comments_image -

Personal Voices: Talking to Bush Voters

An activist learns the value of stepping outside the progressive bubble when she reaches out to women voters leaning toward the GOP.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

Let's face it. Many progressives live in their own little bubble. It's only inevitable in a nation that has become geographically divided along ideological lines, as people increasingly choose to live in communities that favor their politics.

"The fastest-growing kind of segregation in the United States isn't racial. It is the segregation between Republicans and Democrats," observed Bill Bishop in the American Statesman. So it's no wonder that as a journalist living in San Francisco, I rarely met people who are leaning toward or support George Bush. I had no idea why any reasonable person could support him. What could they possibly think he's done to improve their lives over the past four years?

To find answers to those questions – as a concerned citizen, not as a journalist – I joined ReDefeat Bush, a group that meets nightly around the country and calls women in swing states to find out if they're registered to vote and willing to vote for John Kerry. On average, volunteers call 20 women per hour and register one or two new voters. Each of us also manages to change a few minds over the course of the evening. And those numbers add up when there are large numbers of us making the calls.

I quickly found myself having 10-20 minute conversations with women who are either undecided or are supporting Bush. They all had similar opinions about John Kerry.

"He isn't tough enough to fight terrorism," says Julie, a Bush supporter from Portland, Ore. "If Kerry were in office, Saddam Hussein would still be in power."

The male volunteers for our organization usually respond to such statements by telling the women that they are just plain wrong.

"But Saddam wasn't involved in 9/11!" yells one guy in outrage. Her comeback: Click.

Getting all self-righteous was obviously not the way to go.

I soon found a more effective, less presumptuous approach: Ask them what they think instead of telling them what to think.

"Do you think Saddam was connected to 9/11?" I ask Julie.

"Not anymore, but he's a horrible man and we're there, so let's finish the job," she replies. We spend the next 10 minutes talking about poor security in Iraq, the reasons why women in Iraq and Afghanistan are afraid to leave their homes, and what it must feel like to live in an occupied country. By the end of the conversation, she wonders out loud why the Bush administration is still bombing innocent Iraqis and why no one is talking about Afghanistan.

Julie usually gets most of her information from Fox, but is open to other sources of information, like the first presidential debate. It changed her mind about Bush.

"I wanted to believe him, but he kept repeating the same things," she says. "He was so uncomfortable."

Julie is now leaning towards Kerry.

Later in the same evening, I talk to Ursula, an 80-year-old life-long Republican who lives in Eugene, Ore.

"Why are you a Republican?" I ask.

"Because my family is Republican and Republicans are for the common man," she says. When I ask her what she thinks Bush has done for the common man, she says he has passed a tax cut for the middle and lower class.

I respond by offering her the following facts. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the poorest 20 percent of workers, who earn on average $16,600 annually, will get a tax break of $250 this year, which is less than two percent of their income. That amounts to about 68 cents a day. By comparison, the richest one percent, with average incomes topping $1.1 million, will receive $78,460 in tax cuts this year. That is nearly seven percent of their income. Kerry, in contrast, has promised to roll back tax cuts for families making $200,000 and spend the savings on healthcare and education.

Ursula also commends Bush for taking care of the military. I counter by pointing out that Bush's 2005 budget calls for cutting the Department of Veterans Affairs staff that handles benefits claims. The VA receives 60,000-70,000 claims a day from soldiers who've experienced physical injuries and mental problems in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Fox, Breitbart, and Ricketts Try to Bring Back D'Souza's Pseudo-Birtherism

By Steve M | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Activists Speak Out Against Lack of Access to Bradley Manning

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYPD Catches Sexual Assailant, Then Lets Him Go Free Because He Didn't Feel Like Being Questioned

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Gov. Scott Orders Purging of Florida’s Voter Rolls - Just in Time For Prez Election

By Adele Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Abortion Clinics Across Country Put On Alert In Wake of Georgia Clinic Arson Cases

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Former GOP Congresswoman Blasts New GOP Women’s Caucus: ‘They’re Not Voting In Best Interest Of All Women’

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]