Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Opting for 'Opt-In'

By J. Douglas Allen-Taylor, AlterNet. Posted May 16, 2005.


Some school districts are challenging the federal guidelines for No Child Left Behind's military recruitment provision, facing withdrawal of funding over privacy infringement.
Advertisement

In the heart of California's traditionally anti-war Bay Area, a stubborn resistance is growing to access to high school students by military recruiters.

The rebellion comes at a time when the U.S. military is simultaneously under pressure to lift sagging enlistment numbers while coming under increasing criticism over its recruitment tactics. U.S. Army officials recently announced a one-day moratorium on recruitment, scheduled for May 20, in order to give recruiters a chance to "focus on how they can do a very tough mission without violating good order and discipline."

But federal officials are warning that any open defiance by school districts to the military recruitment guidelines contained within the 2001 federal No Child Left Behind Act will carry severe consequences: the complete loss of federal education funds.

In Alameda County, across the bay from San Francisco, school district officials are braving those consequences by promoting what at first seems like an obscure policy for military access to student records -- "opt-in."

Section 9528 of No Child Left Behind provides that "a secondary school student or the parent of the student may request that the student's name, address, and telephone listing ... not be released [to military recruiters] without prior written parental consent ... ."

When the Santa Cruz City High School District -- some 50 miles south of San Francisco -- was considering how to interpret that clause two years ago, staff attorney Ann Brick of the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California wrote to the school board urging them to adopt the "opt-in" policy that "requires a parent's affirmative consent before such information is released to the military. ... The assumption that parents do not object to the release of this information simply because they have not expressed their wishes is very problematic. ... "

According to Dr. Robert Cervantes, the curriculum leadership manager in the California Department of Education, whose duties also include military liaison, the Santa Cruz City School District and 23 other California districts--including San Francisco Unified--adopted the "opt-in" policy around 2003.

"Both the Department of Defense and the U.S. Department of Education have categorically deemed 'opt-in' to be inconsistent with NCLB," Cervantes said. "I've seen the federal government send down a lot of policies in my years working in state agencies, but I've talked with them, and this is the one that they've really dug their heels into. They're serious about this one. There is no ambiguity. Santa Cruz came close to losing their federal funding over this. And it's not partial funding. It's all federal funding. A couple of state legislators had to intervene to get them to change their policy and comply."

That was a part of a U.S. Department of Education crackdown on "opt-in" in the summer of 2003, in which letters were sent to state superintendents of education around the country notifying them that "opt-in" was illegal.

While the state education departments in neither Washington or Oregon have an official policy on the "opt-in/opt-out" military recruitment information issue, spokespersons in both departments said that districts in their states were complying with the U.S. Education Department's "opt-out" interpretation.

Meanwhile, California's Cervantes said that the 23 other rebelling California school districts have followed suit with Santa Cruz, changing their policy to releasing student information to military recruiters unless the parents or students choose to "opt-out."

But Berkeley did not change.

Since a 2003 policy on military information policy was passed by the school board in Berkeley, parents of Berkeley High School students are provided with a form in the Student/Parent Handbook asking the parents to check a box and sign their names stating: "Please DO release my student's name, and address, and/or telephone number." The form goes on to inform parents that if they "do not check a box and sign above, [the high school] will NOT release your child's information to military recruiters."

"Because we expected the numbers of 'opt-in' students to be so low in Berkeley, this is partly a measure to minimize paperwork," Berkeley Unified School District public information officer Mark Coplan said -- with a slight smile. "We knew there would be far more forms to be filled out and handled by the district if we had asked parents to opt out." He added that he thought Berkeley's system was "a better use of time for the military recruiters themselves. It means they don't have to waste their time with students who don't want to be contacted."


Digg!

J. Douglas Allen-Taylor writes for the Berkeley Daily Planet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What!
Posted by: philosopherintraining on May 16, 2005 6:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
withdrawing federal funding completely! THAT IS SO MESSED UP!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Drafting a Recruitment Program?
Posted by: monkeywrench on May 16, 2005 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The turnover of student information to the government mandated by No Child Left Behind (by the way, this provision was buried in the middle of the hundreds of pages of the act), seems to be less a recruiting tool than having schools do the government's work for them: establishing the location and status of military-age students for an eventual draft.

But then again, I may be paranoid – I lived through the Vietnam-era draft. In Berkeley.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Drafting a Recruitment Program? Posted by: jackie_burns_2000@yahoo.c
What is going on???
Posted by: jackie_burns_2000@yahoo.c on May 16, 2005 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think you are paranoid at all. Don't you think this is all going on because of the upcoming draft? It is horrible. Like the article says, you have to get permission to put a childs photo in the paper but the child isn't safeguarded from military recruiters...can you imagine the mind fuck these children will go through while visiting a military recruiter??? I wouldn't want to subject my son or daughter to that...not at such a tender and impressionable age. Now if you want to train them to defend their own communities...well, there are plenty of age groups for that, even little old ladies like me will do what we can to protect ourselves and our loved ones from these monsters that have stolen our country, were responsible for 9/11 and for stealing our elections. These bastards in the WH have committed enough crimes to impeach them all repeatedly...but they are still there...people are too afraid of them...

how many now? 50 top American and other worldwide, top-in-their-fields, biochemists, biologists, anti-body and vaccine researchers have died or been killed in the last three years...and many old school military men...12 of them in one airplane crash alone and many more...over 50 American journalist alone have died (been killed) in Iraq trying to get the truth out...and it goes on and on and on and on...thank you, Berkley for having the cahoonas for standing up to these very, very evil men. I write on the internet boards, everyone needs to do more to stop these monsters...write congress, write two paragraphs to your editorial board, put up your opinion on your community boards...join groups...get out and do something before they come and get YOU! www.johnkaminski.com www.alexjones.com www.tomaspaine.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What is going on??? Posted by: jackie_burns_2000@yahoo.c
Counter-recruitment tools
Posted by: peacemom on May 16, 2005 10:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many communities have counter-recruitment tools available. Anyone, student or others, can have a "Veteran for Peace" with them when they meet with a recruiter. It's a good idea to have someone with you who has served in combat and knows the military system with you when talking to a recruiter who may never have experience combat and who has a quota to fill. Having someone with you will help keep the recruiter honest.
Decisions which may result in lose of life, limb and happiness should not be made casually on a high school campus. Meetings with students should take place in the student's home with a parent or other adult present.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fear for my Children
Posted by: smarie2003 on May 17, 2005 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can we ever look at ourselves in the mirror if we do not stand up now and protest this. Years ago in the late 1970s and 80s I worked with the Boston Alliance Against Registration & The Draft to stop the Selective Service sign-ups, obviously we failed. I think people just could not imagine a need for a draft again after the exhaustion of Viet Nam. I too felt during Clinton's years that we would not have a draft again. It was just a short dream of 8 years.

Now I try to keep as many of my peers with High School and Middle School age children aware of this little known provision of the NCLB and encourage other parents to spread the word. We must all unite against this horrifying use of our children, brothers, sisters, etc. At least we can start at the local level to push back against the Military having use of school records without consent.

Thanks for the great article. Peace, Susan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]