The War on Birth Control
Belief:
Atheism and Diversity: Is It Wrong For Atheists To Convert Believers?
Greta Christina
Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Don't Fear the Deficit Bogeyman
John Miller
DrugReporter:
The War on Weed: Marijuana Is Basically Harmless -- The Monumentally Stupid Drug War Is Not
Jim Hightower
Environment:
White House Garden Won't Make Up for Obama's Nomination of Pesticide Lobbyist for US Chief Agriculture Negotiator
Jill Richardson
Food:
Don't Be Scared of Food: Are We Being Needlessly Hysterical About Food Safety?
David E. Gumpert
Health and Wellness:
47,000 Women Could Die As a Result of the New Mammogram Guidelines
George Lakoff
Immigration:
Republican Playbook on Immigration Debate Long on Emotions, Short on Facts
Mary Giovagnoli
Media and Technology:
The Memory Scrub About Why Ft. Hood Happened Is Almost Complete ... If It Weren't for Archives
Mark Ames
Movie Mix:
Disney Apocalypse: Why 2012 Sucks
Alexander Zaitchik
Politics:
White House's Ties to Health Care Industry Deeper Than Visitor Records Show
Daniela Perdomo
Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Why Can't We Look Away From Sarah Palin?
Vanessa Richmond
Rights and Liberties:
Whatever Happened to the CIA Black Sites?
David Corn
Sex and Relationships:
Hot Mormon Muffins and Models for Jesus: What's With All the Sexy Christians?
Liz Langley
Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders
Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick
World:
Is Obama Following in the Footsteps of Bill Clinton?
Jeff Cohen
I was in the middle of writing about the stunning and often stealthy attack on birth control that is going on now when the news broke that Pope John Paul II had passed away.
The ensuing typhoon of coverage pointed out so many of the pope's laudable efforts, from fighting poverty and war to his early days giving courageous support to Solidarity in Poland.
Many of his efforts--at social justice, at opposing the death penalty and at reaching out to Jews and Muslims--deserve all the wide praise they are receiving.
But his policies towards women--including the denial of female ordination--seem stalled in an earlier era. Looking at the event from the perspective of what is going on in pharmacies and state legislatures and science advisory panels in this country, I was astonished to see that the Vatican's attack on birth control was skimmed over.
This is not a minor part of his legacy; it is a major part of the mix.
The war on birth control is being waged on many fronts all over the world, including right here, under our noses in the United States.
Unease on Web Sites
Log onto web sites where feminists offer opinions and you will see great unease about the fact that this facet of a very political man's history is being downplayed.
"Is it driving anyone else crazy that the pope's death is being covered without mention of the fact that he worked fiercely to prevent condoms from being distributed by international forces, thus ensuring that hundreds of thousands of people in the global south would die of AIDS?" reads a post on the Women and Media Conference web site.
Thousands of articles have been published about the pope. (Within the 24-hour period following his death, 35,000 articles were written about him, 10 times more than the number of stories written about President Bush in the 24-hour period following his re-election, according to The Global Language Monitor, an online news- and word-watcher.)
Missing from much of the coverage of the widespread grief over the pope's passing were acknowledgements of grievous parts of the Vatican story.
"Rome" was very slow to acknowledge a worldwide scandal of priestly pedophilia. (Hats off to Thomas Cahill for his op-ed piece on this in yesterday's New York Times and to Jason Berry in the Boston Globe on the same subject.) It also disseminated misinformation claiming that condoms could not stop the AIDS virus and condoned the burning of condoms in Catholic churches in AIDS-racked Africa.
Key Player in Attack on Birth Control
The Vatican is also a key player in a persistent U.S. campaign by Christian conservatives and the Bush administration against birth control.
Bills in this country have been introduced in a number of states to allow pharmacists to refuse to fill doctors' prescriptions for the emergency-contraception pill.
More and more states are mandating that only abstinence be taught in public school sex-education classes, even while misinformation about birth control is rife in such courses.
Information about the effectiveness of condoms has been pulled from government web sites.
The White House has appointed members to federal science advisory panels who oppose birth control on moral grounds.
Legislators in a number of states are trying to define all forms of birth control other than abstinence (including the pill) as abortion.
All of this is promoted and blessed by cardinals obedient to the Vatican.
The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops proclaim that artificial birth control is sinful, even as they acknowledge that only about 4 percent of Roman Catholic couples of child-bearing age practice "natural" family planning. The church has also opposed bills in several states that would force health-care insurers to cover contraceptives for women.
Ominous Signs
There are ominous signs that the next assault in the war against birth control will be an attempt to remove from the market any substance--including the pill and the IUD--that might have even the possibility of affecting fertilization.
Pro-life Wisconsin, for example, calls "sinful" all types of contraception except abstinence, including "all forms of the birth control pill currently being sold," according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Bills have been crafted in the state to write that notion into law.
Kim Olsen, head of the Missouri Republicans for Choice, notes with alarm that the Republican legislature recently axed the state's highly successful and cost-effective family-planning program. She sees all birth control as being in the cross-hairs of the religious right in her party.
"Reproductive freedoms are being legislated away, piece by piece, by my own party. Like many moderate Republicans, I never thought it could happen. But it has," she says.
American women of all political parties, need to understand that--as Newsday columnist Marie Cocco puts it--we are seeing a "jeremiad against women who want to control every facet of their destiny. The campaign against sex education, against condoms--and now against a tiny pill that sits in the medicine chests of millions of American homes--is a comprehensive assault on modern life."
The battle is no longer simply over abortion.
It is over the most basic rights of women to have any control over when--or if--they will bear children.
We may wake up one day and discover that our rights have been nibbled away by laws consistent with the beliefs of Pope John Paul II and others who have opposed women's reproductive freedom--and their political allies--that have a radical agenda of which few Americans approve.
Caryl Rivers is a professor of journalism at Boston University and author of Same Difference: How Gender Myths Are Hurting Our Relationships, Our Children and Our Jobs (Basic Books).
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »
| More News and Analysis: | ||
|
Republican Playbook on Immigration Debate Long on Emotions, Short on Facts Immigration: Senate Republicans have “thoughtfully’ provided immigration advocates with their strategy for opposing immigration reform in 2010. By Mary Giovagnoli, Immigration Impact. November 27, 2009. |
Lou Dobbs Suddenly Loves Illegal Immigrants? Clearly He's Eyeing Public Office Politics: Dobbs said he now favors the very legalization process for unauthorized immigrants that he's long derided as a brain-dead "amnesty". By Joshua Holland, AlterNet. November 26, 2009. |
Whatever Happened to the CIA Black Sites? Rights and Liberties: The CIA ordered its secret prisons closed, but lawyers for terrorism suspects want them preserved as possible evidence -- and the CIA won't say what's going on. By David Corn, Mother Jones. November 26, 2009. |
Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.