Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Pull Over, NASCAR Dads

By Katha Pollitt, The Nation. Posted March 26, 2004.


Single women voters are fans of progressive change. So why don't the Democrats offer them something progressive? Like pay equity, universal public preschool, or heck, free birth control.
Advertisement

Single women under 65--those separated, widowed, divorced or never married--represent at least 24 percent of the voting-age population and a whopping 46 percent of voting-age women.

According to an influential study by the Democratic pollsters Stan Greenberg and Celinda Lake, they tend to be progressive and to lean Democratic. Indeed, if the nation's 45 million single women voted at the same rate as married women--52 percent versus 68 percent--there would be 6 million more voters in the electorate, and Gore would be in the White House today. Had they turned out at the same rate as other voters in Florida in 2000, there would have been an additional 202,640 votes cast in that state--and no razor-thin 537-vote margin.

Party leaders like Ann Lewis, national chair of the DNC's Women's Vote Center, want the Democratic Party to cultivate single women and connect them with the polling booth; Page Gardner and Christina Desser have founded Women's Voices, Women Vote (www.wvwv.org), to reach out and register them. You've probably read about attempts to woo these "Sex and the City voters" in one of the dozens of nearly identical articles that have come out since Greenberg and Lake's study was released in December.

It's about time! The silly nickname aside (most unmarried women live for a month on what Carrie, Miranda, Samantha and Charlotte spent on lunch and taxis) single women are a natural constituency for the Democratic Party: They tend to be pro-choice, anti-gun, socially liberal and supporters of "big government."

Single women's main issues are, theoretically, Democratic strong suits: healthcare, employment, education. Certainly it makes more sense to cultivate them than the other demographic superstars pollsters have come up with: the suburban soccer moms that were supposed to save the party's bacon in the late 1990s but have since morphed into security moms, keen on defense; or the NASCAR dads--blue-collar white men from rural and Southern parts, who tend to be conservative, live in "red" states and drawn to the racial-gender politics of the Republican Party. (Whatever happened to the waitress mom? I kind of liked her.)

The focus on single women is good in another way. For years we've been hearing that the problem with the Democratic Party was that it was too liberal, too limp-wristed, insufficiently attentive to religious voters and--especially--too pro-choice. The American Prospect's Michael Tomasky recently suggested that Democratic intransigence on abortion rights was alienating religious swing voters. Why not court them, he suggested, if not by naming an anti-choicer as the vice presidential candidate, then by having an anti-choice speaker at the convention?

Well, perhaps because that would demoralize the legions of feminist activists already knocking themselves out for Kerry and blur the party's message: Support for abortion rights is one of the few sharp differences between the national parties (state legislatures swarm with anti-choice Dems), one that motivates more people than it turns off. I can't tell you how many progressive women I know who voted for Gore instead of Nader specifically, and sometimes solely, because of the threat to legal abortion posed by a Bush victory.


Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Hospitals' Lessons From Hurricane Gustav
Health and Wellness: The pre-storm medical evacuation -- the largest in American history -- revealed some critical flaws in American hospitals.
By Sheri Fink, ProPublica. September 5, 2008.
Why McCain and the GOP Are So Afraid of Discussing the Economy
Election 2008: Whether rich, poor or somewhere in between, Americans always do better economically under Democrats.
By Frances Moore Lappe, Huffington Post. September 5, 2008.
Only in America Could a Two-Faced Creature Like McCain Attain Such Media Status
Media and Technology: Only in America could a man who has called the mainstream media his "base" run against that very same media.
By Rory O'Connor, AlterNet. September 5, 2008.

Advertisement