Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Legacy of Pope John Paul II

By Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!. Posted April 5, 2005.


Three progressive religious scholars discuss the beliefs and actions that shaped John Paul II's papacy, and where the Catholic Church is headed.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Amy Goodman

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The Pope died Saturday night at the age of 84. Officials announced the cause of death as septic shock -- an infection causing organ failure and cardiovascular system collapse.

A massive funeral is scheduled to take place on Friday. Rome authorities are braced for as many as two million mourners -- including more than 100 heads of state -- in the largest such event the city has ever seen.

John Paul's 26-year leadership of the Roman Catholic Church was the third longest in history and he was the first non-Italian pope in over 400 years. During his papacy, he visited a record 120 nations and was seen in person by millions.

On Sunday, mourners filed past the Pope as his body lay in state at the Vatican Palace's Clementine Hall. He was dressed in crimson vestments and a white bishop's miter, his head resting on a stack of gold pillows. A rosary was wound around his hands and a staff tucked under his left forearm.

Meanwhile, the College of Cardinals convened Monday in the Vatican's Apostolic Palace in the first of a series of daily sessions which will deal with the day-to-day running of the Church and prepare for elections for a new pope, to be held between 15 and 20 days after his death.

Amy Goodman: We're joined by Angela Bonavoglia, an award-winning journalist author who covers social, health, religious, and women's issues. Her latest book is Good Catholic Girls: How Women Are Leading the Fight to Change the Church, released last month. We're joined on the telephone from New Jersey by Mary Segers, a professor of political science at Rutgers University, an expert on American Catholicism, the Roman Catholic Church, and the relationship between religion and politics in the United States. Her books include Church Polity and American Politics: Issues in Contemporary American Catholicism and The Catholic Church and Abortion Politics: A View from the States. We're also joined on the line by Blase Bonpane, the director of the Office of the Americas. He was a Catholic priest in Guatemala during the 1960s where he was expelled for his efforts on behalf of the poor and disenfranchised. His most recent book is called Common Sense for the 21st Century. He's also a commentator on Pacifica station KPFK in Los Angeles. We're going to begin with our guest on the telephone from New Jersey. Can you talk about the significance of Pope John Paul II, Professor Segers?

Mary Segers: This is an extraordinary papacy that we have witnessed, all 26 years of it. And I think he's remarkable for having restored or renewed or even inaugurated an appreciation of Catholicism worldwide, which is quite extraordinary. The Church may have been in disarray when he became Pope and through force of his personality and travels, he's made many people who are not Catholic aware of his view of the message of Jesus Christ. So what I sensed yesterday -- the churches were full here in the United States -- Catholics themselves finally got a renewed sense of the appreciation of this religious tradition. Too many times in the past the Catholic Church has been kind of dismissed or trivialized, at least in popular culture as a church that has sort of warped views on sexuality. Well, there's a lot more obviously, and I think John Paul II illustrated that.

Amy Goodman: Can you talk about the significance of where he came from, from Poland?

Mary Segers: Yes, he's referred to as a Polish Pope, and I think that is very significant. Clearly this was a pope who was influenced by the Nazi occupation of Poland through which he lived and then by the subsequent 43 years of communist rule of Poland. I think that left him with a sense of the importance of individual dignity. The battle that all of the Polish church authorities and leaders fought with the communist government was real. The Church in Poland at that time was about the only place that you could go to movies. It was the only place that you could assemble, talk about peaceful assembly, to discuss issues of the day. In talking to young students at the University of Warsaw five years ago who had lived through this, they described communism in Poland as immoral, as a system of complete cronyism, everything dependant upon whom you knew, a system of lies and deceit. They spoke about it in the harshest terms, as absolutely immoral. Now, that obviously influenced the pope, and so I think his sense of human dignity came from that distinctive experience of having Jewish friends who were carted off to the concentration camps during the Nazi period, and then this sense of being in a beleaguered church fighting for survival under the Polish communist regime.

Amy Goodman: Can you talk, Professor Segers, about what we expect in the future? Who are the people who could succeed this Pope?

Mary Segers: Well, the College of Cardinals today is very different from what it was in 1978 when John Paul II was elected. There are many more bishops now from Latin America and Africa and Asia. There are even fewer Italian cardinals proportionately. The cardinals, for example, from Brazil outnumber the Italian cardinals. And so it's quite possible that we could have another non-Italian cardinal. After all, the Italians do regard this as a position that perhaps an Italian should fill because the pope is the pope of the whole world, but he's also the Bishop of Rome. And so there's some speculation that maybe the Italians would dearly love to elect one of their own again. But, you know, I think that you could also see a possible candidate emerging from the Brazilian bishops or some of the other Latin American [countries]. There's a whole series of names put forward, of course, and there are Europeans, the Archbishop of Vienna Christoph Schoenborn, Godfried Daneels who is the Archbishop of Brussels, and Walter Kasper, who is a German cardinal. It's possible that some of those others could be named, as well. But it does seem to be doubtful that any American cardinal would be named at the moment.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally-syndicated radio news program Democracy Now.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Evaluating the Pope
Posted by: KAYE on Apr 5, 2005 6:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://tinyurl.com/422bs


Fox article

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The legacy of Pope John Paul II
Posted by: Cyrano de Bergerac on Apr 5, 2005 6:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank God there are others that can talk about this unique man and his life (so shortly before and after his death that it is, perhaps, unfortunate in timing) who are capable of looking beyond their own careers and subjective views...

OUTSIDE the USA (do you remember there's a real world out there, just a little older than your nation, and not as obsessed with self-publicity and parochial issues, and capable of speaking more than one poorly constructed language) there are millions of ordinary folk who genuinely feel he touched and/or changed their lives for good and who were were inspired by his leadership.

For all its relevence to local worshippers, the American Roman Catholic church is of minor import - if one takes a view of the Roman Catholic church in the world as a whole. Is this the real issue that grates at the American psyche - so used to being able to dictate its ways or views by dint of numerical/financial/military supriority?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The legacy of Pope John Paul II Posted by: Cyrano de Bergerac
Pope Shmope
Posted by: pcushnie on Apr 5, 2005 7:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Catholic church is a festering dinosaur that refuses to roll over and die.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Popes in general
Posted by: DennisDalrymple on Apr 5, 2005 8:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If I hear that the Pope is a shepherd leading his flock one more time, I'll just retch. That his followers are mere sheep is a monsterous metaphor that should be dropped.
And while we're at it, calling celebate Popes the Holy Father or Papa has another ring of unreality that should be banished from our language. It's bad enough that the church and Pope John Paul Ringo were against women in the priesthood, homosexuality, birth control, abortion and Liberation Theology.

Dennis Dalrymple
New York City

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Shepherd Metaphor Bizarre Posted by: thirdmg
» RE: Popes in general Posted by: Swimoink
» RE: Popes in general Posted by: Swimoink
» RE: Popes in general Posted by: Swimoink
» RE: Popes in general Posted by: Swimoink
Great article!
Posted by: mviscid on Apr 5, 2005 8:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really enjoyed this piece. I was raised Catholic, like many good Mexican kids, and when I got to be old enough to question things at age 13, my parents let me decide for myself. But Catholicism's always had a hold, as the Old Religions tend to (obviously I'm being very loose here). I'd define my beliefs since age 13 as generally agnostic. So I was surprised to find myself moved by the Pope John Paul II's death and the outpouring that's following.

Like others said, it's nice to find a thoughtful discussion about all this. I LOVE the quote "Liberation theology will become just theology." The world so needs it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On the Destruction of Liberation Theology
Posted by: joncee on Apr 5, 2005 8:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have long admired the Pope for the life dedicated to the service of humanity which he led. I was quite disappointed with his destruction of Liberation Theology in Latin America.

It was a great and promising movement on the part of the poor and down trodden. He destroyed it by flushing Latin American Church Leadership down the tubes.He replaced them with leaders who were supportive of harsh crony capitalism. I think he missed the mark on that day.

From the article:
“in March of 1983 he shook his finger at Ernesto Cardinal at a time when he was visiting Nicaragua and 20 youths had just been killed in the Contra war, and the mothers of those youth were present and they were holding pictures of their sons, and the pope actually told them to shut up. He said, "silencio," and then he shook his finger at Ernesto, and I think he misunderstood completely what was taking place in Central America at the time.”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On Destruction of Liberation Theology II
Posted by: joncee on Apr 5, 2005 8:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He knew he hated communism, and I suppose he naturally included socialism. Sadly, his stance on Liberation Theology and birth control has exacerbated the suffering of the poor in Latin America for the last twenty five years.

But then, he definitely seemed to believe that suffering was good for Catholics.

From the article:

“In talking to young students at the University of Warsaw five years ago who had lived through this, they described communism in Poland as immoral, as a system of complete cronyism, everything dependant upon whom you knew, a system of lies and deceit. They spoke about it in the harshest terms, as absolutely immoral.”

It is curious that he apparently could not see that the above is an exact definition of Latin American Capitalism.

While he spoke out about the excesses of unfettered capitalism, he apparently considered socialism a greater evil. He was a great man, but not a perfect man as

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Death of the Pope
Posted by: John Galbraith Simmons on Apr 5, 2005 8:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Pope, living or dead, should not be immune from criticism in the national media, untrammeled by uncomely and frankly inappropriate hagiographic outpourings. It is unfortunate that Amy Goodman decided to join the pathological media circus surrounding the Pope's death. Her participation points to a serious failure on the left that speaks to many of the ills that currently beset liberal and post-liberal politics.

Religion has become a menace to Americans. The fact that the Pope clothes himself in humanist garb is insignificant compared to the harm that his institution, in concert with fundamentalist religious groups, is poised to inflict on the United States.

As never before, people should distrust religion. There is room in the United States today for a new non-nativist anticlericalism. Concerns to establish the Pope's credentials as a friend to humanity are wholly misplaced.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Death of the Pope Posted by: thinkingisfun
» RE: Death of the Pope Posted by: g's_r_fan
» RE: Death of the Pope Posted by: philmet
» RE: RE: Death of the Pope Posted by: John Galbraith Simmons
» RE: Jeezus! philmet... Posted by: joncee
» RE: RE: Death of the Pope Posted by: Cyrano de Bergerac
Shirley Ujest
Posted by: Shirley Ujest on Apr 5, 2005 7:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I feel sorry for the Pope. I can imagine what it's like to die and hear God say, "You blew it". Catholics should be concerned - they may get a modern Pope who could drag them forward into the 19th century!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tradition and the Papacy
Posted by: Richard Y on Apr 5, 2005 7:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ms. Bonovoglia makes some interesting comments. I found disturbing the comment on the Church's stand that parishoners, who differ with the Church's stand on the aborition issue, should not partake in communion. I remember Sen Kerry being told as such. Paul in 1-Corinithians admonishes Christians to note partake in communion in an unworthily manner (adverb). He was trying to instruct people to properly discern the meaning of commuinon, relating back to the last supper. He never said people should be "worthy" (being made so by Church sacraments, in the modern concept). More problems due to Church tradition. I don't like modern issues such as the celebacy, women as priests, birth control, and other concerns dictated by misinterpreting scripture or from poor biblical scholarship by a senile, midieval church council.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not right in the head
Posted by: thinkingisfun on Apr 5, 2005 8:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Were you dropped as a child? Eat paint chips? Live in an area with a lot of power lines? Or are you simply delusional...bowing to Rome? When has the United States bowed to Rome? Why do you think that only one non-WASP President has ever been elected? If there is a widespread hysteria, it is that Catholics have some sort of ulterior papist agenda. This couldn't be further from the truth. Actually, if you stop to investigate your news sources, you'll find that a majority of the wacko, ultraconservative religious dominance in this country is headed by the so called Christian Coalition which is primarily made up of Southern Evangelical groups.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You can't have the cake, eat it, as well as the chef....Part 1
Posted by: jonath on Apr 6, 2005 1:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Insightful article and great comments.
I think Pope JP2 did as best he could considering he doesn't have any arms and bombs to 'right' the 'wrongs'. Anyway, for Catholics who complain he's anti this or that, it's like asking our God to follow our will. At least, he doesn't issue an edict to condemn us to hell or decapitate us if we choose to leave the church! I read liberation theology and if we think that socialism or whatever name we choose to call it is better than fascism, dictatorship, communism, fine by me-to me there is no perfect alternative it's just selecting the lesser evil. But if i choose to follow a lesser evil system as well as religion, i am hypocritical to say that i'm perfect and all else are imperfect. Men have always used religion for their own gains, be they socialist, dictators and what have you.

jonathan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You can't have the cake, eat it, as well as the chef....Part 2
Posted by: jonath on Apr 6, 2005 1:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It tickles me to hear on tv interviews those who complain of his rigidness especially on condoms, gay rights, abortion, divorce issues and what I'm hearing these people saying is 'hey bug off me, i want to satisfy my pleasure without you having to remind me of my guilt, weakness, etc.' Hey either accept or leave... you can't have the cake and eat it as well as want the recipe, chef and kitchen!!! Why complain the church is this or that, might as well leave it and join some other institution or set one up yourself. If God wants to compromise with us, we might as well be God ourselves!!!
I respect Pope JP2 because he stood up to his convictions the only difference is he didn't have to take a life to justify his convictions.
Jonathan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JPII
Posted by: Cyrano de Bergerac on Apr 6, 2005 3:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Outside the Catholic fold (by talking to those from Anglican, Jewish, Muslim and other traditions) you might receive a less hysterical assessment. To those less burdened by political obsessions or liberal ideologies, he was simply a good man...who became great...and did a great deal of good!

For sure, there were issues and there will be those that have personal gripes. In particular, the stance on birth control when Africa is dying of starvation and disease. This was a decision based on a principle: the belief the right to decide when and where to create or terminate life is for God, alone. One may not agree with his decision, but one respects it. One may not even practice it, oneself, but one accepts it as an ideal to which one may or may not choose to aspire. Great men and women are so often those who take difficult decisions and do so based on principles. One may not agree with them, but one respects them for their integrity and courage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Homophobic Pope
Posted by: neptune on Apr 6, 2005 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If there is a lesson from the papacy of John Paul II, it is the power of moral force, when selectively applied, spells hypocrisy.

The pope didn't command troops, but he deployed verbal hate speech against gay men and lesbians and issued official pronouncements that were profoundly homophobic in nature. Violence and physical harm - even murder - have resulted.

It is hypocritical of anyone to honor him while simultaneously displaying an amoral indifference to this Pope's legacy of hate. Just because he carries the imprimatur of somebody's religion doesn't get him a pass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

John Paul II laid foundation for change in Church's regard for contraception
Posted by: MiiPandaa on Apr 6, 2005 12:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pope John Paul II's greatest gift lies in a tiny proclamation that will have its truest effect over 100 years from now.

When Viagra was new, its company approached the Vatican (among others). Under John Paul II, the Vatican said it had no objection to Viagra’s intended use. For the first time in easy memory, a Pope approved a reasonable means to manage reproduction. We can conclude that the Vatican sees that the ability, place, and timing of reproduction need not strictly be God's will or the randomness of biology. As our world grows & the shrinking oil supply makes food more costly, we need to look at reproduction with more enlightenment.

Future progressives working to avoid unneeded suffering & abortion will invoke John Paul II’s Viagra pronouncement: if we informedly take a drug to aid procreation, then we can use other drugs/tools to prevent procreation. Those in the 22nd & 23rd centuries who see the benefits of such reasoning will praise John

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why do we care about a MAN
Posted by: Iamnotafruittree on Apr 6, 2005 1:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The pope was just a man! Why so much media attention? Well, because the Pope and the church need marketing to sale all the lies! He was fake, all lies. Pervert at that. He is now dead and will never come back. There is no heaven and no hell. He made sure hell was right here on Earth so that he could run his church. No hell no church needed. Lies, lies, and more lies. When is everyone going to see all the lies, so that people can learn to love again?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why do we care about a MAN Posted by: thinkingisfun
That's because homosexuality is a sin
Posted by: elmysterio on Apr 6, 2005 2:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Pope didn't hate gays... or maybe he did... so what! A great number of people think that homosexuality is a sin... So why should they be forced to think otherwise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Population Growth and the Pope - a shame or a crime?
Posted by: Dave F on Apr 8, 2005 11:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1966 I went to Korea and Taiwan to work in national Family Planning programs, and in 1972 I went to the Philippines. I wrote a report, solicited by the Philippine government, telling how they could attain the same birth rates as Korea and Taiwan, detailing 13 cultural/economic areas they needed to change to get desired demographic change.

They needed to modernize role of women, education , maternal/child health, land ownership, transportation, and other indicators, or family planning would not be accepted and the birth rate would not fall. I said "In a society where life is a lottery the more tickets you buy the larger your chance of winning. We must insure that people understand that through small family size they can break the cycle of poverty and have meaningful lives."

Once we launched the program the Responsible Parenthood Council of the Philippine Catholic Church came out strongly against our effort. A Jesuit Missionary from Ireland told me "For every pill you prescribe or IUD you insert we will make sure that ten babies are born. We are more powerful and organized than you!" He was right!

Fast-forward 40 years. In 1966 Philippines and Korea each had about 30 million people and a per-capita income around US$ 2,000, both classified as "underdeveloped countries."

Now S. Korea has population approaching 48 million, increased by half since I was there and per capita income is $17,000, and well distributed. Philippine population is approaching 83 million, almost triple 1966, and the per capita income is around $4,000, very poorly distributed. Korea + Taiwan are highly developed, two of the "Asian Tigers," with birth rates at 11 per 1,000 per year, one point below the average for the developed world. I contend that as long as the Catholic Church dictates policy The Philippines will be a "Never to be Developed Country," continuing the current birth rate of 24 per 1,000 population per year, which is the average for the less developed world.

The new Pope must help the Catholic Church get its act together on this issue, or he will consign millions of his beloved parishioners to lives of desperation, second-class citizenship and early death. The Catholic poor from Latin America and Philippines are forced by economic circumstance to do the dirty work of richer nations who with no papal interference in their reproduction have low fertility + high employment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MANY FOLKS MAKE CATHOIC THEIR GOD!!
Posted by: WONDERWALEYE on Apr 10, 2005 1:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I talk to many catholics and I find them all tied up with tradition and politics. The greatest thing I see out of all of this is that church doctrine does not change the bible. I once talked to a priest about this subject and raised the fact that there are many things going on within the church that is not in the BIBLE. In fact there are things going on in the church that goes against GODS WORD. He asked me if I believed in church doctrine and I told him that the BIBLE states that everything we need is within the covers and that we shall neither add or take away. The priest turned to me and said then your a ONE book man.[like it was a cut to the way i think] I thought about his statement for a minute and then said: YES, maybe i am a one book man!!! That was the day I left the Catholic church.[BUT I TOOK MY BIBLE WITH ME!!] You know the Catholic church at one time sold forgiveness for money!!! This came from church doctrine. I can only hope that folks will be more concerend with whats in the BIBLE and not whats going on in Rome. A fine reading in the Catholic BIBLE that is not in others is the book of SIRACH. I wish all could read this!! There are big words used in the church that many have no real idea what they mean and they become a slave to Catholic because of it and JESUS did not intend it to be this way. MAY THE LOVE OF JESUS BE WITH YOU!![this has two meanings]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pope's death
Posted by: kathaksung on Apr 12, 2005 4:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
302. Pope's death (Continue to 261-265) (4/7/05)

Another two of great prophecy of Anthony Carr came into true. The death of Pope and a big earthquake. (Though the earthquake didn't take place in Italy, it took place in Indonesia and caused a tsunami.)

In World Journal, there were five pictures. Anthony Carr made many prophecies. But those five with pictures obviously were particularly picked up by intelligence to impress people. I think these were the most important projects of Inside Group. (The collapse of Eiffel Tower; earthquake in Rome; the death of Pope, Senator Edward Kennedy, and Prince of Monaco - Albert.

I found four out of five were related to Iraq war. Senator Edward Kennedy, Pope John Paul and France were three strong opposers to the Iraq war. An earthquake in Rome would also affected Vatican. Inside Group intended to create a situation that Vatican were punished by God with the suffering of natural disaster and death of Pope.
John Paul expressed his anti-war opinion as early as in 2001.

Re: "Ex-envoy: Pope was champion of peace
Eric Gorski Denver Post Staff Writer

Coloradan Jim Nicholson met with Pope John Paul II on Sept. 13, 2001, at Castel Gandolfo, the pontiff's summer palace outside Rome. During that summit, the pope decried the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks as an attack not just on the United States but on humanity, Nicholson recalled.
But John Paul II vociferously opposed a U.S. strike on Iraq, sending an emissary to Washington in the run-up to the war in a failed attempt to sway President Bush."

Since then, Roman Catholic had a three years long intensify trouble in US. Many sex scandals were revealed. Roman Catholic were humiliated. Priests were sentenced and fined. When I read such kind of news one after another, I realize it was a revenge and blackmail. Those sex scandal cases were mostly happened decades ago. Now all of a sudden, they were poured out like a big wave. But Pope didn't bent. He insisted his opinion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pope's death Posted by: kathaksung
Continuation to "Pope's death"
Posted by: kathaksung on Apr 12, 2005 4:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pope to Bush: Go into Iraq and you go without God
By CHB Staff and Wire Reports
Mar 5, 2003, 07:18

Pope John Paul II has a strong message for President George W. Bush: God is not on your side if you invade Iraq.

Laghi came bearing the pope's message: A war would be a "defeat for humanity" and would be neither morally nor legally justified.
The Pope also questioned the President's statements invoking God's name as justification for the invasion.
"God is a neutral observer in the affairs of man," the Pope said. "Man cannot march into war and assume God will be at his side."
"It's illegal, it's unjust," Laghi told reporters after the session with Bush.

In a May visit to the Vatican, Bush told the pope he was "concerned" about the Catholic church's standing in America, where the church has been rocked by sex-abuse scandal.

linked text

You can see how Bush extorted Pope with sex scandal.

So when the newspaper reported the Anthony Carr's prophecy, I knew it was the project of inside group. They think they are the real God and punish people who do not obey to them.
There was trace that Pope was poisoned and suffered EM wave shooting in his final days. My condolence to John Paul. He is the victim of Inside group.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't be deceptive! The catholic church has lost touch.
Posted by: vescalant on Aug 21, 2006 1:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With the passing of the pope, the mainstream media has been filled with praise for one of the most important figures of the Cold War. However the view from the rank and file of the catholic world is slightly different. I was sitting at a bar in deep Mexico when the TV was showing funeral services for the Pope, and comments soon started to fly: "Look at the luxury", "What a way of life while we stay in poverty", were the most refrained comments. Mainstream media is presenting the Pope as the "leader" of one plus billion catholics around the World. I wonder when that billion people got a choice to elect their leader. In fact that billion people comes from counting the population of countries with a predominantly catholic population, like Mexico plus all of Latin American. Actually very few of those people do recognize the Pope in Rome as their "leader". Dissatisfaction with the Catholic church runs high in poor countries. A lot of people just have faith in the teachings of Christ and go to church from time to time, but hardly recognize or accept the official catholic hierarchy. This is easy to understand. Catholics don't get the chance to elect their local priests. They are named directly by the Pope and other bishops. The result is that catholic priests usually are disconnected from the local population. The Pope supported dictatorships like the one that overthrew Aristide in Haiti, and despised the Sandinistas in public. He truly represented a right-wing church that is increasingly far from the people mostly because of its highly vertical hierachy and its reliance on reactionary sectors of society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]