comments_image -

Purity

Rejoice! The software is pure again!
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

Passover started last week, which meant I had the atheist-Jew equivalent of Thanksgiving panic. You know what I mean: the feeling you get when you run around looking for a place to eat fake or real bird meat, even if you think nationalism is bullshit and the natives should have kicked our colonial asses back in the day. Each year I feel strangely compelled to join a group of people for seder dinner, even though I've never believed in any kind of monotheistic über-deity.

As I tried to conjure up a last-minute "eat some weird herbs and read from the Open Source Haggadah Project Web site" event, I was also recovering from a morally bewildering trip I recently took to the Microsoft campus in Redmond, Wash. I was part of a select group invited to meet with the rather friendly and bouncy nerds who populate the MSN Search team. My goal? To offer feedback about civil liberties issues raised by the MSN Search services. Other invitees' goals? Sort of unclear. Mostly, I think they wanted to blog things.

There were a handful of Microsoft fanbloggers there, which was utterly bizarre - I'm not used to talking to geeks whose cute faces get frowny and confused when I mention FreeBSD and OpenOffice. As for the MSN Search team? I think most of them really wanted to know what non-Beast employees thought about their product's potential for evil and stupidity. There are a lot of cool people who work at Microsoft, which is both mysterious and frustrating for anyone who aspires to be an ideologue.

So what the hell is up with MSN Search? Well, the local search is "so bad it's good" hilarious - sort of the Web service equivalent of The Chronicles of Riddick. But I can't tell you much else, because I signed a nondisclosure agreement. Yes, it's true. The Beast of Redmond has sunk its legal tentacles into my brain and imprisoned some information in there that I cannot release. But I'll risk the legal peril to give you one hint about what's happening deep in the dark inner recesses of MSN, where the plot to make start.com into a brand is only just beginning. They want to crush Google's multicolored balls between the steel wings of MSN's floaty butterfly icon. Really, that's it.

My loss of ideological purity at the Beast came shortly after an ambiguous restoration of purity to the GNU-Linux community. BitKeeper has been purged. Here's the deal: For the past couple of years, Linux granddaddy Linus Torvalds and several key open-source developers have been using the proprietary software BitKeeper, a "versioning system" that allows multiple people to modify code at the same time, tracks their changes, and publishes the results. Basically, it's a group editing tool.

Anyway, the author of BitKeeper, Larry McVoy, offered his tool to Torvalds and pals at no cost, and they were happy to take it. Although there are open-source and free software tools like CVS and Codeville they could have used, they preferred McVoy's proprietary tool.

But of course the Linux community freaked out. How could their beloved leader betray the cause and use a nonfree software tool to build their free operating system? Flame wars erupted. Accusations were hurled. McVoy's mailbox filled with daily doses of vitriol. Eventually, he got annoyed and asked people to shut up or he wouldn't let them use BitKeeper for free anymore. So of course the purists screamed louder. And finally, a couple weeks ago, McVoy stomped off in disgust and took his proprietary tool with him. Poor Torvalds, who adored BitKeeper, is now scrambling to move all his code over to another versioning system that he likes less.

Rejoice! The software is pure again!

The whole thing makes me grumpy. Of course the free- and open source-software movements should show that it's possible to build kick-ass computer systems without recourse to any proprietary products whose code is hidden. Building unfree code is like signing an NDA - you agree to keep vital information secret so that profit can be made and power can be consolidated. And yet sometimes there's a proprietary thing that isn't evil. Sometimes you have to sign an NDA to get past the security gates and agitate for truth and justice.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
AlterNet Radio: What's At Stake in Wisconsin; Real "Defense" Budget Is $1 Trillion; the Right's Phony Race War

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
Fox, Breitbart, and Ricketts Try to Bring Back D'Souza's Pseudo-Birtherism

By Steve M | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Activists Speak Out Against Lack of Access to Bradley Manning

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYPD Catches Sexual Assailant, Then Lets Him Go Free Because He Didn't Feel Like Being Questioned

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Gov. Scott Orders Purging of Florida’s Voter Rolls - Just in Time For Prez Election

By Adele Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Abortion Clinics Across Country Put On Alert In Wake of Georgia Clinic Arson Cases

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Former GOP Congresswoman Blasts New GOP Women’s Caucus: ‘They’re Not Voting In Best Interest Of All Women’

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]