Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Evolution of Jeffrey Sachs

By Robert Cole, AlterNet. Posted May 18, 2005.


Despite a checkered record as a high-profile guru of global development, the Harvard economist offers an innovative and powerful strategy to end the worst of global poverty.
The End of Poverty

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Robert Cole

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

President Bush's favorite philosopher Jesus Christ once declared, "The poor we will always have with us." Jeffrey Sachs is a man on a mission to prove him wrong.

The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time is an autobiography, a moral call to arms, and a technical blueprint all rolled up into one massive book dedicated to eradicating extreme global poverty by 2025. Here is what extreme poverty looks like today: over a billion people struggle to survive on less than a dollar a day, while another 1.5 billion exist on less than two dollars per day. Some 114 million children are denied any education whatsoever, even as six million children die of malnutrition before the age of five each year.

Sachs' book is a natural extension of his present tenure as director of both the UN Millennium Project and Columbia University's Earth Institute. In the former position he serves as special advisor to UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, guiding the pursuit of that project's Millennium Development Goals. These eight MDGs, which are now formally supported by all of UN member states, range from eradicating extreme poverty -- defined as living on less than one dollar per day -- to creating a global partnership for development, with concurrent plans to ensure universal primary education and promote gender equality. (These targets were originally set for 2015, though the eradication of severe poverty has since been pushed back to 2025.)

Miracle Worker or Reckless Visionary?

The high-profile guru of global development, recently included on Time magazine's current list of the world's 100 most influential people, has a long and controversial track record in curing the world's economic woes. Sachs received his Ph.D. from Harvard University when he was barely 26. Within two years, he had already received tenure at Harvard's economics department, where he established his reputation as an expert on international finance and inflation.

Sachs soon became famous as a macroeconomic miracle worker when Bolivia hired him to cure the nation's rampant inflation. Within seven weeks, the good doctor had rescued the ailing Bolivian peso, stopping the country's hyperinflation in its tracks. Sachs never looked back, soon becoming the most sought-after economic adviser to the developing world.

Over the past two decades, Sachs has treated over a hundred such "patients," from Latin America through Eastern Europe to Asia. Along the way, he's garnered a degree of celebrity rare for an economist, rubbing shoulders with popes and presidents, royalty and rock stars. Fame has brought with it greater scrutiny, and inevitably criticism.

After Bolivia, the summer of 1989 found Sachs in post-communist Poland, urging a crash course in market transformation. Heeding a Solidarity leader's request, he and colleague David Lipton held an all-night drafting session that produced a specific timeline of policy reforms, including the immediate removal of price controls and privatization of state enterprises. This tactic of rapidly injecting free-market reforms into stagnant economies came to be known as "shock therapy" (a label Sachs rejects).

Despite warnings from Polish economists who feared that their country lacked the experience to absorb such quick, radical change, the Sachs-Lipton brief became the nation's official economic policy on Jan. 1, 1990 -- and to disastrous effect, at least in the short run. In the absence of government controls, unemployment rates spiked, prices skyrocketed, and thousands lost their personal savings. Poland's woes inspired a firestorm of criticism that Sachs later dismissed, arguing that his strategy did in fact work in the long run. He pointed to the dramatic increase in per capita income by 2002 in Poland, which also enjoyed the highest rate of economic growth among post-communist nations during the same period.


Digg!

Robert Cole is a freelance writer and historian living on Beaver Island, Michigan.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
checkered past
Posted by: guychick on May 18, 2005 1:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"In Sachs' track record with post-communist economies, his critics see a man eager to advance grandiose visions of social engineering irrespective of their costs."

I am a big critic of Mr. Sachs, but it's not because I think he's eager to advance "grandiose visions of social engineering." It's because he's a power-worshipper who will leg hump anything, and say anything to get ahead.

Cole comes close to the truth with Sachs' work in Russia. Let me put it this way: He willingly cheerleaded the theft of Russia's state resources by a handful of gangsters becuase the State Department told him to, and came up with the cute term of "shock therapy" to describe it. From an American standpoint, this was pure genius. We drove Russia into the ground. From the Russian standpoint, well, the country "lost" at least seven million senior citizens when their pensions were stolen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bah, humbug!
Posted by: Geni on May 18, 2005 3:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jeffrey Sach's advice demolished the economies of Russia and Eastern Europe, yet he won't even admit he was wrong - and now he wants to be known as a friend of the poor? Give me a break! More likely, like the born-again "AIDS activists" with their faith-based "abstinence education" programs, Sachs and his cronies have plans for intercepting a big chunk of the aid money that they hope to liberate.

The aid plan sounds good in theory. Many humanitarians were promoting the idea long before Sachs jumped onto the bandwagon, and if applied honestly and effectively, it would be the right thing to do. But I am deeply afraid that it will be perverted for some other purpose than the one intended. Even African leaders are expressing uncharacteristic reluctance at the new World Bank President Wolfowitz's sudden unholy interest in "helping" them.

The matter is placed in context by Perkins' book, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, where he describes how "aid loans" were intentionally *designed* to make developing nations first beholden, and then bankrupt and under total economic subjection to the World Bank and its donor nations. At this stage, therefore, across-the-board debt forgiveness would be a modest first indicator of good intent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bah, humbug! Posted by: guychick
» RE: Bah, humbug! Posted by: Geni
Ad Hominem
Posted by: john on May 18, 2005 8:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting that the comments attack the man instead of debating the issue. Even if these attacks were entirely correct, where does that leave this economic plan. I favor this type of ground-up approach to poverty reduction. The question remains, however, if this design can withstand the inevitable onslaught from the deep-seated corruption and power structures already embedded in each system.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ad Hominem Posted by: Geni
pzzp
Posted by: pzzp on May 18, 2005 9:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At the present state of global economic affairs, wealth exists because poverty does, and vice-versa. A successful strategy must apply force at both ends, so as to increase the middle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The End Of "ALL" Poverty / War / ETC.
Posted by: mebadgett on May 18, 2005 11:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only way that poverty / war / etc. will "EVER" end is to end corporate greed - keep dreaming Mr. Sachs

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bringing Forth The Best
Posted by: Andrew on May 19, 2005 9:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To guychick, geni, and mebadgett, I ask, "What are you committed to and what do you think Jeffery Sachs is committed to? My guess is that if you're taking the time to read AlterNet articles and post, then you're all committed to some version of creating a more just and healthy world. Thus, I'm requesting that you be more responsible for this commonality and take the time to craft comments that will actually forward this commitment rather than writing comments that vent or tear someone down who is out to cause the same thing that you are.

In today's list of AlterNet articles, there's a transcript from a panel discussion on the new Start Making Sense book. Van Jones, one of the panelists, has this to say about how we respond/react to one another's commitments: "One of the challenges that we have on the left is that we've gotten so good at critique, and so good at deconstruction, and so good at opposition, that we tend to carry that spirit even into interactions with each other. And nothing is going to change, nothing is going to shift, no breakthrough is possible until we decide to treat each other humanely. We need to bring forward the best in each other in our own conversations."

Let's take Jones' advice and begin doing this here and now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Poverty is caused by debt-based usury based centralized commercial banking
Posted by: Sbanet on Sep 26, 2006 8:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Money is based on a collective agreement of trust; that very trust is violated by the way centralized monetary and banking system (a colonnial legacy of Bank of England) currently operates around the world in post colonnial period. See a solution proposed based on actual understanding of the dysfunctional and mathematically unsustainable nature of current monetary system.

Ending Poverty is possible by Transforming Money

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]