Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Hybrid-Happy?

By Mark Clayton, Christian Science Monitor. Posted May 19, 2005.


America's surprising enthusiasm for hybrid cars has a hidden -- but very real -- benefit: it could decrease our dependence on foreign oil.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Nobel Laureate Slams the Bible, Calls It "A Catalogue of Cruelties"
Mario de Queiroz

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why the End May Be Coming for Coal
Christine MacDonald

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Study Claims Even the Most Sophisticated Readers Can Be Manipulated
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Mark Clayton

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Actress Cameron Diaz and Roy Jefferson, a retired government accountant from Fargo, N.D., have something in common: They both love their hybrid gas-electric cars that get 50-plus miles per gallon.

"I laugh when I go by the gas stations" without filling up, says Mr. Jefferson, an octogenarian.

The growing enthusiasm for hybrids is rattling the faith of America's automakers, who have long believed that consumers don't care about fuel efficiency. And it has opened the door to a new theory that hybrid cars — long predicted to be a niche market and a way station to future hydrogen autos — are themselves the answer to revolutionize the fleet and trim the nation's surging dependence on foreign oil.

For proponents of energy independence in the United States, the current level of dependency is worrisome. Last year, 56 percent of the nation's oil -- some 11 million barrels a day -- came from abroad. That's far more than the one-third share imported during the first oil crisis of the 1970s. And it's halfway to the two-thirds share projected for 2025, if nothing changes.

To reduce that dependence will require a massive modernization of America's transportation fleet, especially more efficient passenger cars and light trucks. So are hybrids up to the task?

Most auto analysts still say no, since an enormous number of hybrids would have to be sold over more than a decade to have a real impact. Still, demand for hybrids, the Prius in particular, is so strong that customers are waiting weeks to get one. Some used 2004 Priuses are selling for thousands of dollars more than the cost of a new one. On Tuesday, Toyota announced it would begin building its first North American hybrid car in 2006 at its Georgetown, Ky., plant.

The numbers are turning some heads.

"I was a huge skeptic," says Walter McManus, an auto industry researcher at the University of Michigan's Transportation Research Institute in Ann Arbor. "But I've basically crossed over to the dark side. You can't argue with the market reaction." He estimates Toyota, Honda, and others will sell at least 1.2 million hybrid vehicles by 2010 -- about 7 percent of the US market - and possibly much higher.

If all U.S. cars (not including light trucks) were Priuses today, the nation would save 15 percent more oil than it received from the Persian Gulf in 2002, writes energy-efficiency guru Amory Lovins in his recent book Winning the Oil Endgame.

Of course, a sudden switch is virtually impossible, since there are roughly 235 million cars and light trucks on the road in the U.S. today. Less than one-tenth of 1 percent of those — some 200,000 — are hybrids. So the speed of the conversion will determine how much imported oil the nation might save.

"In our view the hybrids represent a long-term trend toward a dramatically more efficient fleet," concluded consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton in a 2004 report.

For example: If consumers keep snapping up hybrids and automakers begin to integrate the technology throughout their product lines — including pickup trucks — then hybrids might quickly reach 20 percent of new vehicle sales by 2010 and 80 percent by 2015, according to another Booz Allen Hamilton report. That's the most optimistic of three scenarios the management consulting firm laid out. In the "high adoption" scenario, hybrids would save 2 million barrels of gasoline a day by 2015; in the "medium adoption" scenario, 800,000 barrels of gasoline.

Other estimates vary widely. Hybrids could be 10 percent to 15 percent of new vehicle sales by 2012, the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National Laboratory concluded in a report last summer. Together, hybrids and efficient "clean diesels" could be 40 percent of new car sales by then if the technologies are widely adopted, it said.

But with gasoline use increasing 1.7 percent a year through 2025, hybrids' impact on oil consumption will be small, according to the latest outlook by the US Department of Energy. It predicts only 1.1 million hybrids will be sold in 2025. Even in the most optimistic case, assuming rapid adoption of hybrid and other car technologies, the U.S. would still chop only 172 million barrels of oil a year by 2025 — about 2.5 percent of expected oil imports that year. On the other side, Mr. McManus predicts more hybrids will be sold in 2010 than the DOE's 2025 estimate.

So who's right? Consumers are eager. Last month, 49 percent of new-car buyers, the highest level ever, had changed their mind or were thinking strongly about buying a vehicle they would not have considered because of gas prices, according to a survey by Harris Interactive and Kelley Blue Book.

"We're going to have many, many choices," says Ron Cogan, editor and publisher of Green Car Journal, a monthly magazine devoted to energy-efficient and environmentally friendlier cars. "Hybrids are here right now. They're quite clearly the next big thing. To look off into the future for hydrogen is not giving enough credit to what we have here and now."

Nissan plans to offer a hybrid version of its popular Altima model using Toyota technology next year. Even GM says it will soon offer "mild hybrid" technology that stops a car's motor while stuck in traffic — and automatically restarts it. At least 17 hybrid-electric models will be available in the US market by 2006 with 38 forecast by 2011, market research company J.D. Power and Associates reported in February.

Even so, the company is not bullish about hybrids. "Despite the significant growth in the number of models and annual sales over the next five years, we anticipate hybrid market share to reach a plateau of about 3 percent near the end of the decade," writes Anthony Pratt, a senior manager at J.D. Power, in the report.

Conventional wisdom holds that the long-expected growth of hybrids will be slow. Skeptics abound.

"They make a nice story, but they're not a good business story yet because the value is lower than the cost," said Carlos Ghosn, chief executive of Nissan Motor Co., at the National Automobile Dealers Association convention in New Orleans in January.

Even McManus — the hybrid cynic-turned-believer — has serious doubts about how big an impact even a massive surge in hybrid sales will have on reducing America's oil dependence. His analysis, for instance, shows a "rebound effect." For every 1 percent decline in the cost of fuel, Americans drive 1.85 percent more.

Another factor working against hybrids' overall impact on cutting oil imports is the rising number of vehicles on American roads. The fleet grows about 1 percent a year. "I can't imagine a circumstance where we can reduce it enough to cut a significant portion of what we get from over there," McManus says.

Nevertheless, with gasoline prices at more than $2 a gallon, Detroit auto executives seem to be changing tack. Hybrids could be everywhere in the future, if hybrid is defined broadly as any vehicle that uses more than one method of providing power to the tires, some say.

"If you think about the 15- to 20-year time frame, you could argue that all vehicles are going to be hybrids," Michael Tamor, manager of Ford Motor Co.'s Sustainable Mobility Technologies, reportedly told a conference of the Society of Automotive Engineers in February. Meanwhile, the head of GM, Robert Wagoner, has recently said hybrids are important after all. The company is said to be seeking access to Toyota's hybrid technology.

"All we've been hearing for 15 years is that consumers don't care about fuel efficiency, that they care more about cupholders than fuel economy," says Bradley Berman, editor and publisher of Hybridcars.com. "I would say that fuel economy is the new cupholder."

If hybrids do indeed become the "next big thing," with a bigger impact on U.S. oil consumption than is still today widely believed, it probably won't be because of eco-celebrities like Ms. Diaz, but because of a shift by masses of ordinary Americans, Mr. Cogan says.

Unlike Diaz, who has her own environmental show on television, Mr. Jefferson, is an avowed Republican who doesn't at all mind drilling for more oil in Alaska's wildlife refuge. Still, three years ago he decided he wanted something different in a car. And he liked the idea of cutting pollution a bit - and helping the U.S. rely less on foreign oil, too. So he bought a Toyota Prius.

What does he think of hybrids? Are they the next big thing that will help America get free from imported oil? "I'm no scientist," he says. "But I wouldn't bet against it."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Mark Clayton is a staff writer for the Christian Science Monitor.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Driving Ms. Dinosaur
Posted by: RoguebotV on May 20, 2005 10:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The continual poh-pohing of alternate fuel Tech has a sinister aspect as many proven methods have been proposed and shunned over the past few years.
The fact remains that there is little in the way of actually inducing the U.S. to switch to new methods of propelling ourselves down little ribbons of road and rail besides cost.
The public arena has had little to do except wait while the big companies shuffle their feet and try to figure out who will get marketshare.
They are quite obvious in the fact that they do not want us to move away from oil until they have a handle on the money hose.
A sudden crisis such as Saudi pipeline destruction would force a complete change in less than a year.
Re-fitting older cars with new engines would be a huge market as new offerings would be stuck in production bottlenecks and supply problems.
Component manufacturer's would rise to the new "National Emergency" as business would center away from the current offerings and services of GM,Ford, etc.. to local installers and refitters.
Pry the cold grip of oil and car companies from our government and we would all be getting better mileage for it is in OUR best interest, and those who can make that happen would no longer be excluded from the reins of power.
As long as we tolerate being told we need to stay on oil we will.
China will soon show us that we are not the important people we think we are as they suck the available supplies dry within years.
Unrest overseas, poor World opinion, Terminal Technologies, all interplay.
We currently risk becoming a 3rd world country if only a portion of foreign investment stops what will happen when we anger the last of the countries who support our oil habit?
DUCK AND COVER....;>

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hybrids constitute an Expensive, Bankrupt Technology
Posted by: wdzeller on May 23, 2005 8:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All of this vaunted new hybrid technology will soon be seen as boondoogle just as the Wankel Engine Technology was viewed by the mid 1970's. Unfortunately, this view will not prevail until after hundreds of thousands actually go out and buy these horrid things.

How so, one may ask?

Well, for starters, each and every hybrid car requires a highly specialized battery pack. A VERY expensive battery pack, I must mention. Once one has driven their hybrid car for 100,000 miles, the warranty on that battery typically expires and any battery failure replacement costs will come out of the owner's pocket to the tune of no less that $7,000!

If you were planning to purchase a new car and were told that you would probably have to spend $7,000 on that car once it turns around 100,000 miles, would you buy that car? Also, once these costs become recognized as a fact of life by a mechanically-ignorant American public, who in their right mind would want to buy your used hybrid? Does one really think that they could sell it off or trade it in without realizing a huge price depreciation?

Let's face it, the typical American household already has about $20,000 in credit card debt and saves less than $40 per month (Generation Y has about $10,000 in credit card debt AND $30,000 in student loan debt by age 22 and saves SQUAT). Does that average household really need or want a car that will raise that debt load by over a third? Most people would not have enough in savings to pay for such a massive repair bill, hence, "Charge it!" would be the rule of the day.

This technology will become a nightmare for those who have literally bought into it.

The key to reducing fuel consumption has been and still is the diesel engine, but in America this will now NEVER happen since our so lovely and incredibly wise and people-loving Environmental Protection Agency has all but killed this technology. In fact, the EPA has now guaranteed massive price hikes in fuel due to the the fact that their environmental regulations will increase demand for already scarce diesel fuel. ALL diesel engines in 2006 trucks, buses, and locomotives will use TWICE THE FUEL of those engines manufactured in prior years due to the new NOX regulations. Damn, we're really saving the environment by making commercial engines that see their fuel economy reduced by HALF!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dalanharmon
Posted by: dalanharmon on May 23, 2005 11:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Ford Motor Company (or any other auto maker) makes a hybrid that uses hydrogen instead of gasoline, I want to order 1000 vehicles that year, with an option for 50,000 the following year. This will be a demonstration project to set up a small infrastructure to provide hydrogen as a fuel for up to 100,000 vehicles in the Phoenix area. Interested, call me at 602 478-9778

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Batteries not included
Posted by: 42Years on May 24, 2005 8:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are way past dreaming that an American love affair with hybrid, fuel efficient cars is going to make any dent in our dependency on oil. The world's consumption of oil and gas is skyrocketing while known supplies are stagnant. It is very unlikely that new sources will be found. The sum of all the alternative energy sources known today adds up to a thumb in the dike.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hybrids are the pinnacle of vehicle technology.
Posted by: Wells on May 24, 2005 11:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those who complain about the drawbacks of battery power are sorely ignorant of their many, even phenomenal benefits.

Hybrid batteries can form the basis of home-power electricity storage, highly desireable in the event of electricity shortages and price gouging. In this way, they advance the rooftop photovoltiac industry. The battery pack, mounted low on the frame, lowers the vehicle center-of-gravity, improving handling and stability, a major safety factor, perfect for roll-prone vehicles like the SUV. This homepower, zero-emission, battery-only operation effectively reduces fuel costs, a conflict of interest that Big Oil and automakers are actively working to protect by defaming the Hybrid. Some who condemn hybrids are suspect.

Those who tout diesel and bio-diesel fuels do not understand how Hybrids perfect the combustion, emission reduction and economy of these and all other fuels, including hydrogen.

The diesel engine is least efficient during varied accelleration and decelleration. When paired with the Hybrid electric motor drive, the diesel engine rpm range and load are strictly regulated, allowing the electric motor to perform propulsion where the diesel engine fares poorly. This increases diesel fuel mileage, reduces emissions, extends engine life and reduces maintenance.

During the Clinton era, Ford and GM produced Hybrid prototypes, (Ford Prodigy and GM Precept), 4-door sedans similar to the Prius that achieved 70-80 mpg, both employing turbo-diesel engines. Neither incorporated a larger battery pack, as does the next generation Plug-in Hybrid, which can extend zero-emission driving to achieve 500+ mpg.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Part of the multilevel solution
Posted by: billschwalb on May 24, 2005 11:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hybrids won't solve the energy /polution problem. But till we have a meaningful good energy and transportation policy, it will cut down some of the wastefulness. Use of veggie oil and biodiesel, especially with VWs and Benzes is obvious in SF as are the increasing number of hybrids. On a weekly or bimonthly basis, I see these increases. Car dealers that are sharp are leading the trend, both in new and used cars. Price a used diesel Jetta in urban N. California vs. more rural areas in neary CA and other states.

The more there are early adopters of newer, cleaner technology, the easier it will be for more people to decide for economic and/or ecological reasons that wasteful vehicles have outlived their time-like the dinosaurs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hybrid means combined tech for combined benefit
Posted by: Sarris on May 25, 2005 9:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My Honda Insight uses hybrid a gas/electric power source as only one of several technologies that makes 70mpg possible on the highway and over 50mpg around town. Unless other manufacturers take a similar focus on efficiency, just being "hybrid" won't help all that much. After all, my 1992 Civic hatchback still gets over 40mpg on the highway, and it's not a hybrid. The much loved Prius isn't all that impressive by comparison.

Regardless of the energy source, we need higher efficiency transportation. Without it, we are doomed. Our short-sighted orgy of oil consumption will destroy our economy and leave us without means to heat our homes or grow and distribute food if we don't get more work done using less fuel. It's that simple.

There never will be a "hydrogen economy". Solar power will never give us the quantity of energy we are now depending upon because we waste so much. There is no silver bullet that will make the future just like the recent past. People who build luxury developments in the desert because air conditioning is cheap are not thinking very well. People who buy huge SUVs with huge gas tanks are not thinking rationally, and it's going to cost them lots when they finally decide that they can't afford to keep using this vehicle that nobody else wants to buy from them.

The keyword here shouldn't be "hybrid". It should be "efficiency". Hybrids are merely one means of achieving that end.

It makes sense. Build a small gas engine that can convert very portable energy (gasoline) into transportation for a long distance (something electric motors can't do), but don't overbuild it for climbing hills and accellerating to pass. Instead, use electric motors and batteries that are really good at sprinting -- expending a lot of energy over a short distance -- to do that kind of work. Make the gas engine just big enough to keep you going down that highway mile after mile.

We put the first guys on the moon, but we can't build an efficient car.

Instead, we build "off road vehicles" so people can drive them on the roads. I say we should put all those off-road vehicles where they belong:

Off the road.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How about driving less?
Posted by: cyclone2525 on May 25, 2005 10:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hybrids are great, hydrogen would be incredible. But how about driving less? Suburbia is what's killing us (both politically and pollution-wise). I have always searched for jobs and homes that are within walking distance of one another (I currently live in a small town without public transportation). I set up conference calls whenever possible so that I'm not driving unnecessary distances. I plan car trips that have multiple purposes versus taking several of them. What would we do if there was no gasoline at the pump tomorrow? People have come to rely on their cars so much that if they lost the ability to buy gas, they would be too far away from food, family, work, and everything! How smart is that? We rely on other countries to provide us the means to live our daily regular lives. Gulp! We rely on food that has to be trucked in so that we can simply eat! We haven't been too bright when you stop and think about it. But for now, why not be happy that we have the excitement we do about Hybrids :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement