Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Ugly Side of Pretty

By Rebecca Ephraim, Dragonfly Media. Posted April 6, 2005.


Emerging science suggests that untold numbers of cosmetics and personal care ingredients may be silently and insidiously promoting cancer, ravaging women's reproductive functions and causing birth defects.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Rebecca Ephraim

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

"I don't pay much attention to the ingredient lists, I just know what works for me," said Shelley Carpenter, when asked what she looks for in her personal care products. Thinking a little harder, she adds, "I'm allergic to most perfumes, so I stay away from smelly stuff. But I couldn't pin it down." This begs the question, "Who can?" After all, how many of us have the time or inclination to scour the ingredient lists of our moisturizer, deodorant, body lotion and any of the other products we slather on daily?

Carpenter, 45, bases her choices of personal body care products primarily on how her skin immediately reacts to them, and second to that, their functionality. Her skin, beautifully clear and alabaster, erupts into a red, scaly rash at the slightest provocation and she's aware from years of trial and error that certain products set this in motion.

But beyond skin eruptions and rashes, emerging science suggests that untold numbers of cosmetics and personal care ingredients may be silently and insidiously promoting cancer, ravaging women's reproductive functions and causing birth defects. Known by hundreds of long, intimidating chemical names, these ingredients are in the products we shower and bathe with, rub, spray and dab on our bodies, unconsciously, day-in-and-day-out.

It's the day-in-and-day-out part that's of most concern, since these toxic ingredients leak their poisons through our porous skin and into our bodies bit-by-bit. "There's not one smoking gun that we can point to and say 'it's that personal care product, that deodorant, that nail polish that is going to give you cancer," said Jeanne Rizzo, the executive director of the San Francisco-based Breast Cancer Fund. "We can say the cumulative exposure -- the aggregate exposure that we all have to a myriad of personal care products containing carcinogens, mutagens and reproductive toxins, has not been assessed."

Categorically, the giant, mainstream personal care products companies continue to use known or suspected toxic ingredients in their product formulas. There are literally thousands of substances that have been used for decades without the slightest hint to consumers that they may be doing something more than making us squeaky clean and smell good. As activist Charlotte Brody points out, "Neither cosmetic products nor cosmetic ingredients are reviewed or approved by the Food and Drug Administration before they are sold to the public. And the FDA cannot require companies to do safety testing of their cosmetic products before marketing."

Hence, chemicals such as acrylamide (in foundation, face lotion and hand cream) linked to mammary tumors in lab research; formaldehyde (found in nail polish and blush) classified as a probable human carcinogen by the Environmental Protection Agency; and dibutyl phthalate (an industrial chemical commonly found in perfume and hair spray) known to damage the liver, kidney and reproductive systems, disrupt hormonal processes and increase breast cancer risk, are widely used in beauty products.

So should Shelley Carpenter be aware of this? She's certainly no slouch. She's a clinical hospital pharmacist advising doctors on the complex nuances of drug therapies; she's also working on her doctorate in pharmacy while being a mom and wife. Point is, like most of us, she's over-extended and assumes -- like most of us, that whatever personal care products we casually grab off the store shelf must be OK or, well, they wouldn't be sold. In other words, we think, "There's somebody watching out for us, probably some government agency."

"The public, bless our little democratic good government hearts, believes that there is some federal agency that makes sure that dangerous chemicals aren't put into the products we put all over ourselves. Sadly, it's just not true," quips Brody, who's executive director of Commonweal. It, along with Rizzo's Breast Cancer Fund and dozens of other social profit groups, are waging the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics. They're banging the drum to rouse consumers from our slumber of ignorance to realize the dangers lurking in personal care products and the failure -- or refusal -- of any power to change it.


Digg!

Sign the consumer petition to encourage companies to join the compact for Safe Cosmetics:

www.safecosmetics.org

Purchase from the list of companies that have committed to safe products:

www.safecosmetics.org/companies/signers.cfm

Dragonfly Media health editor Rebecca Ephraim has become an avid label reader of personal care products and devotee of "Skin Deep."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
re: The Other Side of Pretty (article by Rebecca Ephraim)
Posted by: Robert on Apr 6, 2005 6:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a useful article about a huge problem which the public is only beginning to be aware of. There are ingredients in cosmetics that have been linked to cancer and other serious diseases that are not required by law to be listed on containers, and so they are not. Men are affected by this as well as women. They,too, use protective sun-tanning cremes and oils, colognes, and deodorants. Presently, consumers do not have adequate information about dangerous ingedients or about more healthy alternatives to protect themselves from serious illness, perhaps even death. -Rob M., N.J.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To learn more about how the cosmetics industry "self regulates"...
Posted by: smadams on Apr 6, 2005 6:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To learn just how the U.S. cosmetics industry "self regulates", see the December 27, 2004 edition of The Nation, "New Power for 'Old Europe'". Cosmetics by definition includes some baby products, such as Desitin and other diaper rash ointments!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's Been a Bit Obvious
Posted by: nakis on Apr 6, 2005 9:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why hasn't anyone linked the incidences of cancer in women to cosmetics? Within the past several years I have known several women to have had there uterus's removed. Why? It's always been that way? Nearly every day almost all women put on some sort of makeup, hair spray, body (de)orderant, feminine products, etc... . None of these were made by elves with woodland resources. They were made in factories with whatever could be found that would do the intentional job. And women slather it on their skin. Ask anyone one if they would rub acetone or titanium dioxide in their skin. They'd say hell no. But they do it when they get themselves pretty. Thank God for the Europian Union. They are taking the lead we used to have before the right derailed us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

100% Organic Cosmetics
Posted by: enigmafmc on Apr 6, 2005 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are products available that are 100% certified organic. Miessence, a new product imported from Australia is the first USDA Certified product in the United States. While some products say 'natural' it does not mean organic and there is a difference.
I've used these products and I love them! They feel and smell great.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

please consider not buying products tested on animals
Posted by: megmsw on Apr 6, 2005 11:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a great article. But, I think it is important to note that many of the personal care products we use everyday are cruelly tested on animals. Testing products on animals does NOT ensure that they are safe for human use. Please check to make sure the products you use are not tested on animals. There are free resource guides available on the internet that show which companies and products test on animals and which ones are cruelty-free.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Ugly Side of Pretty
Posted by: Emma on Apr 6, 2005 12:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is with a hopeful heart that I see the truth coming out more and more about the effect of chemicals in our lives. As one blessed with severe chemical allergies I have searched and found many chemical free cleaners and body care items. Chemicals are being linked not only to cancer, but to a multitude of illnesses. The soap I bathe with is pure enough to eat, it needs to be because what we put on our skin is absorbed, that is why patches are effective medical treatments. I understand that warnings may soon be added to cosmetics stating that they have not been tested for safety. This is not enough, but it is a beginning. To me it is ironic that we are concerned about chemical warfare, yet in ingnorance we commit it on ourselves to satisfy a need implanted in us by clever marketing. Another irony is that we want to lead the world, at the same time our male babies are being rendered infertile by chemical hormone disrupters in body care items used by men and women.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not all chemicals are bad
Posted by: johnsont on Apr 6, 2005 12:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is not news to me. As a chemist I read the labels of my cosmetics and question some of them. But like the woman in the article, I have multiple chemical sensitivity and my skin will tell me what is bad for it. For instance, one writer suggested would someone rub titanium dioxide all over them? I do because I am allergic to all "chemical" sunscreens out there and titanium dioxide is nothing more than chalkboard chalk! And, I might add, a very effective UV absorber. I also use zinc oxide. These are two minerals mined from the earth and not chemicals created in a lab. Many articles out there are written with a "doomsday" mentality, so it is always a good thing to do a little research for yourself if you question what you put on your skin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Take a deep breath
Posted by: paradisi on Apr 6, 2005 6:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and realize that not every chemical is harmful, that everything is made from them. This piece sounds like mostly an ad for Avalon. There is a move afoot to force labelling laws changes that require cosmetics to be labeled as "untested for safety" unless they can shell out the $$$ for testing themselves. It is more than remotely possible that the true motive here is to force many small manufacturers out of business. And I have no axe to grind here; I don't even use cosmetics and I make my own soap.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Take a deep breath Posted by: ill natured