Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

National Defeat Day - National Liberation Day

By Andrew Lam, AlterNet. Posted April 29, 2005.


April 30 became the birth date of an exile's culture, built on defeatism and a sense of tragic ending. But through the years, that date has come to symbolize something entirely different to this Vietnamese American.
National Defeat Day - National Liberation Day

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Andrew Lam

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Flipping through my United States passport as if it were a comic book, the young customs man at the Noi-Bai Airport, near Hanoi, appeared curious. "Brother, when did you leave Vietnam?"

"Two days before National Defeat Day," I said without thinking. It was an exile's expression, not his. "God! When did that happen?" he asked.

"The thirtieth of April, 1975," I answered.

"But, brother, don't you mean National Liberation Day?" he said, while trying to suppress a giggle.

If this conversation had occurred a decade or so earlier, the difference would have created a dangerous gap between the Vietnamese and the returning Vietnamese-American. But this happened a couple of decades after the war had ended, when the walls were down, the borders porous, and as I studied the smiling young official, it occurred to me that there was something about this moment, an epiphany. "Yes, brother, I suppose I do mean liberation day." Not everyone remembers the date with a smile. It marked the Vietnamese Diaspora, boat people, refugees.

On April 28, 1975, my family and I escaped from Saigon in a crowded C-130 cargo plane a few hours before the airport was bombed. We arrived at the Guam refugee camp to hear the BBC's tragic account of Saigon's demise: U.S. helicopters flying over the chaotic city, Vietcong tanks rolling in, Vietnamese climbing over the gate into the U.S. embassy, boats fleeing down the Saigon River toward the South China Sea.

In time, April 30 became the birth date of an exile's culture, built on defeatism and a sense of tragic ending. For a while, many Vietnamese in America talked of revenge, of blood debts, of the exile's anguish. Their songs had nostalgic titles: "The Day When I Return" and "Oh, Mother Vietnam, We Are Still Here."

April 30, 1976: A child of 12 with nationalistic fervor, I stood in front of San Francisco City Hall with other refugees. I waved the gold flag with three horizontal red stripes. I shouted (to no one in particular): "Give us back South Vietnam!"

April 30, 1979: An uncle told me there was an American plan to retake our homeland by force: "The way Douglas MacArthur did for the South Koreans in the fifties." My 18-year-old brother declared that he would join the anti-Communist guerrilla movement in Vietnam. My father sighed.

April 30, 1983: I stayed awake all night with Vietnamese classmates from Berkeley to listen to monotonous speeches by angry old men. "National defeat must be avenged by sweat and blood!" one vowed.

But through the years, April 30 has come to symbolize something entirely different to me. Although I sometimes mourn the loss of home and land, it's the American landscape and what it offers that solidify my hyphenated identity. This date of tragic ending, from an optimist's point of view, is also an American rebirth, something close to the Fourth of July.

I remember whispering to a young countryman during one of those monotonous April 30 rallies in the mid-1980s: "Even as the old man speaks of patriotic repatriation we've already become Americans." Assimilation, education the English language, the American "I" -- these have carried me and many others further from that beloved tropical country than the C-130 ever could. Each optimistic step the young Vietnamese takes toward America is tempered with a series of betrayals of Little Saigon's parochialism, its sentimentalities and the old man's outdated passion.


Digg!

Andrew Lam, an editor at Pacific News Service, is author of the forthcoming book, Perfume Dreams: Reflections on the Vietnamese Diaspora.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
End of a nightmare?
Posted by: CHOLON on Apr 29, 2005 7:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Andrew was only 11 years old when he left VietNam. When he judge the old generation as defeatist he has no idea of what the old has endured. It does not mean that I agree with the people of my generation.. the lost generation. For me the war that in the USA people call the VIETNAM WAR is only part of a long war: a war started in the 1940 and ending for me on April 28, 1975 when I left Vietnam with my family 2 days before the fall of SAIGON. You see, Andrew do not even know the song that glorify SAIGON the beautiful town where I was born 75 years ago. I am not defeatist like the old people. I think that the young generation in Vietnam will decide of the future of VIETNAM without the pressure that myself has endured. When you are born in a french colony as a second class citizen, when you go through a japanese occupation, independence in blood at the end of WWII, occupation again by the Frenchs and at the end betrayal by the Americans it is very difficult to be upbeat!! So, Andrew, do not judge your elders because you are lucky to not endure their nightmare. My two sons at least understand me. And by the way, Andrew you live in Berkeley may be you know one of them and may be in Lake Tahoe,you wear one of his jackets without knowing that it is designed by a vietnamese-american and on week-end you wear a jeans designed by his brother that is not ashamed to have a Vietnamese father.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: nd of a nightmare? Posted by: karyse
» RE: nd of a nightmare? Posted by: CHOLON
Defeat or victory?
Posted by: vescalant on Apr 29, 2005 5:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I visited Vietnam a few years ago, and noticed that elder people still don't like American things. My hotel was right in front of the American embassy and the old pedicycle driver let me know with hand signals his displeasure with it.
The situation is different with young people, who do like the new market economy, but I wonder whether Vietnamese consider that it was their decision to bring in the new economy, as opposed to a decision imposed by foreign powers as has happend in most of the Third World.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sonofthewest
Posted by: sonofthewest on May 1, 2005 8:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Lam's views are both poignant, sad, and still show the confusion of the people who left Vietnam and moved to the country that had tried to destroy theirs. The carpet bombing, the use of napalm, the spraying of defoliants on Vietnam was done by the United States, not by the communists and not by the North Vietnamese who never had those type of weapons systems. I think it is difficult for the Vietnames who left to own up to the fact that they worked for, were financed by, and were subservient to the US and its military. They fought on the side of a South Vietnamese government financed and used by the US. They helped in the execution of their own people, the majority of whom supported the war of national liberation, on behalf of the United States. When the costs became to high for the US, we pulled out and why not? The US was never in Viet Nam to help Viet Nam, we were there for purely American interests and most of the Vietnamese ex-patriots have trouble accepting this fact because it invalidates their role and reduces them to second class citizens in their prior country even as it does to them now in their new country. I happen to know, quite intimately, many
Vietnamese of all ages including many older men who fought in the war as well as their spouses. A few have made it clear to me that they don't even like being here, their previous country and culture were beautiful and they loved and love Viet Nam. They go back on vacation and are proud of the changes even though they are still anti-communist and hurt because they are no longer citizens of Viet Nam, but Americans, and they are treated as Americans in their own country --- loved by family and old friends --- but still Americans. It is also true that most Americans have still never excepted the truth of the war, that there were no high ideals in our attempted occupation and subjugation of Viet Nam it was pure and simple colonialism steeped in the rhetoric of anti-communism. The American GIs were not some heroic defenders of freedom, they referred to the people they were helping as "gooks" and "slopes" although they didn't find the women unaccepatable. I spent many hours and months around soldiers and never one talked about an enjoyable friendship with a male south Vietnamese soldier or civilian, even when they discribed close relationships with women.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sonofthewest
Posted by: sonofthewest on May 1, 2005 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most Americans, and I haven't found many Vietnames immigrants either, have ever went to the historical books such as the Pentagon Papers, or reviewed the compendiums of newsreel film and TV archives and analyzed the truth about the genocidal warfare carried on by the US Military and its Vietnamese surrogate military. Instead they listen to right wing wingnuts that claim to be "veterans" who are still trying to project some sort of glorious purpose to the Indo-China War to cover their own sense of defeat because an underfunded, indigenous people's liberation movement did their own fighting and defeated the US military, a feat that is staggering in its courage, nobility, strategic and tactical movement by a small country. The "most powerful military in the world" was defeated by dogged resistence by a stubborn people who refused and refuse to be subjugated. Hell, in 1979 the Peoples Republic of China attempted to invade into the north of Viet Nam and they got a bloody nose and were repulsed and thrown out --- so much for the idea that PRC and the USSR controlled North Vietnam --- that was all just malarky and propoganda. The Vietnamese controlled Viet Nam once they had kicked butt on the French and our country should have left Viet Nam to the Vietnamese. Very intelligent, learned, and resourceful people that they are they would have solved their own problems and the world would have been spared a US inspired war from 1954-1975 when the inevitable defeat was suffered and the US and its allies had to leave dangling from helicopters and chasing each other on to US cargo planes. The GIs to go home and the allies driven from their home because they had served the occupier. Now it is thirty years into the new Viet Nam and at last much of the country is healed but hearts still need to heal. I feel the anguish of my hundreds of Vietnamese friends who miss their homeland even as the US has become their homeland. Especially touching is the concern of the older generations who see that their children are the "young Americans" in and around gangs, violence, and a sometimes lazy attitude that is not typical at all of the older generation or the first generation. They wonder what it all means and what is a Vietnames-American anymore and what will it mean in the future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sonofthewest
Posted by: sonofthewest on May 1, 2005 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
During the war I worked in a hospital taking care of US soldiers returning from the Indo-China war and my compassion and love for them and their sacrifice is still great, but I don't give a damn about American officers who served their, and I know that for many of them their pain never goes away. Vast numbers of the US troops came to realize that their role was a shame, they were their to kill a people that were no threat to America. Our country still seems blinded by some b___ s___ of pre-eminence or white colonialist mentality that we still can't face the truth of Indo-China so now we are sacrificing our young in another genocidal excursion in the middle east that will end up with vain glorious speeches by small minded politicians and sooner or later a defeat on the ground. And more generations of young home and abroad as well as their families and culture will have been permanently damaged by warfare. That's some thoughts on this thirty year anniversary of liberation or defeat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]