The Mark of Rove

By Noy Thrupkaew, AlterNet. Posted August 26, 2004.

Who is Karl Rove? Just a round-faced man in glasses – homely, unremarkable, beige in affect and color? Or perhaps someone far more powerful than his bland natural camouflage would indicate? The new documentary Bush’s Brain tries to answer those questions by tracing the political career of President George W. Bush’s senior adviser, from his Young Republican days to his ascension to the inner sanctum of the White House. The verdict? For filmmakers Michael Paradies Shoob and Joseph Mealey, the unassuming Rove is the puppetmaster behind the current administration, the Svengali-political Pygmalion who molded a good-looking, popular, but rather dim high-school quarter-back type into the leader of the free world, the duplicitous genius and spin doctor behind smear campaigns, low-blow political shenanigans, and garish photo opportunities for his favorite dummy, George W. Bush.

Based on the book Bush’s Brain by Texas journalists James C. Moore and Wayne Slater, the film is the latest political salvo in a year crammed full of partisan documentaries. As the stakes have gotten higher, the more outraged and one-sided political documentaries have become – a reaction, perhaps, to the seepage of partisanship into our news (the “fair and balanced” Fox News Network) and the ongoing ad-fueled hearts-and-minds campaign for American voters. Uncovered: The War on Iraq unspools like a prosecutorial brief against the Bush administration and its trumped-up calls for war; Fahrenheit 9/11 has the sledge-hammer impact (and lack of delicacy) of well-made war-time propaganda; Howard Zinn: You Can’t Be Neutral on a Moving Train bathes its progressive historian subject in a golden, hagiographic glow. None of these films makes much of a pretense at showing the other side – although one could argue that the other side has done such a good job of twisting the media’s arm, shushing and discrediting official dissenters, and churning out its own take on history and the contested present that they shouldn’t get to grandstand in lefty documentaries as well.

Bush’s Brain digs into Rove’s past in an effort to lay out the adviser’s tactics – the filmmakers track his dirty run for the Young Republicans’ presidency in 1973, and his intimidation tactics on the high-school debate team. His early political career also comes under scrutiny. While he was managing the 1986 Texas gubernatorial campaign of Clements, Rove charged Clements’ opponent White with bugging his office – a flat-out lie, the film’s experts allege. Bush’s Brain also devotes some time to the sandbagging of Texas agricultural commissioner Jim Hightower’s career, stymied by an FBI investigation (performed by the same agent who investigated the 1986 bugging incident) into the campaign fundraising efforts of two Hightower staffers.

As Bush’s Brain author James Moore says, Rove has a “dark part, this thing that moves within him,” based on “power, manipulation and control.” That darkness, Moore asserts, “absolutely demands that he destroy his opponents.”

One failing to which an unapologetically one-sided documentary will frequently succumb is the dreaded “preaching to the choir” syndrome. Bush’s Brain suffers from this malady more than most – its creators are so convinced of Rove’s nefarious omniscience that they don’t bother laying out a case against him that feels fully convincing. What follows onscreen seems more like filmic conspiracy theory – based on rumor, conjecture, and alarmist inference – than a well-reasoned argument.

Noy Thrupkaew is a senior correspondent for The American Prospect.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »