Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bush: Worst President Ever?

By Stephen Pizzo, News for Real. Posted May 20, 2005.


Herbert Hoover may have triggered the Great Depression, but he didn't invade another nation on false pretenses, authorize torture of prisoners, or try to stack the courts.
Advertisement

For the record, I don't like George Bush. And I don't like most of the people who work for George Bush. So, diehard Republicans can just brush aside my remarks as so much partisan blather.

But by now I suppose very few diehard Republicans ever read what I write. So do me a favor -- e-mail this to the diehards in your family and circle of friends. Ask them to tell me why I am wrong about this:

George Bush is the worst president of the United States of America, ever. Hands down.

And here are just a few reasons why I believe that statement is true.

America the Disgraced

President Bush's actions and policies have destroyed America's image as a nation that adheres to a set of core values, such as the rule of law, humane treatment of prisoners, presumed innocence, trial by jury and respect for international laws.

How do I know this? Because the world is telling us so, whenever we care enough to ask.

Positive views of the U.S. in Russia have risen 11 points in the past year. But U.S. favorability ratings in France and Germany are somewhat lower than last year and there has been a larger decline in Great Britain (58 percent now, 70 percent last year). Young people in Great Britain, France, and Germany have more negative views of America than do people in other age groups.  An important factor in world opinion about America is the perception that the U.S. acts internationally without taking account of the interests of other nations. Large majorities in every nation surveyed believe that America pays little or no attention to their country's interests in making its foreign policy decisions. This opinion is most prevalent in France (84 percent), Turkey (79 percent) and Jordan (77 percent), but even in Great Britain 61 percent say the U.S. pays little or no attention to British interests.

Nice going George. Even Richard Nixon couldn't tarnish America's image that much. 

George's Vietnam

Then there's the war that is largely responsible for that drop in our international image. President Bush really screwed this one up. First, everyone not drinking the neocon Kool-Aid tried to warn George not to pull that trigger. Then Army chief of staff, Gen. Shinseki, warned Bush that a war in Iraq would not be the "cake walk" his neocon Rasputin, Paul Wolfowitz, promised. Instead, he warned, we would need a lot of troops in Iraq for long time. For that piece of advice he was first publicly embarrassed by his boss then shown the door, according to The New York Times:

At a Pentagon news conference neither Mr. Rumsfeld nor Mr. Wolfowitz mentioned Gen. Shinseki, the Army chief of staff, by name. But both men were clearly irritated at the general's suggestion that a post-war Iraq might require many more forces than the 100,000 American troops and the tens of thousands of allied forces that are also expected to join a reconstruction effort.  "The idea that it would take several hundred thousand U.S. forces I think is far off the mark," Mr. Rumsfeld said.

That was 2003. Here's a story from today's paper.

BAGHDAD, Iraq, May 19 - American military commanders in Baghdad and Washington gave a sobering new assessment on Wednesday of the war in Iraq. ... In interviews and briefings this week, some of the generals pulled back from recent suggestions, some by the same officers, that positive trends in Iraq could allow a major draw-down in the 138,000 American troops late this year or early in 2006. One officer suggested Wednesday that American military involvement could last "many years."

Gee. Who saw that coming?

So, thanks to George W. Bush and the handful of Neocon nuts you listen to. Now we are stuck in another Vietnam-type war thousands of miles from home. All the Vietnam trappings are here for anyone who cares to notice -- indigenous insurgents, driven by a fanatical ideology, supported and supplied by "spoiler" nation-states with their own anti-U.S. agendas, thousands of dead civilians, American soldiers dying by the gross week in and week out, with no end in sight.

Nice going, George. Maybe because you skipped out on the Vietnam War you didn't know this could happen. Or maybe you really are as dumb as common road gravel.

Sovietization of America

One of the Republican party's proudest boasts is that Ronald Reagan defeated the Soviet Evil Empire. The irony is they are now recreating pieces of that police state here at home now.


Digg!

Stephen Pizzo is the author of numerous books, including Inside Job: The Looting of America's Savings and Loans," which was nominated for a Pulitzer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Great Depression II?
Posted by: Jim Brady on May 20, 2005 2:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dubya may just manage that as well. Give him a little time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Great Depression II? Posted by: militaryforce
"NEOCON NUTS" - TYPICAL LEFT WING HATE SPEECH
Posted by: BillLoathingtheMilitaryClinton on May 20, 2005 2:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"So, thanks to George W. Bush and the handful of Neocon nuts you listen to. "

I so respect and admire the "compassion" (ha ha ha) and "moderation" of Leftists like the author. They're so profoundly "intellectual" calling people like me "Neocon nuts."

Don't anyone DARE call them a name, for that would be "hateful" and "mean-spirited."

But when Leftists call us "nuts" or "stupid" or "fascists" or "Nazis" or "racists" or "greedy" or "stupid" (did I say "stupid" already?), those aren't "hateful" remarks. No! They're TRUTHFUL !

How do you tell a really good president? Here are a few indicators.

1. He breaks solemn and important campaign promises, like "I promise you a tax cut." Worse than not giving you the "tax cut," he HIKES taxes massively.

2. He breaks solemn campaign promises such as "I will have the most ethical administration in history."

3. He lies pathologically to such an extent that even those of his own party acknowledge it: "Bill Clinton is an unusually good liar, unusually good." - Senator Bob Kerrey, D, Neb

4. He is impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice.

5. He sexually abuses subordinates at will, and when under investigation for such sexual abuse and harassment, is SO intelligent as to continue it, with Kathleen Willey and Monica Lewinski, a woman barely older than his own daughter.

6. He ignores the Rwandan genocide, where Hutus butcher ~800,000 Tutsis.

7. He tells Sudan that he doesn't "have any grounds to hold Osama bin Laden when Sudan offers him to us in 1998.

8. He is a rapist, per Juanita Broaddrick.

9. He vetoes the ban on late term abortions passed by congress and favored overwhelmingly by Americans.
www.abortionno.org (go to photos, page 2, for a view of Leftist "choice" in action)

10. Rapist, serial sexual predator, and "husband" of a lesbian, he is called "intelligent" along with his vice president who flunked out of Vanderbilt Divinity School.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "NEOCON NUTS" - TYPICAL LEFT WING HATE SPEECH Posted by: impeachbushandcheneynow
Yes -worst ever
Posted by: apodapa on May 20, 2005 3:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He was a drunk, a cocaine addict, joined a cult, and claimed that God spoke to him. That should say enough about his character

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yes -worst ever Posted by: bentz
» Voted in??????????? Posted by: Diecash1
» RE: Yes -worst ever Posted by: Sidra
» RE: Yes -worst ever Posted by: royrogers
» RE: Yes -worst ever Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: Yes -worst ever Posted by: royrogers
» RE: Yes -worst ever Posted by: militaryforce
Bush -- Not the worst
Posted by: chinasdad on May 20, 2005 5:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I still think James Buchanan is a worse president -- but it's a lot closer than it was when I first came to that conclusion 2 or 3 years ago. Also, I don't recall seeing a mention of Afghanistan in your piece -- that war, which unlike Iraq was legally and practically justified, is lost, just like Iraq. Just like Buchanan provided hope and encouragement to those who would destroy this country (from the inside) Bush's policies have served as recruiting methods for those who want to destroy the U.S. from the outside. Of course, Buchanan was followed by Lincoln; I don't know who will follow Bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush -- Not the worst Posted by: stevewilkesuk
Don't defend Bush! Just attack a democrat
Posted by: Andyd on May 20, 2005 6:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yep, all righties care about is Clinton's blowjobs. Isn't Bush ignoring Darfur? How about what happened the other day in Uzbekistan? I've had the "pleasure" of debating with some righties the past few days, and here is what I learned from them:

1. No innocent Iraqi's have been killed by US forces. They were all terrorists.

2. If you are against the war, you are anti-american, and you WANT to see US soldiers die.

3. Abu Ghraib was grossly exaggerated, and was really no big deal.

4. Newsweek is to blame for all of america's foreign relations problems.

5. Liberals are "self hating jews"

6. The Quran was NOT flushed down the toilet, but it deserves to be.

7. There ARE WMD's in Iraq, they just have not been found yet. Iraq WAS involved with 9/11.

This is the Right. They are stupid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you so much
Posted by: woodford54 on May 20, 2005 6:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for summing up my views so completely and so eloquently.
And when it comes time to march on the Whitehouse, let me know. I am so very there!!!!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Inflation? Count on it!
Posted by: asque on May 20, 2005 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What everybody tends to forget is that most of the world's debt is in....dollars. The Bushites are not flirting with with stagflation-they are depending on it. Why do you think they keep on refering to those T-bills that are the Social Security Trust funds as "worthless paper"? A few years of 100% inflation and the goverment debt and much of the accumulated trade deficent is gone. The fact that such massive inflation will plunge the entire world into a depression that will make the "great" depression look like a minor blip is irrelevent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Inflation? Count on it! Posted by: Pepper
» RE: Inflation? Count on it! Posted by: paulaH
» RE: Inflation? Count on it! Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: Inflation? Count on it! Posted by: monkeywrench
johndt
Posted by: johndt on May 20, 2005 7:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gee, whiz. Don't forget our tax cuts for the rich and profligate spending which has the national debt at an all time high. Then, there's the little problem with the balance of payments. The approach to bamboozling the public looks like something ripped from Goebbels' agenda.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The worst of the worst
Posted by: RJ on May 20, 2005 7:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As far as corruption goes, Grant and Harding were the worst. As far as flaunting the law goes, Nixon was the worst. But W's actions are more insidious than any of these. He wants to undermine rule by all the people, free speech, freedom of religion, equal opportunity for all, an independent press, and checks and balances. He has actually made me ashamed to be an American. Where is FDR when we need him?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

False Information?
Posted by: paschn@comcast.net on May 20, 2005 7:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You wrote this as tho the lying prik (sic) "accidently" invaded Iraq because he was fed inaccurate intelligence. Another stain from that "clan" helped him steal the presidency, the sheeple took it,...The coward demmanded lies be fabricated to allow him to start an illegal war, give billions to the company his pet pig Cheney worked for w/o bids, the sheeple took it. he has murdered over 100,000 men women and children using our "fine boys". the sheeple took it. he's gonna stack the courts for his Republican buddies, the sheeple will take it. He'll walk out of the presidency with more millions than he went in with, we'll be a slave class with no where to go, he, like the traitor Reagan will be lauded as a hero by his buddies who own the corporate media, Will literally get away with murder and the sheeple will allow it. So......in closing, SCREW HIM and the American Sheeple! They can both spiral to hell and flames for all I care. They have their pretty little flags and the tombs of their sons and daughters to visit and say,...." They fought and died defending our freedom" NOT!! they fought and died because they were too dumb to question the swine leading em. My "freedom" hasn't a damn thing to do with it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: False Information? Posted by: ddmffood
» RE: False Information? Posted by: Johanna
» RE: False Information? Posted by: Sidra
» RE: False Information? Posted by: detached
» RE: False Information? Posted by: John Snyder
Is gWb the worst president ever
Posted by: MiiPandaa on May 20, 2005 7:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SHORT ANSWER: Yes.

LONG ANSWER: Yes, he is the worst president ever, having edged out the likes of Buchanan, Harding, Hoover, and Nixon. He and those who installed him in office need to learn to feel shame, and then need to begin to feel it deeply enough to trigger a longing for atonement.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

woolfee
Posted by: calbyj on May 20, 2005 7:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey you nut; you're pointing fingers at individual's concerns: one on one type actions. While these instances are surely not okay, pilfering en masse of the SUV-numbed public and global Anti-American sentiment is scary. I hate living without a prudent reserve and to realize that 3/4 of my neighbors carry on "on-empty" as such, suggests that civil war is waiting in the wings. Furthermore, Bush doesn't need to be an overt pervert. A gynegologist/sodomist on staff, exhorting family values recently leaked through the news. De-escalate that commitment to a left or right side and see what it looks like in the middle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: woolfee Posted by: Mycos
our nation is sick
Posted by: awalton1 on May 20, 2005 7:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for a great article. George W Bush is an utterly
worthless individual who needs to be convicted for his crimes against humanity and exiled. His entire administration is in desperate need of similiar punishment.

Is this a bad dream? We no longer have a fourth branch of government to inform us of our corrupt government's activities. Those mindless puppets known collectively as law enforcement obstruct the people's right to protest while religious zealots rewrite the Constitution.

Our nation has become sick and diseased.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: our nation is sick Posted by: Johanna
» RE: our nation is sick Posted by: Johanna
» RE: our nation is sick Posted by: Here I Come Canada
» RE: our nation is sick Posted by: windy
» RE: our nation is sick Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: our nation is sick Posted by: Action4Freedom
Every president sucked
Posted by: tintobrash on May 20, 2005 7:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When will you people realize that there has never been a president concerned over average Americans problems? This country was founded by rich, white slave owners and land holders, and each generation we're presented with a new set of fat, stupid old white men who think they know exactly what this country needs. Hah! They have never been concerned for the plight of the average joe or jane. Everything they say is lip service or inflammatory rhetoric. They do whatever is possible to keep us riled up and divisive so that we never see the common problems we all have -- Politicians.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» all presidents suck and so does the system Posted by: captialism kills
Barba
Posted by: Barba on May 20, 2005 7:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It doesn't matter that, Yes, Bush is the worst president in our current history. That's the problem. What's the solution? The liberals, progresses and the Republicans are doing nothing to STOP him. That's the problem. Americans just seem to go along with what ever Bush does. Simply put, America is getting what it deserves. I say, Either Shit (Shut Up) or get off the soap box. Do something, don't talk about it. Barba

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Barba Posted by: Marjiro
» RE: Barba Posted by: royrogers
» RE: Barba Posted by: captialism kills
» RE: Barba Posted by: Mycos
» RE: Barba Posted by: detached
worst president?
Posted by: benu67 on May 20, 2005 8:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
since i can't think of any other president that is worse (we've had some terrible ones) then yes, bush is the worst in my opinion. he's been all talk since day one and only takes action when one of his CEO buddies comes up with a new scam to rip off the american public or relieve some other country from it's natural resources. look at who's rewritting our energy policies, health reform, tax reform, bankruptcy reform, and military decisions which seem to be based on corrupt ideological beliefs (under rummie's leadership). can't remember any president that had so many scripted news coferences (that we heard of) and butchered the english language so much. after reading some of the comments under this article, i'm still not surprised of the way some republicans lash back at what seems to be shared by so many. they change the subject and blame someone else like clinton who's become the poster boy for everything that this administration did wrong. before bushco came around, leaders took responsibility and held themsleves accountable. now we have concerted attacks against the public and media, blatant lies, insane spending and borrowing, and an immoral war under the guise of fighting terrorism, which many experts have said is on a major rise since the start of this war. oops, i didn't use a name when i said "experts".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush and Ideology
Posted by: gogm on May 20, 2005 8:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thoroughly agree with Stephen Pizzo's contention that Mr. Bush has bottom place sewn up. And this in an era of bad Presidents. In addition to his perfect record of getting it consistently wrong, Mr. Bush and his radically right wing party also adopt Capitalism as dogma, much as the leaders of the Soviet Union adopted Communism as dogma. The only answer to any economic matter is privatization. There are constant references to competition, the market, and especially "the remarkable entrepreneurial spirit" reminiscent of incantations in a church service.

Government decisions are being made for ideological rather than logical reasons. Health care is the prime example. Single payer is not an option (until it happens by merger and acquisition). It costs 1.7 trillion dollars a year, leaves tens of millions of workers uninsured, and represents a crushing burden to manufacturers trying to compete in a world economy. But it is the market economy so it is above reproach or even review. It is an article of faith, not supported by facts, that private entities can do any job better than any government entity.

Economic systems and poltical systems are just tools developed by people to solve human needs. Communism and Republicanism share the failing of deifying an economic system. Now the tool uses us instead of our using it.

Mr. Bush is also repudiating the American Revolution by creating a de facto aristocracy so entrenched and disconnected from the rest of us that it is becoming a hereditary aristocracy, what our Founding Fathers fought against. George Bush has conceded the American Revolution to George III instead of George Washington. This will be the greatest failure or his many great failures, the one that our children's children's children and generations beyond will come to regret.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

First of the Worst
Posted by: yt cai on May 20, 2005 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Without a doubt Bush is the worst president in any of our lifetimes. Let's not forget for which this man is also responsible:

- 3000 Americans were killed during the most horrendous "terrorist" attack in the history of the world

- He is is funding the build-up of China's military with our hard earned money

- The Mexicanization of our domestic workforce will suppress real wages even more dramatically than what is reported

- Access to the President and the White House has been restricted solely to Republicans

- Traitors who vindictively out CIA agents are allowed to roam freely in the White House (so are gay-prostitute faux reporters)

- God has been turned into a Republican hack who endorses pre-emptive wars and turns a blind eye to the many other atrocities that take place in Republican friendly countries

This part of the article brought a question to mind:

"So, thanks to George W. Bush and the handful of Neocon nuts you listen to..."

At what stage in the total implementation of the PNAC manifesto is it appropriate to stop referring to Bush as a Republican and as the "Neo-con" nutbag that he really is? To me John Kerry should have hammered this home like beating a red headed bastard step child.

I don't know if anyone else caught John Batchelor on C-Span's WJ this AM, but it was one of the scariest displays of elitist neo-con ideology I have ever seen on TV. The information he held (lkely from the AEI he loves) and refused to share with us and would make us all understand if he only had the balls to reveal it, was flippantly withheld since the great uninformed apparently just can't handle the truth. The highlight was his claim that he knew to where Saddam's WMD were moved before we able to find them. Maybe one of his neo-con contacts should have provided Bathcelor with Duelfer's phone number? Unlisted, I imagine.

What could be worst than President Nutbag and his merry band of Idealogical Nutbag Marauders? Why of course it is Bill Clinton and his moderate style of triangulating us through the most prosperous decade in our country's history - Jackasses!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: First of the Worst Posted by: dadzilla
» RE: First of the Worst Posted by: criddic2
» RE: First of the Worst Posted by: criddic2
JrmyJms
Posted by: jrmyjms on May 20, 2005 9:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Keep in mind that the Iranians have been trying, for a few years now, to setup oil markets based on the Euro and not the petro-dollar which would be utterly disasterous for our economy. In addition China appears to be aware of how we use inflation and valuation of currency as a weapon and have refused to acquiesce to our demand that they revaluate their currency in a way that would allow us to put them in an economic headlock. These are certainly heady times we live in and it seems this ship of fools is about to run aground.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

YES
Posted by: SaraO on May 20, 2005 10:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this deserves a standing ovation

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe not...
Posted by: chuckrightmire on May 20, 2005 10:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Baby Bush is a terrible president, maybe worse than Buchanan, but before you label him the worst in our lifetime take a long look back at the Teflon President Ronnie Reagan. Rather than being the worst of the worst, Baby Bush is just following in the footsteps of his mentor who deserves the title, "the worst", for the way he moved this country from one having some morals to one having nothing but the 10 commandments and concern about what's between the hips and the knees.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE FUTURE
Posted by: ckeller on May 20, 2005 11:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IN 1868, E.G. ROSS, A REPUBLICAN SENATOR FROM KANSAS CAST THE DECIDING VOTE IN THE IMPREACHMENT TRIAL OF PRESIDENT ANDREW JOHNSON. AS A RADICAL REPUBLICAN, ROSS HATED JOHNSON AND THOUGHT OF HIM AS A TERRIBLE PRESIDENT. ROSS WAS PROMISED ALMOST ANYTHING TO VOTE GUILTY. HIS FUTURE WOULD HAVE BEEN ASSURED. SO, WHY DID HE VOTE INNOCENT? ROSS REPLIED THAT HE PUT THE FUTURE OF THE REPUBLIC FIRST. AFTER THE VOTE, HE LOST EVERYTHING AND MOVED HIS FAMILY TO THE NEW MEXICO TERRITORY. WHY IS THIS STORY IMPORTANT TODAY? BECAUSE IN PRESIDENT BUSH, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE SOMEONE WHO HAS LOST SIGHT OF THE FUTURE. BUSH STILL MIGHT LEAVE THE PRESIDENCY WITH LITTLE DAMAGE DONE. BUT, HE DEFINITELY IS LEAVING US A VERY CLOUDED TOMORROW. FOR ME, I LONG FOR AN EDMUND G. ROSS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: THE FUTURE Posted by: Flick
Goes beyond party lines
Posted by: mjm3iii on May 20, 2005 11:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This isn't between dems or repubs. This is between right and wrong. Everything the bush has done for??? america is just plain wrong. I've tried to think of one thing the bush has done for AMERICANS and couldn't. Do you actually feel safer with the bush in control? What? safer? Because of the bush??? I get it...it's a joke!
One thing that seems to have evaporated in america in this new century is common sense! I just don't see it and have many examples to prove it like ignoring scientific data from expererts on global warming. Like the neocons following an idiot because he claims to be christian. I saw through his bushit durring the first presidential race betwee the bush and Gore. I investigated the bush via the world wide web unlike many americans on how he preformed durring the bushs governmental post as gov of texas. Texas by the way is still recovering from his tenure in that post. His plan for revising the educational system in tex was the RAND PLAN! His plan if implemented would have allowed students who failed an exam to retake the same test over again till the student passed. Is this a no brainer or what? Not a different exam but the same test.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Refuting false wingnut Clinton claims above - Pt 1
Posted by: SergeiRostov on May 20, 2005 11:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[I know I could have posted this just in the replies to the original post, but I didn't want those silly claims to stand unanswered on the 'front page'. -SAR]

1. He breaks solemn and important campaign promises, like "I promise you a tax cut." Worse than not giving you the "tax cut," he HIKES taxes massively.

Wrong. He raised taxes on the top 1% only; the other 99% he gave an effective tax CUT to by increasing the Earned Income Credit (plus broadening it to include people who don't have children. He also increased various other credits which amounted to tax cuts for the poor and middle class. Further, the tax increase on the top 1% was only from 36% to 39.6%; to whom is a 3.6 percent increase 'massive'?
Not anyone I know (or have even heard of, besides you.).

2. He breaks solemn campaign promises such as "I will have the most ethical administration in history."

Wrong. Only one person indicted in all eight years (no conviction) only one person jailed (Susan McDougall), and that for refusing to lie under oath. All investigations of scandals - 7 years and 70 million dollars worth - found nothing. Not a thing.
Since 100% is as high as you can go, it would make his the most ethical.

3. He lies pathologically to such an extent that even those of his own party acknowledge it: "Bill Clinton is an unusually good liar, unusually good." - Senator Bob Kerrey, D, Neb

Wrong. Clinton didn't lie even once. The definition of 'sexual relations' provided by Congress, the grand jury, and the judges involved did not include anything he did with Ms. Lewinsky. (I notice you didn't provide a link to your quote, so - since you knew you'd be called on it, and therefore would have a link to forestall criticism - I presume it to be a phony.)

4. He is impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice.

Immaterial. Said charges were found to be without merit and motivated by sheer partisan rancor.

5. He sexually abuses subordinates at will, and when under investigation for such sexual abuse and harassment, is SO intelligent as to continue it, with Kathleen Willey and Monica Lewinski, a woman barely older than his own daughter.

Wrong. Kathleen Willey - no evidence found. Monica Lewinsky - consensual affair which SHE initiated.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Refuting false wingnut Clinton claims above - Pt 2
Posted by: SergeiRostov on May 20, 2005 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
6. He ignores the Rwandan genocide, where Hutus butcher ~800,000 Tutsis.
Wrong. Clinton and the rest of the world did, in all fairness, take so long to decide what to do that action became moot, but they did NOT 'ignore' it. This WAS, however, ignored by the vast majority of Republicans, who were too busy pursuing false charges against Clinton to be bothered to even think about it.

7. He tells Sudan that he doesn't "have any grounds to hold Osama bin Laden when Sudan offers him to us in 1998.

Wrong. This a phony story from a single Sudanese individual who now works for Fox News (which should tell you something about his credibility, i.e. that he has none). ALL investigations of this 'offer' have found that it never occurred (9/11 Commission Report, etc.).

8. He is a rapist, per Juanita Broaddrick.
Wrong. No evidence. False charge. Dismissed.

9. He vetoes the ban on late term abortions passed by congress and favored overwhelmingly by Americans.

Wrong. The bill contained no exception for the life and health of the mother; a bill without such an exception was NOT supported 'overwhemingly' , or by even a majority of Americans.

10. Rapist, serial sexual predator, and "husband" of a lesbian

Wrong. All investigations showed no evidence of rape of anyone, no sexual predation (two consensual affairs in 30 years is not this by any stretch of the imagination; Paula Jones case, for example found to be based on false and bribed testimony). No evidence Hillary Clinton is a lesbian (I notice you didn't provide any, where is it, hmm?); this is a common charge weak and insecure men level at a strong and capable woman, due to the fact that they feel threatened by such.

You're 0 for 10. Care to add ten more? You could make it 0 for 20! Judging by your post, in the wingnut universe which you apparently inhabit, that's a perfect score! Congratulations!

Sergei Rostov

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MJ
Posted by: Mal on May 20, 2005 12:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right wing globalization, aggression and nihilism, again. They don’t just hate “other people” they loath themselves with surrogates.

Sometimes things have to get worse in order to then get better. Right wing expenditures and decisions have been enormously expensive, while being a boon to nothing more than militarily minded folk like Uzbekistani tyrants and worse – Historically “Great ideologues” all, eventually wind up trying to kill everyone along with themselves (repeatedly). For that reason, today, the world is well spent to be focused on the severely conflicting ideologies and actions of the right. They are obviously going through a lot more changes than they can possibly deal with, hence their nihilism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

lHow bad does it have to get?
Posted by: ggmurray on May 20, 2005 1:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, George Bush is the worst president, hands down. I marched with millions of others around the world to prevent this war. It was so obvious. Now I think the only thing that will save America is a drastic oil price increase. That will get everyone's attention and put us to work doing what we should have been doing all this time - developing alternate energies for ourselves and the world. Remember that saying, "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself"? It is time to claim our freedom as a species.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PUBLIC DEMONSTRATIONS - IMPEACHMENT
Posted by: chuey1234 on May 20, 2005 1:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If public demonstrations are to take place against George W. Bush and his band of right wing nut cases, a few with leadership qualities, who truly believe in changing the government as it now stands, will have to come out of the closet in order to successfully engage the masses of this country's brainwashed population and truly make a difference in its outcome.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Worst president ever
Posted by: larrymadison on May 20, 2005 2:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would like to say kudos to the article on Bush being the worst president ever. The list goes on and on and should include his myopic views on cloning research.

The advances in cloning by S. Korea amd Great Britain are exciting events in the field of medicine.

When the president, through the veto power he bragged about using today should any cloning researech bill reach his desk, can take the US out of the search for stem cell advances to possibly cure spinal cord injuries, heart disease and the countless other disabilities and afflicitions of our society, it is a sad day.

The president's comments that he opposes "destroying life" in order to create it shows just how Neanderthal his thinking really is. The one good point in this, but what a price for mankind to pay, is there will never be another Dubya Bush!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

paranoid, sadistic megalomaniac
Posted by: drmeow on May 20, 2005 2:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most politicians are somewhat narcissistic and have tendencies towards megalomania - those often are the characteristics that make them want to be politicians. What makes Bush so much worse is that he is also a Psychopath who also has an Anti-social Personality Disorder.

Psychopath: lack of empathy, glib and superficial charm, egocentricity, inflated sense of self worth, emotional unresponsiveness, irresponsibility in interpersonal relationships, poor judgment, failure to learn from experience, deceitfulness, and impulsive behavior

combined with

Anti-social personality: failure to conform to social norms, deceitfulness, impulsivity or failure to plan a