Northern Exposure

In the opening moments of the documentary, "Oil on Ice," Frank Murkowski, then a United States senator from Alaska, is heard talking to fellow senators about the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, which he wants the federal government to open up to the oil industry for drilling.

"It's flat, it's unattractive, it's not pristine," he states firmly from the Senate floor.

Gripping a large, solid-white rectangle of cardboard and rotating it from upraised arms for all his colleagues to see, he declares: "This is what it looks like. Don't be misinformed."

Then, the white cardboard image segues into a full screen of white snow – an image from the wildlife refuge located in Alaska – and viewers might conclude that the image confirms the senator's claim. Until ... out of the powder bursts a furry white head, its eyes staring at the viewer, and in a flash an ermine dashes away.

There can be no question about the message that filmmakers Dale Djerassi and Bo Boudart hope viewers take away from their documentary. The ermine – and the thousands of other creatures of the earth, sky and water captured on video – are the filmmakers' response to Sen. Murkowski's warning: "Don't be misinformed."

The sweeping views of slopes and peaks are their refutation of the senator's description, "It's flat." And stunning images of the landscape teeming with wildlife during seasons of snow and of vibrant sun torpedo his claim, "It's unattractive."

"Oil on Ice," which debuted on Memorial Day at the Telluride Mountain Film festival, is an unequivocal statement of the filmmakers' stance on the controversial drilling issue still being fought in Congress: The risks of drilling for oil in the wildlife refuge, widely know as ANWR, are far greater, they insist, than any benefit that could be gained.

To Drill or Not to Drill

The hour-long documentary, narrated by actor Peter Coyote, examines the many issues surrounding the question of whether a 1.5 million-acre portion of the 19.6 million-acre refuge situated in the northeastern corner of Alaska should be drilled.

Those issues include the fate of the indigenous Gwich'in Indians, who subsist on the land and depend on the annual migration to the refuge of the Porcupine caribou – so named because they must cross the Porcupine River on their 1,600-mile journey up from Canada.

Also addressed are the concerns of indigenous people, environmentalists, biologists and many others over the degradation of the fragile environment that would inevitably follow the introduction into the refuge of oil-drilling machinery, large crews of workers, and the building of roadways and other infrastructure to support the drilling operations.

Those concerns are magnified by memories – and continuing effects – of the 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster, in which 11 million gallons of oil were spilled in Prince William Sound, destroying hundreds of thousands of birds and marine mammals and devastating the commercial fisheries of the sound.

But Djerassi notes that the film project "goes beyond what not to do – drill for oil and be dependent on oil – but also focuses on what we should do instead."

"We made this film to show that Americans deserve better alternatives than what Congress and the auto industry is providing," says Boudart. "The technologies exist right now to burn less oil, but we as consumers need to demand their implementation.

"We need to be more aware that our choices do have an impact, not only in Alaska's arctic refuge but in many places and in countries around the world."

Partners in Arms

"Oil on Ice" is the second joint effort by Djerassi and Boudart, who live in Northern California. Acquaintances since they were boys growing up in Portola Valley, they collaborated on a documentary that took them in the late 1980s to Brazil.