Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Corruption: A Proven Winner

By Christopher Hayes, The Nation. Posted April 23, 2005.


Illinois is a bizarro-world inverse of the rest of the country, where Democrats dominate all branches of government, set the debate and drive policy, while Republicans grasp for a coherent message. Are there any lessons to be gleaned for Democrats elsewhere?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Christopher Hayes

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

On election night 2002, hundreds of Illinois Democrats--politicians, supporters and activists--crowded into the Finkl Steel plant on Chicago's near North Side. They munched Chicago-style dogs, pounded cans of Old Style beer and waited expectantly for confirmation of what everyone already suspected: Illinois Democrats had kicked ass. Rod Blagojevich (whose father had worked at Finkl Steel) had beaten Attorney General Jim Ryan to become the first Democratic governor in 25 years. Democrats swept the rest of the state's races, ending the night in control of both houses of the legislature and every statewide office but treasurer. At 11 pm Blagojevich took the stage to the sounds of his favorite musician, Elvis, and told the crowd he was "all shook up" and filled with "a whole bunch of hunka-hunka burnin' love for each one of you!" It was a corny line, but the crowd was too euphoric to notice.

I went home buzzing with excitement, having almost forgotten I'd neglected to check the returns from outside the state. It wasn't until I listened to a series of increasingly dejected messages from my brother that I realized what a disaster the night had been.

Such is the state of politics in Illinois: a bizarro-world inverse of the rest of the country, where Democrats dominate all branches of government, set the debate and drive policy, while Republicans are beset by nasty, public intramural squabbles between moderates and extremists and grasp for a coherent message. Election night 2004 looked a lot like the one we rang in at Finkl Steel: Barack Obama won his Senate seat by a 43-point margin over Alan Keyes, and newcomer Melissa Bean, a businesswoman from the suburbs of Chicago, defeated Phil Crane, the longest-serving Republican incumbent in the House. In the wake of the almost-too-awful-to-watch spectacle of Keyes' candidacy (whose intent, one Republican quipped to me, seemed to be to get the lowest percentage of the vote possible), the state GOP is practically on life support.

It wasn't always like this. For much of the 20th century, Illinois was the quintessential swing state, the Ohio of its day. Its state government tilted toward moderate Republicans. It voted for the winner in the presidential election 21 of 24 times in the 20th century through 1996, going for Reagan in 1980 and 1984, George Bush I in 1988 and Clinton in 1992 and 1996. The rock-ribbed Republican suburban "collar" counties around Chicago canceled out the heavily Democratic city, leaving the fate of statewide elections to the fiercely independent voters downstate. Now the state looks like a Democratic lock--Gore and Kerry both won it by double-digit margins--and in these dark days you've got to wonder, How did this happen? And are there any lessons to be gleaned for Democrats elsewhere?

Local observers use the term "perfect storm" to describe the confluence of disparate factors that has produced such a true-blue state, but it's clear that demographic changes account for much of the transformation. Over the past decade, both Chicago and its surrounding suburbs have been getting progressively more Democratic as a result of the widespread migration of black and Latino families into the collar counties, an influx of immigrants and the rightward tilt of the national GOP on social issues, which has alienated many suburban moderates. Also, as John Judis and Ruy Teixeira argue in their book The Emerging Democratic Majority, the transition of the regional economy from manufacturing to service and technology has brought with it a substantial number of professionals with graduate degrees, a group that increasingly forms a bedrock Democratic constituency.

Regrettably, Illinois' freshly-minted suburban Democrats can't be exported to red states to help pad the party's margins. But demographic changes are far from the whole story behind Illinois's political makeover; the indicted former Republican Gov. George Ryan has a lot to do with it as well. "What has caused the collapse really goes back to corruption," says Dan Proft, president of the conservative journal Illinois Leader. "It goes back to a former governor who's awaiting federal trial; it goes back to more than seventy convictions of people from Ryan's administration in the last three years. It really goes back to a systematic undercurrent of corruption that's been part of Illinois politics for a long time."


Digg!

Christopher Hayes is a contributing editor of In These Times and the Chicago editor of the forthcoming Just Cause magazine.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
mazur
Posted by: mazur on Apr 23, 2005 1:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An important point is to not just speak about ethics reform and putting more stringent limits on lobbying, but to actually do that. Speaking one thing and doing the opposite is a tried and true method of many reactionaries, and progressives must not use it even though it may be tempting to do so.
Another point: if and when Dems get to improve ethics rules, they should think about how to circumvent them and work until they can find no loopholes, then hire some good GM's and get them to check again. «Strategically placed loopholes» subvert the very idea of law.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

someguy
Posted by: someguy on Apr 23, 2005 8:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only glitch I see in this strategy is that democrats perform many of the same ethical lapses. The right has a louder media machine to trumpet dem misdeeds, and downplay their own.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well Said Mr. Hayes
Posted by: jeri on Apr 23, 2005 11:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your experience and ingsight into the Turn of the Houses of Government in Illinois should be heeded by those of us who feel that our National Integrity is under attack by corruptors and corruptees. For those of us who think it isn't okay to be bought off, we should get involved on local levels and try to foster an honest and pointed assault against this GOP Machine that has hijacked Jesus with a duplicitous moral superiority. The only problem is that, as you pointed out, our reliance on public outrage and media coverage is a shaky foundation of change in an age when it seems that public awareness is clearly focused on a lifestyle of consumption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Excuse me, WELLER, LAHOOD, HASTERT?
Posted by: Karieson on Apr 23, 2005 12:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While good points are made in the article about Illinois politics, this is not a seamless true blue state. And as the article points out, both Dems and Repubs could use ethics reform here in Illinois. I live in the 11th congressional district of Jerry Weller and not far from Ray Lahood's district. Weller, Lahood and Speaker of the House Hastert are all from Illinois and are all DeLay Republicans. I can still hear Hastert on the first day of the opening of the House after the Christmas recess, he invoked God so often I thought I was watching a church service rather than C-Span! Weller follows Delay's lead in lock step. Weller is still saying he supports the ethically challenged DeLay. (At least Lahood had the sense to refuse to answer the question.) It mystifies me as to how these guys, especially Weller, have flown under the radar for so long and keep getting re-elected. Hopefully Weller has done himself in by marrying the Guatamala Senator Zury Rios Sosa. She is the daughter/protector of dictator Efrain Rios Montt, who is currently under house arrest for genocide in the killings of thousands during a 1980s military campaign against Marxist rebels. One of the prosecutors on the case, Sandra Sosa Stewart, said the task force was working with declassified U.S. government documents and examining bones unearthed in ongoing exhumations of mass graves found throughout the country. "We don't have enough people," she said. "We don't even have Internet access." Isn't the marriage between Weller, who is on the International Relations Committee in Congress, and the dictators daughter just a little bit unethical? Just doesn't pass the smell test to me. In his biography on his congessional website it says that Mr. and Mrs. Weller reside in Morris, IL. What a laugh! It's a small apartment above a garage - I'm sure the dictators daughter has never been inside the place! Sure to many of the people in Guatamala that apartment may look like a castle, but to the rich, privileged Guatamlan Senator and dictators daughter I'm sure she considers it a hovel and much prefers Weller's $600,000 downtown Chicago condo - if they HAVE TO be in Illinois, that is. Most of us in the 11th district can play the Where's Weller? game - we never even know if he's in the country, let alone the Il. district he is supposed to represent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Illinois Democrats
Posted by: daveinchi on Apr 23, 2005 1:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As an Illinoisan - it's effing hilarious to me to see Alternet bashing the Illinois G.O.P. for its corruption, while not even mentioning the problems the Dems hae. I'm as left wing as they come - but the Illinois Democratic Party is NOT to be viewed at as a good role model.

Rod Blagojevich is a total asshole, nothing short of an empty suit, who gets goo goo eyes every time he sees his own name in the paper and has wet dreams about the Presidency every week. Mayor Daley is the most corrupt man in America. It seems likely if not probable that within five years or so that the Illinois Democratic Party will probably have a big enough scandal of its own, that people will forget all about George Ryan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Illinois Democrats Posted by: karyse
» RE: Illinois Democrats Posted by: roniweb
Barack
Posted by: KCobain131 on Apr 23, 2005 8:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hopefully, Barack Obama will be leading Illinois Democrats on to bigger and better in the coming years. He is an outstanding Democratic standout.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHAT MOST FOLKS DON'T KNOW!!!!!!
Posted by: WONDERWALEYE on Apr 24, 2005 2:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When folks say that they are a member of a cetain party, what are they really saying?? Hopefully they don't vote a straight line ticket because they believe that there really is a difference. Do you know what the difference is between a dem. and a rep.??? Do you think that the canidate has to sign an agreement to vote a certain way or believe a certain way?? NO!!!!! The only difference is who they pay their money to when they sign up for a certain party to run on their ticket. This is why they say one is either a conservative or liberal. Now if the parties had those names it would be closer to the truth, but even then you don't know who is telling the truth to gain the support of the folks. I ran for office one time when the only reason I ran is to open the media to what was really going on in this state. When I recieved all the questioners on my views for a certain group, I found in reality that I couldn't answer most of them because if I did, I surley wouldn't get their vote. This really made me wonder how anyone gets elected. So when I was at a political rally that was attened by a former govenor that seems to be a real nice guy, I asked him how he has and does handle these questioners. Do you tell the truth or lie? He told me: "You have to lie a little in order to get elected, in order to get your agenda through." I seen right then that running for office was not my bag!!! But I was heard and that was surley worth the $200.00 I paid to register with a certain party. My suggestion to anyone that really wants to be heard is, pay your money to the party that seems to get the most attention at that time and go for it!!!!! You certainly will save mega dollars on the media coverage!!!! But the media is real cruel around election time and they go for the most dollars they can make off the election!!! BUT don't think that you will get good opinions from the newspaper if you don't fill their coffers, and they will pick the worst picture of you that they can find to publish!!!! Now we get down to the REAL TRUTH!!!!! THE RICH CONTROL THE MEDIA TO GET THEIR AGENDA THROUGH!!!! Well I hope this didn't burst your bubble, but it is the PLAIN TRUTH!!!!! That is why you don't have medical care, ect, ect, ect!!!! The rich just hate to pay taxes and it's cheaper to support the canidate that will do exactly what they want them to do and lie to get it done!!!
Ain't that scarry!!!!!! MAY THE LOVE OF JESUS BE WITH YOU!!! [this has two meanings]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SHOULD YOU DECIDE TO BE HEARD!!!!!!!!
Posted by: WONDERWALEYE on Apr 24, 2005 4:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now if you decide to be heard and register with a certain party, here is what you do!!!!!
1. Don't waste your time in the newspaper's office's if you don't intend to fill their coffers.
2. Attend as many rallies as possable where folks gather to hear your views.
3. Even better is to set your pioriety to attending any function that will broadcast live the speech's of the canidate.
4. Don't waste your money on cards, posters, adds, or anything that is a source of vanity.
5. Always put your attention towards where you can reach the most folks.
6. Get plenty of rest before the campain starts, because there is not much rest on the campain trail.
7. Keep your message PLAIN and SIMPLE!!!!
8. Don't go out to cut other canidates[waste of time and your advertising his name][their hungry for name reconigtion] It is true that folks like to see a fight but you have wasted valuable time that is very limited to get out the real message you want them to recieve.
9. Dress for the occasion. Most local rallies are sort of informal so dress like the folks you are addressing. Maybe put on a tie that is not always pulled tight and unbutton your top shirt button as this gives the apperance that your one of them.
10. After you have said all you are able to during the campain and only run to be heard, take a trip out of town election night and relax as you have then and only then, had your view heard.
11. Always keep in mind when your on the trail what the BOOK OF WISDOM [THE BIBLE] SAYS: GOD SAID VICTORY IS HIS!!!!! That means that all you got to do is what HE made you capable of and it is up to HIM how it turns out. Never think for a second that your voice hasn't done anything as GOD WORKS IN STRANGE WAYS!!!!! Your effect may be down the road and you might or might not ever see the effects, but there WILL be some.
12. MAY THE LOVE OF JESUS BE WITH YOU!!! [this has two meanings]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE RICH PLAY"GIVE THEM FALSE RELEIF!!! THE NAME OF THE GAME IS "SWITCH-A- RUE"
Posted by: WONDERWALEYE on Apr 24, 2005 6:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When one side gets their agenda through or you can't stand it any more, they then play the game of "switch-a-rue" This gives folks the idea that they really have a chance of getting done what they want done. In RARE times that might happen. Not because you wanted it, but because it was the most popular thing to do and it DIDN'T cross the rich!!! For an example, abortion was not allowed in this country and the only reason we now make it legal is because the politians got the supream court to act on it. No chance of anyone getting hurt that way and you can't touch the judges!!!!! Now both sides said they where going to change things on this subject. Well we have had both parties in office and guess what? We still have abortion!! What about social issues? Both Clinton and Bush have cut monies towards them, so what is the difference? What is our choice if we don't like what is happening? BE HEARD!!! Instructions are above. That is your only chance!!!! If you are one that hopes to profit $$$$ from winning an office, then join a party and become real involved in party politics.[they have a lot of drinking parties and don't lack for sex] The welcome room is always rich in booze supplied by those that have a mission and want you to get them ahead.[cheap help] A couple of nights of saposed bliss and then you work for them,[maybe even get a job if there elected][promised to many but only the few get selected] only to find your out in the cold when it's all over, then you become just like the rest of us and supported the RICH and do what ever it is they want!!!! I hope you don't think Im just negitive, because it's just the oppisite. Thats why I wrote the above comments. I believe that in order to make a change, we must first know all the facts so we can do things to counter them.

Well folk's, are you just going to sit and do nothing[please don't grip] or are you one of those that have faith, courage, and strength to CHANGE this country to again MAKE IT GREAT AGAIN????

GOD'S WORD[THE BIBLE] CAN LEAD YOU TO ALL THE TRUTH, FAITH, COURAGE, AND STRENGTH YOU NEED!!!!

MAY THE LOVE OF JESUS BE WITH YOU ALL!!! [this has two meanings]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "SWITCH-A- RUE" Posted by: Iamnotafruittree
» RE: "SWITCH-A- RUE" Posted by: elmysterio
Give me a break, please
Posted by: herb on Apr 26, 2005 11:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have family in Illinois politics. The writer must be talking about some other Illinois.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Congressman Weller 11th District Illinois
Posted by: Karieson on May 31, 2005 9:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kankakee Voices II

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]