Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Vader's Villainy

By Dorothy Woodend, AlterNet. Posted May 20, 2005.


George Lucas claims that his latest Star Wars film isn't for kids, yet the world is deluged in Darth mania. Amidst all the hype, one bit of information seems to be lacking: Darth Vader is evil.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Dorothy Woodend

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

This is the end, my friends. Finally, the last installment of the Star Wars saga arrives in a swirl of darkness this weekend. A momentous occasion for some, a relief for others. More than a series of films, the sextet has become a vast cultural edifice, and at the center, having supplanted the mewling puker Luke, stands big bad daddy Darth Vader. The fact that Vader has come to occupy the enterprise's central role is a curious development, since it requires that audiences have compassion for what is, arguably, a monster.

So how did we get here, Darth and us? We watched him grow from a towheaded munchkin in The Phantom Menace to a surly teenager in Attack of the Clones to full-grown towering evil in Revenge of the Sith. This final film, wherein we witness his embrace of the dark side, is played as tragedy.

But the moment that Anakin Skywalker becomes a monster has also been captured by Lego (the toymaker). Just the other day I bought my son Louis some Star Wars Lego, and after enduring the three hours it took to assemble, I looked at it closely. Here was Anakin, cut and bleeding, with a wobbly look -- like he was about to cry, but still demonstrably human. And there was Darth Vader -- underneath his helmet, he wore the same expression (as if he was about to burst into tears), but he'd turned an ashen gray.

Critics may rant and rave about why we ought to be entirely sick of the Star Wars ways, but Darth is, in fact everywhere -- hawking M&M's, Slurpees, and enough toys to sink a battleship. Every time a child pipes "I want that!" the cash register rings and cold cash pours into George Lucas' coffers. Star Wars merchandise is worth somewhere in the ballpark of $9 billion, and Lucas, having forgone his directing salary in exchange for a share of the merchandise, is sitting comfortably.

Lucas is sticking with Vader's proven success to lure in kiddies, despite the fact that this is the film in which evil triumphs. Even while Lucas is quoted saying that it isn't a film for young children, the entire world is deluged in Darth. But amid all the hype, one tiny bit of information seems to be lacking: Darth Vader is evil. He kills entire worlds, slaughters children, tortures his daughter, tries to kill his son. He's bad. It doesn't matter how he became bad, or that eventually he felt sorry -- he's a villain.

Watching the Downfall

But villainy isn't quite what it used to be, when in cases where the biggest villain of the 20th century gets some sympathy. In the recent film Downfall, which depicts the final days of Adolf Hitler, he is a man at the very end of his life, failing in body and mind, but unable to grasp that the end of the Third Reich is at hand. Of course, these two films are entirely different; one is inspired by the real events of history and the other has Jar Jar Binks in it. But there are strange echoes between the two, not the least of which is the figure at the center of each: Darth and Adolf, both tortured men who become something else over the course of history and mythmaking.


Digg!

Dorothy Woodend is film critic for the Tyee, a daily Canadian alternative newspaper.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Lucas' Star Wars and Bush's Iraq war
Posted by: dearkitty on May 20, 2005 2:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
See here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Everyman
Posted by: 42Years on May 20, 2005 7:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Evil is resident in every human being. It is one part of the complex chemical cocktail in the brain. People that may be labeled evil don't go around saying that they are evil. They just are. That is their style. A way of life different in degree from those who are not considered evil. There is no playbook that commands the game be played one way or the other. Most people stay within the boundaries of civility whether it be the low end or the high end and are acceptable to society. Some people slip below the bottom point for any number of reasons and live according to rules that are deemed unacceptable to the rest of us. In some cases we define those people as evil. But it is only another part of ourselves; not something alien. Once in awhile a collective conscience develops among a particular peer group and they all appear to have many of the same characteristics. Today, there are a lot of 20- and 30-somethings that have been heavily infuenced by television, motion pictures, and music to rebel against the norms of society and accept alternative life styles. One major part of their culture is the adulation of evil and the dark side. Gratuitous sex, drugs, and murder are part of their life style. They have grown up on Darth Vadar and accept his character as a part of the human experience. They believe there is little hope for mankind or themselves and prefer to take unnecessary risks to give their lives meaning. Death is waiting around the corner for them and they invite it as a companion to accompany them into the bleak future. Hitler, Darth Vadar, and others have taken the road less traveled and willingly embraced the darker side of Man. It makes us afraid because we see some of what they do in ourselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You missed the point...
Posted by: linguizic on May 20, 2005 7:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are 2 entire Star Wars films that deal with the battle between good and evil that exists within us all. What is important about the conclusion of Return of the Jedi is that there is always a chance for redemption. For every embodiment of evil there is still good within it. Luke Skywalker, though his own father was trying to kill him, found in his heart the abillity to forgive and love his own father, and not condemn him. Condemnation only solidifies the evil of those in whom it prevails.

The fact that these new Star Wars films are all about a villain is a lesson, and an inherently political one at that. George Lucas gave us the child Anakin, who was inherently good, but was given the oppurtunity to be better as a Jedi Knight. But Anakin's extroardinary powers made him more easily corruptible, to where in the end he becomes a monster.

I'm sure the current enemies of freedom in the real world (I don't think I need to say who they are in this forum), were all good children with their own talents and skills that could have made them useful tools for good on earth. But the philosophy that they are more deserving of what they have because they are more hard-working, disciplined, and moral than those that have less is a corrupting one.

But we should empathize, and not condemn these people, we should appeal to the good within them. That's what Star Wars meant to me. By taking us on this journey through the childhood of a monster, we learn to forgive the real life monsters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You missed the point... Posted by: libbys
Darth Monkey.
Posted by: gazevans on May 20, 2005 8:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, I guess. What about the part of the story about compassion and self-sacrifice? Vader teaches us that it is never too late to take a different path: poignant for the US at this time...

Lucas is probably building a REAL Death Star with all that money...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You know... Posted by: nickptar
» RE: Darth Monkey. Posted by: zeeartiste
Star Wars III is actually the best anti-Bush PSA I've seen!
Posted by: harrylin on May 20, 2005 10:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The writer of the article missed the point. The most surprising, and surprisingly insightful, part of the newest Star Wars movie is that it's essentially a very long, very expensive anti-Bush PSA! I mean, MoveOn.org couldn't have created a better movie (even if they had Lucas's billions).

I was shocked by how overtly political the movie was and I was happily surprised to see that its viewpoint was decidely left-leaning. Make no mistake: the evil of Darth Vader in this movie is a metaphor for the evil of Darth Dubya.

Lucas that ol' '60s hippie -- he went and expended all his accumulated goodwill and capital to make an extended critique of our current administration! Who would've thunk!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

blah blah blah
Posted by: BuckFush on May 20, 2005 10:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is the point.

Now here the author missing the point.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Watch the Entire Saga Again
Posted by: Gnostic on May 20, 2005 10:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THe Original Trilogy and the Prequel Trilogy show two important aspects of "evil". How someone can turn away from evil and how someone can fall to evil.

Darth Vader was a mass murderer, he submerged an entire galaxy into darkness and help to destroy liberty and freedom. He wasn't always that way though. He used to be a bright child who was going to be the saviour of the galaxy. Unfortunately he turned to the dark side and commited atrocities and in the end he turned away from the horrors that he wrought upon the galaxy.

The author of this article said that at the end he felt sorry, but his conversion to the light wasn't so simple. Nothing can excuse killing children. Rather his turn to the light side was to show that no one is beyond redemption.

Hitler had a mother and a father who loved him, he was a child who played like all children do. He was just a person...and then he became an evil man....but that didn't mean that he was beyond redemption. If it was my place to I'd forgive Hitler...if he was honest about redemption. You don't have to forgive the acts but you should forgive the person.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Watch the Entire Saga Again Posted by: jimsenter
The movie ain't for kids but this review is!
Posted by: tigua_naghel on May 20, 2005 10:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the silliest most uninforming and critically vapid review I have read--EVER. What makes this review so intellectually palsied is the pretense it apes at conveying a since of intertextual analysis. Here, the review attempts to intersect the discurssive fields of history and political analysis by toggling Darth Vader to Adolf Hitler. But to do so is to trump up the morbidity of influenza in the age of AIDS. Viz., George Lucas is obviously channeling astute politcal commentary via the 1930s filmography that attempted to undermine the fascist influence. Granted. However, we all know that World War II is over, therefore, the auteur is obviously talking no more about fascism in Nazi Germany than he is celebrating the rise of evil in Revenge of the Sith. What George is clearly talking about, that this review fails to address, is the rise of fascism in imperialistic Amerika under the Reagan regime agenda presently sustained by Bush Jr. Period. Adolf is gone. Let him be. By resurecting the dead we fail to apply the lessons embedded in the past to our present predicament with the result that history repeats itself. I mean, which part of history don't people get? Adolf continues to be this antiquated symbol of evil in our society thereby displacing all present and future evils by comparison. To harp on Adolf is to mitigate the very real danger that Bush and fascist America are. I mean, for godssake, the very dialogue of the film is the same propagandistic rhetoric of so many Bush speeches--the Jedi as terrorists who must be hunted down, the Orwellian "war is peace" News-speak. For the review to have missed that reflects the perfect example of how democracies become dictatorships: the stupidity of the people who are led into slaughter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about susceptibility to evil is due to hidden love?
Posted by: terihu on May 20, 2005 11:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't forget, the whole reason Anakin was susceptible to Palpatine's influence was because of his love and concern for Padme. If they didn't have to hide their relationship, he could've gone to his mentors for advice and support, and NOT have been goaded into the dark side by Palpatine.

Secrecy weakened his allegiance to the Jedi. In some ways, Anakin and Padme's relationship mirrors those of gay politicians/celebrities. In order to hide their orientations, they do all sorts of stupid, hypocritical, sometimes hurtful, things.

Also, the Jedi required their knights to be celibate, to eschew worldly love for the greater good. Sound familiar? Again, the priestly molestation scandal arises out of a denial of who you are, having to keep your predilections a secret because of social rules.

So, I would argue that a fundamental message of this film is to be honest in your relationships. Not a bad lesson for all of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good is not the opposite of Evil.
Posted by: amilius on May 20, 2005 1:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ms. Woodend, in trying, vainly, to connect the Sith movie to the Bunker movie, makes a mistake quite common in a world that has avoided digesting, much less appreciating, " the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil." The opposite of Good is not Evil. Like 'sweet' and 'sour' they are qualities that are unrelated though frequently played off and with each other. The opposite of Good is Bad, two terms best used when describing one's assessment about how one's choices have served one's self. The opposite of Evil is Gracious. To be Gracious is to Live, evil in reverse. There are consequences to confusion about arriving at beneficial choices. Choosing to resist evil does not guarantee that one's choices are good if the resistance in ungracious. It is a question of clarity in perspective. As Lucas has pointed out on many occasions, the universality of the Star Wars themes explores good/bad assessments through a variety of gracious and ungracious choices. Sacred texts and mythic quests clearly demonstrate this theme: All choices bare benefit of intent meeting purpose in circumstances: gracious choices invite blessings; ungracious choices, consequences. This Graciously Organized Design the two movies have in common.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Uh...
Posted by: Kym525 on May 20, 2005 6:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In case anyone here is living under a ROCK or else is too busy trying to prove just how hyper-intelligent they are...newsflash...

Star Wars is just a MOVIE. Darth Vader is a fictionalized bad guy. That's all.

Why don't you folks spend time dealing with the REAL issues going on in the world - like the smoking gun memo in which GW is shown planning the war in Iraq - rather than looking for hidden social meanings in a wonderful and fun movie.

Oh, by the way, HE didn't blow up Alderaan - Grand Moff Tarkin did.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Uh... Posted by: danzigstorer
» RE: Uh... Posted by: Kym525
Yeah, really...
Posted by: Erizot on May 22, 2005 3:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually, I was thinking that at least half-way through this whole story...I saw the movie yesterday, it was good, it summed it up nicely, now...I move on...last time I checked, it was a form of entertainment created by a guy that liked sci-fi and wrote a pretty good story...matter of fact, I'm pretty sure other people have done something at least vaguely familiar before (sarcasm, come on in). I have an idea...let's wax intelectual about something that matters...hmmm...

If you learned something from the movie, hey, that's great, but that wasn't necessarily it's primary intent...you want reality, go live it. If you can actually be entertained by something other than hearing yourself spout out a bunch of faux philisophical ramblings to sound like you have a grasp on something, try sitting and just watching a movie, and take it at face value.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yeah, really... Posted by: danzigstorer
"It's Just a Movie"
Posted by: danzigstorer on May 22, 2005 5:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If only things were so simple! The problem is that it's not just a movie but a franchise involving hundreds of billions of dollars, with large amounts raked in by a few. It's also part of industries with connections to politics through lobbying, of a consumer materialist way of life, of endless mass entertainment, and of economic globalization.

As much as some viewers would like to think that it's a critique of the Bush administration, it is also part of an entertainment industry that supports the administration financially. It is also part of means to spread not only U.S. entertainment but also goods connected to that entertainment, ranging from toys to electronic gadgets.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "It's Just a Movie" Posted by: Kym525
» RE: "It's Just a Movie" Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: "It's Just a Movie" Posted by: Kym525
» RE: "It's Just a Movie" Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: "It's Just a Movie" Posted by: Kym525
» It did start as a movie review ... Posted by: AdamSelene40
"Desire leads to Murder"
Posted by: Cosmo on May 23, 2005 9:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What turns Anakin to the Dark Side is identical to what
happens to the apprentice to the Zen Master in
"Spring Summer Fall Winter".

Both the apprentice and Anakin are so obsessed
to hold on to their lovers, that 'desire leads
to murder' as the Zen Master foretells the apprentice
what will happen to him.

This overarching theme is one of the terrors
of being human in a material world -- as you build
attachments, you may be forced to abandon your
ideals.

It matters little if this comes from jealousy or from
fear of death of a loved one.

This is how the Zen Master and the Jedi differ
from the 'world of men' and the Sith respectively.

How do you stay detached to material things (or
people) in your quest for more? Star Wars says
it well -- Jedi care for all but themselves, Sith
care only for themselves. Only the Sith deal in
absolutes.

See both movies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"evil springs from love"
Posted by: Jenny K on May 23, 2005 2:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How, exactly, one can watch any of the Star Wars movies and see this as the message, I have no idea.

It is made pretty clear in the new trilogy that it is not Anakin's strong emotions that causes him to turn to the Dark Side, but his inability to deal with his emotions, and the lack of guidance he is given in doing so.

Anakin admits that he is unable to deal with the pain of losing Amidala and it is pretty obvious that he focuses on his own pain more than her wishes. He is the stereotypical mysoginist boyfriend; he shuts her out, values the emotional bedrock she provides him more than he values her as a person, and then turns on her - violently - when she turns out to be something other than his fantasy. He does not make a deal with Palpatine to save Padme, he makes a deal with Palpatine out of anger because of what he sees as betrayal by the Jedi and because he is shown no other choices in dealing with emotional pain than to simply refuse to let things hurt him.

Compare Yoda's counseling of Anakin in RotS to the advice that Luke is given in ESB when he discovers that his friends - indeed the only family he has left - are in danger. Neither Yoda nor Obi-wan try to convince Luke that he should ignore his love for his friends, instead he is warned against choosing to save them from pain over choosing to uphold their ideals and values. While he does initially disregard their advice and go off and try to save his friends, it is exactly this "training" in dealing with emotions and relationships that helps him deal with Darth Vader's revelation in a way that is not self-destructive.

Anakin, on the other hand, is told that he must be a rock. That becoming a Jedi Knight means rejecting emotions rather than simply dealing with them rationally. Without "training" in how to deal with pain and love, he turns destructive every time he forced to confront them.

Anakin's descent into darkness is a cautionary tale for boys growing up in a world where they are taught to hide and deny their feelings and vulnerability. Boys identify with Anakin in way that they do not identify with Luke, and it has more to do with the frustration of adolesence and the struggle amoung healthy boys to acheive manhood in a culture that defines "masculine" as aggressive and unemotional than it does the idea that "the figure of Darth Vader takes the banality out of evil."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stop with the over-analysis...Please!
Posted by: Kym525 on May 24, 2005 11:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm starting to think you people are the same ones who somehow believe that Lord of the Rings was racist.

Tell me something - is this what you're all learning in film school? No wonder Hollywood hasn't had an original idea in over ten years or so.

Give me my Episode III.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is a story about the religious right; primitive, evil behavior vs. good, reason, care
Posted by: KingGeekoid on Jun 5, 2005 1:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Star Wars saga is more than has been thus far been analyzed. If we should compare the two present-day US ideologies with those of Star Wars, the result would be the right wing as the dark side and the left wing as the light side. The central premise of the whole "Force" philosophy is how one chooses to use the Force. If one chooses to use the Force in the most extreme sense, abandoning reason and compassion, one has so chosen to be a part of the dark side, thereby allying himself to the attitude of "faith." Conversely, if one should choose to follow the path of reason and compassion, one would follow the path of light, thereby reflecting the attitude of liberal thought.

President Bush uses the most primitive of means to communicate to the American people, and his comrades use all power to obscure the truth (and thus reason), so making the right those of the dark side. The Republicans refuse to accept long-held truths (of which the Jedi are the champions), and make sure to introduce dangerous ideas into the minds of people, horrifyingly similar to the situation in the new movie, in which Darth Sidieous corrupts the mind of Anakin. The right-wing machine makes no attempt to preserve ethics in journalism, long-established governmental traditions, or to provide responsible political activism, using any and all methods to get their way. How does Palpatine get his way, I wonder?

The left wing, on the other hand, uses evidence, reason, and compassion to propagate their ideas. They do not ever use emotion or feeling (i.e., the Force) as a tool of intimidation or aggression. Blind militarism, homophobia, xenophobia, and bigotry are the tools of the dark side, as they abandon reason and compassion. In the defense of people, the environment, and others do people of the left use the tool of emotion. Humans are gifted with the capacity of empathy, and left-wingers make sure to use it, always while making sure that it is not false goodness that is actually hurting people.

Think of the relationship of the Force to present-day issues, and then you will see the most damning evidence against the right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why waste time?
Posted by: georg on Jun 20, 2005 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The contentions such as Lucasfilm is a billion dollar corporation and thus an evil in its own right, the movie is a lesson forewarning the rise of the religious right, or Darth Vader being a celebration of evil (which suggests movie goers are mindless automatons being shaped by text and discourse) in films is simply sophomoric and ultimately laughable. This pathetic and gratuitous attack on fun movies (and other benign elements of culture) is the sort of pseudo-logic that seems to be one reason many of the average everyday individual despises the sanctimonious nature of the left, largely dismissing it to be a joke.
If the saga is to be used as a metaphor for the current existing social condition, perhaps its parallel of the overly passive ineptitude of the American left. The American left, like the Jedi, has become so cocksure and arrogant, separating itself from the people it wishes to free with its hyper use of intellectual exclusion; it seems most of the left hunt for the right polysyllabic word in their discourses, so they can write in an overly bloviate and turgid style that the layperson has difficulty reading. The left’s overt discontent of Christian religiosity, though it’s the largest organized religion in the US and the world, and its championing a larger (morally relative) set of values and goals that few understand as though it were an entity in itself, gives the movement little political support and utility, while the enemy exploits its wishy washy passivity and political ineffectiveness. The Jedi were overly passive with their dogmatic point of view of the use of the force, similar to the American left's over-passivity and dogmatic point of view of social change through simple political protest. The Jedi eventually recovered with Luke, who used a balance of the dark and light sides of the force (he used the dark side to defeat Vader), an improvisation of tactics necessary to defeat the spectre of evil that haunted the republic for two decades. Perhaps the American left should be looking at Luke's methodology of political effectiveness of social change rather than simply bitch all the time about the dark side. If I may be frank, columns of this sort are a waste of time; the American left attempts to be an all-encompassing force, attempting to deal with every single trivial issue, when all it does is divert its focus and energy from the more significant economic, social, and political dangers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Art imitates life
Posted by: Stateless on Jun 22, 2005 10:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That is why even "fun movies," if you consider any movie to be a work of art, need to be analyized and discussed to gain futher understanding into the life and times that created it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

starnut
Posted by: starnut on Jun 30, 2005 3:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I enjoyed your review, most of your salient points are valid. However, I'm afraid that you and your commenters have missed the most important issue of all. The prequel episodes not only draw a rough analogy between Hitler and Palpatine but they also contain a very complex allegorical "code" about World War II. I have collected a list of 179 references to Hitler and the war in the three movies (and a further 77 in the intervening novels). The prequel episodes contain allegorical analogues for such famous people as Churchill, de Gaulle and Franco; specific countries like Austria, Norway and China; and even famous battles like Dunkirk, Stalingrad and the Nanking massacre.

I know this sounds nonsensical on the face of it. However, I was able to make several correct predictions before the movies' premieres. This wouldn't be possible if I wasn't on the right track. As an example, I predicted that a Stalin figure had to appear in Episode Two. The name "Dooku" derives from the Georgian word "dzhuga", meaning steel (in Russian, "stalin"). Stalin's real name was Dzhugashvili. During the films, Yoda paraphrases several of Churchill's most famous utterances. Have you ever heard of the German anti-war politician August Bebel? Neither had I until I started researching this subject.

We all know that Lucas is justly famous for hiding secret messages in the Star Wars movies, it is one of his strengths as a director. In my opinion, the encryption of this extensive World War II code into the prequel episodes is a superior accomplishment to Lucas's employment of the Hero Cycle in Episodes Four, Five and Six. While the debate about the films' relevance to current political events is true, it is of lesser importance than this Hitler analogy. The films make a lot more sense when the ineffectiveness of pre-war politicians, the desperation of the appeasement movement and the obsolescent doddering of Allied military commanders is taken into account.

My website explains all of Lucas's allegorical parables in depth (www.geocities.com/starwarstika). Even though some of the references I have listed are simply speculative, there are enough blatantly unmistakable allusions that Lucas's true intent becomes undeniable. All Star Wars fans and World War II histroy buffs deserve the opportunity to consider this concept for themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]