Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
The Security Mom Myth
Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Debate Continues, but There's Little Doubt Speculators Are Adding to Pain at the Pumps
Thomas Palley
Democracy and Elections:
Seven Ways Your Vote Might Not Count This November
Steven Rosenfeld
DrugReporter:
'The Dope Craze That's Terrorizing Vancouver'
Lani Russwarm
Election 2008:
An Ex-Beauty Queen for VP: Political Risk or Political Genius?
Heather Gehlert
Environment:
Palin Is a Global-Warming-Denying, Polar-Bear-Dissing, Pat Buchanan Acolyte
Joseph Romm
ForeignPolicy:
Bush Is Pouring Gas on Afghanistan's Bonfire
Chris Hedges
Health and Wellness:
Universal Health Coverage Is No Silver Bullet
Niko Karvounis
Hurricane Katrina:
From the Bayou to Baghdad: Mission Not Accomplished
Amy Goodman
Immigration:
Immigration: Too Hot for the Dems?
Roberto Lovato
Media and Technology:
How the Media's Tarring of Hillary Hurt Obama Too
Eric Boehlert
Movie Mix:
Hollywood Gets Muslims Wrong, Again
Wajahat Ali
Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Americans' Attitudes Toward Breastfeeding Are Making Our Kids Sick
Aisha Qaasim
Rights and Liberties:
Guantánamo Suicide Report: Truth or Travesty?
Andy Worthington
Sex and Relationships:
Yet Another Obscenity Trial? We Should Be Ashamed
Dr. Marty Klein
War on Iraq:
U.S. Forces to Hand Over Anbar Province to Iraqis
Water:
Alaska Chooses Largest Gold Mine Over Clean Water
Kari Lydersen
Editor's Note: This report comes from Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research, a public opinion and strategic research company.
In the past weeks, we have seen numerous articles and commentaries discussing John Kerry's problem with women. As the argument goes, Kerry is losing women and that this erosion is rooted in their deep-seeded concerns about security. Women simply trust George Bush more than Kerry to keep them safe and they drop off from Kerry as they are less confident he can handle the war on terrorism and homeland security. The fabled "security moms" lead this charge, as they worry about the safety of their children especially after being exposed to the images of terrorism in Russia and rising terrorist attacks around the world. These "key" women voters, it is said, want to hear more about security from Democrats and Kerry.
There are a number of problems with these arguments and they profoundly misrepresent who women are and what they worry about politically. Let me take each assertion in turn:
1. Kerry is losing women voters. The latest CBS/New York Times poll shows Kerry trailing Bush by 5 points, 43 to 48 percent among women. This result was a lead story on NPR and the front page of the New York Times, but most other national polls shows Kerry winning among women. In our Democracy Corps polls, conducted every week in September, Kerry leads by an average of 7 points among women, 52 to 45 percent and loses among men by an average of 10 points, 43 to 53 percent. It is true that Kerry is currently underperforming among women. For example, in the most recent Democracy Corps poll, women identify with the Democrats by 9 points, but Kerry is only winning them by 6 points in a two-way race with Bush and by 4 points in a three-way contest including Nader. But underperforming is not the same as losing women and, as I will explain below, this underperformance is not necessarily rooted in security issues.
2. Women are security moms. Sixty-four percent of women voters are married, but only 43 percent have children under 18 years of age. This means that only 26 percent of all women voters could be characterized as "security moms." If we narrow the analysis to white women, this number goes down to 22 percent of all women voters. Women are diverse and trying to characterize them as a monolithic group with a unified set of political views misses the mark. As we know, there are huge differences among women voters, just look at the marriage gap between married and unmarried women. Kerry currently wins unmarried women by 22 points and loses married women by 4 points.
3. Women are more worried about security than men. Women tend to be more worried about their personal and economic security than men, which is not surprising because they are more likely to be victims of crime at home and they are more likely to live on the economic margins. But this concern about personal security does not necessarily translate into political preferences. In fact, men are much more likely to make the war on terrorism and security a part of their voting calculus.
Anna Greenberg is Vice President of Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research Inc.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »
| More News and Analysis: | ||
|
U.S. Forces to Hand Over Anbar Province to Iraqis War on Iraq: Citing stronger domestic security forces and a need for troops in Afghanistan, a U.S. general says control will be handed over in "just a few days." Middle East Online. August 30, 2008. |
Guantánamo Suicide Report: Truth or Travesty? Rights and Liberties: More than two years after the government began investigating the suicides of three Guantánamo prisoners, disturbing questions remain. By Andy Worthington, Andy Worthington's Blog. August 30, 2008. |
Theocratic Sect Prays for Real Armageddon Members of Joel's Army are fighting to bring about the millennial reign of Christ. By Casey Sanchez, Southern Poverty Law Center. August 30, 2008. |