Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Muslim Refusenik

By Terrence McNally, AlterNet. Posted April 8, 2005.


Irshad Manji, author of 'The Trouble with Islam Today,' discusses the closemindedness and literalism of present-day Islam and her path to free thinking.
Advertisement

This interview originally aired on Free Forum with Terrence McNally on Los Angeles' KPFK radio.

At a moment when America is at war in a Muslim country due in part to the electoral muscle of the Christian Right, I agree with those who speak of a clash of civilizations. But I don't see Jews and Christians versus Muslims. I see fundamentalist, pre-scientific, pre-enlightenment Jews, Christians and Muslims versus Jews, Christians, Muslims and non-believers who, in their search for meaning, ask questions and question answers.

In her controversial best-seller, The Trouble with Islam Today, Irshad Manji, a spike-haired, lesbian Canadian who looks younger than her 36 years, challenges fellow Muslims to revive a lost tradition of free inquiry within Islam. The book has been published internationally, including in Pakistan, and Urdu and Arabic translations can be downloaded free of charge from her web site (www.muslim-refusenik.com.

Her earlier book, Risking Utopia: On the Edge of a New Democracy, called on young people to re-define democracy through new technologies and social networks. Manji produced and hosted "Queer Television" on Toronto's Citytv, the first program on commercial airwaves to explore the lives of gay and lesbian people. She currently hosts "Big Ideas" in Toronto, featuring innovative thinkers from around the world.

Oprah Winfrey recently honored Irshad with the first annual Chutzpah Award for "audacity, nerve, boldness and conviction." Ms. magazine has selected her as a "Feminist for the 21st Century." Maclean's, Canada's national news magazine, named her one of ten "Canadians Who Make a Difference," and in June, she received the Simon Wiesenthal Award of Valor.

Terrence McNally: The Trouble with Islam Today grows out of your own life experience, doesn't it?

Irshad Manji: I think it's vital that I convey what my lived experiences are, because that's where the authenticity is, that's where the sincerity resides. My family and I are refugees from Idi Amin's Uganda. We settled just outside of Vancouver in 1972. I grew up attending two types of schools -- the public, secular school of most North American kids, and then on top of that, every Saturday for several hours at a stretch, the Islamic religious school, the madressa. That's where I regularly imbibed two major messages--that women are inferior, and that the Jews are treacherous, not to be trusted. Now Terry, I have never said, nor would I ever say, that every madressa teaches these things. How the hell would I know what every madressa teaches? I haven't been to every one of them, thank god for them as well as for me. But, even back then, at the age of eight, nine, ten, I had enough faith to ask questions, lots of them, and that's what got me in trouble.

As someone who went to Catholic school and did the same thing, I know what you mean (laughs).

(laughs) I can see the twinkle in your eye right now.

What kinds of questions did I ask? Questions like "Why can't girls lead prayer?" A question I know many Jewish and Christian women have wanted to ask of their own ayatollahs, and some have. I graduated, entirely metaphorically, to asking more sophisticated questions, like "If the Koran came to prophet Mohammed as a message of peace, then why, even after receiving that message, did he command his army to slay an entire Jewish tribe?"

Now you can appreciate that such questions irritated the hell out of my madressa teacher, who felt quite entitled to put down women and slog the Jews. So it's not surprising that he and I reached our ultimate impasse over yet another one of my annoying, ignorant questions.

At about what age?

At 14 I got booted out of the madressa, permanently. As I often have to remind my beleaguered mother, just because I left the madressa, mom, doesn't mean I left Allah. As a matter of fact, I had a crucial choice to make at this point. Sure, I could have walked away from Islam and got on with becoming a secular, materially-oriented North American, as many Muslims quietly do, or I could have given Islam another chance, and more importantly, asked Islam to give me another chance. Out of fairness to my faith ... I say "fairness" because maybe my madressa teacher was just a lousy educator. Why should my faith be punished for his shortcomings as a teacher? Out of fairness, I took time over the next 20 years to study Islam on my own when there were no interviews like this one, no spotlights, no journalists clamoring for commentary, no publishers approaching me, and no money to be made from the sale of books. In other words, I studied Islam with total and utter sincerity. I'm so pleased to say that as a result of all of that self-study, I came to discover a truly progressive side of my faith.


Digg!

Interviewer Terrence McNally hosts Free Forum on KPFK 90.7FM, Los Angeles (streaming at kpfk.org), where he interviews people he believes can help create 'a world that just might work.'

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Islam and Enlightenment
Posted by: CJC on Apr 8, 2005 7:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Irshad Manji is brave to write and speak out against orthodoxy and fundamentalism. I hope she or other translators will get her text posted in the many other vernaculars spoken by Muslims around the world, Turkish, Persian etc etc and the languages of the European countries to which many Muslims have dispersed.
With Christianity, especially in the US, there has been a retreat from the ideals of the Enlightenment. Since the reelection of President Bush there has been a dismaying amount of punditry devoted to recommending that politicians (Democrats) learn to speak to evangelicals and fundamentalists, which often means accepting their world view.
In my opinion, the so-called "war" we should be engaged in is against all kinds of fundamentalist and narrow-minded assertions of "truths" that certain groups believe are unique to them and that therefore give them superiority over others.
This American citizen is alarmed that fundamentalist thinking is prominent at the highest levels of our government.
I congratulate Manji for her forthrightness and hope that her work will stimulate other Muslims to think and write critically about their own religious and historical traditions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't Just Fight Islamists: Laugh At Them
Posted by: dchauls on Apr 8, 2005 1:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fundamentalist Christianity and Judaism obviously have their power bases. But those of us who may be moderately religious (or even more than moderately) view such people with scorn. Just think, for example, of the immediate reaction that any reader of AlterNet is likely to have to those Christians and Jews who keep their heads in the biblical sands, who believe that the world was really created in six days, who think that it’s probably OK to bomb an abortion clinic, who believe that God told George Bush to start a war. We consider them idiots. We say so – openly, vocally, often. We laugh at them.
But too many moderate Muslims view their fundamentalists as co-religionists when they are not really ‘co’ at all. Too many moderate Muslims consider the Islamists in their midst as mis-guided people whose heart is in the right place. Too many moderate Muslims consider Saudi Arabia as their religious heartland, as the place in which people today live lives closer to that of the Prophet and, therefore, command respect; they don’t see it as the Wahabi wasteland that it is, as a medieval dungeon.
Until moderate Muslims lose this respect for the fundamentalists and instead begin to ridicule them, there is little hope for change. Recognize them for the idiots that they are; laugh at them; make fun of them. Vociferous, frequent ridicule by other Muslims can be a powerful tool to weaken the fundamentalists, to destroy their hold on so many minds.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I WILL SPEW YOU OUT OF MY MOUTH
Posted by: WONDERWALEYE on Apr 8, 2005 2:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thats what JESUS said about cold or lukewarm believers! The bible discribes folks that have no knowlege and belief will have itching ears, and will accept and be lead to evil worship.
muslims believe that JESUS was a profit and not the SON OF GOD!!!! They also believe that all that do not belong to their faith are infidels!!! muslims are getting a strong hold in this country because folks really have no real knowledge of GODS WORD in the CHRISTIAN BIBLE and CHRISTIANS are complacent! If CHRISTIANS and muslims had any idea what its like to be BORN AGAIN, they would devote all their heart, mind, strength, and soul to the WORSHIP OF GOD THE FATHER, GOD THE SUN, AND GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT!! Which by the way muslims dont have any idea what the precious gift of the HOLY SPIRIT is. You may have a name for me but it makes no difference!! While I love your soul I can not tolerate your faith!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A FOOL FOR CHRIST Posted by: WONDERWALEYE
» I FEEL SORRY FOR YOU!!! Posted by: WONDERWALEYE
YOU HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL!!!!!!!
Posted by: WONDERWALEYE on Apr 8, 2005 3:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I read that oprah winfrey gave the award, I can only think of all she does in pulic as charity. Many folks think she is wonderfull because of it. I call it EMPIRE building!! GODS WORD says that if it is done in public then you have recieved YOUR FULL REWARD. She will do anything thats popular!!! It is not popular to restrict your actions to GODS WORD!!! I cannot believe that oprah is a practising CHRISTIAN because she gave an award to irshad manji, a reformer seeking a more liberal islam and she is also a LESBIAN!! Check out irshad on your computer!!! OHHHHH WHAT A COST OR PRICE TO PAY TO BE POPULAR!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You prat. Posted by: gazevans
» LOOKING FOR TRUTH???? Posted by: WONDERWALEYE
» Hang on a second, mate. Posted by: gazevans
» RE: Hang on a second, mate. Posted by: ryoushi
Coure, audacity, boldness, nerve? Gimme a break!
Posted by: tinto on Apr 9, 2005 10:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It used to be that the words and deeds of solitary agents of dissent or reform in a sea of conformity would be described with praising terms such as 'boldness, audacity, nerve, conviction'.

Today, it seems all one has to do to receive such acclaim is get into the long line of self-hating Muslims or Christians who are only so willing to speak out against their religion or ethnicity, sing the praises of the specific concerns of their dissent (nowadays usually with the attendant homosexual or radical-feminist agenda), get signed by a publisher (after beating the others off with a stick), and presto, you are now free to rub elbows with such bright beacons of intellectual discourse as Terrence McNally and Oprah Winfrey!

McNally introduces this rising star of free-thinking, pluralistic
intellectual inquiry as a spike-haired lesbian, presumably for the few people who have thus far been spared the sight of her boyish...ahem! girlish good looks. In fact, Manji's image is so ubiquitous on the plethora of television and print media outlets that are so eager to lend an ear and blank page to her 'radical, courageous' discourse, that it is truly a wonder there are people out there who are still ignorant of her existence.

The interviewer goes to on to credit the fundamentalist American Christian right for the war in Iraq, and Manji supports a similar argument in her interview, with reference to the evangelical Christians, many of whom populate the White House. An additional comment about the other, more powerful ethnic group in Washington and in the media, and
the real cause of the war (namely the security of a tiny Middle Eastern nation which will go unnamed, but which, like Iraq, starts with an 'I') would have been truly worthy of the terms 'boldness' and 'courage' and 'audacity'.

However, such a comment would obviously have been out of
context. Not to mention an offense to Manji's publisher and McNally's (and Oprah's) producers.

The casual mentioning of the ethnicity of the enemy slain by Mohammed, however, was apparently not out of context. No more out of context, say, than a news report covering the Quebec ice storm inserting a segment with an interview of Holocaust survivors describing the similarity between the two experiences. (continued in next post)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Courage, audacity, boldness, nerve (continued)
Posted by: tinto on Apr 9, 2005 10:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Continued

I can go on by pointing out the ridiculousness of McNally's assertion that we have the scientific 'revolution' and the Enlightenment to thank for that exemplary and long-persecuted segment of our society, the 'non-believers'. I imagine the terms 'atheist' and 'agnostic' are omitted here for the purpose of simplicity, and not because Mcnally feels such labels are degrading to the non-believer cause, whatever that
may be.

I would however take this opportunity to refute the long-suffered myth that Christianity was devoid of intellectual activity or thought; and to dispute the suggestion of those champions of secularism that the decay of Western society can be identified with Constantine's confirmation as a Christian and the subsequent instatement of Christianity as the official religion of the Roman Empire.

One only has to look at the advanced state of the Byzantine Empire, and the Renaissance which resulted from the flight to the West of Greek intellectuals from the invading Ottomans, to refute this baseless anti-Christian argument.

Manji and McNally's sole contribution to supposed intellectual discourse is to join the rabble of complainers who relentlessly, and annoyingly question the immutable wisdoms and truths put forth by men (and women) much wiser than us many years ago, without offering any real alternatives.

These maverick libertarians enjoy 'asking questions' and 'questioning answers', without bearing the responsibility of proposing any viable, sustainable solutions, save for the obscure benefits brought about by Manji's brand of diversity. This diverse society dreamed by the writer and her group, it should be noted, would, according to Manji's own promise, include opponents to her way of thinking. What kind of place
these true dissidents would occupy in Manji's utopia is not mentioned.

Perhaps a fate equivalent to the special treatment which was supposedly reserved for exemplary citizens like her, during eons of 'oppressive' fundamentalist religious states.

(continued in the next post)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Courage, audacity, boldness, nerve (final)
Posted by: tinto on Apr 9, 2005 10:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is disturbing, if not perverse, that Manji equates the virtues of a truly free and diverse society and open Islam with the condonation (read promotion) of divorce, abortion, homosexuality, and all sorts of other wonderful by-products of our libertarian Western society. The supposed legion of young 'progressive' Muslims pleading with her to make her
enlightening work more available to them blindly welcomes such 'innovative' free-thinkers as Manji, with reckless nothing-to-lose abandon, not for a moment considering the subsequent vulgarization of their society.

What is more disturbing and perverse, is that slick opportunists like Manji, who risk nothing but rather promise to gain everything by 'coming out' against their religion--while promoting their own special interests--are lauded by useful idiots like McNally and Oprah as being bold pioneers and courageous intellectual visionaries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» AMEN!!! Posted by: WONDERWALEYE
» Great endorsement Posted by: tinto99
I probably disagree with everybody on here in some way, but ...
Posted by: grace on Apr 9, 2005 3:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just wanted to second the comment about the Christian intellectual tradition. DESPITE the incredibly narrow-minded and ill-informed views of some Christians on this page, the Council of Nicaea did NOT represent the "clamping down" of a rigid orthodoxy on a previously free and open faith. Yes, there were drawbacks to the institutionalization of Christianity. But the orthodox center had long ago rejected the Gnostics, Manicheans, Marcionites, and other such heretics long before Nicaea, and what the Council did was simply to formalize the lived understanding of Christians as worshipping a fully divine Christ and fully incarnate God, against those with a lopsided Christology that rendered the basic concepts of the faith meaningless. As for the subsequent intellectual history of Christianity, let me just offer a few names: St. Augustine of Hippo. Venantius Honorius Fortunatus. Gregory of Nyssa. Gregory of Nazianzus. Pope Gregory the Great. St. Anselm. Peter Abelard. Hildegard of Bingen. Mechtild of Magdeburg. St. Thomas Aquinas. Julian of Norwich. William Langland. Dante Alighieri. John Duns Scotus. Roger Bacon. And that's only the ones I can think of without getting off the couch, and only before the Reformation. And doesn't include the thousands of anonymous students, scholars and teachers who read, wrote, discussed and debated in the extremely rigorous universities of medieval Oxford, Cambridge, Paris, Bologna, Salerno, Orleans, Prague, Vienna, Budapest, Freiburg, Montpellier, Salamanca, and St. Andrews. Don't you dare tell me my faith has no intellectual tradition. As our posters used to say in the Episcopal Church, "he came to take away your sins, not your mind."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A WISE QUOTE!! Posted by: WONDERWALEYE
Politics of Truth by Joe Wilson
Posted by: w 91 on Apr 10, 2005 2:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the little reading i've read of this book gives me hope in the agency. a good man does some good and raises twins in the process. I'm blessed to have gotten something good about the cia. p.s. bush sucks

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If proof was needed
Posted by: sterlingwisdom on Apr 20, 2005 11:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I very much enjoyed the interview with Irshad and thought her points were well taken. Her comments about Fundamentalists were right on and then, as if to prove just how right on, along comes Wonderwaleye or whatever frothing at the mouth and spewing hateful nonsense IN CAPITAL LETTERS! Wow.
I have never understood why any human being believes that they are privy to the Word of God. Seems to me the whole essence of being human is to have to make decisions without any certainty. God, if there is one, doesn't seem inclined to issue instructions. To believe he wrote a book is just as silly as to believe he made a movie or cut a CD. Belief such as Wally's helps I guess because it eliminates the necessity for both thought and doubt. Drugs could probably accomplish the same purpose with fewer negative consequences for the rest of humanity and while retaining the possibility of redemption. Oh well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

under reported Irshad
Posted by: davidg on May 7, 2005 5:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having read Irshad's book some time ago, I have waited for friends and acquaintances to engage in some discussion of it. She calls for the most crucial of events to happen: open and free discussion, taking the sacred to the people, out of the hands of oppressive old men. Sadly, my muslim friends don't seem to have much curiosity about it. She is a courgeous journalist and an exciting activist citizen. Now that there has been a women leading prayers in a mosque in Toronto, much to the chagrin of traditional men and women alike, the time is ripe for all of us to buy, read it and pass it on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]