Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Bush's Space Folly

By Adam Werbach, AlterNet. Posted January 12, 2004.


First Iraq, then Mars: Bush sets his imperialist sights on the red planet, sending a dangerous signal that the world is not enough for American conquests.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Atheism and Diversity: Is It Wrong For Atheists To Convert Believers?
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Don't Fear the Deficit Bogeyman
John Miller

DrugReporter:
The War on Weed: Marijuana Is Basically Harmless -- The Monumentally Stupid Drug War Is Not
Jim Hightower

Environment:
White House Garden Won't Make Up for Obama's Nomination of Pesticide Lobbyist for US Chief Agriculture Negotiator
Jill Richardson

Food:
Don't Be Scared of Food: Are We Being Needlessly Hysterical About Food Safety?
David E. Gumpert

Health and Wellness:
47,000 Women Could Die As a Result of the New Mammogram Guidelines
George Lakoff

Immigration:
Lou Dobbs, Eyeing Public Office, Endorses Policy He's Long Spun as "Amnesty for Illegals"
Joshua Holland

Media and Technology:
The Memory Scrub About Why Ft. Hood Happened Is Almost Complete ... If It Weren't for Archives
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
Disney Apocalypse: Why 2012 Sucks
Alexander Zaitchik

Politics:
White House's Ties to Health Care Industry Deeper Than Visitor Records Show
Daniela Perdomo

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Why Can't We Look Away From Sarah Palin?
Vanessa Richmond

Rights and Liberties:
Whatever Happened to the CIA Black Sites?
David Corn

Sex and Relationships:
Hot Mormon Muffins and Models for Jesus: What's With All the Sexy Christians?
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick

World:
Is Obama Following in the Footsteps of Bill Clinton?
Jeff Cohen

More stories by Adam Werbach

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

When President Kennedy stood before a joint session of Congress on May 25, 1961 to announce the Apollo Project, he set America on a bold path towards exploring our universe. It was the stuff of dreams. It was also a deliberate piece of foreign relations and domestic fiscal policy. President Bush's space policy is more like the item on a kid's Christmas list right before world peace.

In 1961, Kennedy found himself challenged by a hostile and growing Soviet empire in a race to seize countries as if they were pawns on a chessboard. Shortly after his inauguration, the failed Bay of Pigs invasion left Kennedy with public and private doubts about his leadership abilities. Khrushchev's threat to unilaterally solve the Berlin "problem" was a constant threat. Meanwhile, 5.5 million Americans were unemployed and business bankruptcies had reached their highest level since the 1930s. America seemed to be searching for a direction after Kennedy's divisive and razor-thin election victory. America was still reeling from the eerie beeping sound of the Sputnik spacecraft that they could see floating above them among the stars on a clear night in October 1957.

It was within this context that Kennedy addressed a special joint session of Congress and said:

"I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth. No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind or more important for the long-range exploration of space; and none will be so difficult or expensive to accomplish."
Kennedy's statement was not an empty policy pronouncement. It was a message sent to the Soviet Union that America would challenge the growth of communism and totalitarianism on any field. It was a message to the capital markets that America would pour billions of dollars into the economy and provide a fiscal stimulus not seen since wartime. It was a message to schoolteachers and students that America needed to step up its math and science education in order to achieve this national endeavor. We still use the phrase "you don't have to be a rocket scientist" because rocket science was elevated to the top badge of intelligence.

President Bush's announcement of a new space policy for the United States will also be taken as a major foreign relations and fiscal policy announcement. Bush is hoping to signal to the American people that he does not lack "the vision thing" that was frequently cited as a reason his father lost his second term. Like the 1960s, America's economy is struggling through a jobless recovery and the prospect of the largest federal deficit in American history. The Fed has already lowered interest to historic lows, and the Federal government has poured billions of dollars into tax cuts, military spending and new Federal programs like Homeland Security. America now faces a risk of signaling that it will undertake profligate spending through a space program. In light of the growing deficit, new federal spending programs should instead be designed as investments with a clear payback.

As a piece of foreign relations, Bush's space program sends all the wrong signals. America has flexed its muscles mightily in Iraq to the consternation of the rest of the world. An America-first space program sends the message to conspiracy-loving Europeans that this world is not enough for American conquest. By reprioritizing the international space station, America is choosing to go it alone one more time.

On the same day of the President's announcement, an unlikely alliance of labor unions, environmentalists, high tech leaders, and civil rights leaders will announce their proposal for a new Apollo Project for clean energy jobs in America. The proposal, in development for over two years, has been endorsed by 17 major labor unions and some of the largest environmental groups in the country. Unlike President Bush's hastily drafted plan, this new Apollo Project will pay for itself and create more than three million new jobs, according to an independent corporate economist. Instead of making America less secure by antagonizing our friends and allies, this Apollo Project moves America towards energy independence, which will make us safer.

Reaching Mars is a noble goal, and it should be pursued by America. But this is not the time, nor is this the way to do it. The world is calling out for leadership from America demonstrating that America sees its destiny as tied to the fate of the rest of the countries on the planet. Bush's new space folly is the wrong signal to the world, and the wrong signal to the economy. Apparently he still needs some help with the vision thing.

Adam Werbach is the executive director of the Common Assets Defense Fund, and a board member of the Apollo Alliance.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Lou Dobbs, Eyeing Public Office, Endorses Policy He's Long Spun as "Amnesty for Illegals"
Politics: His fans must be thinking, 'Et Tu, Lou?'
By Joshua Holland, AlterNet. November 26, 2009.
Whatever Happened to the CIA Black Sites?
Rights and Liberties: The CIA ordered its secret prisons closed, but lawyers for terrorism suspects want them preserved as possible evidence -- and the CIA won't say what's going on.
By David Corn, Mother Jones. November 26, 2009.
Don't Fear the Deficit Bogeyman
Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace: A second dose of deficit-financed stimulus spending would create a lot of jobs that America needs.
By John Miller, Dollars and Sense. November 26, 2009.
Advertisement
Advertisement

 

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement