Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bollywood Breakthrough

By Elizabeth Kadetsky, AlterNet. Posted April 28, 2005.


Indian actor Amitabh Bachchan is the most famous film star in the world. So how come most Americans have never heard of him?
Advertisement

Ask an American to name a South Asian dramatic figure and you'll probably hear Apu Nahasapeemapetilon, owner of the Kwik-E-Mart on "The Simpsons." So it may come as a surprise that the best-known actor in the world is Indian, and one most Americans don't know.

Bollywood heartthrob Amitabh Bachchan is a fixture in his home country, where his visage promotes everything from Parker pens to Pepsi on TV and where his hit show, "Kaon Banega Croepati?" (Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?), dominates the Hindi airwaves. He has appeared in over 150 films and is, according to a BBC poll, "the most popular film star in the world, the most recognized face, the biggest box-office draw."

In Guyana, there are Amitabh Bachchan look-alike contests; in Calcutta, there is a temple to Amitabh Bachchan. His likeness appears in Madame Tussaud's Wax Museum in London. A query to most any South Asian will yield a reaction not unlike that of the waiter at a Midtown Manhattan hotel who placed a fist on his chest and proclaimed, "He is my friend." When asked what phrase best encapsulates the actor's profile worldwide, the Jersey-based, Delhi-born journalist Nidhi Kathuria explained simply, "He's God."

Bachchan swung through New York recently as a guest of the Film Society of Lincoln Center, which was hosting a retrospective of the 63-year-old actor's 36-year film career and a $60-a-head appearance by the screen idol himself.

Dressed in a somber gray business suit and powder-pink plaid tie, the only hint of his Bollywood pedigree two knuckle-sized silver rings and a Hindu mala around his wrist, Bachchan enjoyed softball questions from an admiring, almost exclusively South Asian coterie of journalists Wednesday. ("It's a great cause!" he was commended for his work with the Indian eye bank.) Hollywood Bollywood magazine came out, as did DesiMatch, BharatMatrimony.com and Bharat Darshan Radio. But given an opportunity for an in-person audience with the world's most beloved film star, the non-Indian New York media stayed home.

The elision raises an important question: Why don't Americans know Amitabh Bachchan?

Bachchan's mostly Hindi-language filmography spans genres from the romantic to the musical to action--though, in true-to-Bollywood form, most of his films are a hybrid of all three. He does fight sequences choreographed like Astaire and uplifting boy-meets-girl musical interludes to rival the Gershwins. The only genre Bachchan hasn't fully explored is the art film, though the 10 movies showcased at Lincoln Center highlighted the rare moments where Bollywood has intersected Hollywood's artier side--stylized, Peckinpaw-esque '70s action films and political morality tales of the last decade. Lincoln Center's curators left out Bachchan's work with the Bollyest of Bollywood's directors--Yash Chopra, for instance, who cast the actor in Kabhi Kabhie (featuring one of the great Hindi film tracks, "Kabhi Kabhi Mere Dil Mein" [Sometimes in My Heart]). In explanation of the winnowing, Bachchan pointed out simply, "Yash Chopra's films, everybody has seen."

Everybody, of course, is a relative term.

There are 6.4 billion people on the earth, and, by some estimates, a quarter live in the vast and sprawling megalopolises that comprise the world's top population centers. These are overwhelmingly in the Third World--Mexico City, Sao Paolo, Jakarta, Delhi and Bombay appear reliably on most top-10 lists.

Bollywood has numbers on its side. These population "agglomerations," as social scientists call them, are either South Asian or cities otherwise in the path of Bollywood's cultural footprint. Outside South Asia, Bachchan has permeated where there is either a sizeable Indian Diaspora population or a poverty-stricken underclass at the whim of the optimistic charms of Bollywood and a global distribution market favoring inexpensively reproduced exports from India, Egypt, Hong Kong and Nigeria.

Where American cities feel Bollywood's cultural weight is among immigrants. Of the 21 million residents of the metropolitan New York area, a quarter million are South Asian. Add the Africans, East Asians and Eastern Europeans for whom cheap Bollywood knockoffs have shaped a cultural worldview and you have a massive fan base for a figure like Bachchan.

Village Farm is a grocery on Ninth Street and Second Avenue in Manhattan that is a kind of United Nations of South Asia. It is the sort of place that brings home the message of Bollywood's vast and unifying appeal. Hindi film soundtracks echo through the aisles 24-seven, and a staff of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs hails from such diverse locations as Bangladesh, Pakistan, Calcutta and South India. Hindi is the lingua Franca.

Kejas Mehta is the counter guy, a 25-year-old one-time student at Long Island University from Bombay. India seems to infuse his life here, yet the South Asian names that are household words to many New Yorkers mean very little to him. He raised his voice over the soundtrack from Hum Tum (Me and You), a romance with starlet Rani Mukherjee, as he guessed at the identity of Satyajit Ray.


Digg!

Elizabeth Kadetsky is the author of First There Is a Mountain (Little Brown, 2004). She is a professor of journalism at Columbia University and a Pushcart Prize-winning fiction writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
WHo'd a thunk it.
Posted by: psg2103 on Apr 28, 2005 8:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting. I'll have to subscribe to the Hindi Film Channel...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

f2411
Posted by: f2411 on Apr 28, 2005 2:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Amitabh Bachchan is a well seasoned, wonderful example of the Bollywood hero. I wish more North Americans were familiar with the joyous, colorful movies from India. Even without English subtitles they assault the senses in a very positive way! What a wonderful way to access another culture!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bachchan etc
Posted by: sunnysingh on Apr 29, 2005 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suppose we must be grateful that you covered the AB event. but as a non-poverty stricken, capable-of-thinking Indian fan of AB and other Indian cinema, I am not.

The article unfortunately also revealed how deeply ingrained certain prejudices of cultural superiority are. By classifying nearly 100 years of film production in 14 languages as something that appeals in only to the South Asian Diaspora or a poverty-stricken underclass, your built-in prejudice shows up.

Not all Indians are poor, even back in India. Neither is the entire audience in Malaysia, South Africa or Dubai. So this oft-parroted theory of "Bollywood" appealing to the illiterate, starving masses is quite insulting to viewers who CHOOSE this form of cinema over yours.

Perhaps you needed to remember WHY non-Western audiences prefer Indian cinema. Hollywood and most European cinema has two spaces for non-Western people: marginal, or negative. At least in Indian cinema we stand a chance as something more than "oppressed people to be liberated by white humanism/feminism/evangelism/ capitalism (take your pick!)

You also missed the irony of Bachchan´s reply about working in Hollywood in a part to hand a suitcase to DeNiro or Pacino. What if we reversed the equation? With DeNiro in a bit part in an AB movie? AB would disappoint and enrage the billions of fans (and yes, it is BILLIONS) if he took on a bit part in a Hollywood movie because that would just prove that we have no other possibility.

Shahrukh Khan (the reigning king of the industry) told a journalist who asked him why he didn't consider working in Hollywood roles that there would be only space for him as an "Indian" character, or at best as the second lead to a Tom Cruise. In a cheeky take on the very prejudice your article reflects, he said: "I would rather be the king in hell than a begger in heaven."

Interesting that none of this showed in your article. But perhaps we should wait for a moment in the future when you can actually accept Indian cinema as something independent, unique and culturally-specific instead of exotic but not-quite-yet Hollywood cinema.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bachchan etc Posted by: ajitnj
» The author replies Posted by: ekadetsky
» RE: The author replies Posted by: ajitnj
» RE: The author replies Posted by: sunnysingh
Mr Bachchan is the best thing that ever happened to Indian Cinema
Posted by: gitanjali on May 2, 2005 5:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a practising journalist but I see no attempt to do justice by this award winning lecturer in journalism to this article. It was a long, boring and disappointing read to the finished. For anyone who understands Hindi cinema, they can only see it as some ingrain prejuidices coming through. Or maybe, the writer simply does not understand the stubject she is writing about. First lesson in journalism, research thoroughly the subject you intend to write about and what you do not know, find out.

Secondly, you do not print what you cannot prove. In other words, rumours are not to be treated as facts (bankruptcy claims etc).

I am broad and open minded but I am sorry to say, it was a very disappointing and boring read. Nothing at all about the enigma that Mr Bacchan is came through; nor his powerful presence on screen; his ability to captivate an audience or as Sharukh Khan said, the power he brings to his roles.

I was never a fan of Mr Bachchan until 1993 when I interviewed him and recognised the steely strength of his character; his passion; his integrity and above all, his ability to turn what should be simply superb acting, into a lasting impression on the senses of both his fans and non fans.

Madam lecturer obviously have never seen Mr Bachchan in his roles - I will simply recommend to her the recent line up - Mohabbatein; Khabie Khusie Khabie Gham; Black and Waqt. But then, without an appreciation of Asian cultures, values and the way of life, it will be impossible to recognise the impact for what it is.

So maybe as background research, the writer should try understanding the values that Hindi cinema portrays and what these values mean to its audience. It is not simply entertainment but leaving cinema goers with something to strenghten their moral fabric. This is so unlike the Hollywood scene dominated by sex and violence.

Mr Bachchan, hats off to you! Your power shines through each time you move your fans to tears, laugher and applause. And you do it every time, so well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sloppy journalism
Posted by: Joedoe on May 7, 2005 11:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author does nothing to prove the thesis of this entire article, that Bachchan is THE best-known actor in the world. That he is a Bollywood star and that there are Asians throughout the world is not enough to support her assertion. A profile of the man is intriguing, but to spin him as a victim of Western ignorance and prejudice is absurd.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]