comments_image -

A Consultant Comes in from the Cold

A loophole in a law created to equalize the election campaign playing field allows big money to push the small players out, all while media consultants' wallets get fat.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

Forget Enron. Nevermind the Wall Street executives who are raking in high salaries while the economy tanks. Right now, the real "masters of the universe" in the corporate marketplace are political consultants. But as the California recall proves, their success comes at a cost to democracy.

The California election is a perfect example of a disturbing national trend. From presidential campaigns to the candidacies of Austrian-American action heroes, consultants have replaced political parties as the gatekeepers of credibility. A candidate for high office is evaluated less for what he says and more for who he has saying things for him. When a candidate signs with a top consultant it gives him a boost with the media, donors and political leaders. From then on it's the consultants who supply most of the quotes to reporters, trying to outdo each other with vitriol and wit. Then it's high fives all around, while consultants laugh all the way to the bank.

Media consultants make money not just from thinking up ads, but also from fees they tack on to buying the film stock, hiring the crew, paying for the crew's lunch, duplicating the campaign commercials, and placing the ads on the air. It's not the cost of campaigns that's out of control -- it's the mark-up.

Professional media buyers and ad agencies make commissions -- usually 15 percent -- for placing orders with TV stations and networks. The unexpected statewide election in the country's biggest media market was a windfall for consultants who usually spend off years like this working for corporate clients. Before the courts threw the date of the election in doubt, the short campaign promised to be one of the biggest earners for consultants. Between the start of the campaign and the original Oct.7 election date, the estimate was that $100 million or more would be spent on airtime. If the election is delayed until March, all bets are off.

But say all the candidates and committees running ads in California spend $200 million on airtime. That's a profit of at least $25 million on the "buy," which does not require much heavy lifting. Mostly, media buyers spend their days making phone calls, sending out tapes, and taking their clients to nice restaurants (which get billed as "campaign expenses").

More and more campaign strategists today also look for a piece of the media buy. Dick Morris wrote that when President Clinton questioned why Morris wanted to fire a media buyer, Morris told the president, "It's my way or the highway." Morris wanted two bites of the apple -- one for thinking up the media strategy and another for placing the ads. Nice work if you can get it.

Back in the 1970s, political reformers targeted airtime as a place to economize on campaign costs. A federal law was enacted requiring stations to give candidates the lowest "unit rate" -- the cheapest price for broadcast time available, including any discount offered by stations to their best customers.

Sounds great -- but then a loophole opened that could be called the "consultants protection act." If a commercial advertiser, or another candidate, is willing to pay the regular rate, you and your puny political rate get bumped. To avoid getting preempted in this manner, candidates can pay as much as five times more than the political rate.

I once helped a client who lost a race for Congress in a mid-size media market where TV time was affordable to an insurgent campaign, thanks to the lowest unit rate. There wasn't much competition for time on the morning news show I had bought. Funny, though, the consultant working for our opponent in the primary felt it necessary to pay the higher rate. Less value for the candidate, but a bigger commission for the consultant.

Making political time cheap and non-preemptable would of course have two direct consequences: Campaign costs would fall, and consultants would drop like flies. Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) tried to add a provision to the McCain-Feingold campaign finance bill closing the consultant's loophole, but it died as fast as you could say, NAB.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Scott Walker's Recall Strategy: Avoid Anyone Who Isn't A Walker Voter Already

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos

 
 
Radioactive Bluefin Tuna Contaminated by Fukishima Reach US Shores

By Agence France-Presse

 
 
Thousands Protest Anti-Gay Pastor In North Carolina

By Annie-Rose Strasser | Think Progress

 
 
Bad Company for Mitt: Trump, Newt, and Now Meg Whitman

By Ed Kilgore | Washington Monthly

 
 
Battle of the Dems: Blue Dog Spends $1.25 Mil of Own Dough Trying to Defeat Progressive in CA Congressional Primary

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Electoral Map Big Picture: If We Win This One, the GOP Fever Might Break

By BooMan | Booman Tribune

 
 
Pilot Kicks Sexist Passenger Off Her Plane

By Melissa Van Gelder | Ms. Magazine Blog

 
 
Koch Footing Bill for "Grassroots": Anti-Gov't Folks Have Billionaires Paying for Every Need

By Digby | Hullabaloo

 
 
Republican NLRB Member Accused of Leaks to Romney Campaign Resigns

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos Labor

 
 
Record 45% of Iraq and Afghanistan Vets Have Filed for Disability

By Muriel Kane | Raw Story

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]