Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

'Tis the Season for Shareholder Activism

By Jan Frel, CorpWatch. Posted May 10, 2005.


Every spring, activists and investors attend general meetings to protest and meet with CEOs and corporate boards. The goal is to place their agendas -- on everything from the environment to labor practices -- front and center.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

In Special Coverage

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Jim Hightower, Raising Hell
Jonathan Rowe

Democracy and Elections:
Are Feds Trying to Aid Republican Candidate's Election?
Tim Kalich

DrugReporter:
A Cultural History of the Magic Mushroom
Lux

Election 2008:
The Real Elitist: Video of McCain's Collection of Mansions Reveal He's Not Your Average Joe
Steven Greenhouse

Environment:
Republicans Have Handed Democrats a Winning Election Issue
David Morris

ForeignPolicy:
Blocking a Gazan's Path to an Education
Fidaa Abed

Health and Wellness:
The Misshapen Mind: How the Brain's Haphazard Evolution Left Us with Self-Destructive Instincts
Sasha Abramsky

Hurricane Katrina:
From the Bayou to Baghdad: Mission Not Accomplished
Amy Goodman

Immigration:
Medical Neglect in Immigrant Prisons Reveals America at Its Worst
Kyle Hussein de Beausset

Media and Technology:
What's Going on with the Media's Ballooning Coverage of Celebrity Babies?
Meredith Blake

Movie Mix:
Protest over Use of the Word 'Retard' in Stiller's 'Tropic Thunder' Misses the Target
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Why Obama Should Pick Hillary
Lanny Davis

Rights and Liberties:
Stop the Execution: Jeff Wood Faces Death Tomorrow for a Murder He Didn't Commit
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
Catching the Wrong John: When Are the Media Going to Talk about John McCain's Infidelity?
Drew Westen

War on Iraq:
How Many More Iraqis Can You Throw Behind Bars Without Trial?
Fatih Abdulsalam

Water:
What If Your Tap Water Is Not Safe To Drink?
Elizabeth Royte

More stories by Jan Frel

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Every spring, thousands of annual general meetings take place across America. Many of these are banal affairs where CEOs use their big day to unveil their latest product, announce record profits, or otherwise make a media splash and get their votes of confidence from the stockholders who own the companies. You've seen it before: Bill Gates grins on stage as he touts Microsoft's New Feature. There's a colossal screen above Gates' head with a close up of his face, and the audience of thousands goes into thunderous applause every time he finishes a sentence.

Shareholder meetings are also the one opportunity each year where minority shareholders and advocacy groups have a chance to speak directly with the company boards in a public forum. Participation ranges from mild-mannered opposition to radical, attention-getting activism. In 1998, for instance, environmental activists from Amazon Watch splashed fake blood on the exterior of the Occidental oil company's headquarters and carried a "pipeline" of eight oil barrels welded together into the lobby of the building. Other meetings have prompted large scale banner drops, traffic obstructions, and puppet parades.

Amazon Watch's Leila Salazar, who was present at this year's ChevronTexaco meeting, believes that participating in these annual meetings is a useful way to be heard as an activist. "A lot of times we don't have that access," she says. "It's rare to be able to go and meet with companies that normally wouldn't listen to activists."

Resolving to Change

Below is a list of shareholder resolutions that have yet to be presented this season. For a complete list of the U.S. resolutions (including those that have passed and those that have been omitted or withdrawn), visit www.iccr.org.

Avon
May 5, 2005
Product Safety

While the cosmetics company has removed products containing any ingredients on a list of chemicals known or suspected of causing cancer, genetic mutation, or birth defects from European products, it has not done so for its U.S. products. The recent shareholder's resolution points to the chemicals still found in U.S. products -- from petrolatum, to known carcinogens to reproductive toxins -- and asks for a worldwide ban.

Ford Motor Company
May 12, 2005
Global Warming and Executive Compensation
As the maker of a number of inefficient passenger vehicles, such as sport utility vehicles (SUVs) and pickups, one resolution points out that "Ford's average fleet fuel economy has been lower than any other major automaker since 2000." The shareholders requested that the company link a significant portion of senior executive compensation to progress in reducing lifetime product greenhouse gas emissions from the company's new passenger vehicles.

Hasbro
May 19, 2005
Vendor Standards
Hasbro makes most of its toys in overseas factories. A resolution to be presented at their upcoming meeting acknowledges the recent rise in awareness about human rights abuses and the denial of labor rights in overseas subsidiaries. Here, the shareholders went as far as to ask the company to promise to give all workers the right to form and join trade unions, to refuse to use bonded or prison labor and to refuse to use child labor.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
May 3, 2005
HIV Reporting
This resolution sites a recent World Bank study which predicts "a complete economic collapse will occur" unless there is a response to the HIV/AIDS pandemic. The study estimates that the HIV/AIDS crisis in Africa, where this company has operations in over 50 countries and employees more than 15,000 workers, will continue to grow. The resolution argues that HIV, along with malaria and TB, "can directly impact our company's bottom line through decreased productivity, increased absenteeism, ballooning healthcare and disability costs," and what they call "the destruction of human capital." It asks, therefore, that the company make an effort to evaluate and report on the effects of these diseases on their companies.

ExxonMobil
May 25
Sexual Orientation Discrimination
The company has had eight resolutions filed against it for its shareholder meeting. One is led by the New York City Employees Retirement System, and it suggests that ExxonMobil rewrite its equal employment opportunity policy to include protection for workers regardless of sexual orientation.
The meetings are also a convenient springboard for social responsibility investors and NGOs to introduce resolutions for shareholder votes to change company practice and generate media attention for their cause against standing policy at a company's expense.

Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Stockholder Control of Corporations
Posted by: Grampop on May 10, 2005 12:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A permanent "fix" to corporation control that would not require annual confrontation by interest groups would be for all groups to unite and demand that interests such as environment at home and overseas, anti-slave labor, etc. be represented by ombudsmen on the boards of directors. Thusly these issues would be continuously addressed throughout the year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mattlubic
Posted by: mattlubic on May 10, 2005 2:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What would also help is if shareholders demanded accountability of corporate CEO's and asked "Why in the face of declining shareholder value are you being awarded your salary, not to mention your 'bonus'?"

And if someone replies "We have to offer substantial salaries and bonuses in order to atttract and keep great talent" we need to ask "Why? Is there no one who loves the work and the prestige of directing a corporation more than they love money and stock options? And if you're unable to attract such people, might it be because you've established a corporate culture of personal greed rather than a culture of public service and personal accomplishment?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]