comments_image -

Base Immigration Reform On Respect, Not Fear

Whether it's election-year posturing or an honest attempt at reform, President Bush's new immigration plan will fail unless the actions and attitudes of U.S. immigration agencies change drastically.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

When is Washington going to learn that no immigration reforms can work as long as immigrants continue to fear and distrust the very immigration system meant to serve them?

Eighteen years after the 1986 overhaul of immigration laws offered amnesty to 7 million undocumented immigrants, up to 10 million people are without papers in the country. Provisions put in place then to correct the system are clearly not working. Another overhaul of the old INS, before it was absorbed by the Department of Homeland Security, has also left the agency as dysfunctional as ever.

Well-intentioned as President Bush's latest immigration plan may be, it is doomed to failure as long as immigration authorities loom as figures of fear to most immigrants.

The Bush proposal offers three-year, renewable permits to undocumented workers to live and work in the United States. To implement the plan, up to 10 million people who have lived in the shadows, some for many years, are expected to step forward, reveal numerous details about theirs lives and trust that immigration authorities will not use the information against them.

Considering the agency's recent history, they would be insane to do so.

Just a year ago, non-citizen Moslem men were asked to trust the system, step forward and comply with the Special Alien Registration Program. Many who did so were interrogated, arrested, detained and slated for possible deportation.

The program caused such an uproar among immigrants and proved so useless in combating terrorism that authorities themselves scrapped it. It remains, however, a fresh and bitter memory among those who may be asked again to trust in the system.

In 2002, the INS, with its fearsome reputation among immigrant communities, was split into two separate law enforcement and service sections, the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (BICE) and the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). The intent was to serve non-criminal immigrants without intimidation and dread. Yet this reform, taking place in a post-9/11 atmosphere as the agency was being absorbed by Department of Homeland Security, has resulted in two law enforcement arms whose main purpose is to find and deport the "bad apples."

Many immigrants who show up for interviews to gain such benefits as permanent residence or citizenship must witness the spectacle of applicants ahead of them being arrested and handcuffed as they beg and plead not to be taken away. According to the provisions of the Patriot Act and current immigration practices, such people may easily be flown to a detention center away from their homes and summarily deported, even for simple visa violations.

Particularly chilling are reports of Iranian immigrants who were flown to a detention center in Florence, Ariz., to be interviewed by representatives from the Islamic Republic of Iran. After having fled religious and political persecution at home, they came face to face with their tormentors halfway across the globe.

Such stories spread throughout immigrant communities like wildfire, further perpetuating a culture of fear. Is this what living the American dream has come to?

Congress, while considering the Bush plan, should take a good, hard look at USCIS to make sure that, true to its name, it functions as a service agency rather than a law enforcement organization. No immigrant invited for an interview at the USCIS should be subject to arrest, detention or deportation. The agency should only screen and interview immigrants it knows to be non-criminals, and refer those with criminal records to the BICE, the enforcement arm.

Such bureaucratic solutions, however, are of little consequence until Homeland Security gets rid of the old INS attitude that considers immigrants as enemies rather than clients. Whether this can be accomplished during a proclaimed "war on terror," within an agency whose primary function is security of the "homeland," remains to be seen.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Why Did the Associated Press Make an Anti-Choice 'Correction'?

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Minimum Wage Not Enough for a 2-Bedroom Unit in Any State (Unless You Way More Than a 40-Hr Week)

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board Will Investigate ALEC for Lobbying Violations

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Obama and Targeted Assassinations: Had Secret Kill List, Calls Killing American-Born Cleric "Easy Decision"

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
Romney Excuse for Birther Trump Endorsement: I'm Running for Office and I Wanna Win!

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Women's Center In New Orleans Destroyed By Arson, Third Incident in the South

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
US Productivity Up, Wages Stagnant

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
Scott Walker's Recall Strategy: Avoid Anyone Who Isn't A Walker Voter Already

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos

 
 
Radioactive Bluefin Tuna Contaminated by Fukishima Reaches US Shores

By Agence France-Presse

 
 
Thousands Protest Anti-Gay Pastor In North Carolina

By Annie-Rose Strasser | Think Progress

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]