More Meth Mania
Belief:
Atheism and Diversity: Is It Wrong For Atheists To Convert Believers?
Greta Christina
Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Don't Fear the Deficit Bogeyman
John Miller
DrugReporter:
The War on Weed: Marijuana Is Basically Harmless -- The Monumentally Stupid Drug War Is Not
Jim Hightower
Environment:
White House Garden Won't Make Up for Obama's Nomination of Pesticide Lobbyist for US Chief Agriculture Negotiator
Jill Richardson
Food:
Don't Be Scared of Food: Are We Being Needlessly Hysterical About Food Safety?
David E. Gumpert
Health and Wellness:
47,000 Women Could Die As a Result of the New Mammogram Guidelines
George Lakoff
Immigration:
Lou Dobbs, Eyeing Public Office, Endorses Policy He's Long Spun as "Amnesty for Illegals"
Joshua Holland
Media and Technology:
The Memory Scrub About Why Ft. Hood Happened Is Almost Complete ... If It Weren't for Archives
Mark Ames
Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler
Politics:
White House's Ties to Health Care Industry Deeper Than Visitor Records Show
Daniela Perdomo
Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Why Can't We Look Away From Sarah Palin?
Vanessa Richmond
Rights and Liberties:
Whatever Happened to the CIA Black Sites?
David Corn
Sex and Relationships:
Hot Mormon Muffins and Models for Jesus: What's With All the Sexy Christians?
Liz Langley
Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders
Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick
World:
Is Obama Following in the Footsteps of Bill Clinton?
Jeff Cohen
The Today show jumped on the methamphetamine epidemic bandwagon with a recent segment on "Suburban Moms on Meth." Claiming that an increasing number of mothers are using methamphetamine, the show failed to present any evidence to support this notion.
For the record, among females 12 and older, methamphetamine use is stable, with 4.1 percent reporting having tried it, .3 percent (three-tenths of one percent) reporting use in the last year, and .1 percent (one-tenth of one percent) reporting past month use in 2003 according to the government's National Household Survey on Drug Use and Health.
In general, methamphetamine use among youth (which tends to foreshadow adult trends) shows a downward trend in all grades since the government's Monitoring the Future figures began looking at the drug in 1999.
Today also presented a classic example of what scientists call "the clinician's error." In an interview with a researcher from the Hazelden treatment center, Katie Couric asked whether recreational use of the drug was possible. The researcher replied that she'd "never seen" it.
But why would a treatment provider see a recreational user? Recreational users don't voluntarily seek treatment: why would they? And at least with adults, those forced into treatment through the criminal justice system are mainly addicts, not casual users.
The "clinician's error" occurs throughout medicine when clinical workers believe that those they treat for a condition are typical of people in the population with the condition. In fact, those who seek treatment are the worst cases – and their prognoses will look far less promising than if the disease was studied in the general population.
The photos Today aired of what it called "typical users" – which are genuinely shocking "before" and "after" pictures of addicts taken from police mug shots – represent this selection effect visibly. They do accurately show the rapid aging and skin problems common to methamphetamine addicts seen in treatment and by police; but they aren't an accurate picture of most users.
This is not to say that methamphetamine use isn't highly dangerous, nor to suggest that recreational use is a good idea; but the government's own statistics cited above show that the majority of methamphetamine users do not take it regularly.
At least the Today show did not report that meth addicts are untreatable or have a worse prognosis than other addicts. Couric asked about this, seemingly expecting to be told dire news. But the Hazelden researcher debunked the notion, noting that when crack was the hot drug, crack addicts were seen as incurable and that this was not true, either with crack or today's drug of the moment.
Maia Szalavitz is a senior fellow at the media watchdog group STATS.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »
| More News and Analysis: | ||
|
Lou Dobbs, Eyeing Public Office, Endorses Policy He's Long Spun as "Amnesty for Illegals" Politics: His fans must be thinking, 'Et Tu, Lou?' By Joshua Holland, AlterNet. November 26, 2009. |
Whatever Happened to the CIA Black Sites? Rights and Liberties: The CIA ordered its secret prisons closed, but lawyers for terrorism suspects want them preserved as possible evidence -- and the CIA won't say what's going on. By David Corn, Mother Jones. November 26, 2009. |
Don't Fear the Deficit Bogeyman Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace: A second dose of deficit-financed stimulus spending would create a lot of jobs that America needs. By John Miller, Dollars and Sense. November 26, 2009. |
Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.