Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Times Sees No Evil

By Craig Aaron and Timothy Karr, AlterNet. Posted February 23, 2005.


The Times' story on community internet, as with most Times stories, quotes a number of think tanks and other 'experts.' What they don't tell you is who's writing their checks.
Advertisement

The biggest news from the digital frontier may be the advent of community internet – low-cost, high-speed broadband services provided by municipal governments and community groups via local networks.

Hundreds of cities and towns – from Philadelphia and San Francisco to Granbury, Texas, and Scottsburg, Ind. – recognize broadband internet access as a public necessity, no different from water, gas or electricity. Especially in rural and underserved urban areas, community internet promises to narrow the digital divide.

Telecom and cable companies are pushing laws across the country that would restrict local competition and cut off consumer choice. This newsworthy battle finally graced the front-page of the The New York Times on Feb. 17, with a story pegged to Philadelphia's ambitious plans to turn the city into "one gigantic wireless hot spot."

The real problem with James Dao's piece wasn't its tardiness – other papers covered similar ground months ago – but the way the Times failed to question the true motivations of its sources.

The first quote in the story goes to Adam Thierer, identified as "director of telecommunications studies at the libertarian Cato Institute and the author of a soon-to-be-released study criticizing the Philadelphia plan." He tells the Times: "The last thing I'd want to see is broadband turned into a lazy public utility."

Dao fails to note that the Cato Institute is funded by Verizon, SBC Communications, Time Warner, Comcast and Freedom Communications – all companies seeking to put a stake through the heart of homegrown broadband systems. Thierer is little more than an industry sock puppet.

Dao then goes on to interview David L. Cohen, executive vice president of Comcast, who asks: "Is it fair that the industry pay tax dollars to the city that are then used to launch a network that would compete with our own?"

Fair enough. But again, Dao fails to alert readers to his source's conflicts of interest that might impugn his integrity. In a previous incarnation, Cohen served as chief of staff to then Philadelphia Mayor Edward G. Rendell. Rendell has since moved into the governor's mansion, while Cohen jumped to the private sector.

But Cohen still has Rendell's ear, which might explain why the governor ignored widespread public opposition and signed a bill into law last December that prevents other Pennsylvania communities from offering competitive broadband services. Though the Philadelphia plan secured a last-minute reprieve, the rest of the state got shafted.


Digg!

Timothy Karr is the Executive Director of MediaChannel.org . Craig Aaron is the Communications Director of Free Press . Karr's blog MediaCitizen stakes out the public's claim to the future of American media.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Even as Celebrities, Women Face a Double Standard
Reproductive Justice and Gender: There was little media introspection about Heath Ledger's overdose, while Amy Winehouse receives daily scrutiny for her drug habits. What gives?
By Vanessa Richmond, The Tyee. July 5, 2008.
Big Pharma Is in a Frenzy to Bring Cannabis-Based Medicines to Market
DrugReporter: While the the American Medical Association claims pot has no medical value, Big Pharma is busy getting patents for marijuana products.
By Paul Armentano, AlterNet. July 5, 2008.
Sex From a Can
Sex and Relationships: Most representations of sexuality in pop culture are not sexy or sexual, erotic or arousing; they're shallow and laughable.
By Joyce McFadden, Huffington Post. July 4, 2008.

Advertisement