Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Bush's New Social Security Tactic

By Jim Hightower, AlterNet. Posted May 11, 2005.


Excellent. Professor George W.'s "60-day, 60-city, traveling medicine show" to sell the miracle cure of his Social Security privatization tonic to us gullible rubes--has been a bust.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Nobel Laureate Slams the Bible, Calls It "A Catalogue of Cruelties"
Mario de Queiroz

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Jim Hightower

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

As a result of George, Dick Cheney, and a plague of other big-shot Bushites going on this cross-country flim-flam tour, more Americans now oppose Bush's scheme than before the White House crew ventured out of Washington. So Bush & Company are now trying a new tactic: Class war.

George W. has come out for an arcane proposal he calls "progressive price indexing" as a new way for the government to calculate the amount of your Social Security check when you retire. Striking a populist pose, which is awkward for this elitist, rich son-of-a-Bush, George asserts that his accounting gimmick will fix most of the long-term financing gap in Social Security by cutting the benefits of the rich and increasing those of the poor.

But Mr. George Jennings Bryan is a fraud. The poor would get no increase in benefits under his indexing, and a millionaire's reduction would amount to only one percent, which is insignificant to the rich, since they don't depend on Social Security for their retirement.


The devastating cuts under Bush's "progressive" indexing would come in the retirement checks of the middle class. An average worker earning about $36,000 today would face a 16-percent cut in benefits, while those earning about $58,000 would see a 25-percent cut. The cuts grow more severe for today's youngsters who are not yet in the workforce. Coupled with Bush's privatization scheme, his indexing plan would leave millions of middle-class Americans with a monthly Social Security check at or near zero.


That's George's real goal: Gut Social Security. The rich don't need it, it'll pay zip to the middle class, and it'll become just a poverty program that then can easily be cut by future Bushites. That's not populism--it's cynicism.



Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Jim Hightower is the best-selling author of Let's Stop Beating Around the Bush, from Viking Press. For more information, visit jimhightower.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
son-of-a-bush
Posted by: oceanye on May 12, 2005 3:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good for you Jim! Its my opinion the above title is somewhat inappropriate for the snake oil salesman however.

It should simply haave been sob.

jerry warsing

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

son-of-a-bush
Posted by: oceanye on May 12, 2005 3:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
great job Jim! Instead of son of a bush, however, you could have used the acronym.

jerry warsing

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

self-centered candy asses
Posted by: paschn@comcast.net on May 12, 2005 5:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for having the courage atleast 50% of the American Sheeple haven't. Gut wrenching when you consider that it takes an action like the lying coward's trying to dip directly into the sheeple's retirement to get em to give a shmit enough to roll out of their stupor to prevent it.......but that treasonous swine is caught lying to send us to war as his hired murderers and all you see are "support our troops" and "freedom isn't free" stickers. A nation of sheep, lead by a cartel of whores, controlled by American Corporations. Welcome,....to the REAL Evil Empire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: self-centered candy asses Posted by: itchyvet
» RE: self-centered candy asses Posted by: Iamnotafruittree
Social Security? Bush Is A Social Disease
Posted by: monkeywrench on May 12, 2005 8:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My profound worry is that no matter how idiotic are Bush's ideas to "reform" (deform?) Social Security, no matter how deeply his idiocy is resented by the American public, our lock-step-goose-step Congress will pass them anyway. Basically, I fear that Bush and Congress are going to shove their "poverty program" – that is, OUR poverty – right down our throats (even with the failure of his spoon-full-of-sugar "bamboozlepalooza" tour), no matter how much we complain. They don't care – because they don't think we can touch them any longer.

WE HAVE TO TAKE BACK THE POWER OF THE VOTE!! Members of Congress think that they can act with impunity because they know that people are lemmings and will follow each other and vote brain-dead for either the incumbant or whomever puts the most ads on TV. We must let these clowns in Congress know, IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS, that if they continue to screw us they are gone.

Remember – no matter how much money they suck up from corporations, no matter how far their noses are shoved up CEO's you-know-whats, no matter how much power they exercise in Congress, WE can throw the bastards out of office! And we had better, or we're going to wake up one not-so-fine morning and see a country that looks a lot more like Nazi Germany than the good ol' USA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Human
Posted by: 8easy8 on May 12, 2005 11:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks Jim.This country needs people like you,and again thanks.but as you know this Wingnut has God on his side,so logic (Ignorance is not a virtue)and what not will have no positive effect.It looks to many like were in a situation that the founding fathers feard the most. See Thomas Jefferson,John Adams;--where some kind of twist develops between a democracy/Republic-then kerbang!!.Im not all that smart,mabe a notch or two above "Sheeple". Somebody who can better get to figuring--before its too late..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

llaznyc
Posted by: LLaznyc on May 12, 2005 12:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article. Why is no one talking about repeal of the massive tax cuts whom went mainly to the wealthy in this country as a cure for social security. Repealing the tax cut would not only save social security (which is really not in crisis) but would also save medicare as well. I quiver to think that we have to endure another 3 years of this administration. Are people in the red states that dumb that they vote time and time again against their best interests. I don't get it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: llaznyc Posted by: ALANHESTER
scwylder
Posted by: scwylder on May 12, 2005 1:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're right, as usual, Jim, but I wish you wouldn't sully the name of William Jennings Bryan by comparing him with Bush. Bryan's campaigns were honestly for the ordinary farmer and worker. As Secreatry of State under Wilson, he had the courage to resign in protest rather than sign an ultimatum to Germany which he believed would lead to war. And he spoke to anyone who'd hear him--suporters, opponents, and hecklers--not the handpicked audiences of Bushworld. Even when he was wrong, as he was in the Scopes Trial, he had far more intergrity than a George W. Bush could ever imagine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Social Security
Posted by: davidt on May 12, 2005 3:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article. If you want to get a whole lot smarter read Jim's books and get his newletter Lowdown. Comes to your door for $15/year, money well spent.

In response to the other comments. SS tinkering is dead. Why? Because the GOPers got an earful from their constituents when they were on recess. They see that the liability of supporting this Wall Street bon-bon is too high a price to pay. Especially since S.O.B is a lame Duck, euphemism applied.

Sheeple are uniting all over America, don't be fooled into a hopeless state simply because the Four Stooge Media isn't talking about it. It is happening. Progressives are making inroads into so-called "red states" at a breakneck pace.

Don't subscribe to the "red state/blue state" shenanigans, it is just another way for the Powers-That-Be to pigeonhole American voters then casually dismiss their stark refusal to be homogenized. I ain't talkin' about milk!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Social Security Posted by: ALANHESTER
Republicans haven't given up on Social Security
Posted by: reason on May 13, 2005 3:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They know that they are not winning on Social Security, so now the Republicans are going to try to roll it into what they call a "Retirement Plan". They want to lump Social Security in with Medicare and longterm care.

That is a dangerous thing for them to do. Medicare, since Bush fixed it, is going bankrupt. He gave the surplus to the insurance company and the medical doctors. I think he bought them computers so they could file medicare more efficiently. The medical field didn't have the money to buy their own computers, I suppose.

The "Retirement Plan" is just another way to do away with Social Security. Medicare needs to stand alone and so does longterm care.

C-span2 was supposed to show the committees discussing Social Security starting yesterday, but I couldn't find it on there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Since when did 36K become middle class?
Posted by: ghoster on May 13, 2005 10:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess for Wal Mart workers it is, but hey when you can give CEOs multi million dollar bonuses for not doing their job, then anything is possible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement