Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Scapegoating Newsweek

By Robert Jensen and Pat Youngblood, AlterNet. Posted May 17, 2005.


Blaming Newsweek for a journalistic foul is just, but blaming them for 17 deaths and America's image overseas is just plain wrong.
Advertisement

If there is a political playbook for right-wing conservatives these days, it no doubt begins, Step #1: Whenever possible, blame the news media.

What to do if the U.S. invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq have sparked a persistent and bloody resistance that eats away at the president's political capital?

Blame journalists.

That's exactly what the Bush administration and its rhetorical attack dogs are doing with the "scandal" over Newsweek's story on the desecration of the Koran at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo.

In a short item in its May 9 issue, Newsweek reported that U.S. military investigators had found evidence that U.S. guards had flushed a copy of the Koran down a toilet to try to provoke prisoners. This week, the magazine retracted, saying not that editors knew for sure that such an incident didn't happen but that, "Based on what we know now, we are retracting our original story that an internal military investigation had uncovered Koran abuse at Guantanamo Bay." (emphasis added)

Meanwhile, after the original story ran, Afghan and U.S. forces fired on demonstrators in Afghanistan, killing at least 14 and injuring many others.

The conventional wisdom emerged quickly: Newsweek got it wrong, and Newsweek is to blame for the deaths. The first conclusion is premature; the second is wrong.

First, it's not clear whether U.S. guards in Guantanamo or other prisons have placed copies of the Koran on a toilet or thrown pages (or a whole Koran) into a toilet. Detainees have made such claims, which have been reported by attorneys representing some of the men in custody and denied by U.S. officials. Newsweek's retraction is ambiguous, suggesting they believe the incident may have happened but no longer can demonstrate that it was cited in the specific U.S. government documents, as originally reported.

Given the abuse and torture -- from sexual humiliation to beatings to criminal homicide -- that has gone on in various U.S. military prison facilities, it's not hard to believe that the Koran stories could be true. Given that last month U.S. officials pressured the United Nations to eliminate the job of its top human-rights investigator in Afghanistan after that official criticized violations by U.S. forces in the country, it's not hard to be skeptical about U.S. motives. And given that even the human-rights commission of the generally compliant Afghan government is blocked by U.S. forces from visiting the prisons, it's not hard to believe that the U.S. officials may have something to hide.

Until we have more information, definitive conclusions are impossible. But if you go on a popular right-wing web site, youíll find the verdict that administration supporters are trying to make the final word: Newsweek lied, people died.

Yes, people died during demonstrations, and political leaders in the Muslim world have cited the Koran stories to spark anti-U.S. feeling. But reporters outside the United States have pointed out that these demonstrations have not been spontaneous but were well-organized, often by groups of students. The frustration with U.S. policy that fuels these demonstrations isn't limited to the Koran incident, and to reduce the unrest to one magazine story is misleading. Indeed, Gen. Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at a news conference last week that the senior commander in Afghanistan, Army Gen. Carl Eichenberry, reported that the violence "was not at all tied to the article in the magazine."

So, why the focus on the Newsweek story? It's part of the tried-and-true strategy of demonize, disguise, and divert. Demonize the news media to disguise the real causes of the resistance to occupation and divert attention from failed U.S. policies.

The irony is that the U.S. corporate news media deserve harsh criticism for coverage of the U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq -- not for possibly getting one fact wrong, but for failing to consistently challenge the illegality of both wars and the various distortions and lies that the Bush administration has used to mobilize support for those illegal wars.

We should hold the news media accountable when they fail. But we should defend journalists when they are used by political partisans who are eager to obscure their own failures.

Digg!

Robert Jensen is on the board and Pat Youngblood is coordinator of the Third Coast Activist Resource Center in Austin, Texas. They can be reached at rjensen@uts.cc.utexas.edu and pat@thirdcoastactivist.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yet still more media bias...
Posted by: Crazy H on May 17, 2005 12:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Right Wing Punditry is all atwitter with Newsweek's retraction of their story. They're claiming it's yet another 'proof' of media bias.

Let's look at something those mediots will never show you - the truth. There have been eye-witness reports of Korans in toilets since 2003. A pentagon official vetted the Newsweek story before it was published; if there was no truth behind the report they could have spoken up then. They chose not to.

They also chose not to react immediately after publication. It was only after eleven days of anti-US protests that our government decided to speak up; and then it was to put pressure on those that reported the abuses, rather than to speak out against the perpetrators. They didn't even bother with their usual tactic of claiming to investigate while waiting for the furor to die down.

The Right Wing Pundits should ask themselves and their audiences WHY the Middle East is so ready to believe these reports. After all - our army of liberation is given to murder, rape, torture, and sodomy; is it so hard to believe that they'd desecrate a Holy Book as well?

As for proof of media bias: Newsweek retracted the story under government pressure. I wouldn't call that bias - I'd call it outright propaganda.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yet still more media bias... Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: Yet still more media bias... Posted by: dennyduke@earthlink.net
adp3d
Posted by: adp3d on May 18, 2005 2:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey now, we can't have people dying because someone LIED now can we? I'm writing a letter to Rummy right now reminding him of all the lying and deception done by the administration leading up to the war and beyond until this very day and how thousands have died.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More distortions
Posted by: steveruff on May 18, 2005 3:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here we go again... let's blame the news nedia for the blunders in Iraq and Afghanistan. Seventeen people have died and now it's Newsweek's fault? I hardly think so! Even if Newsweek got it wrong, does anybody remember the lies and faulty intelligence that led us into this illegal and bloody war to begin with? The hypocrisy that guides the Bush administration is staggering, and it seems as if Americans just sit back and go along with it. The mainstream media has cowered, covered up, and bowed to the Bu$h administration for too long. The problem here is not Newsweek - the problem is the present administration from the top on down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: But are they Posted by: bookwoman
I Agree
Posted by: cushniesr on May 18, 2005 5:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Newsweek's blunder means zip when compared to the fabrications given the American public to justify the war in the first place. But take heart. Things aren't totally turned upside down. I heard on Fox "News" this morning that hot-dog bun manufacturers are finally making packs of eight rolls instead of six to match the standard eight hot dogs in a pack. You can imagine the sigh of relief I heaved. Maybe the world is getting on the right track after all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I Agree Posted by: lenal
Critical mass
Posted by: solrey on May 18, 2005 6:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When are enough people in this country going to finally come together and do something about this pack of liars, criminals and traitors occupying Washington D.C.? Not that Clinton's foreign policy was humanitarian by any means and I'm not defending him at all, but by contrast he was subjected to impeachment proceedings for an indiscreet libido. Don't count on the legislative or judicial branches of government to do anything about these fascists within the executive branch. The parallels to Nazi Germany are staggering, of course Shrub's granddaddy supported Hitler in a big way financially and politically so what do you expect...the nut doesn't fall far from the tree.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thoughts on Newsweek retraction
Posted by: hispirits on May 18, 2005 6:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems amazing that in all the aftermath of the Newsweek revelation, that no one has asked the question, as to whether
the real story lies in the possibility that the unnamed source of the Newsweek story was known by the administration and was forced to retract his statement, leaving Newsweek holding the bag!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mr Rumsfeld
Posted by: jobie1kno on May 18, 2005 6:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr Rumsfeld- Yes, people have died. Now you finally start counting the bodies. Congratulations.
I'm sure you have photos of the 17 Afghan flag-draped coffins on your desk, alongside your Tiffany paperweight from the World Trade Center.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mr Rumsfeld Posted by: Iamnotafruittree
Newsweek was a dupe, not a liar
Posted by: MiiPandaa on May 18, 2005 6:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While Newsweek should have known better than to rely on a statement vetted by the Pentagon, it is unfair to cast Newsweek as a knowinging party that chose to deceive. It was not.

In fact, Newsweek moved rather quickly to get the word out about its loss of faith in what it had printed as soon as its Pentagon vetter backpedaled on what may or may not have happened at Gtmo involving copies of scripture. There is a world of difference between Newsweek's sloppy sourcing followed by earnest efforts to mitigate the damage versus the active lies that the B'Administration CHOSE to make (and continues to treat as fact despite blanching evidence to the contrary).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Minn. Star-Tribune to Newsweek and others: "Resist."
Posted by: jules_siegel on May 18, 2005 6:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]

Editorial: Newsweek/It doesn't deserve the diatribes

May 18, 2005 ED0518A

[Excerpts]

White House spokesman Scott McClellan flat-out said Newsweek was responsible for causing the rioting in Afghanistan that led to at least 17 deaths. Newsweek editors appear to have accepted that responsibility. They shouldn't have; the White House is simply changing the subject from abuse at Guantanamo to Newsweek's journalism.

Newsweek used as a source a "senior government official," normally a Cabinet secretary or someone fairly close to that rank, who had previously been a reliable source. It then showed the report to two Pentagon officials before publication. One declined comment and one corrected another aspect of the story. Neither challenged the Qur'an-in-the-toilet statement.

Only after the report had been printed did the original source back away from his assertion that he had seen the confirmation in a military report on abuse at Guantanamo. On reflection, he thought perhaps he saw it in other reports or drafts; but he did see it.

Before the Newsweek item was even published, both the Associated Press and Agence France-Presse reported a new surge of Taliban-led violence.

This behavior seems so Nixonian, except that the current crew is much better at the press-intimidation game than William Safire and Vice President Spiro Agnew were. For Newsweek and other media that come in for this treatment, we have one word: Resist.

--
JULES SIEGEL Cancun Q. Roo Mexico
http://www.cafecancun.com/bookarts

Newsroom-l, news and issues for journalists

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Machiavelli must be smiling
Posted by: tintobrash on May 18, 2005 6:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When will we finally realize that everyone in the government is out to serve their own ends? They'll say and do anything to keep the power and control right where it is -- in their hands. Just remember America, you chose war over peace by re-electing the 'Prince' himself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

typical!
Posted by: benu67 on May 18, 2005 7:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when a story like this comes out, and seems to be inaccurate (not in this case though) wouldn't the next logical thing to do is find out if it is true or not? for some reason (wonder what that might be?) the white house wants the story buried and the deaths of civilians blamed on newsweek. what did you expect from the same administration that didn't even want to investigate 9/11 and when they had to, they put together the perfect group to blatantly whitewash the whole event. no accountability and always blame someone else is a consistant theme with this administration. i'm waiting for them to blame clinton for this one too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Never believe a story until it is officially denied
Posted by: mick on May 18, 2005 7:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Various sources have confirmed the "Koran in the toilet" story, and it is too consistent with this government's policy of humiliation and "breaking" of detainees that it could not be believed. Now the liars and war criminals make a great fuss, and unfortunately Newsweek gives in. "He who once tells a lie should never be believed again even if he happens to tell the truth.", a German proverb says. Well, "once" is a big understatement in the case of this government. Bush is a living lie. So the story has gained much probabilty for me because it is officially denied. Newsweek had revealed it and had now to to re-veil it under government pressure. I hope, with the other commentators on this blog, that one day you will be able to hold your government accountable for all the lies and crimes it committed. You would help us in the rest of the world very much.
Mick

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In The Republican Club – Or Clubbed by Republicans?
Posted by: monkeywrench on May 18, 2005 9:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The media doesn't care if the public holds them accountable when they fail, for a couple of reasons: 1); We continue to pay attention to them anyway, choosing to eat s**t if it's the only thing on the menu; 2); We do not have control over careers or regulation within the media – the Bush administration does, and it is using its enormous, corporate-sponsored power to threaten those who won't "go along," allowing the Bushitters to literally sculpt the news into propaganda rivaling what was done in Nazi Germany (Goebbels could have learned a thing or two from cretins like "K-K-K" Karl Rove).

I'm afraid that we are sunk unless we – the whole population – wake up, pay attention to our crap detectors, and DEMAND the truth; but I'm really afraid that it might require some event more catastrophic than anything in our history in order for us to wake from our self-induced national coma.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Newsweek story red herring for Downing Street memo
Posted by: zippyten on May 18, 2005 10:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The focus on the Newsweek story is a diversionary tactic to take our attention away from the real story -- and the big story -- happening right now, which is the leaking to the London Times of the Downing Street memo.

This is finally our proof in black and white of what many of us have known to be true for some time, that the Bush administration wanted to remove Saddam through military action by using terrorism and WMD as the excuse, and "the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy." This memo -- basically the minutes of a top secret meeting with top UK officials in July 2002 -- proves that the US and the UK went into Iraq knowing they were fabricating a war.

Not surprisingly, this story (top news in the UK) is being largely ignored by the US mainstream media to the point where many people have not even heard of the Downing Street memo. (Go to www.downingstreetmemo.com among other sites for more info.) The administration and the right wing media are making very sure that the Newsweek hysteria will take up all of our attention and focus while the smoking gun is quietly kicked under the carpet.

Our job is not to let this happen. Let as many people know about the Downing Street memo as possible. Continue to pressure Congress (though lots of luck there) and the media to investigate and publicize this information. We need to express our outrage and our refusal to let this immense travesty of American government go unchallenged.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stop the government and media from perpetuating the myth!
Posted by: eanderso on May 18, 2005 12:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The first trailer for "Red, White & Blue: A Tale of Two Americas" is now available for viewing online at efilmonline.com!

The project is designed to diffuse the "red vs. blue" mentality and to undermine the extremists who seek to perpetuate the war of words. It's our belief that the majority of Americans don't agree with extremists attempts to hijack America. To check out the film and to view the trailer, please follow the link below:

http://www.redwhiteandbluemovie.com

Thanks to everyone who has supported this film so far. There is much, much more to come.

Sincerely,

Eric Anderson & Amelia Dellos

P.S. We're still seeking completion financing for the film, so if you're interested in contributing, please visit the "Support" tab of our website.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Union guy
Posted by: Union Guy on May 18, 2005 12:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I truly believe it much worse than any comment I've see so far. That the Administration coerced Newsweek’s sources from them, and then demanded that those sources recant their comments and testimony. Bush's mantra has always been your are with me or against me, nothing in between. He has always mandated absolute obedience to his agenda and his side of the story, him and his supporters, cabinet and followers!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HIPOCRISY 101
Posted by: gideonh on May 18, 2005 7:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Condoleeza Rice and Donald Rumsfeld pointing their blood-soaked fingers at Newsweek and wagging them while tsk tsking them because "people died" is the ultimate in hypocrisy, as well as being yet another example of misdirection by those in power.

Good thing we have them around to remind us that warmongers and Presidents and Secretaries of Defense don't kill people, magazines and a free press do.

Pot, meet Kettle.

How many more times do they tell us our shoe is untied before we stop looking down at our collective feet? Apparently not enough.

By the way, your shoe's untied.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rule #1
Posted by: lenal on May 18, 2005 8:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Revise that to: Blame the media, or the Clintons, or us "libruls".

lenal

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There's a bigger problem here
Posted by: SteveB on May 18, 2005 11:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and it's this: the mainstream media has apparently lost the ability to do investigative reporting or even the most basic fact-checking.

Newsweek printed a story that wasn't true simply because an unnamed government official told them it was true. This is now standard operating procedure for the MSM, which has turned into a machine for the uncritical dissemination of corporate and government news releases.

As a result, basic reportorial skills (like fact-checking) have atrophied to the point where mistakes like this are commonplace (e.g. CBS and Bush's nat'l guard memos).

Of course, the Newsweek story was "untrue" only in the narrowest sense of the word: the incidents almost certainly happened, but they weren't in a defense dept. report, as Newsweek claimed.

Which points out yet another problem with the MSM: facts aren't facts until the US gov't acknowleges them to be facts. This gives the gov't complete control of what qualifies as news. For example, civilian casualties in iraq arent news simply because the military deliberately refuses to count the bodies.

We need to get busy building an alternative media which can keep alive the basic craft of news reporting, because MSM outlets like Newsweek and CBS are beyond repair.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Red Cross report
Posted by: Shakti on May 19, 2005 8:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Didn't the Red Cross just confirm that, yes, the Koran has been defiled and flushed down toilets etc? I think it is pretty much a fact, at this point.

Many Daily Kos postings suggest that Newsweek was deliberately set up a la Dan Rather. Perhaps the "unnamed source" was used to trap Newsweek on a technicality: "sure, it's coming out in a report soon, go ahead and run with the story (ha ha)."

Without a doubt the flap over the WH trying to bring Newsweek to its knees has overshadowed other stories, like the Downing Street memo, the Left's reaction to Galloway, the nascent civil war in Iraq, the fillibuster. Actually the fillibuster is getting some peripheral Star Wars action.

But, as Molly Ivens has pointed out, where is the deafening public outcry over the fact that the U.S. is torturing people? I'm going to write my representatives, but can't the Dems show some leadership here?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ed Cross report Posted by: papergirl