Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Harvesting Chaos

By Jason Mark, AlterNet. Posted May 11, 2005.


Farmers in the U.S. and around the world are likely to face serious challenges in the coming decades as new kinds of weather test their ability to bring us the food we all depend on.
Advertisement

Most keyboard jockeys would die for the view from Orin Martin's office window: apple trees in blossom, lines of citrus, dozens of varieties of flowers and neat rows of peppers, garlic and potatoes. Martin is a farmer in Santa Cruz, Calif., where for last 30 years he has been an instructor at the University of California's agro-ecology program, one of the nation's oldest organic agriculture curriculums. Strong, stout and built like a tree trunk, with sun-bleached cornsilk hair, thick hands, and deep crowsfeet around his eyes from years of working outdoors, Martin loves farming, and it shows whenever he starts to talk about his craft, as he will happily do for hours on end.

In recent years, however, something has been amiss in Martin's idyllic setting. The weather is changing in strange ways. And for a farmer that's bad news.

"I don't know if you can talk about predictable weather anymore," Martin said on a recent walk through his three-acre plot. "Each of the last ten years has been anomalous in one way or another. The weather here used to be like clockwork. Around March 15 it would stop raining. But all through the '90s we had rain into April, May and even June. If you talk with farmers and gardeners, oh yeah, they think there's something off."

Martin is right. From New England to the Midwest to California, farmers and scientists are noticing that once-dependable weather patterns are shifting, and concern is growing that those changes will have a significant impact on our agriculture system. Farmers in the United States and around the world are likely to face serious challenges in the coming decades as new kinds of weather test their ability to bring us the food we all depend on.

The culprit is climate change, caused by society's burning of fossil fuels. When it comes to global warming, farmers--who are more attuned to weather patterns than most people--may be the proverbial canaries in the coalmine.

"Some of the changes in weather are consistent with climate change predictions, and that's real troublesome," says Michelle Wander, a professor of soil science at the University of Illinois. Wander recently published a report with the Union of Concerned Scientists which predicted that within 25 years Illinois summers may resemble the hotter climate of Arkansas. "By the end of the century, I think we will really be suffering."

The weather changes underway differ by region. In California, which has a typical Mediterranean climate with a wet winter and a dry summer, rainfall is stretching later and later into the spring. New England is experiencing a warming trend, with average temperatures up 1.8 degrees F over the last century. Winter warming in the northeast is even more pronounced; temperatures between December and February increased 4.4 degrees F in the last 30 years, according to a study by the University of New Hampshire. In the Midwest, the springs and summers have become unseasonably wet, while the summers get hotter and drier.

"What we're experiencing is rather abnormal," says Dave Campbell, who farms 225 acres of oats, wheat, corn, soy and hay in Maplepark, Illinois, land that has been in his wife's family since the 1830s. "It just keeps raining and raining. Last year, from May 10 to June 21 we had 13 inches of rain. Normally we have 38 inches of precipitation the whole year. Last year we had real trouble with our wheat crop because it was so excessively wet. We just get dumped with rain."

The weather, of course, has never been exactly dependable--farmers have always been at the mercy of the vagaries of sun and rain. But general weather patterns have at least been broadly predictable, allowing farmers to know when to sow their seed, when to transplant, when to harvest. As weather patterns become less reliable, growers will be tested to develop new rhythms and systems for growing crops.

For a city dweller who thinks that food comes from Safeway, rain may seem like an unqualified benefit when it comes to growing food. Farmers know better. Too much rain at the wrong time can make it difficult to plan or harvest crops. Above-average rainfall also contributes to fungi and insects that can dramatically reduce crop yields. Too much warmth is equally problematic. Some plants require a certain number of frost days each year in order to thrive the following spring. As temperatures warm, farmers who are accustomed to growing, say, blueberries in Maine or soybeans in Indiana may find themselves having to either shift to different crops or actually move their operations to new locales. Unreliable weather will make it harder for farmers to be as productive as we have come to expect.


Digg!

Jason Mark is the co-author, with Kevin Danaher, of Insurrection: Citizen Challenges to Corporate Power. He is researching a book about the future of food.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Climate change?
Posted by: Sojourner on May 11, 2005 5:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I heard that was a Democratic myth. So the record rains in southern California this year are just a blue state trying to make the President look bad.

Ain't it something? Our readiness to deny, deny, and deny again until it's too late? What a legacy for the next generations!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Inquisitive
Posted by: conquip on May 11, 2005 9:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cambridge University climate researcehrs have just released a study of the dramatic slowing of the falling cold water flows off Greenland that are the pump moving the Gulf Stream up the Eastern Seabaord and effecting all the world's weather patterns. Those giant "pumps" have slowed to 25% of their past flow only five years ago. The Pentagon climate change study warned of this phenomenon. This is the engine that drives the conveyor belt of the major ocean currents throughout the world. The article can be found here:

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Too many folks
Posted by: lamar on May 11, 2005 9:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe the problem isn't with farming. It is that there are too many people. Let's face it: we will continue to rise in population as long as there is excess food. Giant agro-business is only aiding unsustainable population growth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is called global warming
Posted by: Here and now on May 11, 2005 10:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find it asinine that the author calls it climate change when it is really global warming. In fact the author is forced to use 'global warming' at one point in the article because that is exactly what it is. Calling it climate change is using a repugnican context rather than using the actual context. Global warming is exactly what was being spoken about. It should have been used. Climate change deflects the conversation from the actual issues. The author goes on to speak about how it is being caused by fossil fuels.

Get with the program and use progressive contexts. You can visit demspeak.com and see what progressives are doing. They are trying to shift the conversation back to using correct terminology instead of using orwellian terminology like the author uses by saying climate change and really meaning global warming.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It is called global warming Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: It is called global warming Posted by: englehart
Small Changes – BIG Effects
Posted by: monkeywrench on May 11, 2005 10:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As frightening as this article is, it doesn't tell the whole story. What is missing is the devastating effect that even very small, completely unpredictible weather changes can have on crops.

My father farmed rice and safflower. He told me that with a rice crop, if a "cool snap," a sudden drop in daytime temperatures of just a few degrees for just a few days, happens at the wrong time, the rice will not fully "head out," that is, there will not be grains in most of the heads – ergo, little or no crop. Similarly, if even a quick, light rain hits during harvest, the rice will grow mold, and be useless; if high winds come up during harvest, the heavily-laden crop can be blown to the ground and be unharvestable.

And rice is not the only crop affected: we once sharecropped tomatoes with another farmer, and for ONE DAY just before harvest, we had light showers; the entire crop was lost to mold.

For these reasons, when I read about large-scale climate change, I recall my past and hope against hope that our shortsightedness in failing to address overpopulation and our dependence on fossil fuels won't result in the massive destruction of worldwide food production. By making abrupt, unnatural changes to a world that has slowly evolved in harmony for millions of years, mankind is stomping into virgin – and VERY dangerous – territory.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Small Changes – BIG Effects Posted by: monkeywrench
And the answer is...
Posted by: whatever on May 11, 2005 4:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
» RE: And the answer is... Posted by: Linda
Author Responds
Posted by: jasondovemark on May 13, 2005 7:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would like to respond to a few of the comments about my article.

First, to the person who thinks that global warming is a Democratic conspiracy: Please wake up. Ninety-five percent of scientists agree: The earth's atmosphere is heating up faster than it has in thousands of years, and our relentless burning of fossil fuels is largely to blame. The small band of scientific dissenters are typically found to be on the payroll of the carbon industries. For more info, please visit the National Academy of Sciences, or the UN's International Panel on Climate Change.

Second, to Here and Now, who suggested that I am "asinine" for using the term "climate change" instead of "global warming" and seemed to suggest that this was part of some plan to deliberately cloud the issue. Please check your tone, friend, and give this correspondent the benefit of the doubt. Yes, our fossil fuel consumption is heating the atmosphere. But that may not necessarily lead to a warmer weather. As another commentator noted, increasing atmospheric temperatures very well could lead to a new ice age by short circuiting the North Atlantic gulf stream. That is why "climate change" is more accurate--because it suggests that a variety of changes may occur. Also, you should note that many people, for example wintertime residents of Buffalo, may look forward to global warming, so it's not necessarily a term that instills concern. ... Perhaps the best desriptor would be "climate chaos"?

Finally, to the correspondent who suggested that our biggest concern should be global population. Yes, we need to put in place policies to check population growth. But climate change remains, as it were, the "mother of all issues." If we don't figure this one out, all other issues will be irrelevant.

Many thanks to you all for reading and contributing feedback. I appreciate it.

Jason Mark

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]