot be really first rate at your work if your work is all you are," she said. "Get a life. A real life, not a manic pursuit of the next promotion, the bigger paycheck, the larger house. Do you think you'd care so very much about those things if you blew an aneurysm one afternoon or found a lump in your breast? Get a life in which you notice the smell of salt water pushing itself on a breeze over Seaside Heights, a life in which you stop and watch how a red-tailed hawk circles over the water or the way a baby scowls with concentration when she tries to pick up a Cheerio with her thumb and first finger."

Monica Mehta is an associate editor at AlterNet. At the moment, she lives in San Francisco. This column was first printed in the San Francisco Chronicle.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »