Photographs that Damn

It was a damaging week for American public relations in the Arab world. What started with deadly riots over allegations that U.S. interrogators flushed the Koran ended with leaked photos of Saddam Hussein in his underwear.

To the New York Post, which first published the pictures on Friday along with its sister publication the Sun of Britain, the photographs were a chance to emphasis Hussein's crimes and indulge in public humiliation of the former strongman. The Sun and the Post say a U.S. military source gave them the pictures.

But for the most of the Arab press the pictures are being treated as a small piece in an overall pattern of alleged American violations of prisoners' rights. And as confirmation, to many, of U.S. contempt for Arabs and Islam.

Al-Hayat, one of two major pan-Arab dailies, followed the story on the front page Saturday, with the headline "Pictures of Saddam in His Cell Violate the Geneva Conventions." The paper, like many in the region, didn't show the photos of Hussein.

Al Jazeera, the dominant regional satellite news channel, which is frequently attacked by U.S. politicians for alleged bias, has reported briefly on the pictures, but didn't show them. "The picture in itself isn't newsworthy, and we felt that it was denigrating in general,'' says Jihad Ballout, Al Jazeera's spokesman in Qatar.

Mr. Ballout says the decision is consistent with Al Jazeera's general policies, though it has shown pictures of U.S. servicemen and other hostages in insurgent custody in Iraq.

How one organization sees the importance of the photos, however, seems to follow how they felt about the U.S. decision to invade Iraq. Al Jazeera has been opposed to the war, and tends to paint Iraq's insurgency as nationalist resistance to occupation.

The Sun and the Post, both owned by Rupbert Murdoch, supported the war and tend to paint the insurgency there as Baathist terrorists. The Sun quotes the unnamed source of the pictures as saying: "It's important that the people of Iraq see him like that to destroy the myth. Maybe that will kill a bit of the passion in the fanatics who still follow him."

President Bush doubted that the pictures would have much impact on Iraq's insurgency. "I don't think a photo inspires murderers. I think they're inspired by an ideology that's so barbaric and backwards that it's hard for many in the Western world to comprehend how they think."

The minor flap over the release over the pictures, which presidential spokesman Trent Duffy said are a "clear violation of [Department of Defense] directives and possibly Geneva Convention guidelines for the humane treatment of detained individuals,'' has been overshadowed in the Arab media by more serious allegations.

Over the weekend, the New York Times reported the results of a U.S. military investigation into a pattern of torture and abuse of prisoners, which led to the deaths of at least two detainees, at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. Pakistani and Middle Eastern newspapers have continued to run stories from former prisoners at the U.S. military's Guantánamo Bay detention camp alleging torture and desecration of the Koran.

A Newsweek story two weeks ago, since retracted, told of U.S. interrogators flushing the Koran down toilets to break the will of prisoners. Retraction or not, it's become an article of faith in the Arab world.

The pictures from Abu Ghraib, the Baghdad prison where U.S. soldiers abused Iraqi are still frequently shown on Arab TV. Most in the region have been disappointed with the Abu Ghraib investigation and sentences so far. Army Specialist Charles Graner, the accused ringleader of the abuse, was sentenced to 10 years in prison in January. Sabrina Harman, the only other soldier yet convicted, received a six-month sentence last week.