Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

A Journey into Red America

By Rose Aguilar, AlterNet. Posted May 23, 2005.


A San Francisco progressive begins her four-month journey through the so-called Red States. Her first stop: the bluest town in Texas.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Rose Aguilar

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Editor's Note: After the 2004 election, Rose Aguilar, like many other progressives, was haunted by the same question: what went wrong and why? She realized that the answer lay not in the liberal bubble of San Francisco but in the vast expanses of George Bush's America, among the many people who voted for him despite the best efforts of progressives everywhere. Over the next four months, Aguilar plans to visit a number of red states, including Mississippi, Oklahoma, Nebraska, South Dakota, Montana and Utah. Her first stop was Zavala County, Texas.

The drive from San Francisco to Texas took almost three full days. The road to El Paso, Texas looks like chain store America, with loud fluorescent signs and advertisements lining the highway. John Kerry got 56 percent of the vote in El Paso County, but I am headed for Zavala County, where Kerry got 75 percent of the vote. It's as blue as you get in Bush country.

I drive into Crystal City, a small town with two main roads that reveal its slow decline. The shops on the main drag near the movie theater (House of Wax is showing for $4) are empty and dilapidated. I drive by a pinata party at Pizza Hut and spot a Dairy Queen sign touting the virtues of its rancheros plate. No other restaurant chain could be bothered to set up shop in Crystal City.

The town's staunchly Democratic tradition dates back to 1969, when more than 1,700 high school students staged a walk-out to protest a high school rule that allowed only one Hispanic on the cheerleading squad. "Cheerleading may not sound significant now, but thanks to that walkout, everything changed," says Diana Palacio, Crystal City's city manager who led the walkout. The issues at stake were much larger: bilingual education, Hispanic teachers, college preparation and representation in the curriculum.

"Today, every member of the school board is Hispanic. Back then, they were all white," she says. "We couldn't even speak Spanish and had no one to look up to."

It was a proud moment in Crystal City's history when this small town became a catalyst for similar protests across the country. The walkout did not, however, change the town's fortunes, and it has since languished as a neglected outpost of progressive America.

The Religious Left

I attend Mass at the Church of the Almighty, a Pentecostal church with parish of around 200 people, and am immediately greeted with a dozen handshakes and hugs. After the service, which focused on Mother's Day and the importance of family, I ask the pastor, Brother Dino Espinoza, whether he discusses political issues in church.

"If I want people to vote for a certain issue, I will do it outside of the building," he says. "I never bring politics into my church. It's not appropriate." Brother Espinoza is a registered Democrat and is staunchly opposed to abortion and homosexuality, but he never preaches against them from the pulpit. "I believe God loves everyone. Therefore, everyone is welcome in my church," he says.

The vast majority of the people I meet at service say they're very religious and vote Democratic for its economic policies and anti-discrimination stance. They never mention abortion or gay marriage.

It's no surprise that the economy is the number one issue for women like Sofia Munoz, who works 64 hours a week at three jobs. She averages $5.60 an hour as a cook for Head Start and at a taco stand and as a labor contractor in the fields.

"I've always voted Democrat and always will," she says. "I feel the Democrats fight harder for us poor people than the Republicans." Munoz says she barely makes ends meet, but rarely complains about her 1 percent annual raise -- not when the unemployment rate in Crystal City is 14 percent, one of the highest in the state. "If you have a job you keep it, because you won't get a better one," she says.

Crystal City is one of the poorest towns in Texas, and 98 percent of the city's 8,263 inhabitants are Hispanic. Most residents have no idea that they live in the most Democratic constituency in Texas, but are not surprised. "Democrats give more opportunities to low-income and minority people," says Maria Alvarez, a teacher in a local Head Start program.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Rose Aguilar is a San Francisco-based journalist gathering stories from people living in states that voted overwhelmingly for George W. Bush. Track her journey at Stories in America.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What happened to good ol' Red?
Posted by: wbblack on May 23, 2005 5:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How did RED come to mean its opposite?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: weak political understanding here Posted by: Samantha Vimes
Are we Balkanizing? Is that PC incorrect to say?
Posted by: Pepper on May 23, 2005 6:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am aghast at the results of the town turning completely hispanic in leadership with no cross section representation of the population.

It appears the move brought the town down in quality of life.
Is that what we want for the rest of America? I don't think so.

Maybe its cultural. Look at Mexico; its a poor country and and it appears we are on the way to replicating that nation through its migrating citizens. Its a bleak prospect. Sorry, if you don't like my "incorrect PC" assessment, but I am just repeating the facts as stated above.

I think we need to come to a meeting place here between the two cultures and work together to bring towns like that up and to have the same language and same culture. If not we are just balkanizing and that will destroy rather than enhance any town of similar circumstances. I think we are balkanizing already. It maybe too late.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» it IS a different world. Posted by: FoxSucks
» RE: it IS a different world. Posted by: spyderbaby
Better Red than Dead
Posted by: 42Years on May 23, 2005 7:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How soon we have left behind our old enemy, the Communist and the negative connotation of the color red as it applied to a political system different from democracy to now embrace the redness of America as anything having to do with an American political sign. Just what does it all mean? A continuation of the rivalry humans perpetuate as a model of life on planet earth. Even the smallest organisms practice rivalry for resources. Guess our evolution has not really made us better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Better Red than Dead Posted by: tyranny704
Blue in a Red State
Posted by: susan9390 on May 23, 2005 7:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you nothreat. I, too, am tired of the way everyone buys into this crap about blue and red states. And now it seems that even the so-called "progressive" media has betrayed us. We are all Americans, no matter which way our electorate delegation spoke for our state, no matter what party PRETENDS to represent us, and even if we disagree with one another on issues.

What happened to honoring diversity? It is only natural that border towns should have more "minority" representation than the heartland, since in such towns they are not minorities at all.

The author makes two important points, however. One is the arrogance of the Democratic party, which will be its final undoing. People vote on ideals, personalities, and even appearance - not necessarily in their best interest. Democrats need to strengthen their base of support before they start trying to change people's minds, no matter how progressive their stance is on the issues (not).

Second, the death of the middle class has meant that the majority in most places in this country consists of working poor that have no time to keep up with the issues and no priorities beyond keeping the jobs for which they are probably overqualified, keeping the bills paid, and providing a roof and a meal for their families. You can't reach these people by appealing to issues when the addictions they have acquired to consumerism force them to hold three to five jobs per household and leave them with the mental acuity of a couch potato.

Our only hope is in a major (hopefully bloodless) political revolution in which both of these parties implode from their own internal corruption and a new world emerges where the voice of an informed and concerned public will once again be heard. Meanwhile, if you are "blue in a red state" like me, get some real comfort at Purple America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Blue in a Red State Posted by: lynnejane
More "Progressive" Self-Righteousness
Posted by: veganmama2002 on May 23, 2005 8:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you! I am SO tired of the condescension and sense of superiority of "progressives" from California and New York. How unsophisiticated and self-serving. I appreciate people from the coasts leaving their little myopic "bubbles" to see the rest of the country, but when they set out like anthropologists trying to understand a very backwards people, it comes across loud and clear. This is a HUGE problem in the progressive movement; there is no room for this sort of elitism and posturing. I feel blessed to live in a place (Chicago) that has a strong progressive ethic but does not have a sense of righteous entitlement coarsing through it.

This is a plea to supposed progressives on the coasts: leave your little "bubble communities" to see how other people live, and what matters to them, but do it without that ridiculous baggage. We dumb savages elsewhere are sick of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Web site correction
Posted by: newsjunky on May 23, 2005 8:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Web site is spelled incorrectly in this article.

Check out: http://www.storiesinamerica.org/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

God hates Liberals
Posted by: RoguebotV on May 23, 2005 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The issue at hand seems to be getting folks to vote....
How republicans got you to vote for idealogical safety is the real threat.
Not accepting challenges in the areas of god and family have led to good folk voting away their best intrests.
This is another intelligence matter.
Without good personal intelligence no one understands the common counter-intuitive issues that surround us today.
As for the future?
There is no change on the horizon for us as there is no quality intelluctuals to help lead us away from tribalism and personality politics.
DUCK AND COVER....;>

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Color Coding? Bush (Rove) Tactics.
Posted by: haystack1317 on May 23, 2005 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am continually overwhelmed by the easy acceptance of this "Red vs. Blue" terminology. I too feel betrayed by the endorsement of this ridiculous simplification by "progressives." Has anyone researched the origins of these terms? How have they become accepted parts of our political dialogue? Can the editors at Alternet not see that by grouping together the millions of people in "red" states they are furthering the perceptions imposed by the mainstream media with the support of the most conservative forces in this country? If the intent is to better understand those living in states where the majority voted for Bush, the first step would be to do away with a label that inaccurately puts all the residents of the state into one simple group. It seems to me that the editors of Alternet are beginning with a non-existent limitation on understanding and then patting themselves on the back for attempting to get beyond it.

It's hard for me to believe that people who rightly lambast Bush's childish color-coded terrorism alerts seem perfectly happy to accept an even more simplistic set of colors for something far more important. The mainstream media love this mind-numbing system. Bush loves it. Why wouldn't he? He resists complexity at all costs. Plus, he's the action color, the fierce color, the war color, the "don't mess with me" color, while Democrats are the cool color, the soothing color, the inactive color. Far more important than the psychological meaning of each color, however, is the fact that they are used to reduce things to a system of opposites. Must everything in this country be reduced to duality? Democrat vs. Republican, Right vs. Wrong, Good vs. Evil, Red vs. Blue. (Have you ever noticed how much more awkward it is to write "Blue vs. Red"? Hard to put weak before strong, isn't it. And we accept the use of these labels?)

Colors makes even logos or soundbites seem complex, bringing everything to the most infantile of levels. I question Alternet's allowing this simplistic approach to form the basis of an important story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

freepalestine
Posted by: freepalestine on May 23, 2005 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that this is an excellent article, and I wish rose the best of luck on her continuing journeys! I truly don't see what the fuss is about- her work on the Crystal City area debunks the stereotype of a Red/Blue state. And at least she goes to these places instead of doing a Brooksesque pontification from an elite office in NYC or something.

keep up the good work & I'll get signed up on her website asap for more updates!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Texas
Posted by: mviscid on May 23, 2005 12:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It does seem like a lot of the votes Bush got from unlikely supporters were more like votes against the hip, happenin 'cool kids.' John Kerry kept telling people to look at his website--LAME!

I'm just glad my fair state got some press that doesn't reinforce our label as the land of dolts and morons. It's a huge state, Bush is a carpetbagger (born in Connecticut), and there's plenty of good-sensed, humane people here. Down with assumptions!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Goal of This Trip...
Posted by: roseaguilar on May 23, 2005 1:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hi,

I'm the journalist who wrote this article and would like to respond to a few of the posts.

The goal of my trip is not to perpetuate, but to debunk stereotypes about the so-called red state voter (hence this article being about the bluest part of TX); the goal is to start a dialog with people of all political stripes, including those who don't vote.

I left my "myopic bubble" to actually meet and talk to the people you never see or hear from in the media. I'm doing interviews in churches, campgrounds, motels, cafes, the parking lots of Wal-Marts, upscale grocery stores and gas stations. I've met more Republicans in the past three weeks than I have in the past year in San Francisco.

I'm also finding Democrats and progressives in predominantly Republican areas who are sick of being ignored by politicians and progressives who live in large liberal cities.

I don't see how my project is unsophisticated or self-serving.

That said, I welcome your opinions. I also could try and make room in my van if you'd like to join me and spend your summer in some of the most Republican areas in the country. That is, if you can stand the heat!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Goal of This Trip... Posted by: nothreat
» RE: The Goal of This Trip... Posted by: freepalestine
» RE: The Goal of This Trip... Posted by: roseaguilar
» RE: The Goal of This Trip... Posted by: Campesino
» RE: The Goal of This Trip... Posted by: scsmith
» RE: The Goal of This Trip... Posted by: Campesino
» RE: The Goal of This Trip... Posted by: scsmith
» RE: The Goal of This Trip... Posted by: Campesino
» RE: The Goal of This Trip... Posted by: scsmith
» RE: The Goal of This Trip... Posted by: Campesino
» RE: The Goal of This Trip... Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: The Goal of This Trip... Posted by: Campesino
» RE: The Goal of This Trip... Posted by: Campesino
» RE: The Goal of This Trip... Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: The Goal of This Trip... Posted by: Campesino
» RE: The Goal of This Trip... Posted by: Campesino
republicans equal red
Posted by: anninroosevelt on May 23, 2005 5:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think red and blue became an election night convention of the television networks. They arbitrarily assigned red to the republicans rather than the democrats because red has been associated with the left. The networks must have thought that they should not color the democrats red because that would be seen as perpetuating the communist label.
anninroosevelt

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Name Calling...
Posted by: newsjunky on May 23, 2005 7:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is what journalism is all about: interviewing real people, rather than pundits and the usual talking heads.

Why is it that progressives so openly rip each other rather than have a dialog. Why not ask the writer what she hopes to accomplish rather than call her names?

I'd much prefer to read about places I've never been and probably will never go instead of the same old progressive whining.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Precisely
Posted by: BriMan on May 23, 2005 7:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A knee-jerk reaction to imagery, a blue trip into the red..., met more Republicans lately, etc.

Give the girl a little slack please. She just started and she's in Texas for Chrissakes! I grew up there and its hot and not very pretty in most places.

I for one am interested to see what she'll discover - not because I think one person taking a trip leads to a mass epiphany but because she is bound to teach us something about ourselves.

I would say the process has already begun! Rock on Rose!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Precisely Posted by: scsmith
Why not just Democrats and Republicans?
Posted by: haystack1317 on May 23, 2005 8:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think anyone is questioning the validity of the trip and the importance of the story. I think the question is why Alternet should validate the reduction of important political distinctions to an infantile system of color coding. Is it really too difficult to go back to using "Democratic" instead of "blue" and "Republican" instead of "red"? If it is, where are we? Do we have to reduce everything to soundbites or worse? If you look at the history of politics, you can see that such label making always simplifies things to the point of limiting the truth. A system that has it's root in TV over-simplification should not be perpetuated by Alternet. The fact that the story is important, and that it's intent is to debunk myths, means that the first step should be to do away with these labels, which perpetuate the myths before the reader even gets beyond the title.

One thing that makes this glaringly clear is the apparent readiness to accept that California is a "blue" state. California? Where Arnold Schwarzenegger is governor? It is just as dangerous for a state that went for Kerry to be labeled "blue" as one that went for Bush to be labeled "red." It is not an accurate representation, and those in California would be wise to look in their own backyards rather than rejoicing in their "blueness" and talking about how few Republicans they've met.

None of us can afford these simplifications. Let's resist them now and use the actual terms themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Beyond Red/Blue and Us/Them
Posted by: hagwind on May 24, 2005 6:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This thread features some of the most thoughtful and useful commentary I've read yet on the AlterNet board, but it also includes a bit of the same old same-old: leftists ripping each other to shreds to show that "my analysis is better than your analysis" and "your analysis has holes in it." Like a story has to have (or act like it has) all the answers before it sees print? Think of it instead as a beginning -- the writer puts her experiences and ideas out there, and others can supplement, expand, clarify, and correct as needed instead of trying to stomp the original text into the ground. (You'd almost think we were debating religious doctrine; either you're saved or you're in the pit, there's no middle ground.)

Sure, Rose Aguilar probably didn't need to travel three thousand miles to learn what she learned; that doesn't diminish the importance of what her informants said and the conclusions she's drawn from her experience. I could tell you a few things about Massachusetts, where I was born and raised and where I've lived for the last twenty years. We're within range of the _Boston Globe_ and even the _New York Times_, but as far as I can tell most of us vote the way our friends, neighbors, and family vote, and what we read in the papers doesn't have all that much to do with it. (Local elections are another matter!) A few people I know were into apocalyptic wailing and caterwauling after the last election -- "The sky is falling! The sky is falling!" etc., etc. All because John Kerry lost?

I did my apocalyptic wailing and caterwauling in 1972, when George McGovern lost. The sky didn't fall in. In 1992, for the first (and so far last) time ever, I voted for the winner in a presidential election. For about three years I felt personally responsible for everything the jerk did. Moral of story: there's a lot more to politics than elections, especially presidential elections. Categorizing people by the candidate they voted for in the last election is pretty silly, and categorizing them by the candidate their state went for in the last election is even sillier.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Colonize us please.....
Posted by: vicki2001lynn on May 24, 2005 6:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Red states are primarily southern & midwestern states, where the most racial gerrymandering takes place, and where white men consistently vote conservative and Republican (I believe I saw a statistic of around 80% white males voting Republican). White women, however, are less attached to the Republican party; married white women just tend to pacify their husbands by voting the way their husbands want them to. No wonder the Bush Republicans have been pushing the marriage initiative! More single women equals more liberal Democratic voters, and more married women (ie if they are married to *white* men, that is!) equals more conservative Republican voters. We should work to make it easier for white women in red states to divorce their white husbands (so they will become single women voters again), and/or to encourage more interracial marriages. Asian Indians in the USA (for example) overwhelmingly voted Democrat, over 80% of them!!! That is the same percentage of white men who voted Republican. Find a way to marry those Indian guys off to red-state white women, and the white Republican-voting males will find their votes cancelled out at a much higher rate in future elections. We can't change their minds believe me -- I have a family full of white, Republican guys. There is no reasoning with them. We can't change them so we must simply STOP MARRYING THEM AND STOP BREEDING THEM. I call for a systematic program of re-colonization of the South by better educated and more prosperous Asians, who will be able to attract, marry and turn white married women to the progressive political agenda in greater numbers. Southern and midwestern politics *are* racial politics. It's rude, but it's true, and it's time to reinvent the rules of engagement (pun intended!).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Colonize us please..... Posted by: scsmith
» RE: Colonize us please..... Posted by: markitup137
Pentecostals don't have Mass.
Posted by: bettsoff on May 24, 2005 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Catholics do.

Pentecostals hold services.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Missing the point
Posted by: Guy on May 24, 2005 10:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think a lot of the comments are missing the point; you are getting hung up on the Red/Blue thing, cultural elitism, etc. I think the point is that the Demos are going about it all wrong. The Repubs are the ones hitting the streets and making phone calls and knocking on doors, even in an out of the way place, Demo stronghold like Crystal Springs, Texas. This is clearly inlustrated with the ignorance on the Minimum Wage Bill. The Demos need to get this kind of info out there all the time, every day, not just at election time.

Like most of you, and the author, I was depressed and confused about the Novemeber election. I didn't understand what happened. Two books really helped me: 'What's the Matter with Kansas' and 'Dispatch from the Culture Wars (?)" I recommend checking them out. They showed me what the Demos are doing wrong and what they/we need to do to get this country back.

Guy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Missing the point Posted by: scsmith
conservatives studying liberals?
Posted by: Samantha Vimes on May 28, 2005 1:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mmmm... because...
1. The Republicans have pretty much taken control of the government. They don't feel the *need* to understand why people vote against them, because they have power anyway.

2. Probably, if you think you have all the answers, you don't need to ask questions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: conservatives studying liberals? Posted by: Samantha Vimes
Color Coding? How about 'stolen election'?
Posted by: trina on May 28, 2005 7:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article's title, (whatever the intent) epitomizes why I and many others I know, haven't read Alternet and other 'progressive' articles for quite some time.

There is no such thing as 'red' and 'blue' states and most of us don't have to travel thousands of miles to figure that out.

I live in NY, btw, the notion that most 'progressives' 'wouldn't spend their summer talking to dreaded Republicans is almost laughable!!

I talk to them every day, I'm related to them, I work with them, most of my friends (yes, even in this 'Blue' state, are Republicans! ) I have spent three years talking to them across the country, online. I know all their talking points.

If you want to understand why people voted for Bush, don't bother traveling the country. Check out talk radio, Newsmax, Fox News, CNN etc. and you'll get it. It's called brain-washing, propaganda, using a huge tragedy and religion, to hi-jack the emotions of otherwise intelligent and thoughful individuals for the most part.

But Alternet completely ignored the other reason 'Bush won'. It's called 'election fraud'. And no, it's not a conspiracy theory.

Why has Alternet totally ignored the issues and evidence that this election was corrupt? Why did they follow the lead of the right wing of the Democratic Party (the DLC) and encourage everyone to 'move on' and ignore the evidence of election fraud?



Maybe Alternet missed the historical moment in the Senate on Jan. 6th when for the first time in 200 years a fraudulent election was objected to when Sen. Boxer stood up and refused to certify it? Where were the investigative 'progressive' journalists that day? ?

A tip to the author of this article if you want to debunk the 'red' 'blue' state mantra. The first rule in 'debunking 101' is not to use the frame of the opposition, especially in your title. The reason? Simple, it reenforces the frame. (Check Lakoff).

I'll return to the writings of real independent journalists. Alternet is a disappointment, especially because it poses as a 'progressive' site, but in reality, is apparently just another, corporate funded magazine, catering more to it's corporate donors, than to those who are looking for the truth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yeah, i get what your trying to say, but...
Posted by: markitup137 on May 29, 2005 6:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i think the reason the color coding system was used that way during the elections was to illustrate which states got the electoral votes (determined state by state obviously).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

and...
Posted by: markitup137 on May 29, 2005 6:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
after the election was over people held on to the idea because it does say a lot about the way people vote from a geographical standpoint. however, it is much more useful to look at it in terms of counties than states... it's just a higher resolution pic. why not make the democrats red? because they would have a fit and the NY/LA times wouldn't have any more room to run articles on how horrible bush is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

froget red and blue; it's dumb and dumber
Posted by: apodapa on May 30, 2005 9:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's face it, anyone who voted for Kerry thinking that he was some kind of saviour to lead America out of the darkness of the Right-wing neo-com revoulution is dumb. And anyone who voted for Bush is simply, dumber.
Repubs and Dems neither make sense or are much different after certian issues like abortion, minumum wage, and other similar hot button issues. Both parties are suckups to lobbyists representing corporations and foriegn interests, such as AIPAC (by the way, why DOES Israel spy on America? I thought Israel was a friend of the U.S., I guess not). We need a peoples revolution to burn down the corporate free market system and the to repair devastation perpetrated agianst our freedom and our economy by alien anti-American entities such as Wal-Mart and Halliburton. and the Konservative Khristian Kult.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]