Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Who Forged the Niger Documents?

By Ian Masters, AlterNet. Posted April 7, 2005.


A former counterterrorism chief claims that the now discredited documents that showed Iraq trying to purchase uranium were fabricated right here in the United States.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Editor’s Note: This is an edited transcript of an interview conducted by Ian Masters with Vincent Cannistaro, the former CIA head of counterterrorism operations and intelligence director at the National Security Council under Ronald Reagan, which aired on the Los Angeles public radio KPFK on April 3, 2005.

Ian Masters: You’ve been following President Bush’s commission’s report that came out this week, featuring fairly much, in terms of the press coverage, questions about “Curveball,” apparently a very appropriately named agent that the German intelligence was working. And, apparently his intelligence was heavily relied upon as a justification for going into war, particularly a lot of his claims ending up in the speech that Colin Powell made before the U.N.. And apparently, though, from the very beginning, the Germans were letting our side know that the guy was a fabricator and was, in fact, crazy. First of all, I didn’t think the CIA relied that heavily upon foreign intelligence. I thought there was a kind of professional sense that our taxpayers give us $30 billion dollars a year, we should be able to do this on our own and not rely on others. First of all, address that, sort of, cultural question if you will.

Well, I think in the case of Iraq, there were special circumstances, because the CIA does not have a good network of Iraqi sources in place, even though Iraq had become the forefront of U.S. policy all the way back to the Gulf War in 1991. So there was a dearth of information coming from CIA’s own sources. Secondly, there was an awful lot of so-called information coming from Iraqi exiles, primarily Ahmed Chalabi’s INC—the Iraqi National Congress. And that seemed to have a very receptive audience in some areas of the government, particularly at the Defense Department and at the vice president’s office. These were reports that tended to support the preconception of the administration that Saddam Hussein needed to be gotten rid of, and the primary reason for doing that was that he was in imminent possession of weapons of mass destruction, which could be turned against the United States of America or its allies.

So in that kind of environment — where there’s a tremendous policy need for information and you don’t have a great deal of source information that’s proprietary — then that’s how information that seems to be comprehensive, coming in from a foreign source, is overemphasized.

Well, in this case, the Germans had told the CIA’s head of the European desk on the operations side, Tyler Drumheller, who I spoke to, but he wasn’t comfortable going on the radio. He was told by Curveball’s handlers in Germany that the guy was crazy and a fabricator and the real question, I guess, is he passed this information on to the top people inside the agency, the Deputy Director McLaughlin and the Director George Tenet, both of whom are now — well, I don’t know about McLaughlin. He works for CNN. But, I believe George Tenet says he doesn’t remember the conversation.

Well, I think there’s no question that there’s a sequence of events that still remains a bit clouded, mainly because the report itself indicts the whole incident as an egregious example of a failure of intelligence.

To put it in some perspective, Curveball was an Iraqi chemical engineer, who allegedly defected and showed up at a refugee camp in Germany. He was then being exploited by German intelligence for information. Allied countries to the United States had all been alerted to the U.S. need for information on Iraq and on weapons of mass destruction programs in Iraq. And so the Germans exploited this information.

But the first cut of the information was passed to the DIA, not to the CIA. That’s the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon’s intelligence collection unit. And that information then was disseminated by DIA to the CIA. So the CIA never had any direct access to Curveball, a codename provided by the Germans to this defector source. The interesting thing to me is that the only DIA analyst who ever met with Curveball — who went to Germany and was given access to him — came back with an assessment which was very, very negative.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Ian Masters is the host of the radio programs Background Briefing (Sundays from 11am - 12 noon) and Live From the Left coast (Sundays from 12 noon - 1pm), heard on KPFK 90.7FM Los Angeles. The full transcript and mp3 audio of the Vincent Cannistraro interview is available at IanMasters.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Hindsight and Data Mining
Posted by: Stolentime on Apr 7, 2005 5:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This development should come as no surprise. Amidst a plethora of non-neocon pundits and bloggers it was a common belief, during the lead up to the war, that the Bush Administration and the Dept of Defense was cherrypicking information because the agenda was policy based rather than reality based. Many stories have been published which chronicle the data mining operations which took place to amass data which substantiated the Bush Administrations insistance that military intervention was the ONLY option with respect to Iraq. Most amazing is the example presented here with respect to the entire intel community knuckling under to the pressure of the Administration. The same self delusory behavior was rampant throughout the Mainstream Media as well. Even the vote for the enactment of the Patriot Act stunk of the odious cowardice of both the House and the Senate with respect to not wanting to be perceived as unpatriotic in our Nations great moment of pain. The entire neocon agenda has been based on misdirected policy construed utilizing questionable intel, rather than the impartial assimilation of intel being scrutinized and then utilized for the development of rational policy. The Rovian manipulation of propaganda has perverted the tenuous balance of power intended by the framers of the Constitution. So pervasive is the reliance upon the carefully crafted talking points of the administration that the truth is no longer even pertinent since disinfo repeated loudly and often enough is generally taken to be truth even in the face of a preponderance of evidence to the contrary. So... the Senate, The House, the Intelligence community, and now we are witness to the assault on the last barrier to the tyrannical rule of the Majority, that being the Judiciary. May God provide strength to muster the courage for the few, who, in these times are willing to point out that the Emporor truly has no clothes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: RE: Hindsight and Data Mining Posted by: Stolentime
Brave New World
Posted by: jwg on Apr 8, 2005 8:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Makes you wonder given the spin meisters in office if George Orwell was a time traveler from the future who came back to write a prophetic warning.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Any Back-up?
Posted by: Cybernalt on Apr 9, 2005 3:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This interview makes some pretty bold claims. Has anyone elso come forth to second the information?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another Vast right-wing Conspiracy?
Posted by: windy on Apr 9, 2005 4:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This story reminds me of another story I read back in September on the Common Dreams website (Common Dreams google search - "Dan Rather+forged documents"). Remember when CBS aired the famous story (based on forged documents) relating to Bush who ignored a direct order to take a flight physical while in the National Guard. That forged story was rushed in at the last moment, bumping off another story from the air. The bumped story also dealt with forged documents - those that said Saddam was trying to buy uranium from Niger. Sounds like a vast right-wing Rove conspiracy to me!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

pants on fire
Posted by: fancy on Apr 10, 2005 4:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is not new news, to the media or the admin. Please see below link, R. Greenwald's documentary with interviews guesting Wilson, Scott Ritter, David Kay from early 2004.
The CIA knew, the bushwackers knew. Come on America....wake the F up.
http://www.truthuncovered.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]