comments_image -

Lies, Lies, and More Lies

With an election year looming, an avalanche of new books bashing George W. Bush is pouring into bookstores.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

Mudslinging season has arrived. With an election year looming, an avalanche of new books bashing George W. Bush is pouring into bookstores.

Leading the mudslide is Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right (E.P. Dutton, $25), written by former Saturday Night Live writer Al Franken and a team of 14 Harvard students he hired to do research. Team Franken systematically skewers the exaggerations of conservative commentators like Ann Coulter ("the reigning diva of the hysterical right") or Fox News pundit Bill O'Reilly (who falsely claimed that he'd won two prestigious journalism awards). And 'Lies' debuted near the top of the bestseller charts thanks to massive pre-release publicity generated by one of the book's primary targets: Fox News. In a stunningly stupid move, Fox sued to stop release of the book, thereby attracting attention to it. Publisher E.P. Dutton promptly upped both the press run and release date.

A more insightful examination of much the same issues is New York Observer columnist Joe Conason's Big Lies: The Right-Wing Propaganda Machine and How It Distorts the Truth (St. Martin's, $25). Conason greets his readers with a thought-provoking introductory chapter that asks: "Is the United States of America liberal or conservative?" He then presents a series of 10 short debates. Each begins with a thesis question, such as "Who relates better to the little guy, Republicans or Democrats?" or "Are liberals less patriotic than their conservative counterparts?" Conason presents the neoconservative conventional wisdom on each thesis, then refutes with his own well-researched rebuttal. By challenging Republican rhetoric on its own terms, 'Big Lies' ventures beyond the propaganda and begins to explore the societal presumptions that have made right-wing rhetoric so successful.

David Corn focuses on one big liar in The Lies of George W. Bush: Mastering the Politics of Deception (Crown, $24). Longtime Washington editor of The Nation, Corn brings the patience of an investigative reporter to his examination of Bush's business, gubernatorial, campaign and executive lies. Among Corn's well-researched conclusions: Bush deliberately misrepresented the provisions and effects of his tax cuts; lied about his ties to corporate criminals; and presented deceptive claims to sell controversial policies on stem cell research, missile defense, abortion, energy, health care, education and the environment.

The Five Biggest Lies Bush Told Us About Iraq (Seven Stories Press, $10) narrows its sights even further, asserting that every major claim the U.S. government put forward to justify the conquest of Iraq has been proven false. Written by the father and son team of Robert and Christopher Scheer, along with AlterNet.org senior editor Lakshmi Chaudhry, 'Five Biggest Lies' unflinchingly asserts Bush knew he was lying: "...we are not dealing here with misconceptions, overblown rhetoric, government spin, political games or any of the other essentially non-threatening phrases that have come to excuse official chicanery as the business-as-usual propaganda in which all governments indulge," the Scheers write. "...but rather... an alarming but deliberate method of governing."

Weapons of Mass Deception: The Uses of Propaganda in Bush's War on Iraq (J. P. Tarcher, $12) explores the way Bush used public relations tactics to marshal support for the invasion of Iraq. Coauthors Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber argue that in the looking-glass world of political PR, the U.S. is perceived as a brand (like Coca-Cola), and foreign-policy initiatives are rolled out like new products.

Bushwhacked: Life in George W. Bush's America (Random House, $25) demonstrates how Bush runs the United States using the same flawed strategies he applied in governing Texas. Columnist Molly Ivins and former Texas Observer editor Lou Dubose ask the core question of Texican jurisprudence: "Who's getting screwed, and who's doing the screwing?"

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
AlterNet Radio: What's At Stake in Wisconsin; Real "Defense" Budget Is $1 Trillion; the Right's Phony Race War

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
Fox, Breitbart, and Ricketts Try to Bring Back D'Souza's Pseudo-Birtherism

By Steve M | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Activists Speak Out Against Lack of Access to Bradley Manning

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYPD Catches Sexual Assailant, Then Lets Him Go Free Because He Didn't Feel Like Being Questioned

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Gov. Scott Orders Purging of Florida’s Voter Rolls - Just in Time For Prez Election

By Adele Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Abortion Clinics Across Country Put On Alert In Wake of Georgia Clinic Arson Cases

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Former GOP Congresswoman Blasts New GOP Women’s Caucus: ‘They’re Not Voting In Best Interest Of All Women’

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]