Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Million-Word March for Media Reform

By Danny Schechter, MediaChannel.org. Posted May 19, 2005.


In St. Louis last weekend citizens met to discuss ways to 'take back' a media beholden less to democracy than to the bottom line.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Danny Schechter

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Outside the window was the great Arch of Exploration, St. Louis's national monument honoring Thomas Jefferson and his patronage of the Lewis and Clark expedition that mapped out our continent for major change back in the early days of the 18th century.

In these early days of the 21st century, alongside the banks of the same Mississippi River, two modern day Lewis and Clarks -- one a scholar named Robert McChesney, the other a journalist called John Nichols -- invoked the unfinished promise of Jeffersonian democracy to convene a second National Conference on Media Reform to energize an emerging citizens' movement to explore how to take back our media.

The goal: To redirect the most powerful arsenal of communication technology humanity has ever known away from serving corporate interests and into the hands of our citizens and public needs.

The organizers had to close the registration early because the aptly named Millennium Hotel could not accommodate more than the 2,500 people who crammed into the 50 or more panels and plenaries to hear calls for action and plan campaigns for media change.

They came from 50 states and 10 countries. They were old and young, white and black, straight and gay, media consumers and media makers, researchers and academics, lawyers and activists. In the words of an earlier exhortation to media combat in the movie Network, they were "mad as hell and not going to take it anymore." They didn't just open their windows to shout, but came to the conference to exchange ideas.

There were angry hip-hop activists demanding "media justice" and senior citizens alarmed about the current threats to PBS. There were internet savvy advocates of municipally-owned wireless systems and senior level "lions of litigation" who believe that the laws and the courts can be used to safeguard our rights.

There were unknown community media producers and some of the best-known voices of liberal left media, like radio revolutionaries Al Franken and Amy Goodman; concerned celebrities like Jim Hightower and Patti Smith; distinguished broadcasters including Bill Moyers and Phil Donahue; two outspoken FCC commissioners; several members of Congress; one Corporation for Public Broadcasting board member, and probably even a partridge in a pear tree.

At times, it had the feeling of a revival meeting, not just a rally. It was a million-word march to end media concentration and open the airwaves to more diversity of expression. And sure, there were tensions, with younger grassroots activists feeling frozen out by the grey heads and media movement vets who dominated the proceedings.

Hundreds of groups that care about media change took part -- national groups from MoveOn to Media Channel, from FAIR to Common Cause, and local groups from Chicago Media Action to Seattle's Reclaim the Media and Philadelphia's Media Tank. All gathered under the auspices of Free Press, a relatively new organization that now claims 183,000 people on its e-mail list.

The small but robust indy TV channels LinkTV and Free Speech TV, and the emerging news-oriented International World Television network were also there in a conclave of shared consciousness. Ditto for the Newspaper Guild, the National Writers Union, AFTRA and the Screen Actor's Guild. Earlier, organizations that claim to represent 20 million Americans had endorsed a citizens' Bill of Media Rights to lay out principles to guide the kind of media system that's needed.

Pacifica Radio aired Saturday night's session nationally, while C-SPAN sent its cameras to record a Sunday morning sermon by Bill Moyers (mp3 download) on the need for real journalism on PBS and a real PBS. (He glossed over its many flaws but upheld the need for a publicly-owned and responsible broadcaster in a time of so much commercialism and corporate media.) Moyers demolished the claims of new Corporation for Public Broadcasting Chairman Kenneth Tomlinson that his on-air work needed to be "balanced" with new right-wing fare. "I simply never imagined that any CPB chairman, Democrat or Republican, would cross the line from resisting White House pressure to carrying it out for the White House," he said to continuing applause.


Digg!

Danny Schechter writes a daily blog for MediaChannel.org. He is the author of Embedded: Weapons of Mass Deception--How the Media Failed to Cover the War on Iraq (Prometheus).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Shareholder activism
Posted by: PB on May 20, 2005 5:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We can start to take back the media through shareholder activism. Most media companies are public. If you purchase $2000 worth of stock in the company and hold it for a year, you have the right to submit a shareholder proposal for possible vote by all the stockholders. There are lots of mechanics and details, which I'm outlining in a series of articles for my local Democratic club, but that is the gist. Americans can thank John and Lewis Gilbert, the first shareholder activists, who helped carve out the rights we enjoy today but seldom use. These two gadflies attended 100 shareholder meetings per year for decades! Both died in the last few years. We owe them a huge debt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Learn History, Mr. Schechter
Posted by: dellb on May 20, 2005 8:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Danny Schechter says, in his first paragraph about the Million-Word March For Media Reform that the Arch of Exploration commemorates Thomas Jefferson and Lewis and Clark who opened the west in the "early years of the 18th century. Lewis and Clark left to explore the Missouri River and points west in 1804 and returned in 1806 -- that is the early years of the 19th century!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's A War, Not A Discussion!
Posted by: thirdmg on May 20, 2005 9:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It amazes me how so many on the left have yet to understand that the right has declared war on us and has no intention of letting up until it has won unconditionally. Now, here's Bob McChesney advising us of the need to reach out to the other side, and that any suggestion of replacing Rush Limbaugh is "the wrong answer." What nonsense! Limbaugh is not an alternate voice in a civil debate. He is purveyer of propaganda and disinformation in a cold civil war. Getting rid of him and others like him is exactly what's needed. It's the same as in World War II - you use every strategy to defeat the fascists; you don't try to appease them by reaching out to them or their constituencies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's A War, Not A Discussion! Posted by: Michael Turnauer, Vancouver,WA
Glowing Box Tribe
Posted by: RoguebotV on May 20, 2005 10:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The simplictic nature of the average human,(not you Dear Reader), allows for the science of media to develop into one of the few perfect mind-control methods.
As you know, studies show that the same portion of the brain stimulated while observing is the same portion stimulated while actually completing a task.
Science lesson aside, we are now faced with a dire challenge stemming from the controllability of others.
A college cinemetography class would barely explain the relationship of emotions/images used to portray storylines.
As our general I.Q. has changed,( I said changed but mean lowered as we are very cunning, but have exhibited a loss in volitional intelligence.) i.e. calculator over calculation.
We MUST understand that the ONLY repairs we can make on our jingoistic, propagandised culture is to throw the gates of information wide open.
Not this current "knowledge is power" structure used in large part by those who would dictate our lives by only promoting that which they themselve find acceptable, but the raw feed from all over the world pumped 24/7 into low class America for free.
The classism developed by cable vs. broadcast should be evident to even the most casual observer.
Those who met in that conference should have had only a few resolutions passed and here is what they should have been:
1. Free access to media programming to those without it nation-wide from sources World-wide.
2. Content broadcast on those channels are to be governed by the locality/nationality of the feed but legal to view in any area without exception.
3. Internet access is to be included in the connection.
Why? you ask?
The Genie has been out of the bottle for a long time and won't go back in.
Massive amounts of content in delivered media will dilute the propaganda and release our culture from the narrow angled focus of current outlets.
The shock value alone from foreign broadcasts would help to relieve our myopic vision.
THERE IS NO OTHER WAY THAN THROUGH THE ENEMY....;>

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternetter
Posted by: AlterNetter on May 20, 2005 11:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ironically, the progressive city that hosted the media reform conference is in the stranglehold of right-wing talk radio. The public airwaves reverberate day and night with the diatribes of Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reilly, Beck, Ingraham, and others; but there are no nationally-syndicated progressive voices---except for Amy Goodman in her nightly news report on an independent station. And it’s not as if St. Louis is a bastion of neoconservatism; the region voted ‘blue’ in the last presidential election.

In a happier irony, while many speakers at the conference stressed the need for grassroots activism, a group of St. Louisans in attendance had just launched an effort to bring a progressive perspective to St. Louis radio. That effort is described on their still-under-construction web site: ProgressiveTalk.Org. (If you can pick up St. Louis radio broadcasts, please visit the site and sign the petition!)

The conference could not have come at a better time, or to a better place than St. Louis. As Mr. Schechter points out, St. Louis was where Lewis and Clark launched their bold fact-finding expedition. Today, average St.Louisans, in an admittedly more modest way, are launching their own Thomas Jefferson-inspired expedition–a quest for fairness, balance, perspective, and truth--all fundamentals for the continuation of our democracy.

Wish us luck!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Noticable Lack of Conservative Attendance!
Posted by: BriMan on May 21, 2005 8:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How come the rights arent trying to reframe the liberal media?

Answer - because it doesnt exist! Just as those with open minds and energy to think for themselves have suggested for years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]