Top 10 Reasons to Lower the Voting Age to 16

By Staff Writer, National Youth Rights Association. Posted March 29, 2004.

Illustration by Sara Varon

In 1971, the United States ratified the 26th Amendment to the Constitution, lowering the voting age from 21 to 18. At the height of the Vietnam War, most Americans realized the sick double standard inherent in sending 18-year-old soldiers to fight and die for their country when they weren't allowed to vote. Double standards didn't go away in 1971. Right now, youth who don't have the right to vote can be criminally charged as adults and even be subject to the death penalty. What kind of twisted message do we send when we tell youth they are judged mature, responsible adults when they commit murder, but silly, brainless kids when they want to vote? Lowering the voting age is the just, fair way to set things straight.

2. Youth pay taxes and live under our laws.

Just like all other Americans, young Americans pay taxes. In fact, they pay a lot of taxes. Teens pay an estimated $9.7 billion in sales tax alone, not to mention many millions of taxes on income. Youth pay billions in state, local, and federal taxes, yet they have absolutely no say over how much is taken. This is what the American Revolution was fought over: taxation without representation. Young people are also affected by every law that Americans live under, yet they have no say in the matter. In her 1991 testimony before a Minnesota House subcommittee, 14-year-old Rebecca Tilsen had this to say: "If 16-year-olds are old enough to drink the water polluted by the industries that you regulate, if 16-year-olds are old enough to breathe the air ruined by garbage burners that government built, if 16-year-olds are old enough to walk on the streets made unsafe by terrible drugs and crime policies, if 16-year-olds are old enough to live in poverty in the richest country in the world, if 16-year-olds are old enough to get sick in a country with the worst public health-care programs in the world, and if 16-year-olds are old enough to attend school districts that you underfund, then 16-year-olds are old enough to play a part in making them better."

3. If youth vote, politicians will represent their interests.

Young people are no one's constituency. Why should politicians care about the needs and wishes of youth when youth have no ability to vote for or against them? Lowering the voting age will give politicians a real reason to respect the desires of young people.

4. Youth bring a unique perspective to politics.

A common argument is that denying youth the right to vote isn't the same kind of burden as denying women or racial minorities, since in a few years, young people will be old enough to vote. Would we limit the right to vote to those with a certain income, reasoning that those with less income can simply work harder to earn enough money to vote? Voters vote based on their individual circumstances. The concerns of a 16-year-old are different than those of a 24-year-old, just as the concerns of a poor man differ from those of a rich man.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »