Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Way Out of Iraq

By David Solnit, AlterNet. Posted May 9, 2005.


Two conscientous objectors have sparked a National Day of Action in Support of GI Resistance.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
"Women Are Being Killed All Over the World": One Reporter's Fight Against So-Called "Honor Killings"
Robert S. Eshelman

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Egyptian Marine: Soldiers Often 'Racialize' the Enemy to Cope With Stress
Aaron Glantz

More stories by David Solnit

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

On May 11, Navy Petty Officer Pablo Paredes and U.S. Army Sgt. Kevin Benderman will stand before military court martial tribunals for refusing to participate in the Iraq war. These men applied for and were denied conscientious objector status because of their public statements against the continuing war. They now face military jail time and forfeiture of pay and benefits.

On May 2, Pablo's brother Victor Paredes, Kevin's wife Monica, and anti-war, veteran and military family organizers from across the country sent a public letter calling for May 10th to be a National Day of Action in Support of GI Resistance. Support actions are being organized in 20 cities, including San Diego, Baltimore, Buffalo, Burlington, Charlotte, Deerfield, Helena, Honolulu, Los Angeles, New Haven, New York City, Orlando, Ventura, Providence, Rochester, San Francisco, and Springfield. A group of supporters from across California will caravan to San Diego to be present at Pablo Paredes court-martial, where Paredes says he intends to "put the war on trial. After all, it's the real crime here."

There are thousands of other resisters. While many of them keep their resistance private, all of them are taking courageous stands against the war and in support of international law. GI resistance has the power to stop the war and occupation in Iraq. The Bush Administration can't fight war or maintain an occupation without obedient troops. Nor can they begin new wars without enough compliant soldiers. Courage to Resist, a new group of concerned community members, vets and military families, has helped organize the May 10th day of action as part of their goal to "organize support for military objectors to illegal war and occupation and the underlying policies of empire."

Courage to Resist's campaign has three key areas:

1. Supporting troops (or private or government employees) who refuse deployment or otherwise resist the war and occupation. 2. Counter-Recruitment. Use education to reduce the military's ability to recruit young people, disproportionately low income and of color. 3. Resisting the Draft and Draft Registration. Support young men to refuse to register for the selective service and prepare for mass resistance to a possible draft.

GI resistance within the military, together with massive desertion and draft resistance, is widely credited with being a key element in forcing the U.S. out of Vietnam. Steve Morse, a former U.S. Army soldier who was active in the antiwar GI movement during Vietnam and today coordinates the GI Rights Program of the Central Committee of Conscientious Objectors explains, "This was an unprecedented event in U.S. history. Underground newspapers, GI coffeehouses, petitions, demonstrations, black armbands, stockade revolts, the FTA (Fuck The Army Show), leaflets, discussion groups, civilian/veteran support and counseling, combat refusals of riot control training and duty, revolts on ships; these all occurred many times." By 1970, the Army had 65,643 deserters.

GI Resistance

Much of the last year's resistance to the war has come from within troops themselves and their families: The entire 17 member Army Reserve platoon-the 343rd Quartermaster Company -- refused an order to go on a "suicide" supply mission in Iraq. Hundreds of enlisted men and women cheered when one of their own confronted Rumsfeld at his photo op speech in Iraq and almost two thousand former soldiers are fighting the "backdoor draft." In November 2004, 1,800 of 4,000 people notified (of 110,000 former "individual" ready reserves) are requesting exemption or appealing deployment and of 2,500 ordered to report to military bases 733 never showed up; hundreds have applied for conscientious objector status and the military has admitted that over 5,500 have gone AWOL sine the Iraq invasion. In addition to this resistance within the ranks, military families have become public anti-war spokespeople and frontline activists.

On Dec. 6, 2004, Pablo Paredes refused to board his Navy ship. Paredes explained, "Like all members of the military, I have been trained to recognize my personal responsibility for participating in war crimes. Since the war is itself illegal and has been characterized by repeated and consistent violations of international laws and treaties, of the Geneva Convention rules of war, and of generally accepted standards of human rights, I have a reasonable belief that my training required me to avoid participating in these crimes."

The invasion and occupation of Iraq has included War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity and Acts of Torture in violation the Geneva Conventions, the Nuremberg Conventions and the UN Charter. The War Crimes Tribunals held after World War II declared, "anyone with knowledge of illegal activity and an opportunity to do something is a potential criminal under international law unless the person takes affirmative measures to prevent the commission of crimes." Additionally, the U.S. Military Code of Justice states that military personnel have a right and a duty to disobey illegal orders.

On Jan. 7, Sergeant Kevin Benderman refused to re-deploy out to Iraq, saying " since the governments want the wars then why don't we let the government fight the war? All of the politicians that want to fight a war are free to trade places with me at any time." Benderman is a 40-year old veteran from a military family who has received many awards, including four Good Conduct Medals; Benderman was deployed in Iraq from March to September of 2003 with the 4th Infantry Division. Twenty-two other soldiers in his unit also refused less publicly-- seventeen have gone AWOL (Absent Without Official Leave) and two attempted suicide. "U.S. military personnel," Benderman said, "are increasingly killing non-combatants. On my last deployment in Iraq, elements of my unit were instructed by a captain to fire on children throwing rocks at us."

Military personnel have a legal right to conscientious objector status based on their opposition to war, yet objectors like Pablo and Kevin, who have made their views public have had their claims rejected and been punished for speaking out.

How can we create a climate of massive visible support for GI resistance and spread the risks to civilian society, so we create a serious political and social consequence for cracking down on those who refuse orders/obey international law or assert their rights? How can we organize to protect soldiers of conscience from crackdowns for their standing up for international law or asserting their rights?

Courage to Resist suggests that as well as supporting military resisters directly, people can work directly to stop military recruiting. Students at the University of California, Santa Cruz, San Francisco State University, University of Wisconsin-Madison, New York University, University of Illinois, Chicago, and Southern Connecticut State University have been succesful in fighting recruitment on their campuses. Massive counter education of students and youth, increasing protests and direct action at recruiting centers have contributed (along with the losing war in Iraq) to the record low for military recruitment. Many recruiters, under intense pressure to produce bodies, have gone AWOL themselves.

In every branch of the military recruiting is has collapsed and the military is getting desperate. Morale is so low that Lt. Gen. James R. Helmly wrote that "stop loss" orders that involuntarily extending reservists' tours in war zones has pushed the Army Reserve to the point that it is "in grave danger of being unable to meet other operational requirements" and is "rapidly degenerating into a 'broken' force.

It's clear that the anti-war movement needs a strategy and as usual it is the courage of young people in the military, on the campuses and in the streets who, by example, show us how to assert our people power. A people power strategy can stop the war and occupation if we clearly articulate it and organize and organize relentless innovative campaigns against the pillars the war. We need to find the courage and the heart that is in root of the word courage, le coeur, to assert our power as communities, as movements and as people to reverse the policies of empire behind both the war in Iraq and the war at home. It's clear that Pablo Paredes, Kevin Benderman and other GI resisters have the courage to resist. Do we?





Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

David Solnit is an organizer with Courage to Resist, editor of Globalize Liberation: How to Uproot the System and Build a Better World (City Lights, 2004).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Rev. Alexander Harper (United church of christ)
Posted by: zan123 on May 10, 2005 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hurrah for the courAge of COURAGE TO RESIST and for David Solit for his courage to write boldly about the movement within the military!

This is scary, but most important stuff.

I was a Navy line officer in WWII, a chaplain iin the Korean War, a draft counselor in the Vietnam War.

The time may well have come when resistance within the military, towards recruiters (campuses, high schools) must and will play an increasing role. Please keep writing, reporting, keeping incidents of repression alive!

Take heart from how the draft was ended a generation ago in Canada: through a coalition of the generals and the war-resisters! The resisters said NO on princile, but the generals also said NO to prospective fighters who would be unreliable when push came to shove and the trigger must be pulled.

The rise of civilian deaths from 10% in WWI to 90% in this war should alone make CO's of us all.

ALEXANDER HARPER

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good Message Bad Writing
Posted by: manustrium on May 10, 2005 7:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is it just me or does this guy need an editor? I kept coming across unclear, run-on, or repetitive statements that really detracted from the piece.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good Message Posted by: Iamnotafruittree
» RE: Good Message Posted by: manustrium
» RE: Good Message Posted by: solar
» RE: Good Message Posted by: Alex
Make a call
Posted by: Alex on May 10, 2005 1:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you are interested in calling Donald Rumsfeld on behalf of
Kevin's situation, Rumsfeld's private office line is
703-692-7100.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Conciencious Objection??
Posted by: AdamSelene40 on May 10, 2005 5:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Volunteer military service is something of a Devil's Bargain -- if the volunteer expects to NOT to be sent in harm's way. In both these two cases the Devil is claiming his Due, and sadly, Old Scratch has a strong case. Do we think we can rally anti-war sentiment around our weak one?

When I trained as a Draft Counselor with the American Friends Service Committee during the Viet Nam War, we were taught that it was vitally important for each potential Inductee to know if he really WAS a Conscientious Objector ... someone who had a deep moral repugnance for killing others -- or whether he simply very much preferred not to be killed himself. While we supported both positions as being worthy and legitimate, we urged very different strategies for each.

Here's the problem: Conscientious Objector status was created as a WW I accommodation exempting men born into Pacifist religions -- principally Quakers and Anabaptists -- from military conscription. There were two main criteria an Objector HAD to satisfy: 1) the objection had to apply to all wars in all forms and 2) the objection had to be based on "religious belief and training."

By the end of the Viet Nam era, deeply held philosophical (but non-religious) beliefs (even when relatively new-found) could serve as grounds for a CO exemption ... but Objector status was still not to be granted based on POLITICAL objections to CERTAIN wars, and not others. Until the abolition of the Draft, local Draft Boards staffed by military veterans were the initial finders of fact in CO cases. Appeal from their judgments although difficult and rare, was possible.

When the conscripted Citizen Soldier was replaced by the professional Volunteer, processing Conscientious Objector applications was transferred to the Enlistee's own chain of command. It was also assumed that since the soldiers were now all volunteers, who had certified as a condition of their enlistment that they were NOT and had never been Conscientious Objectors, there would be very few applications, and that the soldier's Chaplain and Commanding Officer would be well positioned to judge the sincerity of the very few claims that might arise.

See the problem?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

humblecitizen
Posted by: humblecitizen on May 10, 2005 6:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I want to express my gratitude and admiration to:
Pablo Paredes, Kevin Benderman and David Solnit, for having the courage to stand up against our present government, knowing that such government, and all those who believe in it, are going to insult you, try to humiliate you, and call you unpatriotic.
BUT YOU ARE THE TRUE PATRIOTS.
The crimes committed, in our name, by Bush and his cronies, deserve to have all of us, US citizens, get united and emulate these three brave men. When that happens, we will solve terrorism, the world will stop hating us, and will be truly free.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Talk to Kevin directly
Posted by: solar on May 11, 2005 3:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is a good message delivered with abysmally bad writing, which obscures the power of the message. If you want to hear Monica and Kevin's own words you can visit the "NeverGiveUp" forums (just click on the NeverGiveUp link).

This is where the old Alternet community forums wound up after being shut down by Alternet. Kevin and Monica were, and are still, an active part of the community from the days when Alternet sponsored it (it is now hosted by Cafe Utne) and repeated e-mails by me to the editors of Alternet informing them of Monica and Kevin's presence there when it was still their community were ignored.

It is beyond ironic that they just now get around to posting an article about Kevin. They could have had all kinds of access to Kevin had they only paid attention to their own online community.

Anyway, drop by the NeverGiveUp forums and read Kevin and Monica's posts and an interview of Kevin by one of the hosts there. They post most often in TheWar forum.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement