Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

That Other America

By Bob Burnett, AlterNet. Posted April 25, 2005.


Once, Republicans were the party of the upper class; Democrats represented the middle and lower class. Now, many poor voters are faith voters and the issue of moral values trumps economic concerns.
Advertisement

1962 saw the publication of Michael Harrington's insightful study, The Other America, which vividly described the harried lives of America's poor. This week two polls were released that portrayed another vision of desperation in America, one that progressives are still struggling to understand. Both surveys focused on the voting group termed "faith voters," roughly one-third of the electorate. Faith voters believe that "moral values" is a big issue, in many instances the one issue that decides their vote.

When Democrats gathered in Washington to hear Democratic National Committee (DNC) chair, Howard Dean, give a status report on his first two months in office, they were shown the results of a new poll conducted by Cornell Belcher. This, and a similar Mellman Group survey funded by the powerful EMILY's List political action committee, indicated that the class distinctions that historically distinguished Republicans from Democrats are being replaced by cultural differences. Once it was accurate to characterize the GOP as the party of the upper class and the bourgeoisie, and Democrats as the party of the lower class and the struggling middle class. The two polls indicate that now it is more precise to describe Republican voters as those who care a lot about moral values and go to church often; in contrast, Democratic voters aren't as concerned about moral values and attend church infrequently, if ever.

Taken in conjunction with the results of the 2004 presidential election, these polls clarify the nature of the Democrats' numbers problem. Historically, no matter how good the economy might be, there were always more American poor than rich, and therefore, Democrats always had a numerical superiority over Republicans; in any given election, if Democrats could manage to get out the vote, they would win. Now that familiar formula has changed. Many poor voters are faith voters and the issue of moral values trumps their economic concerns.

According to the Belcher survey, faith voters are worried about issues such as the economy and the deteriorating situation in Iraq, but their number one anxiety is moral values. In the last election, they believed George W. Bush shared their concern, and this proved to be a decisive factor in determining their vote.

Most progressives regard this behavior as perplexing, if not self-destructive. In his recent best-seller, What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America, Thomas Frank depicted faith voters as rubes who foolishly vote against their own self interest because they are, in effect, blinded by the light of their Christian practice.

DNC chair Howard Dean appeared to have a deeper understanding of this cultural divide. He pointed out that while the American economy is struggling, many Democratic partisans are not unduly anxious about economic issues. In contrast, faith voters -- Dean characterized them as "backlash Republicans" or "Reagan Democrats" -- are caught between the proverbial rock and a hard place. Typically both the husband and wife work to make ends meet; often they have more than one job. The family is under extreme economic pressure. They see themselves on the edge of homelessness, a couple of missed paychecks or one serious illness away from losing everything they have. But what the parents are most worried about are their kids.

Dean continued that faith voters typically spend so much time at work that they don't have the opportunity, or the money, to provide their children with adequate supervision. As a result, the parents are obsessed with the notion that television, other kids, or lefty teachers will corrupt their sons and daughters. Driving to and from work faith voters constantly hear conservative commentators rail against the liberal "media elite," whom they accuse of advocating various forms of immorality: drug use, free love, abortion on demand, and so forth. Because they live in this environment of fear, faith voters accept wild accusations as the gospel; for example, that the National Educational Association has an agenda to teach homosexuality as a lifestyle "choice."

Howard Dean observed that many Democrats are too quick to dismiss the behavior of faith voters. He noted that this group truly believes that a liberal Democratic elite is corrupting America. Dean's analysis was that in the last election, faith voters trusted George W. Bush to do the right thing to stem the tide of immorality; they accepted Bush's campaign rhetoric, "The Democrats don't respect you. They don't understand your problems because they are the elite. But I do respect you. ... I'm just a regular guy."

The DNC chair commented that the typical Democratic response to the fears of faith voters has been to offer them programs: health care, child care, and the like. For various reasons this hasn't worked. Dean remarked that the Belcher poll showed that 54 percent of the voter sample believed that "a decline in our moral values" was a bigger obstacle to raising strong families than were jobs, health care, and quality education.

Howard Dean concluded by arguing that if Democrats are to regain preeminence in American politics, they must understand the desperation that is an everyday burden of that other America.

Digg!

Bob Burnett is a Berkeley writer and activist. He can be reached at bobburnett@comcast.net.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Why don't the poor want programs that help?
Posted by: bettsoff on Apr 25, 2005 2:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because the programs are offered by the homo liberal baby-killers, duh! Who would want a handout from the enemy? Gov. programs are "tainted" by a liberal agenda (ooooh, scary, scary). Of course faith voters vote against their own interests--they're convinced their own work and moral virtue and some help from God are what's required to save them and make them Unique Individuals--not some handout from a program that promotes immorality. Faith is proud. Libs may be the intellectual "elite", but faith voters have a monopoly on moral elitism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe the moral values folks will wake up ....
Posted by: dennyduke@earthlink.net on Apr 25, 2005 5:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...to the fact that lying, stealing, raping, torture, mangling & murder, the principal aspects of Bush foreign practice (policy is just cover), are in fact immoral.

Not to mention, of course, the totally complementary homeland practice of destruction of the constitution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Timeline: When's jesus comin' back?
Posted by: danopacki on Apr 25, 2005 5:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is great at structuring the playing field in which progressives have to use to defeat the party of Jesus. We must force those wayward and out of sync Democrats to understand the reasons for which so many very decent people blindly give their allegance to hucksters, conmen and criminals like James Dobson, Tom Delay, and W. They do so because, first and last, they say that they are Evangelical Christians and that no matter what awful things they do contrary to the law of the land as long as the say the magic words, "Jesus is my Saviour" they can, essentially, get away with murder. They will follow fools and criminals who seek to use Jesus as the tool to keeping power and enriching themselves in spite of their own well being because they think the world is ending very soon. It's called Rapture.
Evangelicals all want Jesus to come back to take them to the great beyond. So why don't we start pushing for the Evangelical Leaders to give us a timeline. All the non-believers can prepare to have a chance to either get on the hot air baloon to heaven or the Amtrak to hell. Let's demand that the religious nuts give ua a date when the big J is a comin'. When the time comes and goes and the Evangelicals are all standing around wondering what the hell went wrong with the rapture we can be ready with MRE's and tent cities. You see, there will be alot of very disappointed people without jobs, healthcare, homes, liveable wages, proper education, a clean environment, milk at $5.00 per gallon, chemical laden food products, and, of course, a very big SUV. They will all have given away their resources to good Christian charlatans like Pat Robertson and the many TV hucksters who will be living in luxury saying, wait, I have a message from God, we have a new date. They will realize, finally, that they were screwed. And when that happens We must be ready to tell them what Jesus is really all about. And hopefully by then Democrats can get it together with real leaders of the kind that respect the need for faith but can temper the message with sanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

author and agitator church and state
Posted by: eileen_flmng on Apr 25, 2005 5:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If any are interested in reading more deeply about these issues from a progressive Christian dedicated to peace, justice, a moral government budget and more, please check out, Jim Wallis's 2005 release; "Gods Politics: Why the Right gets it Wrong and the Left doesn't get It"
www.godspolitics.com
www.sojo.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Paying too much attention to Jesus
Posted by: ghoster on Apr 25, 2005 7:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that these brainwashed knuckle draggers pay way too much attention to this jesus guy. Get a grip and take charge of your actions and life and leave your neighbors alone. Damn this constant looking over the fence at your neighbors and trying to tell them how to live. Minding your own business should be the first thing we learn. Meddling in other countries affairs are also the main cause of some of our problems. Al Queda's tactic is called bleed and bankrupt, they want to stretch our military thin all over the world and bankrupt our economy. Looks like they are doing great in their mission, how are we doing in bringing democracy, and faith values anywhere in the world? Looks like we are losing big time and it is just a matter of time before the sheeple in this country realize that they have been sold a pig in a poke. MOrons!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jesus-bots
Posted by: gonzoskismet on Apr 25, 2005 9:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your looking at brainwashing on a major scale and a gut level here. Ever try to talk commonsense with one of these Jesus-bots? It's like trying to talk to a little kid who puts their hands over their ears and makes irritating noises so as not to hear you. No, the only thing that could maybe penetrate this type of brainwashing would be a total system collapse of the economy or an outright disaster that they didn't get Raptured out off. Until then, everything their minister programmers tells them about Bush will be gospel.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OHHHHH THERES STILL HOPE!!!!!!!!
Posted by: WONDERWALEYE on Apr 25, 2005 9:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That is what describes the POOR voter!!! They are the ones that put us under BUSH'S COMMAND!!! When you think what Clinton did for the morals of this country, did you think that the POOR FOLKS would do any different?? I love the POOR FOLKS because they haven't give up hope and are doing their best to follow GOD!!!! What choice did you give them???
You can't just come out and qualify as a canidate for pres. like any other elected office in this country. Oh no, we have to vote for the man that is selected by the party. In other words the RICH man rules!!!! So when we find a man that is promoting FAITH, we are going to vote for them!!! I like many other citizens of this country are POOR!!!! Not because of money, but because of the POOR FAITH IN GOD that has taken over this country!!!! So be real carefull when you discribe the POOR OF THIS COUNTRY!!! I sure hope the POOR will continue to run this country and just maybe we will be able to vote FOR a canidate, rather than vote AGANIST a canidate. Rep. and Dem. parties PLEASE GIVE US A POOR CANIDATE TO VOTE FOR!!!!

MAY THE LOVE OF JESUS BE WITH YOU!!!
[this has two meanings]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Still missing the point
Posted by: ghoster on Apr 25, 2005 11:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The theocrats are still missing the point they will give you bibles and bow your head in prayer and when you lift your head they have your freedom and you have their bible, not a good trade. Besides not all those mouthing christian mantra actually practice what they preach. See it is just for the other brainwashed not for the ones that might espouse a different view. Believe it or not, jebuss is not the savior of a great portion of this planet and not even this country, so get over yourself, and quit trying to ram your religion onto this country, it is mine too. The religious right is trying to hijack amerika in a typical fashion and as always it will come to bad end. Just get over yourselves. Damn bible thumpers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Still missing the point Posted by: elmysterio
» RE: Still missing the point Posted by: kingfelix
Give us a better alternative
Posted by: tinto99 on Apr 25, 2005 11:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excuse me, but the people who voted for Bush at least knew whom they were voting for. And in my opinion, they made the right decision between the options provided.

What other alternative were they given? Vote for the pathetic Democrats? John Kerry? Gimme a break.

In my opinion, these voters picked the lesser of two evils, and the better party of the two, at least from the standpoint of defending traditional family values, religion (of any kind), individual dignity, self-respect, etc.

And talk about missing the point: if you like to continue deluding yourselves that the Christians are the group who have railroaded this once-great country, and are directing it to its utter ruin, what can I say?

Those blindfolds seem to be all the rage nowadays. Especially on sites like this one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Give us a better alternative Posted by: BenjamminH
» RE: Sleeping well, dear? Posted by: tinto99
» RE: Sleeping well, dear? Posted by: chip90043
» RE: Sleeping well, dear? Posted by: Kym525
» RE: Give us a better alternative Posted by: Sprocketman
» RE: Give us a better alternative Posted by: elmysterio
» RE: Give us a better alternative Posted by: Jon Koppenhoefer
POV for the devout.
Posted by: ghoster on Apr 25, 2005 12:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They might not be leading the decline but they have let themselves become co-opted for political ends. Nothing worse than someone that stands by and lets themselves be used for purposes that destroy something. Either that or worship your god and his minions and leave the rest of the world alone. That might be a new idea. How about it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

we really do get the government we deserve
Posted by: deannatroi on Apr 25, 2005 1:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The more that people inwardly despair of the world, the more they turn, for hope and consolation, to God and God-substitutes. This why, in times like ours, the fascists prevail and, in consequence, the good people, who support and follow them, bring about their own destruction. America's fatal illness will take its course and we'll learn history's lesson which is also the Gospel's lesson: nations that abuse their power lose their power. Those who quietly, in community, take to the lifeboats may survive, on the open sea, until they make landfall. Those who remain on board will, in God's own time, go down with the ship.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A few common mistakes
Posted by: JesseBC on Apr 25, 2005 2:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find it irritating that working class Evangelical Republicans are referred to as "morals voters" with the implication that progressives are NOT moral voters. This article even essentially states so outright. If the war, the budget, and civil rights are not moral issues, I can't fathom what could possibly be considered a moral issue.

I also find it irritating that this group of Republican "morals voters" are treated in the progressive press as though they are so stupid and blinded by faith that it's a surprise they're still walking upright. I think some progressives actually have so much contempt for these that we smugly think they are living proof of the evolution they profess to disbelieve since they clearly have not evolved from the apes as far as we have.

I'm working on a series of articles that I would dearly love to contribute to Alternet in an effort to keep this important dialogue going. We aren't going to be able to resolve the gross economic inequality of American society as long as the working class continues to be divided by these stereotypes about one another.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RELIGIOUS RIGHT
Posted by: susan9390 on Apr 25, 2005 3:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Progressives have family values, too. Even radicals have family values. FAMILIES have family values. We happen to live in a country where it's okay if those values differ one from another. We've forgotten that; we've let fear get in the way of tolerance. The problem is just as the author states: the people are more concerned with values than they are with policies, and they are too ready to follow the leader who tells them what they want to hear.

However, we happen to live in a country where church and state are supposed to be separate. People escaped or were exiled from countries where that was not the case so that they could come here and have the freedom to worship as they chose. What has happened to that idea?

I have to apologize to the true Christians when I say what I am about to say, because so much of our core is based on Christianity - even if we practice other religions (including the various flavors of paganism). But I have to say it to these idiots who think that if they use enough exclamation points in their writing and shout loud enough from their pulpits, then they will be correct. Do your homework, you $%&@# fanatics! Jesus was a radical. He forgave his enemies. He helped the poor. He healed the sick and fed the hungry. He honored diversity. He taught that we are all the sons and daughters of God - ALL, not just the ones that agree with you. He said that his kingdom was not on this earth; that is why we want the separation of church and state, because as long as people live together in nations, someone has to govern the kingdoms of earth.

But again, the author is correct in saying that, between the decline in our literacy level and the demands of living in an economy where people are away from their families for so long and working so hard that even when they are at home they are too exhausted to participate in family living, how can they be expected to apply critical thinking to the pap they are fed by the mainstream media, the self-absorbed politicians, and the crafty mini-messiah posers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More Than Money
Posted by: Campesino on Apr 25, 2005 6:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Most progressives regard this behavior as perplexing, if not self-destructive."

So what your saying is that Progressives find it hard to understand that for some people, there are more important things than money?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here is a concept.
Posted by: ghoster on Apr 25, 2005 6:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about leaving out the tirade about jesus or any religious slant to the problem. Trust me god or whoever is in charge is not going to pull our butt out of this mess, and no amount of saying "it's god's will" is going to make one small iota of difference. So let's get it figured out without the bending of priorities and goals to fit one or the others religious goals. Let's all try to get this place working again and after that you have the time and energy to figure out that your religion is better than any other religion OK, but let's fix the problem first. Of course, letting yourself be coerced into buying into someone else's game then by all means throw yourself into a fight that you don't understand and won't know the rules, or goals of. Yep, that sounds prudent, doesn't it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We can be be religious too
Posted by: sefba@aol.com on Apr 25, 2005 11:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need to prove that Democrats can be religious too , with
family values. One of the main points that Jesus & the bible makes alot is that the rich should share there money with the poor . The Republicans like Bush & Reagan give big tax cuts
to the rich & then say that there is a big deficit , so they need
to cut welfare. This is selfish - not religious. Starting a war in Iraq that needlessly killed or injured over 100,000 people, based on lies about weapons of mass destruction is not religious. The pope was against it. There are some religious PAC groups that are one the Democrat's side . Maybe we need to use them more to counter guys like Robertson.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Democracy vs. Theocracy
Posted by: chitijdth on Apr 26, 2005 5:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It’s somewhat frightening for me to read the various responses to this article. Most take the position that you’re either “for or against” God and/or Jesus. First of all, in a true democracy, my religious beliefs are nobody else’s business. Second, not every religious believer in this country is Christian, and third, we were never supposed to be a theocracy. Our government was intended to govern secular items, such as the economy, public education, the environment, etc. while letting each person follow his/her own beliefs. Even something as controversial as abortion can follow that dictum in that it is allowed, not mandated. Nobody is forced to have an abortion if it against her belief. The part of the religious right that is undemocratic is that they are imposing their form of Christianity on me. If they want such a country, they should strive for a referendum in this country that puts the question squarely, “Do you want to change the United States into a Christian theocracy, with the President and law makers having the power to enact laws accordingly?” In a democracy, you have the right to follow the rules of Evangelical Christianity, and I have the right not to. The whole discussion of which rules are “better” are a distraction from the meaning of democracy. At the bottom of all of these issues are the questions of power and money. All theocracies strive for the power to dictate others’ behavior; and as Thomas Franks makes clear in his book, “What’s the Matter with Kansas,” those who vote to outlaw abortion, get tax cuts for the rich instead.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We don't know each other, that's one big problem for all of us!
Posted by: Al Nathan on May 1, 2005 6:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe Bob Burnett hits the nail on the head. If you want to reign supreme and you're in the minority the thing to do is to divide and conquer the masses. That's what is keeping the top .1% in power. The rest of us Americans are so busy casting dispersions upon each other (e.g., "those dumb ass hick facists" vs. "those homo loving baby killing liberals") that we don't realize we have something much more important in common than the differences in our political views is important. That is, we care about our quality of life and the quality of life for our neighbors and children. The problem is that "we" big city liberals and "those" small town conservatives are living in different worlds receiving different news, different "facts" about what is going on, and living different lives. I would like to suggest that all of us make it a personal project to go out and make friends with someone from "the other side".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]