comments_image -

Where's the Beef?

Latest data show that election coverage on television is as usual biased and thin on substance.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

And they're off. With buses, cameras, computers, pundits and correspondents at the ready, the Big Three news networks have taken to the campaign trail with a commitment and fervor that is unparalleled. But "the beef" in their reporting -- in the form of coverage of the candidates' positions on issues that matter most to Americans -- has gone missing from nightly newscasts.

Data compiled for MediaChannel.org by international media monitoring firm Media Tenor showed that in January the three networks devoted less than 5 percent of their coverage of the Democratic campaigns to reporting the candidates' positions on the five election issues that Americans say matter the most.

In a Jan. 4 CBS/New York Times poll of 877 registered voters, Americans chose the economy as the issue they "would most like to hear the candidates for president discuss during the 2004 presidential campaign." This was followed by the war against terror, health care, education and taxation.

You wouldn't know it from watching the nightly news at CBS, NBC and ABC, who gave scant airtime to these issues in their January coverage of the Democratic presidential candidates and Republican incumbent George W. Bush. According to MediaChannel/Media Tenor analysis, only 2.8 percent of network campaign coverage dealt with candidates' positions on the economy. The networks devoted less than 6 percent of their January election coverage to the candidates' positions on the war on terror; less than 1 percent to positions on health care; and a dismal 1.1 percent of network coverage was devoted to candidates' positions on taxation.

These numbers are more than halved when coverage of candidate Bush is removed from the analysis. Network news coverage of the president's policy positions on the five key political issues accounts for 56.8 percent of all issues-related election coverage. Looking at news coverage of the Democratic candidates alone, news statements related to their positions on the five most important issues fall below 5 percent.

And the trend is towards less and less coverage according to Media Tenor. "For the past four weeks, all three networks have decreased their share of policy coverage on the candidates," Media Tenor president Roland Schatz reported. "Television is depriving the voters of information about the position of the candidates on certain issues."

Follow the Winners, Typecast the Losers ...

Additional MediaChannel/Media Tenor analysis is beginning to clear the static surrounding broadcast news. But the image that emerges -- of bias for and against candidates and a reluctance to cover the issues that matter to Americans most -- is not necessarily one the network heads would like Americans to know about.

The numbers tell the tale.

According to January data compiled by MediaChannel and Media Tenor, the networks have already picked their favorites and typecast their losers. And there were few surprises to be had.

The news winners in the final week of the month were Senators John Kerry and John Edwards. Of the 290 network statements made in January about Kerry, 35.5 percent were positive; against only 9 percent of statements made during the nightly, half-hour broadcasts that cast the candidate in a negative light.

For Edwards, 31.4 percent of statements were positive; against only 2.5 percent negative. Media Tenor analysts counted the remainder of statements as neutral towards the candidates.

There were few surprises in January, says Media Tenor President Roland Schatz. "Given the momentum Kerry and Edwards carried out of the Jan. 19 Iowa caucus -- where they finished one and two -- we would expect this sort of positive change."

Also of little surprise is the network turn against Governor Howard Dean. In the first two weeks of January, Dean commanded a relative high positive in network news coverage of his campaign with more than 26 percent of all news statements considered positive; less than 16 percent was considered negative. By the final week, Dean's news image had changed. Negative press statements had risen one percentage point, while his positive coverage fell ten points from more than 26 percent at the beginning of the month, to 16 percent in the final week.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Fox, Breitbart, and Ricketts Try to Bring Back D'Souza's Pseudo-Birtherism

By Steve M | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Activists Speak Out Against Lack of Access to Bradley Manning

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYPD Catches Sexual Assailant, Then Lets Him Go Free Because He Didn't Feel Like Being Questioned

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Gov. Scott Orders Purging of Florida’s Voter Rolls - Just in Time For Prez Election

By Adele Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Abortion Clinics Across Country Put On Alert In Wake of Georgia Clinic Arson Cases

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Former GOP Congresswoman Blasts New GOP Women’s Caucus: ‘They’re Not Voting In Best Interest Of All Women’

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]